Quote:

---

Originally posted by Storymark:
There are similarities, sure. But I'd still put my money on Clinton if they were both on Jeopardy. Or, I dunnow.... asked to think their way out of a paper bag.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Ehm... Well, I think Palin is smart but acting dumb to broaden her appeal and appear less menacing.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Bytemite:
Yup. But see, this is a major problem all libertarians face. There are people who come to you and say they're your allies, that they're against big government and taxes and that they want to recover and reinstitute the lost ideals of the constitution.

The problem is, what's really going on is they know how to tell you what you want to hear. They don't stand for anything that they're saying. But they infiltrate your ranks and undermine what you're really trying for at every turn, and people aren't paying close enough attention to question them on it. Palin is one such person.

A big group for you to scrutinize are the Republican Party. Some of them might be genuine (Ron Paul), but the others are just taking advantage of the fact that before 1960 they could be considered allies to fiscal conservatism, taking advantage of the fact that a lot of people on the right wing trust them out of tradition, and things that their parents and grandparents have told them the party stands for. But it's been taken over by neoconservatives, and you're mostly going to find people who just want more power among them, even as they loot our treasury for their friends.

The tea party itself, a lot of the money originally came from Republican Party fronts. Find your plants and infiltrators, expell them, and maybe then the movement will be a legitimate revolution. As it is now, it's only good for anyone like-minded about government to meet up, because actual revolution is being discouraged and put down. You're going to have to abandon it soon once you have your contacts in order to get anywhere.

The libertarian party itself has pretty much become a front for Republican interests. It's where they can channel money through for stuff that seems more crazy than they can allow the main party to embrace.

---

Quote:

---

The problem is, what's really going on is they know how to tell you what you want to hear. They don't stand for anything that they're saying. But they infiltrate your ranks and undermine what you're really trying for at every turn, and people aren't paying close enough attention to question them on it. Palin is one such person.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:

Lord Byron was prolly the first confirmable Dark Spark, and his lady summed it up best.

"Mad, Bad, and Dangerous to know!"

-F

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
There's three kinds of foe to deal with.


The first tells you they mean to take what is yours.
They are a businessman, and easily dealt with by obtaining something of equal or greater value in exchange, or refusing to deal with them if this is not possible.


The second tells you they mean to help you, but really means to take what is yours.
They are a thief, and easily dealt with by not allowing them the opportunity, or if need be, force.


The third tells you they mean to help you, honestly BELIEVES they mean to help you, and yet still somehow winds up taking what is yours.
They are a zealot, and so dangerous they should be chased from every civilized land on the planet as quickly as possible.


Hillary is the second, Palin is the third.

-F

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by antimason:
i personally dont trust the republicans either. on domestic fiscal policy, they seem to be gaining their footing.. but until they address the Fed(which IS evil), and our currently interventionist foreign policy, i fear they will fracture the tea party movement, and only serve to undermine their legitimacy as the 'constitutional' party

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:

Big surprise to some here, but I really don't like or trust Palin... I also really don't like the idea that she is becoming the face of the Tea Party movement...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Kwicko:



BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA...


That's hilarious! "Gaining their footing" on domestic fiscal policy? REALLY?! Our "CURRENT interventionist foreign policy"? SERIOUSLY?!

---

Quote:

---

Were you in a coma for the last eight years, or were you just high? You obviously haven't been living on the same planet as the rest of us, where the "conservatives" spent us damn near into insolvency chasing after their idiotic foreign wars.

---

Quote:

---

And all that "gaining their footing" crap is just TOO funny.

---

Quote:

---

And then there's good ol' Mark "Hikin' the Old Appalachian Trail" Sanford, who compared the stimulus to child abuse - and then decided last week that yes, he WOULD like $325 million in stimulus money for his state. Guess he's wanting to jet off to score some more strange... Funny that he endorses child abuse in the process, though. Odd dude, that one.

---

Quote:

---

The Republicans at this point aren't capable of pouring piss out of a boot if the instructions were printed on the sole. And the tea-baggers are too busy ratfucking themselves to be any kind of threat to anyone but the Republicans.

---

Quote:

---

"Not one dime of income taxes goes to support any federal program."
-President Ronald Reagan, right before George Bushes' CIA cousin John Hinkley Jr shot him (released from loonybin by George Bush Jr and Hussein Obama Soetoro)
youtube.com/watch?v=9nbMqQo4AYY

“There is no patriotic duty to pay taxes.”
-Commissioner of Internal Revenue Service v Newman 159 F2d 848,850 (1947)

Jury says US citizens don't have to pay income tax:
www.freedomtofascism.com

---

Quote:

---

yes, republicans traditionally have been elected to get us out of wars that were (coincidentally)started by democrats(Korea/Veitnam/Bosnia).

---

Quote:

---

and all this slander about 'tea-bagging', all we want is the US constitution, the LAW OF THE LAND, to be upheld. are you telling me that you really stand opposed to that?

---