Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Lieberman, McCain propose military tyranny (not PN)
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:00 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Quote:Whenever within the United States, its territories, and possessions, or outside the territorial limits of the United States, an individual is captured or otherwise comes into the custody or under the effective control of the United States who is suspected of engaging in hostilities against the United States or its coalition partners through an act of terrorism, or by other means in violation of the laws of war, or of purposely and materially supporting such hostilities, and who may be an unprivileged enemy belligerent, the individual shall be placed in military custody for purposes of initial interrogation and determination of status in accordance with the provisions of this Act.
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:26 AM
RUE
I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:41 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:43 AM
OUT2THEBLACK
Friday, March 19, 2010 8:46 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:01 AM
RIVERLOVE
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:03 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Out, on this one you and I are of one mind!
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:09 AM
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:25 AM
Friday, March 19, 2010 9:30 AM
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:07 AM
Quote:Originally posted by out2theblack: I have hopes that there's a vacant tiger cage in Vietnam that still has his name on it...
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:14 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SignyM: RUE: Yeah. Terrorism? Does that mean... strikes? Boycotts? Economic sanctions of some sort? Honest discussion of a particular company's products, or stocks? Reverse engineeering? Benchmarking? (MS forbids the last three by their EULA.) The whole definition of terrorism is just so friggin' loosey-goosey that ANY self-respecting American should oppose this.
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:30 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Friday, March 19, 2010 10:41 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: ...Riiiight, 'cause he didn't suffer nearly enough in the Hanoi Hilton hellhole all those years. Yeah, having to have lived his life as half a cripple just isn't punishment enough for you.
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:32 AM
Friday, March 19, 2010 11:49 AM
CITIZEN
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Actually, that's pretty much EXACTLY what it means. After all, the main aim of terrorism is to disrupt economies and affect spending. Boycotts, strikes, derision of products... all those are aimed at affecting spending and hurting corporations, which would fit the definition of terrorism. So if you were planning on boycotting Toyota, you're a terrorist; if you were planning on staging a sit-in to oppose having to buy mandatory health care coverage, you're a terrorist.
Tuesday, December 10, 2024 1:04 PM
JAYNEZTOWN
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL