Why are we moving backwards on civil rights??? Bad enough that Dumbya did it, but now Arizona is going nuts on its own![quote]A sweeping immigration bil..."/>
Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Arizona Legislature sends immigration bill to gov
Wednesday, April 21, 2010 8:19 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:A sweeping immigration bill intended to ramp up law enforcement efforts in Arizona has been approved by state lawmakers. Passage by the Senate on a 17-11 vote Monday sends the bill to Gov. Jan Brewer, who has not taken a position on the measure championed by her fellow Republicans. The bill would make it a state crime for illegal immigrants to not have an alien registration document. It also would require police to question people about their immigration status if there's reason to suspect they're in the country illegally. Other provisions allow citizen lawsuits against government agencies that hinder enforcement of immigration laws, and make it illegal for people to hire illegal immigrants for day labor or knowingly transport them.
Quote: Now that Arizona lawmakers have passed what's considered some of the toughest immigration legislation in the country, other states are watching to see whether they should follow in the state's footsteps or stand back.
Thursday, April 22, 2010 6:12 AM
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:23 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:27 AM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:36 AM
FREMDFIRMA
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:44 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: Niki, I think it's cause most folk who care at all about this issue are pretty sure the Arizona state government is quite, quite insane. Come on, these are the folk who keep a nutter like Sheriff Joe Arpaio in power, which is about all the evidence one needs to prove it. -F
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:49 AM
Thursday, April 22, 2010 8:52 AM
Quote:So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens, then you " care " about the issue ?
Quote:...it's unequivocally racial profiling
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:10 AM
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:12 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people..
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:15 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2:You're not worth responding to, but what the hell: "rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like" as describing who comes across the border is rather obviously illustrative of your racist bent.
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:18 AM
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:22 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Crapper: Nice try, but it failed.
Thursday, April 22, 2010 9:25 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Fremdfirma: We already have those. They're called Republicans. -F
Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:22 AM
Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: How is this in ANY way 'moving backwards' on civil rights ? Seriously. The worst part about all this is that the border states are having to do all the heavy lifting on what has become a national crisis.
Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:55 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:...it's unequivocally racial profiling Ahhh yes... the standard " IT'S RACISM " cry.
Thursday, April 22, 2010 11:59 AM
Quote:you blanketly imply that anyone who crosses the border IS a rapist, a thug, a criminal
Friday, April 23, 2010 5:20 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: So, if you AGREE that there should be open borders, and rapists, thugs, drug runners, criminals and the like should all be granted equal access, and be lumped in with law abiding, hard working, honest and productive people, wanting to become full fledged citizens, then you " care " about the issue ? Really?
Quote: ...simple minds want to deduce such things to, well, the most simple of terms.
Friday, April 23, 2010 6:02 AM
Quote:High RWAs tend to feel more endangered in a potentially threatening situation than most people do, and often respond aggressively.
Quote:Why do high RWAs want to censor, for example, a racist when they themselves are prejudiced? Because they don’t know they are, so a racist is a socially condemnable outsider to them. Furthermore, experiments show authoritarian followers are turned off by blatantly racist appeals. A skilled demagogue knows you play the “race card” best by disguising it as something else, like law and order.
Friday, April 23, 2010 6:11 AM
Friday, April 23, 2010 7:14 AM
Friday, April 23, 2010 8:00 AM
Friday, April 23, 2010 8:29 AM
STORYMARK
Friday, April 23, 2010 8:31 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:...it's unequivocally racial profiling Ahhh yes... the standard " IT'S RACISM " cry. Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!" Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."
Friday, April 23, 2010 9:25 AM
Friday, April 23, 2010 10:38 AM
Friday, April 23, 2010 2:28 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Gotta love that the people bitching about Government interference will cheer on a step towards becoming a full-on police state.
Friday, April 23, 2010 5:12 PM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Quote:Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs US's toughest immigration law; Obama says you ain't arresting me bitch! "We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation." www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/04/23/2010-04-23_president_barack_obama_slams_arizona_immigration_law_as_misguided_and_a_threat_t.html#ixzz0lz9Hy55H
Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:30 AM
Quote:Originally posted by piratenews: Quote:Arizona Gov. Jan Brewer signs US's toughest immigration law; Obama says you ain't arresting me bitch! "We in Arizona have been more than patient waiting for Washington to act," Brewer said after signing the law. "But decades of inaction and misguided policy have created a dangerous and unacceptable situation." www.nydailynews.com/news/politics/2010/04/23/2010-04-23_president_barack_obama_slams_arizona_immigration_law_as_misguided_and_a_threat_t.html#ixzz0lz9Hy55H I say bring the US military back to USA, put em on the border, and shoot to kill. US troops killed 2.7-million Iraqis who never set foot on USA, so it's only fair to kill 2.7-million Mexicans. Not like we haven't done it before. If any liberal Commies want to get in the way, so be it. Kill em all, let Gaia sort em out.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:33 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: I don't see this as a "national crisis", but I'm not as fearful, paranoid, or easily manipulated as you are, either.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:37 AM
Saturday, April 24, 2010 2:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: I don't see this as a "national crisis", but I'm not as fearful, paranoid, or easily manipulated as you are, either.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 4:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: You said "informed" where you meant "brainwashed".
Saturday, April 24, 2010 6:12 AM
Quote:And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:13 AM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: That you don't see this as a national crisis only shows you're not as informed as me either.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:19 AM
Quote:The bill raises concerns by some in law enforcement because it is unfunded and may lead to racial profiling. It also allows individuals to sue local police departments if they believe they are not fully enforcing the law. Municipalities could be fined between $1,000 to $5,000 per day in such instances. Arizona Association of Police Chiefs oppose the measure. It contends that it would hinder the investigation of more serious crimes and erode the trust between police and immigrant communities. “We’ve opposed the law from the beginning,” said John Thomas, a lobbyist for the group. Even the day before Brewer signed the bill, Mesa’s elected officials worried about the cost of jailing those arrested under the law. Mesa police told the City Council to expect more arrests and substantially higher jail costs. “This is an unfunded mandate,” Mesa Mayor Scott Smith said. “There’s no money, just demands.”
Quote:AACOP STATEMENT ON SENATE BILL 1070 The Arizona Association of Chiefs of Police (AACOP) remains in opposition to Senate Bill (SB) 1070. The provisions of the bill remain problematic and will negatively affect the ability of law enforcement agencies across the state to fulfill their many responsibilities in a timely manner. While AACOP recognizes immigration as a significant issue in Arizona, we remain strong in our belief that it is an issue most appropriately addressed at the federal level. AACOP strongly urges the U. S. Congress to immediately initiate the necessary steps to begin the process of comprehensively addressing the immigration issue to provide solutions that are fair, logical, and equitable.
Quote:Arizona Sen. Russell Pearce (R) defended a wasteful new anti-immigrant bill with the claim: "The greatest threat we have to some of our neighborhoods is the illegal alien invasion." Maybe Pearce is lucky enough that the only "threat" to his neighborhood is undocumented immigrants trying to eke out a living there, but the state's police think some other threats are a bit bigger -- such as murderers and rapists, to name a couple Under the proposed legislation, any nativist Tom, Dick, or Harry who thinks their city or county police department isn't doing enough to hunt down undocumented immigrants can sue over it. Never mind that, as Rep. Daniel Patterson (D) pointed out, this is an unconstitutional requirement: "The U.S. Constitution specifically gives the enforcement of our nation's borders and immigration to the federal government." Sure, everybody's all "law and order" until it comes to legislatures (or our favorite sheriff, Joe Arpaio) respecting federal jurisdiction. Never mind that this is an unfunded mandate, which Pearce ludicrously claims will have "no cost." Local cops don't currently receive extensive training in understanding and enforcing complicated federal immigration law (you know, because it's not supposed to be their jurisdiction), so that will have to be paid for. And as Jennifer Allen of Border Action Network points out, skimping on the training is liable to open police departments up to racial profiling and wrongful arrest suits, when untaught cops are forced to enforce laws as best they can without official know-how.
Quote:San Francisco Police Chief George Gascon told CBS 5 that there are several consequences of the new law. “For police officers it’s a severely unfounded mandate. They’re going to have to start aggressively seeking the immigration status of people that may not necessarily be committing any other violations,” said Gascon. Chief Gascon also says the law is likely to give rise to lawsuits against police departments which will be costly and take focus away from other police work.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 8:46 AM
Quote: Quote:Originally posted by Niki2:And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.Wonderful; that's one I'm going to keep and throw back at you, because you do that more than anyone else here.
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2:And that's the sum total of your argument. You can't offer up any substantive, reasonable reply, other than dole out insults and dismissive, personal comments.
Quote: As for what you cited (thank you for specifics!), nobody is arguing that there isn't a major problem on the border; there is and we all know it.
Quote: The argument is against MAKING policemen accost anyone who LOOKS like they might be an illegal alien. It's totally absurd on the face of it; those actual criminals with the money will probably change their mode of dress, etc., and it'll be harder to recognize them...which means perfectly legal citizens will be accosted.
Quote: The ONLY possible good that will come of this is it will push the administration to get serious about the issue. We'll see.
Quote: But this is no solution. For one thing, anyone coming in from another state who doesn't know about the law (and there will be many; most people don't pay attention to, or remember, such things) runs the risk of being jailed because who in other states walks around with their "papers"? The guy on TV last night who said there are many ways to recognize illegals, by their dress, even their SHOES??? So, now warned, criminals can go out and buy different shoes, and only poor immigrants will wear "recognizably Hispanic" shoes. Great solution.
Quote: I assume you're one of those who wants every illegal alien in America hunted down and deported.
Quote: It's just not possible, it's ludicrous to think it could ever be achieved. So some kind of immunity has to be established, some kind of "back-of-the-line" thing and work program. It's not that "America" doesn't want something done, it's that those who want immigrants deported don't want it, and those who have no problem with immigrants don't want to deal with it.
Quote: By lumping all illegal immigrants into the categories of "rapists, drug lords", etc., "and the like", you are omitting the VAST majorit of illegal immigrants and focusing only on the unsavory element, addressing the issue as if all illegal immigrants fall into that category. That is as racist as saying any cateory of people are all one thing or another. That IS racism, pure and simple. I know you can't see it, I imagine most racists can't see their own racism, but that is a perfect example of how it comes out.
Quote: This is going to pull cops off their protective duties, require money to hire more cops, destroy the trust between the cops and their community (which is where they get a LOT of cooperation in getting the actual criminals among them), give bad and/or racist cops freedom to abuse their power, harrass actual citizens who don't carry papers because they don't know about it, forget about it, or whatever, and cause a further rift between both illegal and legal-citizen Hispanics and the rest of the citizenry. Who WOULDN'T feel persecuted if only their own race were targeted?
Quote: This is not a good way to deal with the problem. It will cause more trouble than it solves, wait and see.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 9:03 AM
Quote:Further, the law allows for private citizens to “sue” a police department if they believe that they are not enforcing the law to their satisfaction.
Quote:The only thing which separates illegals and anyone else is the law, not their skin color.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:39 PM
Quote:Posted by Rappy: Quote: As for what you cited (thank you for specifics!), nobody is arguing that there isn't a major problem on the border; there is and we all know it. Well, no one except Kwickie. To which those remarks I made were directed. But fret not, I'll not lay HIS idiocy at the feet of others.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:44 PM
Quote:Well,if the guy on t.v. said it, then I guess that settles it.
Saturday, April 24, 2010 1:54 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote: The argument is against MAKING policemen accost anyone who LOOKS like they might be an illegal alien. It's totally absurd on the face of it; those actual criminals with the money will probably change their mode of dress, etc., and it'll be harder to recognize them...which means perfectly legal citizens will be accosted. But that's not what this law does. So, while you DO have a valid claim, it's really not applicable here on this matter.
Quote: A. NO OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE MAY ADOPT A POLICY THAT LIMITS OR RESTRICTS THE ENFORCEMENT OF FEDERAL IMMIGRATION LAWS TO LESS THAN THE FULL EXTENT PERMITTED BY FEDERAL LAW. B. FOR ANY LAWFUL CONTACT MADE BY A LAW ENFORCEMENT OFFICIAL OR AGENCY OF THIS STATE OR A COUNTY, CITY, TOWN OR OTHER POLITICAL SUBDIVISION OF THIS STATE WHERE REASONABLE SUSPICION EXISTS THAT THE PERSON IS AN ALIEN WHO IS UNLAWFULLY PRESENT IN THE UNITED STATES, A REASONABLE ATTEMPT SHALL BE MADE, WHEN PRACTICABLE, TO DETERMINE THE IMMIGRATION STATUS OF THE PERSON. THE PERSON'S IMMIGRATION STATUS SHALL BE VERIFIED WITH THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT PURSUANT TO 8 UNITED STATES CODE SECTION 1373(c).
Sunday, April 25, 2010 2:07 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: ANY "lawful contact", an attempt "SHALL BE MADE", etc. This is legalese for saying that police MUST hassle anyone they suspect of being illegal. Not "MAY be made", but "SHALL be made". There's a difference, not that I expect you'll be able to figure it out. As usual, you're lying, making shit up where you really have no idea what you're talking about. You really should stop; you're embarrassing yourself. Not that this is a new condition for you...
Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:04 AM
Sunday, April 25, 2010 5:37 AM
Sunday, April 25, 2010 6:10 AM
Quote:"That's legalese for saying illegal aliens can come into your house, make a sandwich and take as many cheeze its as they like"
Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:02 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Crappy, damn it, did you even READ where anyone who thinks the cops AREN'T stopping (or stopping enough) potential illegal aliens can be SUED?!?! It is a MANDATE: "an authoritative command; especially: a formal order from a superior court or official to an inferior one". Can you grasp that? They bloody-well BETTER do as the law mandates, or they can be involved in a lawsuit, get it?? Not that there won't be tons of lawsuits anyway, if they already haven't begun. Because it's going to wreak havoc with law-enforcement agencies statewide. Do you understand "unfunded mandate"? It means they're REQUIRED to do something, but they're not given any funds to hire extra cops to do it; ergo, the cops they have will HAVE TO spend a certain amount of time checking out "potential illegals" on any given day, time they would otherwise be using for real crimes, BECAUSE THAT'S THE LAW. Try, Crappy, try to understand.
Sunday, April 25, 2010 8:33 AM
MAL4PREZ
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Try, Crappy, try to understand.
Sunday, April 25, 2010 9:11 AM
Quote:Originally posted by mal4prez: Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: Try, Crappy, try to understand. Oh, I think he understands. But he's here to piss people off, and stubborn misunderstanding works better for that. When do we get that "ignore" feature on fff 2.0? It's the only cure for Rappy.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL