Separated at birth ? by AURaptor

America loves a winner!

I just KNEW I'd seen that face somewhere before....

Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:00 PM

WHOZIT

ick

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:08 PM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg

EWWWWWWWWWW

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:24 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

Whoz it?

Doubledong SCOTUS. The Founding Fathers are so proud.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:32 PM

WHOZIT

Quote:
Originally posted by piratenews:
Whoz it?

Doubledong SCOTUS. The Founding Fathers are so proud.

*rimshot*

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:48 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

Frakkin jew lesbian HAS NEVER BEEN A JUDGE... Nor a lawyer.
http://rawstory.com/rs/2010/0510/obama-names-trailblazing-kagan/

Is Kagan independent? Hardly. She is a bankster operative. Kagan sat on a Goldman Sachs advisory council between 2005 and 2008. It was her job to offer “analysis and advice to Goldman Sachs and its clients.” Kagan’s role working for the “great vampire squid wrapped around the face of humanity” (as Matt Taibbi described Goldman) should not be dismissed lightly.
http://www.infowars.com/elena-kagan-wall-streets-scotus-pick/

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:54 PM

DREAMTROVE

Farscaper?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 1:02 PM

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

Rappy's mom?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, May 10, 2010 2:30 PM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by dreamtrove:
Farscaper?

I'm saddened that THIS crowd is so Princess Bride illiterate.

Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, May 12, 2010 12:59 PM

OPERATIVE1

Yeah, the top character is from the Princess Bride. One of the torturers, I think. He wasn't a good guy. He's no Miracle Max.

Operative1

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, May 12, 2010 1:02 PM

OPERATIVE1

Yeah, the top photo is a character from The Princess Bride, he was one of the torturers, I think. He's no Miracle Max.

Operative1

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, May 12, 2010 6:45 PM

IREMISST

For what it's worth, I got it immediately, and thought it was hi-larious...I kinda think she looks like Brendan Frazier's older thicker sister, though.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 1:48 AM

I'm saddened that the biggest concern over a Supreme Court nominee is with her LOOKS.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 3:43 AM

IREMISST

Natural complication of a mostly vain and shallow society, but are you really THAT suprised?

I'd rather the homely lookin' people run the country, less of a chance their gonna screw everything that moves and make the evening news just that much MORE annoying...

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:19 AM

JONGSSTRAW

I loved her performance in The Godfather as Luca Brasi.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 4:39 AM

I thought it was that tubby Scalia who played Luca Brazzi...

Still, I suppose it should be heartening that none of the usual Republicans (PN, Rappy, Jongsie, Wulfboy) here have anything negative to say about her actual record or qualifications. I'll take that as a ringing endorsement of her nomination. Thanks for your support!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:14 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Yes, Mike...as I read down the threads and noticed how fast those particular posters jumped on the "joke", my thought was "pathetic; all they can do is resort to idiocy yet again". The fact that none seems capable of even DREAMING anything might be positive about an Obama nomination is no surprise either, nor is that they choose this to jump on board with and enjoy.

Not been a judge has been dismissed over and over, merely by the fact that many Supremes HAVEN'T been judges. Get some new material, idjit! Or I guess "If that's all that you can come up with, how telling that is..."

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 5:25 AM

JONGSSTRAW

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
I thought it was that tubby Scalia who played Luca Brazzi...

Still, I suppose it should be heartening that none of the usual Republicans (PN, Rappy, Jongsie, Wulfboy) here have anything negative to say about her actual record or qualifications. I'll take that as a ringing endorsement of her nomination. Thanks for your support!

She has no record, no decisions from the bench. She's just another Liberal academic pinhead permanently residing in the Land Of We Libs Know What's Best For Everyone....just like the other Harvard twit, Professor Obama. And what's he tryin' to do to the Supreme Court anyhow? Make it the Fat & Ugly Court with her and Sotomayer? They better get Ruth Ginsberg on milkshakes or somethin' real fast.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 6:02 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
I thought it was that tubby Scalia who played Luca Brazzi...

Still, I suppose it should be heartening that none of the usual Republicans (PN, Rappy, Jongsie, Wulfboy) here have anything negative to say about her actual record or qualifications. I'll take that as a ringing endorsement of her nomination. Thanks for your support!

She has no record, no decisions from the bench.

Yes, having never been a judge, she wouldn't really have a record of decisions from the bench. Of course, that also means you can't call her an "activist judge", right? Although I'm sure you'll find something equally stupid to say about her

Quote:
She's just another Liberal academic pinhead permanently residing in the Land Of We Libs Know What's Best For Everyone....just like the other Harvard twit, Professor Obama.

See? That didn't take you long at all. Jongsie, have you gone off your meds? Or are you drinking again? Or huffing paint? For a little while there, you were pulling off a somewhat convincing impersonation of an actual person. What went wrong?

And let's go on record. Are you saying that EVERYONE who ever went to Harvard is a twit? Or just the ones who didn't join the neo-conservative movement?

Quote:
And what's he tryin' to do to the Supreme Court anyhow? Make it the Fat & Ugly Court with her and Sotomayer? They better get Ruth Ginsberg on milkshakes or somethin' real fast.

Ah, so you're saying that Bush was only trying to make it the Rich and White Court with his appointments? Clarence Thomas isn't going to like hearing that...

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 8:40 AM

Quote:
....just like the other Harvard twit, Professor Obama.

Hey, ummm... Jongsie? You realize that Obama hasn't been a professor in quite a while, right? Is your Obama Deragement Syndrome still acting up?

The man quit teaching in 2004. Six years ago. Let me repeat that... HE QUIT TEACHING SIX FREAKING YEARS AGO!

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:19 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Oh for gawd's sake, knock it off Strawman:

Quote:
She has no record, no decisions from the bench

When Kagan was born in 1960, five of the Supreme Court's nine justices had no previous judicial service.

Per Findlaw, Supreme Court Justices without prior judicial experience in the history of the Court:

1. William Rehnquist
2. Lewis Powell
3. Abe Fortas
4. Byron White
5. Arthur Goldberg
6. Earl Warren
7. Tom Clark
8. Harold Burton
9. Robert Jackson
10. James Francis Byrnes
11. William O. Douglas
12. Felix Frankfurter
13. Stanley Forman Reed
14. Owen Josephus Roberts
15. Harlan Fiske Stone
16. Pierce Butler
17. George Sutherland
18. Louis Brandeis
19. James Clark McReynolds
20. Charles Evans Hughes
21. William Henry Moody
22. George Shiras, Jr
23. Melville Fuller
24. Lucius Quintus Cincinnatus Lamar
25. Joseph Philo Bradley
26. Salmon P. Chase
27. Samuel Freeman Miller
28. Noah Haynes Swayne
29. Nathan Clifford
30. John Archibald Campbell
31. Benjamin Robbins Curtis
32. John McKinley
33. Roger Brooke Taney
34. Henry Baldwin
35. Joseph Story
36. John Marshall
37. Bushrod Washington
38. William Paterson
39. John Jay
40. John Rutledge

Can we now PLEASE let that pathetic old dog die?? Give it UP!

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 9:26 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

As to being an "academic": "Assuming President Obama wins confirmation of Solicitor General Elena Kagan to the Supreme Court, that august body will be exclusively filled with judges who earned their law degrees at Harvard or Yale."

Ooops...

Can you prove she's a "liberal academic pinhead"? Got the "academic" down, what about the other two? Do you want me to quote cites on how many Supreme Court Justices were professors, if that's what you're inferring by "academic"?

And hey, if you think Obama's two nominees are ugly, my gawd, have you looked at the rest of the Court??? He couldn't do much worse!

http://thm-a01.yimg.com/nimage/2cf7d4dd785fdd84

And fat?

she looks pretty good to me in comparison; the others are just a buncha old ugly farts. 'Cept Thomas, he's just ugly and horny.

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:04 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

But then, Borking a nominee is well known, as Stephen Colbert pointed out with Sotomayor:

And Jon Stewart does a pretty good job on the subject, too:

And Stewart did a good job on White being Neutral on the Supreme Court:

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:26 AM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
I'm saddened that the biggest concern over a Supreme Court nominee is with her LOOKS.

What's sadder still is that this dude does NOT look like a lady.

Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:38 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Yes, Republican women are usually hot--dumb airheads, but hot, as opposed to Democratic women, who appeal to us for who they ARE, not what they look like.

The fact that you have so many bimbos on your side of the aisle is wonderfully indicative of the fact that most Republicans are white males who think and vote with their dicks.

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:48 AM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by Niki2:Yes, Republican women are usually hot--dumb airheads, but hot, as opposed to Democratic women, who appeal to us for who they ARE, not what they look like.

The fact that you have so many bimbos on your side of the aisle is wonderfully indicative of the fact that most Republicans are white males who think and vote with their dicks.

Right. And black males, or asian males,....all other males never do that, huh ?

wow.

Of course, if a strong, independently thinking, successful,intelligent woman actually LOOKS good , then she's deemed a bimbo.

This from the crowd who fabricates up the idea of " tolerance " and treating everyone equally.

Well, everyone who agrees with THEM, of course.

Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 10:53 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

The statement reflects the fact that, despite their insisting otherwise, Republicans are by FAR and away Caucasians. Teabaggers even moreso. Prove otherwise: I dare you.

Also the fact that Republican bimbos aren't there to ATTRACT Asian, Black, Hispanic or otherwise males...

Quote:
Of course, if a strong, independently thinking, successful,intelligent woman actually LOOKS good , then she's deemed a bimbo

Oh, gawd, it's to laugh! No, wait, you might actually HAVE one of those! Do you? Wanna name her so we can all have a good laugh, 'cuz you gotta think it's Bachman, Sarahcuda or Coultergeist, and we would get GREAT laughs out of THAT!

"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:06 PM

FREMDFIRMA

And here I thought someone, anyone, might go and bring up here record - cause yanno, I don't give a fuck what they look like, myself.

That said, I don't want her on the bench, as she does not properly respect the constitution when it conflicts with her own personal beliefs, a glaring lack of the one thing that is the primary requirement for a judge at all, much less a supreme, impartiality.

I could care less whether an appointee is a flaming liberal, grumpy conservative, or cloudcuckoolander - ALL I care about, is that when the rubber meets the road, they can keep their damn spare change to themselves, and decide things based on the Constitution, and if there is any confusion, the fully stated intentions, explained in excruciating detail for just this very reason, of the people who wrote the friggin thing, and that's ALL THAT SHOULD EVER MATTER.

But no, these days, they select appointees on the basis of just how far, and in which direction, they're willing to bend and break a set of provisions that is in place for bloody good reasons - a practice, mind you, that goes all the way back to that sumbitch John Jay, who immediately jumped on the loopholes Madison and Hamilton set up for the exact purpose of subverting the whole intention of the Constitution in the first place.

The Antifederalists of course, no fools they, pointed this out immediately...
http://www.thisnation.com/library/antifederalist/78-79.html
http://www.thisnation.com/library/antifederalist/81.html
And were, as usual ignored and scoffed at with the platitude that "no one would ever dare!" by the very folk planning to do exactly that the moment it became expedient to do so.

So really, the whole premise of the supreme court kinda upsets the checks and balances system since they have loaded dice and no accountability, and it's always been that way.

Thefore it's absolutely imperative that the nominees are impartial, and they're not, and it's not like we peons have any say about it anyhow.

And it was intended that way from the very start.

So forgive me for not havin a lotta faith in the supreme court, and being rather pissed about deck stacking of this nature no matter who does it...

Of course, since when you're playin such a rigged game the only thing you can really do is cheat back, and if you wanna include folks with no judicial experience as candidates, I say pick the most extreme liberal you can with any respect for the Constitution, and this lady ain't it.

I'd be nominatin Dennis Kuchinich.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, May 13, 2010 12:10 PM