REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

President Favors Equal Rights

POSTED BY: ANTHONYT
UPDATED: Thursday, August 19, 2010 16:09
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5912
PAGE 2 of 3

Monday, August 16, 2010 7:50 AM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
As custom w/ those like minded to yourself, you offered no attempt to discuss or debate any particular point, you just mocked, and dismissed my views. Never once contemplating that most Americans do feel this way, and would come to a similar conclusion if presented the facts.

Okay, AURaptor,

You want some debate? Could you start by telling me how you get around the 1st Amendment to the Constitution on this one?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.



HK....that is weak. Try again or go back and read the rest. I am a constitution buff...you are off mark...just one girl's opinion...

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 7:59 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by HKCavalier:
Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
As custom w/ those like minded to yourself, you offered no attempt to discuss or debate any particular point, you just mocked, and dismissed my views. Never once contemplating that most Americans do feel this way, and would come to a similar conclusion if presented the facts.

Okay, AURaptor,

You want some debate? Could you start by telling me how you get around the 1st Amendment to the Constitution on this one?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.




It's the Constitution and the founding fathers that mocked and dismissed Rappy's views.

Quote:

n 1776, John Adams published "Thoughts on Government," in which he praises the Islamic prophet Mahomet (Mohammed) as a "sober inquirer after truth" alongside Confucius, Zoroaster, Socrates, and other "pagan and Christian" thinkers.

In 1785, George Washington stated a willingness to hire "Mahometans," as well as people of any nation or religion, to work on his private estate at Mount Vernon if they were "good workmen."[23]

In 1790, the South Carolina legislative body granted special legal status to a community of Moroccans, twelve years after the Sultan of Morocco became the first foreign head of state to formally recognize the United States.[24] In 1796, then president John Adams signed a treaty declaring the United States had no "character of enmity against the laws, religion, or tranquillity, of Mussulmen".[25]

In his autobiography, published in 1791, Benjamin Franklin stated that he "did not disapprove" of a meeting place in Pennsylvania that was designed to accommodate preachers of all religions. Franklin wrote that "even if the Mufti of Constantinople were to send a missionary to preach Mohammedanism to us, he would find a pulpit at his service."[26]

Thomas Jefferson defended religious freedom in America including those of Muslims. Jefferson explicitly mentioned Muslims when writing about the movement for religious freedom in Virginia. In his autobiography Jefferson wrote "[When] the [Virginia] bill for establishing religious freedom... was finally passed,... a singular proposition proved that its protection of opinion was meant to be universal. Where the preamble declares that coercion is a departure from the plan of the holy author of our religion, an amendment was proposed, by inserting the word 'Jesus Christ,' so that it should read 'a departure from the plan of Jesus Christ, the holy author of our religion.' The insertion was rejected by a great majority, in proof that they meant to comprehend within the mantle of its protection the Jew and the Gentile, the Christian and Mahometan, the Hindoo and infidel of every denomination."[27] While President, Jefferson also participated in an iftar with the Ambassador of Tunisia in 1809.[28]

Alexander Russell Webb is considered by historians to be the earliest prominent Anglo-American convert to Islam in 1888. In 1893 he was the only person representing Islam at the first Parliament for the World's Religions.[20]



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Islam_in_the_United_States#Islam_in_the_e
arly_United_States



AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 8:24 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
The terrorist organization Hamas fully supports building the mosque near ground zero.
So nice to see the President of the United States in full agreement with Hamas. I'm sure they talk all the time about the best ways to destroy America.


Hamas leader: Ground zero mosque must be built
NEW YORK – AP August 16, 2010
A Hamas leader says Muslims "have to build" a mosque near ground zero.

Mahmoud al-Zahar said Muslims "have to build everywhere" so that followers can pray, just like Christians and Jews build their places of worship.

Al-Zahar spoke Sunday on "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on WABC-AM. He is a co-founder of Hamas and its chief on the Gaza Strip.

Sen. Chuck Schumer says Al-Zahar's comments don't carry any weight because Hamas is a terrorist organization. Schumer hasn't taken a stand on the mosque.

Rep. Peter King, who opposes the mosque, says he won't respond to Hamas.

The mosque is a project of the Cordoba Initiative, an advocacy group that promotes improved relations between Islam and the West. It didn't respond to Al-Zahar's comments.

___








Hello,

I saw this today, and it troubled me a great deal. It makes one ask just what kind of President we have, when he agrees with extremist political groups like Hamas.

Quote:


Reported in the Assinine Press:

Earlier today, a taped message was received from Osama bin Laden, and dropped off at A.P. offices in Kabul. Specialists have confirmed that the tape appears to be legitimate. In the tape, the wanted terrorist leader comments that 'the sky is blue.' This comment stirred up considerable controversy in the U.S. amongst conservative personalities, when President Obama was heard to acknowledge, "Yes, the sky is blue," when queried at a news conference.

"What kind of a President do we have," railed Rush Limbaugh on his popular syndicated radio show, "when he aligns himself with the philosophy of terrorists?"




--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 8:28 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Whenever someone discards the Constitution and its protections as soon as they become inconvenient, you know you are not dealing with a Libertarian or a Conservative, or even a Patriot of any stripe.

You are dealing with a bully who will use anything, say anything, and do anything to get his way.

A Patriot is someone who stands between the hated and the mob, not someone who signs up to join the lynching.

Every time someone speaks out against a person's rights, that speaker is pissing on the Constitution. The Constitution only means something to them as long as it gets them what they want. When it ceases to be useful to their agenda, they are prepared to wipe their collective asses with it.

Anthony, that is gorgeous. It says everything that needs to be said about any number of things the Tea Partiers AND Republicans believe. It says everything about this discussion as well as that of the 14th Amendment and the Arizona law. Thank you.

Raptor,
Quote:

As custom w/ those like minded to yourself, you offered no attempt to discuss or debate any particular point
I take exception to that; I debate and discuss issues all the time, and to what I see as a lesser extent, so do Story and others who also snark. You have only to look at the two posts directly above yours to know that throwing such stones is futile when we are surrounded by those like-minded to YOU.

As to
Quote:

Why did he backtrack from his own glorious statements, hmmm ?
That has absolutely no relation to the discussion of Mosques and the freedom of religion turning into a “personal insult, obscenity-laced rant”. So many of the threads here do devolve in that way, which has nothing to do with any of the issues proposed. I made an observation; you replied with an unrelated partisan snark.

Cavalier’s question is actually the only single question of relevance in this debate: How does anyone, for any reason whatsoever, honestly defend negating the First Amendment of our Constitution in order to disallow a Mosque in which Muslims can pray?

Essentially, ANY answer besides “one doesn’t” invalidates the debater, especially any who claim that strict adherence to the Constitution is what our country is founded on and what should be followed. The First Amendment reflects the fact that we a people who built this country because of religious persecution in the country from whence they came. It’s not possible to have it both ways; either we revere the Constitution, even when it’s uncomfortable, or we pick and choose what we want to respect...the latter making that person precisely what Cavalier described.

It has nothing to do with what some radical organization or person anywhere else in the world thinks or wants. It has nothing to do with how uncomfortable it makes us or how much it offends us. It has nothing to do with how we feel about the religion or those who practice it. The only way in which it has anything to do with patriotism is that a patriot recognizes that, even when inconvenient, this country stands for something or it stands for nothing.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:12 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Obama didn't "backtrack" from anything. Only a complete idiot would think he did.




Obama backtracks over Ground Zero mosque after furious 9/11 families label him 'insensitive and uncaring'

By MAIL FOREIGN SERVICE
Last updated at 6:26 PM on 16th August 2010


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1303463/Obama-backtr
acks-Ground-Zero-mosque.html



***********

President Obama flips on Ground Zero mosque
http://www.mid-day.com/news/2010/aug/160810-president-obama-ground-zer
o.htm



***********

Obama's 'Ground Zero Mosque' Two-Step

http://news.yahoo.com/s/atlantic/20100816/cm_atlantic/obamasgroundzero
mosquetwostep4717


*************

The Big Story: Obama wades into mosque debate and backs away
Did President Barack Obama endorse the building of a mosque near Ground Zero? Did he flip-flop less than 24 hours later, as critics contend, or merely clarify what he had said Friday at a White House Ramadan iftar dinner? Is the issue religious freedom o FULL ARTICLE AT DALLAS MORNING NEWS - BLOGS


*************

Jamie Dupree
The Mosque Remarks
By Jamie Dupree @ August 16, 2010 1:31 AM Permalink | Comments (0) | TrackBacks (0)
I figured that the question about building an Islamic Mosque near Ground Zero in New York would become an issue in a few campaigns this year. But President Obama may have increased that number over the weekend.

How? Well, the President stirred the pot on this story himself, not once, but twice.

First on Friday night, the President told a White House gathering marking Ramadan that Muslims should enjoy the same freedom to worship in the United States that is guaranteed to all others under the Constitution.

"As a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as everyone else in this country," Mr. Obama said to applause from the audience.

"And that includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in Lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America. And our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable."

But overnight, the President and his advisers evidently had a slight change of heart, because Mr. Obama made sure to give a statement to TV cameras that seemed to alter his stance slightly, while sticking by his argument that people have the right to worship freely in America.


*************



There's universal opinion that you're wrong. Again.







NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:26 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Three sources that you cherry-picked, and you call it "universal", eh?

That says a lot about you. ;)

Quote:




"Just to be clear, the president is not backing off in any way from the comments he made last night."

Said Obama spokesman Bill Burton.



That's his own spokesman saying he ISN'T backing off in any way.

That makes it universal, right? ;)



AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:37 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


All early reports stated that Obama was backtracking. Because he was and did backtrack.

After the editors got a look at the big picture, and realized what a colossal fuck up Obama had landed himself in, the unspoken word went out across the left leaning MSM, and they started towing the WH line, as much as they hated to do so.

You see, this came as a major unannounced cluster fuck for the Democrats. Barry was to start his campaign rounds after a 27 hour 'vacation' in Florida, but after word got out of his abysmal stance on the Mosque in NYC, even Dems started raising all sorts of hell.

This President is fantastically inept and tone death to the wishes and views of not just conservatives, but democrats as well. MOST Americans, and many Muslims, are against this, and it's not even close.


I didn't so much 'cherry pick' as show restraint on headlines I could have used.


* of course the *spokesman * is going to spin a favorable line.
IT'S HIS JOB!





NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:42 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


All early reports stated that Obama was backtracking.



Not like the media could ever be wrong, eh?

Heck, all the early reports - including YOURS - claimed that Shirley Sherrod was a racist, and ACORN was helping pimps traffic in underage hookers.

And all of them were 100% wrong.

Obama's spokesman says he isn't backtracking. Obama himself hasn't taken anything back, because on this issue, he's 100% right.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:42 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Nice try, but it failed. Just so there are no doubts in your mind:
Quote:

President Barack Obama has clarified that his defence of Muslims’ right to build an Islamic complex near New York’s Ground Zero site of 9/11 attack, was not an endorsement of the controversial proposal.

Speaking to reporters, Obama reiterated the stand he took Friday night at a White House aftar dinner observing the Muslim holy month of Ramadan.

“In this country we treat everybody equally and in accordance with the law, regardless of race, regardless of religion,” Obama was quoted as saying in various media reports.

But he went on to explain that he was not endorsing the construction of the Islamic centre.

“I was not commenting and I will not comment on the wisdom of making the decision to put a mosque there,” he said. “I was commenting very specifically on the right people have that dates back to our founding.”

http://religion.gaeatimes.com/2010/08/15/backing-right-to-build-mosque
-not-endorsement-obama-4254
/

By the way:
Quote:

Some families of 9/11 victims said they support the proposed Islamic center, and the president's position.

"America, the concept and the people and the land thrive when we choose to trust in our principles rather than cave to our basest fears," Donna Marsh O'Connor, spokeswoman for September 11th Families for Peaceful Tomorrows, said in a statement, adding: "What better place for healing, reconciliation and understanding than ground zero?"

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/08/15/obama.islamic.center.politics/i
ndex.html?hpt=Sbin


At least THEY get it, and if anyone has right to their opinion on the matter, THEY do!


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:55 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Obama's spokesman says he isn't backtracking. Obama himself hasn't taken anything back, because on this issue, he's 100% right.


Most Americans, most Democrats know he's wrong.

He can bow up and claim he's not backtracking all the hell he wants, but that's exactly what he did,and no amount of spin or false bravado by the 1st Community Organizer can change that fact.


A CNN/Opinion Research poll released this week found that nearly 70 percent of Americans opposed the mosque plan while just 29 percent approved. A number of Democratic politicians have shied away from the controversy.
http://cbs2.com/national/Ground.Zero.Mosque.2.1860064.html




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 9:58 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Niki -

Think she has a right to speak as well ?

Quote:

Debra Burlingame: 9/11 Families Stunned by President’s Support of Mosque at Ground Zero

by EDITORS on AUGUST 14, 2010
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE

9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America
Statement of Debra Burlingame, Co-founder of 9/11 Families for a Safe & Strong America, in Response to President Obama’s Remarks about the Ground Zero Mosque

9/11 Families Stunned by Presidents Support of Mosque at Ground Zero

New York, NY, Aug. 14 — Barack Obama has abandoned America at the place where America’s heart was broken nine years ago, and where her true values were on display for all to see. Since that dark day, Americans have been asked to bear the burden of defending those values, again and again and again. Now this president declares that the victims of 9/11 and their families must bear another burden. We must stand silent at the last place in America where 9/11 is still remembered with reverence or risk being called religious bigots.

Muslims have worshipped in New York without incident both before and after the attacks of 9/11. This controversy is not about religious freedom. 9/11 was more than a “deeply traumatic event,” it was an act of war. Building a 15-story mosque at Ground Zero is a deliberately provocative act that will precipitate more bloodshed in the name of Allah. Those who continue to target and kill American civilians and U.S. troops will see it as a symbol of their historic progress at the site of their most bloody victory. Demolishing a building that was damaged by wreckage from one of the hijacked planes in order to build a mosque and Islamic Center will further energize those who regard it as a ratification of their violent and divinely ordered mission: the spread of shariah law and its subjugation of all free people, including secular Muslims who come to this country fleeing that medieval ideology, which destroys lives and crushes the human spirit.

We are stunned by the president’s willingness to disregard what Americans should be proud of: our enduring generosity to others on 9/11–a day when human decency triumphed over human depravity. On that day, when 3,000 of our fellow human beings were killed in barbaric act of raw religious intolerance unlike this country had ever seen, Americans did not turn outward with hatred or violence, we turned to each other, armed with nothing more than American flags and countless acts of kindness. In a breathtakingly inappropriate setting, the president has chosen to declare our memories of 9/11 obsolete and the sanctity of Ground Zero finished. No one who has lived this history and felt the sting of our country’s loss that day can truly believe that putting our families through more wrenching heartache can be an act of peace.

We will honor the memory of our loved ones. We will protect our children, whose lives will never be the same. We will not stand silent.






NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:31 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


A) She has every right to speak up. Everyone has the right to free speech, just as everyone hast the right to freedom of religion. What you posted, and your posting of it, have absoltely nothing to do with the issue of whether the President favors equal right to freedom of religion.

What you posted is a visceral, dramatically-worded appeal to emotions which is 100% wrong: IT IS about religious freedom. If anyone were to tell any group of people "You can't build a church here, it offends us", that IS restricting their freedom of religion.

The article is also badly slanted and erroneous. The President saying everyone has freedom of religion in NO way: "disregard(s) what Americans should be proud of: our enduring generosity to others on 9/11–a day when human decency triumphed over human depravity." How the two can even be connected is absurd.

B) There is obviously no way of you recognizing that saying something is a right in no way indicates someone's personal opinion on the wisdom of exercising that right. He stated the CONSTITUTIONAL LAW on the matter of freedom of religion. People mistook that, and Republicans jumped on it, as him saying HE was personally in favor of the mosque, so he clarified that he was not stating his opinion, but stating the rights in the Constitution.

To repeat: "The president wasn't backing off in any way from the remarks he made Friday.

'What he said last night, and reaffirmed today, is that if a church, a synagogue or a Hindu temple can be built on a site, you simply cannot deny that right to those who want to build a mosque,' Burton said."

C) As has been stated repeatedly, the Constitution is not enforced at the whim of the majority; the rights it grants are not to be voted on by the population; "it's the Constitution, stupid".

There is no argument, only your biased opinions. You can give no VALID argument for restricting anyone's freedom of religion.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:34 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

It's interesting what people think this country is about.

People rail, wail, cuss, and complain.

And if someone listened? If someone denied the Mosque due to their complaints?

Well, they'd have destroyed a piece of this country more surely than any terrorist could have.

And then they'd throw a party about it, and clap each other on the back, and say "God Bless America!"

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:38 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Right on, Anthony. I continue to shake my head that it just doesn't seem to get through. I guess a statement that emotions (especially fear) can trump reason and law so easily.

It's such a simple issue: What we FEEL in no way trumps the RULE OF LAW, the Constitution and what we stand for. Why is that so hard to understand? I don't get it.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:38 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


By the same token then, you would be ok with building a statue honoring Hirohito at Pearl Harbor?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:47 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Niki

It's not about freedom of religion, and no matter how many times you or the Obama sycophants try to twist the discussion that way will make one iota of difference.

It's about Obama supporting the Mosque at Ground Zero, and nothing else.

Straight up.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:51 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"By the same toke then, you would be ok with building a statue honoring Hirohito at Pearl Harbor?"

Hello,

Such a statue might be in poor taste. However, if the land is available for purchase and use, and that's what they want to do with it, you won't find me shouting, "THEY CAN'T DO THAT!"

Because they CAN. They can, and as a Patriot I defend their RIGHT to do so, even if it makes me sick to my stomach.

Aren't you prepared to 'gather your armies' and go to war to defend this country and its principles?

Is enduring a distasteful icon so much harder on your fortitude than the prospect of civil war?

What a shallow sense of Freedom you display. What a Fair-Weather Patriot you are.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:55 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I agree with Anthony. But far beyond that, your comparison is completely false. A statue of someone anywhere has nothing to do with freedom of religion, which is a CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHT.

Freedom of speech is also a Constitutional right, so there would be nothing but the same public distaste for what you proposed.

It's obvious that to you and those who think like you that the Constitution is only there for convenience; the very instant what it protects becomes inconvenient to you, it becomes irrelevant. Our last President felt the same way; thus we got waterboarding, wiretapping of American citizens, unlawful detention, and more.

There is no point in attempting to discuss this issue further; I understand you can't grasp the concept, I understand that whatever the actual facts, you both have a need to see it as Obama "supporting" a mosque in this particular place, so I'll leave you to agree with one another and dump the law of our land and the principles we are built upon in the dirt.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 10:59 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

Actually, Niki, it might be an appropriate comparison. Unless I am mistaken, the Emperor of Japan is a Living God, and hence a statue of him could be considered a religious icon. Like a giant cross, or a big sickle and star. Spans both freedom of speech and freedom of religion. Twice the reason to die defending it. ;-)

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:00 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Valid point. I didn't know that, thank you.

On second thought, I think I would still argue that Hirohito does not represent "a religion"--sticky point, I realize, but I doubt any would go there to pray to him, ergo it's comparison to a place of worship is pretty iffy.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:03 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Never argued for or against it... just stating that building a stature to Hirohito at Pearle harbor is pretty much the smae thing as building a mosque at Ground Zero...

Im staying out of the debate on the right or wrong of it.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:04 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
By the same token then, you would be ok with building a statue honoring Hirohito at Pearl Harbor?



Is Hirohito a religion?

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:10 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Niki

It's not about freedom of religion, and no matter how many times you or the Obama sycophants try to twist the discussion that way will make one iota of difference.

It's about Obama supporting the Mosque at Ground Zero, and nothing else.

Straight up.




Actually, it's about whether or not Muslims have the right to build a mosque. The President says they do have that right. So does the Constitution.

Straight up.

You make it just too easy. You make these grand, sweeping statements about opinion being "universal", and all anyone has to do at that point to prove you 100% wrong is provide ONE SINGLE dissenting voice. As long as one person (in this case, the President's own spokesperson) says he isn't backtracking, then it's not "universal" or anything close to it. No amount of belly-aching by the right or its sycophants can change the truth, which is that he said it, and he stands by it, and there is no backtracking in any way, shape, or form.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:13 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Never argued for or against it... just stating that building a stature to Hirohito at Pearle harbor is pretty much the smae thing as building a mosque at Ground Zero...




An ACCURATE comparison would be if someone was proposing the building of a statue of Osama Bin Laden at Ground Zero. You're making that typical mistake of equating a religion with the actions of a few of its zealots.

So riddle me this, Wulfie - would you support erecting a church on the site of a former family planning clinic after the doctor who ran that clinic was murdered in a church?

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:14 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Saying you're not backtracking after you've backtracked doesn't make it so.

He backtracked. He got caught, and now is sticking to his guns, supporting a very poor idea to place a Mosque near the WTC site.

Even Dems are seeing what a blunder this President is making here.

Funny, you don't.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:21 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"An ACCURATE comparison would be if someone was proposing the building of a statue of Osama Bin Laden at Ground Zero."

Hello,

And even so? If it's their land to use, they can put a statue of anyone they like there. And a Patriot would defend that right, also.

Whatever the most vomitous, awful, disgusting gesture is. Whatever the most repellant structure. It really doesn't matter what nightmare anyone conjures up for comparison. Religion and Speech are both protected, so no matter what horror is summoned up from the wicked depths of our imaginations, someone has the Right to do it.

And if I refuse to comment on the Wisdom of such forms of speech, that diminishes neither the right nor my defense of it.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:25 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Very correct Anthony.

Its in poor taste... but hey, if they own the property, have a right to do it.

How I wonder if you would say the same thing if the Klan built a Hall, on land they owned, where they used to hang blacks?

If you can do that... then more power to you, and you would be equally correct.

If you own the land, its yours, to do with as you see fit.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:34 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

Wulf, no need to wonder. I'll tell you. I endorse their Right to do so.

I even endorse their right to put up a piece of artwork depicting a hanged man.

You can't conjure up an image that will make me turn against the fundamental rights of speech and religion. Not even the most hateful, disgusting example.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:39 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Holy crap AnthonyT, I have now come to respect you and your opinions.

Good job. Thats a lot harder to do than people might think (or snark) about.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 12:38 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Wulfenstar:
Very correct Anthony.

Its in poor taste... but hey, if they own the property, have a right to do it.

How I wonder if you would say the same thing if the Klan built a Hall, on land they owned, where they used to hang blacks?

If you can do that... then more power to you, and you would be equally correct.

If you own the land, its yours, to do with as you see fit.





Wulfie, are you old enough to remember when the ACLU - an organization you no doubt detest to its very core - defended the rights of the Klan to march in the predominantly Jewish area of Skokie, Illinois? The ACLU lawyer who argued (successfully) for their right to do so was himself Jewish.

The Klan can erect their meeting place at The Lynching Tree if they so desire, and I'll bet money the ACLU would agree they have the right to do so.

But stay away from such sweeping generalities as "If you own the land, its yours, to do with as you see fit"; that doesn't include the right to pollute the land or the water.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 12:45 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
"An ACCURATE comparison would be if someone was proposing the building of a statue of Osama Bin Laden at Ground Zero."

Hello,

And even so? If it's their land to use, they can put a statue of anyone they like there. And a Patriot would defend that right, also.

Whatever the most vomitous, awful, disgusting gesture is. Whatever the most repellant structure. It really doesn't matter what nightmare anyone conjures up for comparison. Religion and Speech are both protected, so no matter what horror is summoned up from the wicked depths of our imaginations, someone has the Right to do it.

And if I refuse to comment on the Wisdom of such forms of speech, that diminishes neither the right nor my defense of it.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.




Yes, quite so. And if some Japanese group buys land on Pearl Harbor and wants to put up a statue of Hirohito, they are within their legal rights to do so.

Last time I checked, the Constitution doesn't say that you have the right to not be offended, or that someone else doesn't have the right to exercise bad taste.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 12:49 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Saying you're not backtracking after you've backtracked doesn't make it so.

He backtracked. He got caught, and now is sticking to his guns, supporting a very poor idea to place a Mosque near the WTC site.

Even Dems are seeing what a blunder this President is making here.

Funny, you don't.



Actually, nothing I've seen or heard of his remarks seems to be "supporting" building a mosque, a church, a synagogue, or any other religious shrine anywhere. What he said was that they have the constitutional right to do so, not that he applauds them doing so, or supports their desire to do so.

You're equating his saying that they have a right to do so with him saying he's glad they're doing it. You're assuming facts not in evidence, nor from what I've seen, even hinted at. And then you further claim that the President has backtracked from a position YOU claim he took, but which he never did. Hell, YOU said they have a right, and that nobody has denied that. That's what the President said, too. Seems you're just whining about him agreeing with you.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 1:19 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


For those who haven't read it, or didn't hear the speech, here's the text of it.

Quote:

Text of President Obama's remarks at the White House Iftar dinner on Ramadan
Good evening. Welcome to the White House. To you, to Muslim Americans across our country, and to more than one billion Muslims around the world, I extend my best wishes on this holy month. Ramadan Kareem. I want to welcome members of the diplomatic corps; members of my administration; and Members of Congress, including Rush Holt, John Conyers, and Andre Carson, who is one of two Muslim American Members of Congress, along with Keith Ellison.

Here at the White House, we have a tradition of hosting iftars that goes back several years, just as we host Christmas parties, seders, and Diwali celebrations. These events celebrate the role of faith in the lives of the American people. They remind us of the basic truth that we are all children of God, and we all draw strength and a sense of purpose from our beliefs.
These events are also an affirmation of who we are as Americans. Our Founders understood that the best way to honor the place of faith in the lives of our people was to protect their freedom to practice religion. In the....

...Virginia Act for Establishing Religion Freedom, Thomas Jefferson wrote that “all men shall be free to profess, and by argument to maintain, their opinions in matters of religion.” The First Amendment of our Constitution established the freedom of religion as the law of the land. And that right has been upheld ever since.

Indeed, over the course of our history, religion has flourished within our borders precisely because Americans have had the right to worship as they choose – including the right to believe in no religion at all. And it is a testament to the wisdom of our Founders that America remains deeply religious – a nation where the ability of peoples of different faiths to coexist peacefully and with mutual respect for one another stands in contrast to the religious conflict that persists around the globe.

That is not to say that religion is without controversy. Recently, attention has been focused on the construction of mosques in certain communities – particularly in New York. Now, we must all recognize and respect the sensitivities surrounding the development of lower Manhattan. The 9/11 attacks were a deeply traumatic event for our country. The pain and suffering experienced by those who lost loved ones is unimaginable. So I understand the emotions that this issue engenders. Ground Zero is, indeed, hallowed ground.

But let me be clear: as a citizen, and as President, I believe that Muslims have the same right to practice their religion as anyone else in this country. That includes the right to build a place of worship and a community center on private property in lower Manhattan, in accordance with local laws and ordinances. This is America, and our commitment to religious freedom must be unshakeable. The principle that people of all faiths are welcome in this country, and will not be treated differently by their government, is essential to who we are. The writ of our Founders must endure.

We must never forget those who we lost so tragically on 9/11, and we must always honor those who have led our response to that attack – from the firefighters who charged up smoke-filled staircases, to our troops who are serving in Afghanistan today. And let us always remember who we are fighting against, and what we are fighting for. Our enemies respect no freedom of religion. Al Qaeda’s cause is not Islam – it is a gross distortion of Islam. These are not religious leaders – these are terrorists who murder innocent men, women and children. In fact, al Qaeda has killed more Muslims than people of any other religion – and that list of victims includes innocent Muslims who were killed on 9/11.

That is who we are fighting against. And the reason that we will win this fight is not simply the strength of our arms – it is the strength of our values. The democracy that we uphold. The freedoms that we cherish. The laws that we apply without regard to race or religion; wealth or status. Our capacity to show not merely tolerance, but respect to those who are different from us – a way of life that stands in stark contrast to the nihilism of those who attacked us on that September morning, and who continue to plot against us today.

In my inaugural address, I said that our patchwork heritage is a strength, not a weakness. We are a nation of Christians and Muslims, Jews and Hindus — and non-believers. We are shaped by every language and culture, drawn from every end of this Earth. That diversity can bring difficult debates. Indeed, past eras have seen controversies about the construction of synagogues or Catholic churches. But time and again, the American people have demonstrated that we can work through these issues, stay true to our core values, and emerge stronger for it. So it must be – and will be – today.

Tonight, we are reminded that Ramadan is a celebration of a faith known for great diversity. And Ramadan is a reminder that Islam has always been part of America. The first Muslim ambassador to the United States, from Tunisia, was hosted by President Jefferson, who arranged a sunset dinner for his guest because it was Ramadan—making it the first known iftar at the White House, more than 200 years ago.

Like so many other immigrants, generations of Muslims came here to forge their future. They became farmers and merchants, worked in mills and factories, and helped lay the railroads. They helped build America. They founded the first Islamic center in New York City in the 1890s. They built America’s first mosque on the prairie of North Dakota. And perhaps the oldest surviving mosque in America—still in use today—is in Cedar Rapids, Iowa.

Today, our nation is strengthened by millions of Muslim Americans. They excel in every walk of life. Muslim American communities—including mosques in all fifty states—also serve their neighbors. Muslim Americans protect our communities as police, firefighters and first responders. Muslim American clerics have spoken out against terror and extremism, reaffirming that Islam teaches that one must save human life, not take it. And Muslim Americans serve with honor in our military. At next week’s iftar at the Pentagon, tribute will be paid to three soldiers who gave their lives in Iraq and now rest among the heroes of Arlington National Cemetery.

These Muslim Americans died for the security that we depend upon, and the freedoms that we cherish. They are part of an unbroken line of Americans that stretches back to our Founding; Americans of all faiths who have served and sacrificed to extend the promise of America to new generations, and to ensure that what is exceptional about America is protected – our commitment to stay true to our core values, and our ability to perfect our union.

For in the end, we remain “one nation, under God, indivisible.” And we can only achieve “liberty and justice for all” if we live by that one rule at the heart of every religion, including Islam—that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us.
Thank you all for being here, and I wish you a blessed Ramadan. And with that, let’s eat.



I can't find where he "supports" the building of a mosque; only where he affirms the constitutional right of the followers of Islam to do so.

Seems some oversensitive members on the right are trying to brew a controversy where there is none. Again.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 4:00 PM

HKCAVALIER


But gang, this Hirohito gambit is just a sneaky frame--don't fall for it. If indeed ANY Islamic government went to war with our nation, a holy war to convert us to Islam, then AND ONLY THEN would this Hirohito canard be relevant.

Answering the Hirohito query keeps the argument about letting our enemies walk all over us. And by extension, Islam is our enemy. It is not. Many American citizens are Muslim. As citizens they have certain rights like the rest of us. The Emperor of Japan DID wage war against us. Islam did not. It's formal representatives did not. No nation's government has endorsed the 9/11 attacks. The Quran EXPLICITLY condemns killing innocent people regardless of religion.

I gotta say, it's damned ironic that these folks argue against the mosque/community center on the grounds that it's "insensitive." Do they even realize that they're using EXACTLY the sort of argument Muslims make when someone draws a picture of their prophet? It's offensive and insensitive. To them we say, that's freedom of speech for ya--sucks to be you.

Same difference here. That's freedom of religion for ya--sucks to be you.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 4:13 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


HKC, I've been trying for quite some time now to get that point across.

If anyone wants to claim that the religion of Islam attacked the U.S. on 9/11, they would be forced to admit that the religion of Christianity attacked Iraq in 2003.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 4:20 PM

HKCAVALIER


Problem with that argument, Mike, is: they DO believe Christianity attacked Iraq in 2003. Haven't you heard? We live in a Christian nation and we're exporting our Christian American values. They're not gonna tell you that because you're the enemy, but that's what's going on here.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 4:41 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Good point. Bush did, after all, say we were in "a crusade".

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 7:53 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Did it never occur to them that not all muslims are alike, no more than christians or jews ?
That men are men and all are fools, but not about the same things ?

That maybe this is islams rebuke against the monsters who had done this thing ?


Word for word, from a conversation with a local Imam earlier today at a McDonalds in Dearborn.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, August 16, 2010 11:23 PM

HKCAVALIER


Anyone else hear a reference to the Gates fiasco in Obama's choice of the word "wisdom?" He got raked over the coals for saying the cops acted "unwisely" and so now he's saying, "Hey, I'm not gonna fall into that trap again, guys. I ain't gonna offer my opinion of the wisdom of anyone involved--period."

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, August 17, 2010 7:22 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

See, and I hate to sound cold, but the "pain" anyone might feel is ridiculous. *Islam* did not carry out 9-11.

Who said pain, or grief, was a rational thing? But I still think it ought to be respected. The events of 9-11 had an *association* with Islam, and that is enough. Well-meaning muslims should respect the sensitivity around this: it's a human thing, not a moronic islamophobic thing (Riverlove and her ilk excluded).

Quote:

The more that Americans can see progressive Moslims like the ones building this community center, the sooner we as a nation will get over this vilification of an entire religion due to the acts of a fringe few.


I agree, and I would like to see this mosque/community centre built - in something like 50 years time.

I see this analogy with Hirohito down the thread. What this issue most reminds me of is the idea of German soldiers being part of a UN troop deployment in Jerusalem, in a Middle-East peace plan. Now rationally speaking it wasn't the current generation of German people who were responsible for the Holocaust, it was the Nazis. Modern Germans strongly renounce Nazism and have done for many years. And that German contingent in an international troop deployment would theoretically be a way of helping Israel achieve peace, and promote reconciliation between the two peoples...

But no. It would be unwise. The wound is still sensitive - and that's just human nature. Forcing rationality on such a deep national tragedy IS cold, in my view. And I think this mosque-near-ground-zero issue is the same.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 4:02 AM

MAL4PREZ


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

See, and I hate to sound cold, but the "pain" anyone might feel is ridiculous. *Islam* did not carry out 9-11.

Who said pain, or grief, was a rational thing? But I still think it ought to be respected.

The institutionalization of biases, blind hatred, and scapegoats lead only one place. We're already half there and hundreds of thousands of innocent people have died because of it.


Quote:

The events of 9-11 had an *association* with Islam, and that is enough.
My god, are you serious? If we ruled out anyone who had any association with something unpleasant, the world would be completely empty.

Now, how about all those people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and are for this community center? Do they mean nothing to you? Because such people have been supporting it from the start. (Niki posted references about this.) The ones I've heard talking the loudest against this are NOT 9/11 victims, but politicians looking to push a policy of hate. They are the ones using the 9/11 association to manipulate us and push their own agenda. They are the ones causing the pain.

And how about the people building the community center? How about their stated message of unification and bridge-building? How about the fact that the lead guy worked in anti-terrorism for our govt? Why can't we focus on that for a change, instead of giving in to blind bias and hate and persecution of muslims for the next "something like 50 years"? How will it go away in that time if we won't even try now?

If we were truly the country we claim to be, we wouldn't only support this community center, we'd build something on the actual WTC site, in the memorial, encouraging understanding of the moslim world. I picture one little room containing actual true information about the people and their faith, so that visitors to the memorial can experience muslims as human beings, rather than boogie men, and separate these people from the radicals who carried out the attack.

But we're not that kind of country, and many of us are incapable of seeing that separation. Our politicians get more mileage out of having us afraid of boogie men.


-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 4:39 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"I agree, and I would like to see this mosque/community centre built - in something like 50 years time."

"that German contingent in an international troop deployment would theoretically be a way of helping Israel achieve peace, and promote reconciliation between the two peoples...

But no. It would be unwise. The wound is still sensitive - and that's just human nature."

Hello,

The wound will always be sensitive, as long as we sensitize it. By your own words, even half a century isn't really enough, nor even THREE GENERATIONS is enough for a German peacekeeper to perform a United Nations mission in Jerusalem.

It's never enough until someone says, "Enough is enough."

So enough already. I'm not interested in protecting a wound by perpetuating irrational fear and hatred. That's a very insensitive kind of sensitivity that the world can do without.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 5:45 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Why is anyone even the least bit surprised by this?

The GOP stated quite clearly (and even published a cute little PowerPoint presentation to back up their agenda) that the biggest - in fact the ONLY - thing they were interested in running on was FEAR. That's their only perennial campaign plank, the only thing they have to offer to the nation.




AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 6:02 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

The wound will always be sensitive, as long as we sensitize it. By your own words, even half a century isn't really enough, nor even THREE GENERATIONS is enough for a German peacekeeper to perform a United Nations mission in Jerusalem.

Time is a good healer. Remember the scale of the Holocaust was much bigger than the events of 9/11. I am quite confident that passions and sensitivities around ground zero and its vicinity will die down (so long as the war on terror doesn't become more bitter), and a Mulsim centre that promotes reconciliation like this one (purportedly - I haven't looked into it much myself) built in the future.

Quote:

I'm not interested in protecting a wound by perpetuating irrational fear and hatred.

For some people undoubtedly, the building of this mosque/community centre touches a stupid reactionary nerve - those same people will bleat and howl about any Muslim activity around ground zero until judgement day. But to others I'm suggesting, this touches a more ordinary, *human* nerve. Give it time, and people will come over to the idea of emphasising understanding + reconciliation. But ignore the current sensitivity and inflict new pain on a sensitive area - well I suggest this will only prolong the bitterness and delay the healing process.

That's how I see it: it's too soon for a muslim centre like this near ground zero, and causing pain in the name of tolerance may well put back the cause of tolerance. I personally wish the president would see that, and speak out against the wisdom of the mosque.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 6:31 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I don't agree, KPO. If you can't get past something in nine years you're not going to get past it in ninety. You'll never get past it for as long as the world waits on you. Moreover, as long as anyone feels pained by this and moves to stop such a project, they are contributing to the equation of Muslim and Terrorist.

It may be 'human' to behave with illogical emotional reactions, but it's not a part of human nature I'm interested in fostering and cementing on the landscape of a city.

But I do appreciate your tone, and I'm glad to have a calm voice representing rational disagreement on the issue.

--Anthony



Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, August 18, 2010 8:48 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Wulf, I wouldn’t have a problem with the Klan building a hall anywhere. It’s none of my business, and I don’t consider anywhere “holy” except actual holy sites. Everything Anthony said goes for me as well. I might not like it; I might HATE it and be offended, I might even rail about how disgusting it is when I see it, but I’d never consider trying to stop the building of it. If I did, I would be going against what I believe America stands for, and about which I have always been proud. If I did, I would realize that any issue I DO protest might someday be silenced.

And I will keep saying it: It’s a COMMUNITY CENTER, which includes a “prayer room”, not a mosque. No minarets, no huge edifice that people can look at and say “look at that mosque, how offensive”. Just a building on the site of a defunct Burlington Coat Factory. It’s been TURNED INTO the “Ground Zero Mosque” by people with an agenda, which appears to be working quite well for them, and picked up by the GOP to help them win elections in Fall...they have clearly stated that.

Raptor, you can lie all you want to, but the plain fact is Obama never said one word about his own feelings on the COMMUNITY CENTER, and has yet to do so. He reminded us of the freedom of religion and their right to practice same. People like you jumped to the conclusion he was endorsing it, which required the clarification on his part that he was NOT endorsing it. That’s not backtracking; that’s clarifying something in response to people jumping to the wrong conclusion. But go ahead and believe whatever you want, I recognize your need to do so.
Quote:

Now, how about all those people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and are for this community center? Do they mean nothing to you? Because such people have been supporting it from the start. (Niki posted references about this.) The ones I've heard talking the loudest against this are NOT 9/11 victims, but politicians looking to push a policy of hate. They are the ones using the 9/11 association to manipulate us and push their own agenda. They are the ones causing the pain.

And how about the people building the community center? How about their stated message of unification and bridge-building? How about the fact that the lead guy worked in anti-terrorism for our govt?

Absolutely right on, Mal4
Quote:

Our politicians get more mileage out of having us afraid of boogie men.
And that is the issue, in its entirety. They made hay of the COMMUNITY CENTER, they made hay of Obama addressing it, and they're effectively distracting the country from the actual, serious issues we face. Works for them!


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:01 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Quote:

Originally posted by mal4prez:
Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
Quote:

See, and I hate to sound cold, but the "pain" anyone might feel is ridiculous. *Islam* did not carry out 9-11.

Who said pain, or grief, was a rational thing? But I still think it ought to be respected.

The institutionalization of biases, blind hatred, and scapegoats lead only one place. We're already half there and hundreds of thousands of innocent people have died because of it.


Quote:

The events of 9-11 had an *association* with Islam, and that is enough.
My god, are you serious? If we ruled out anyone who had any association with something unpleasant, the world would be completely empty.

Now, how about all those people who lost loved ones on 9/11 and are for this community center? Do they mean nothing to you? Because such people have been supporting it from the start. (Niki posted references about this.) The ones I've heard talking the loudest against this are NOT 9/11 victims, but politicians looking to push a policy of hate. They are the ones using the 9/11 association to manipulate us and push their own agenda. They are the ones causing the pain.

And how about the people building the community center? How about their stated message of unification and bridge-building? How about the fact that the lead guy worked in anti-terrorism for our govt? Why can't we focus on that for a change, instead of giving in to blind bias and hate and persecution of muslims for the next "something like 50 years"? How will it go away in that time if we won't even try now?

If we were truly the country we claim to be, we wouldn't only support this community center, we'd build something on the actual WTC site, in the memorial, encouraging understanding of the moslim world. I picture one little room containing actual true information about the people and their faith, so that visitors to the memorial can experience muslims as human beings, rather than boogie men, and separate these people from the radicals who carried out the attack.

But we're not that kind of country, and many of us are incapable of seeing that separation. Our politicians get more mileage out of having us afraid of boogie men.


-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left



You seem to have a heart for increased understanding of and reconciliation towards the muslim commuunity Mal4, and that drives your opinion on this matter (is that fair?).

So I have this for you. Picture a small U.S town, now or at some historical time, that has just become faced with the influx of a small but significant immigrant population, living among them. The immigrants are foreign, speak a different language, and generally are considered quite 'different'. There are inevitable inter-community tensions in the town.

Then one day an immigrant who happens to be crazy, enters the home of one of the native townspeople and goes on a killing spree, and then kills himself. The children and father in the family are killed, only the mother survives.

Tensions in the town are inflamed, but after a few incidents, begin to die down. A group of responsible and thoughtful immigrants ask to attend the funeral - they want to pay their respects, and to promote understanding and reconciliation: not all the immigrants are like the crazed murderer. But the mother who has lost her whole family, staunchly refuses. She doesn't want to see any of this disctinct looking group of people, whom she associates with the murder of her family, during the ceremony commemorating her lost loved ones.

Now in this case it is in the mother's *right* to accept well-wishers at the funeral or not. But what is the morality of the case? Is she bigoted, or is the pain just too raw? Perhaps it's both. I personally think it would be tasteless and wrong for the responsible group of immigrants to try to insist on their attendance at the funeral (supposing the town had such a strange law) - not because their goal of reconciliation is bad, but because respecting the pain of the mother should take priority. Efforts at reconciliation can come later, or in different places away from the funeral and the mother's grief. Such is how I view a muslim community centre near ground zero - understandably there's still a raw nerve there for a lot of folk, even while others are ready to promote understanding and acceptance.I'm removed from the situation over here in the UK, admittedly, but I don't find it difficult to imagine at all that this muslim centre is just coming too soon for a lot of people.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:12 AM

RIVERLOVE


Quote:

Originally posted by mal4prez:
Our politicians get more mileage out of having us afraid of boogie men.


So true, I couldn't agree more. Like when Nancy Pelosi demonizes the Tea Party as "astro-turfed racists", or when Harry Reid admonishes a group of Hispanics and says that he "cannot fathom how any of them could be Republicans." Then the endless demonizing of Sarah Palin as stupid and dangerous to America by Liberals and Democrats. Or even when Democrat Congressman Alan Grayson tells America that Republicans want to just "let them die" over Healthcare, and that Republicans are "knuckle-dragging neaderthals." Yeah, it's just awful when those politicians create bogeymen for political purposes.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:15 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

Except a funeral is a private 'party.'

Except it's nine years later.

Except it's across the street from the graveyard.

Except the dead include the minority in question.

Except, well, almost everything.

The greatest presumption is that Muslims are not part of the affected community. That they didn't have members killed, or a great sense of loss. That their lives and world weren't equally upended.

That THEY are not US.

--Anthony


Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, August 19, 2010 7:45 AM

MAL4PREZ


Quote:

Originally posted by kpo:
You seem to have a heart for increased understanding of and reconciliation towards the muslim commuunity Mal4, and that drives your opinion on this matter (is that fair?).

Quite.

As for your example, Anthony called it - the funeral is a private function. The woman's home is her own, and she can refuse entry to anyone.

But your example doesn't apply to the NYC community center. I haven't heard any actual family of 9/11 victims speaking out against it, whereas many have voiced their support. The people speaking out against the Cordoba center are politicians.

So try this variation on your situation:

The mother does NOT blame the entire race of immigrants for the actions of one nut, and furthermore she sees in her tragedy an opportunity to ease tensions in the town. She accepts the immigrants' presence, even welcomes them into her home. She's eager to set an example for those in the town who tend toward racism and bigotry.

Now, Susan Pepin, who sits on the local Board, is a die hard immigrant hater, and elections are coming up. She goes on TV talking about the horrible thing these evil foreigners are doing by "forcing" their gloating, victorious presence on the poor woman, after they killed her family. (Never mind that they did no such thing.)

Thus, Susan Pepin uses this victim and the community's strife for her own ends, hoping to ride a big fat wave of hate into the election cycle. The bigotry is on the part of the politician, not the victim, and the pain of the tragedy is not being respected, it's being *used* in a way that makes the whole damned situation worse for everyone. Except Susan Pepin.

And again I stress - it isn't the actual victims of 9-11 who are making this fuss. Do you acknowledge this? Or have you heard of something I haven't?

-----------------------------------------------
hmm-burble-blah, blah-blah-blah, take a left

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Trump Presidency 2024 - predictions
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:54 - 15 posts
U.S. Senate Races 2024
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:49 - 9 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:47 - 35 posts
Are we witnessing President Biden's revenge tour?
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:44 - 7 posts
No Thread On Topic, More Than 17 Days After Hamas Terrorists Invade, Slaughter Innocent Israelis?
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:35 - 35 posts
Ghosts
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:30 - 72 posts
U.S. House Races 2024
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:30 - 5 posts
Election fraud.
Thu, October 31, 2024 20:28 - 35 posts
Will religion become extinct?
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:59 - 90 posts
Japanese Culture, S.Korea movies are now outselling American entertainment products
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:46 - 44 posts
Elon Musk
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:33 - 28 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Thu, October 31, 2024 19:24 - 594 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL