Those who disagree with me are evil by mincingbeast

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Those who disagree with me are evil

POSTED BY: MINCINGBEAST
UPDATED: Friday, August 20, 2010 11:08
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3852
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:28 AM

I haven't been paying attention to American politics for several years, choosing instead to focus on panhandling and huffing gasoline. Anyway, with the few brain cells remaining in my eggshell skull, I have made a remarkable, albeit obvious, observation. Those who disagree with me are evil, bad people.

Allow me to offer the following examples. Those who support Prop 8 are not merely wrong, but rather maliciously evil and wicked bigots. Opponents of the Cordoba Mosque are simply racist islamophobic satanic bigots--that is the only reasonable explanation for their position. Supporters of Arizona's immigration policy are not mistaken, but racist asshole idiots that should be force fed cold shit from a dead dog's stomach. Those who enjoy chocolate, which I detest, are stupid evil dumbasses. Opponents of Prop 8? Wicked sodomite despoilers of marriage. Those who support the Cordoba Mosque? Well, they are dhimmi sissy evil naughty jackasses, if not outright terrorists. I could continue.

Does anyone believe that reasonable people of good conscience may disagree, or do you agree with me, that any evidence of disagreement on an issue must immediately be framed in terms of an absolute moral crusade? If you believe the former, you are evil, and I'm going to smite you sooner or later.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:36 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Those who enjoy chocolate, which I detest, are stupid evil dumbasses.

I could agree to disagree on everything but the choclate thing. You're not only evil but you have no taste.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:39 AM

Me -->

Those arn't boobs, they're lies! - Stewie Griffin

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:44 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Klesst:
Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Those who enjoy chocolate, which I detest, are stupid evil dumbasses.

I could agree to disagree on everything but the choclate thing. You're not only evil but you have no taste.

Obviously, you are a girl, and also evil, which would make you a witch or some other variety of dark spellcaster. Your careless statement not only evidences extreme wickedness and depravity, but also violates the majority of my constitutional rights. You belong in jail.

Anyway, how can you agree to disagree, or recognize that disagreement is possible, on an issue, if you think that you're right? Doesn't that mean that the other guy is wrong, and hence must be punished? Violently?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:45 AM

Well of course. This trend started thousands of years ago. Have a disagreement with your local religion and you are in league with satan. It just snowballs from there. Disagree with any policy and you are shit on a stick. You are just following the natural course.

I'm a stupid dumbass because I love chocolate. No argument there.

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=28764731
Traveler

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:49 AM

The issue of chocolate deserves a thread of its own. I'm working on it, but it may take me a few weeks to get it right. It is tenatively entitled: You are a stupid dumbass for eating chocolate: why matters of taste are actually moral battles .

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:52 AM

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg

People who disagree with me... havnt been paying attention..

Or are so hopelessly entrenched in their systems that they can't see outside of it.

But theres me... cutting holes in their little boxes.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 11:54 AM

You put a Kid Rock video in my thread? This suggests you enjoy Kid Rock, which while not surprising, is nonetheless upsetting. I would rather you dump in my lungs than post such wicked, degenerate filth. I hate you; you are evil.

I think Wulf agrees with me that it is impossible for people of good conscience to disagree; people of good consicence all agree with me and Wulf, and those who don't, are evil stupid dumbass malfeasors.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:03 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Anyway, how can you agree to disagree, or recognize that disagreement is possible, on an issue, if you think that you're right? Doesn't that mean that the other guy is wrong, and hence must be punished? Violently?

Now days if you even mention rounding people up and putting them in camps, people get all bent out of shape. I'm just talking reeducation, it's for their own good.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:06 PM

Freedom is Important because People are Important

Hello,

Did the dog eat the shit, or did it back up into the stomach somehow?

I think you may have identified the cause of death.

As to the rest...

I frequently disagree with people who are not evil.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:08 PM

If we learned anything from FF, aside from that it must be rad to be a Reaver, its that people don't get better. Ever. They don't improve, and its evil to suggest that they ought to. Hence, your re-education plan is evil, and you are an evil doer.

Phew, I was afraid that someone would try to talk some sense into me, though my huffing-induced brain damage is a shield to that sort of thing.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:12 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

Did the dog eat the shit, or did it back up into the stomach somehow?

I think you may have identified the cause of death.

As to the rest...

I frequently disagree with people who are not evil.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

Damn it Anthony, no fair. You are the exception that proves the rule. You are so reasonable that your reason rises to the level of vice; this is why you are evil, and i hate you, and will reflexively dispute everything that you say.

The dog in question has been dead for a while, but it had a final meal of kibble and baby before it passed. I am a moral crusader, not a vet, so I imagine I should have said "dead dog's bowels" to make my point about force feeding the semi-digest of the departed. Wherever the fecal matter gathers; in my case, its my skull.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:16 PM

Freedom is Important because People are Important

"in my case, its my skull."

Hello,

I think we all have this anatomical anomaly from time to time.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 12:19 PM

Maybe it's shit for brains that makes you all evil.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:37 PM

This thread is heavy with shit, which is a shame. Instead, it should be heavy with unanimity, and good and evil.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 1:58 PM

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.

I have two mottos:

"Know your enemy." and "To understand all, is to forgive all."

Hence my heart bleeds for everyone - especially my enemies.

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:11 PM

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

Those who disagree with me aren't evil, just stupid and deluded.

AURaptor's Greatest Hits:

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 20:32 To AnthonyT:
Go fuck yourself.
On this matter, make no mistake. I want you to go fuck yourself long and hard, as well as anyone who agrees with you. I got no use for you.

Friday, May 28, 2010 - 18:26 To President Obama:
Mr. President, you're a god damn, mother fucking liar.
Fuck you, you cock sucking community activist piece of shit.
... go fuck yourself, Mr. President.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:43 PM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

There is no evil. But there's an awful lot of

running around.

Those who disagree with me can be mistaken, deluded, sad/sick or have a good point. I can pity the first three, learn from the last.

But as for the

,

'em,

Mincing,

(in a good way)

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, August 19, 2010 2:44 PM

Mince:

You didn't mention "The Three Stooges". That is always a very black and white issue. Also the issue of who was better, Shemp or Curly.

http://www.imdb.com/mymovies/list?l=28764731
Traveler

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 5:53 AM

I have to agree with mince that the un-evil cannot disagree. Agreeing to disagree is not very agreeable with the reasonable. It shows a lack of commitment which taken to it's full extent would destroy a society. It is much nobler to force feed the disagreeable shit until they agree or are killed off in unspeakable ways. And yes I did get more shit into this thread. Are we in agreement?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 6:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
I have to agree with mince that the un-evil cannot disagree. Agreeing to disagree is not very agreeable with the reasonable. It shows a lack of commitment which taken to it's full extent would destroy a society. It is much nobler to force feed the disagreeable shit until they agree or are killed off in unspeakable ways. And yes I did get more shit into this thread. Are we in agreement?

Yes, agreeing to disagree is like being bi-sexual or agnostic, or playing a True Neutral character in DnD. We are in complete agreement, or as Fred Durst once said, agreeance.

Upon further gasoline-fume aided reflection, I have determined that the clever are incapable of disagreement.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 6:36 AM

QUESTIONABLEQUESTIONALITY

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
I have to agree with mince that the un-evil cannot disagree. Agreeing to disagree is not very agreeable with the reasonable. It shows a lack of commitment which taken to it's full extent would destroy a society. It is much nobler to force feed the disagreeable shit until they agree or are killed off in unspeakable ways. And yes I did get more shit into this thread. Are we in agreement?

Yes, agreeing to disagree is like being bi-sexual or agnostic, or playing a True Neutral character in DnD. We are in compelte agreement, or as Fred Durst once said, agreeance.

Upon further gasoline-fume aided reflection, I have determined that the clever are incapable of disagreement.

I disagree. Disagreeing shows for more commitment than agreeing with a disagree-er. To disagree with agreeing to disagree shows zero fortitude and should be shunned by all of gods children.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 6:37 AM

QUESTIONABLEQUESTIONALITY

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:
I have to agree with mince that the un-evil cannot disagree. Agreeing to disagree is not very agreeable with the reasonable. It shows a lack of commitment which taken to it's full extent would destroy a society. It is much nobler to force feed the disagreeable shit until they agree or are killed off in unspeakable ways. And yes I did get more shit into this thread. Are we in agreement?

Yes, agreeing to disagree is like being bi-sexual or agnostic, or playing a True Neutral character in DnD. We are in compelte agreement, or as Fred Durst once said, agreeance.

Upon further gasoline-fume aided reflection, I have determined that the clever are incapable of disagreement.

I disagree. Disagreeing shows for more commitment than agreeing with a disagree-er. To disagree with agreeing to disagree shows zero fortitude and should be shunned by all of gods children.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 6:40 AM

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

I disagree about agreeing to disagree, because agreeing to disagree means there can be no agreement since the two parties disagree and should agree that they disagree, not disagree on the rightness of their disagreeing and continue to disagree in the hopes they will reach agreement.

So there.

As to bisexuals, hey, I resemble that remark!

Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 6:51 AM

That made total sense to me, which is a cause for alarm, considering my lust for gasoline fumes and other brain-nailing inhalants. It made sense, but I disagree, so you have once again demonstrated evil.

Do not be alarmed Niki. My best friend, who may or may not be imaginary, is a bisexual agnostic. I constantly taunt him about his inability to fully ally himself with either god or dong. He is also a self-professed moderate, which I find to be a moral failing that evidences evil and wickedness.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:01 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
considering my lust for gasoline fumes and other brain-nailing inhalants.

I'm glad you included other inhalants, I was beginning to think you were a low life trailer trash for sniffing gasoline. Everyone sense the 70's knows that Liquid Gold furniture polish is the Shit. (disclaimer: will cause brain damage, but that would be an improvement for most of you).

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:05 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Klesst:
Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
considering my lust for gasoline fumes and other brain-nailing inhalants.

I'm glad you included other inhalants, I was beginning to think you were a low life trailer trash for sniffing gasoline. Everyone sense the 70's knows that Liquid Gold furniture polish is the Shit. (disclaimer: will cause brain damage, but that would be an improvement for most of you).

Hell no; I am a beast of rareified tastes. I only huff the finest, premium grade gasoline.

Liquid Gold is too lemony for my tastes; I find that freon has a delightfully skull-jarring boquet, however. I have been known to attach myself to airconditioners like a vampire just to get a whiff.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:07 AM

Quote:
Yes, agreeing to disagree is like being bi-sexual or agnostic, or playing a True Neutral character in DnD. We are in compelte agreement, or as Fred Durst once said, agreeance.

Most of the entertainment in Fantasy or Sci-Fi settings is to poke sticks into various all-good or all-evil races and light them on magical fire, and the rest of the time is resisting the urge to do the same to the dumb fools giving you epic loot. So I've always wondered, how do the True Neutral types fare, or even SURVIVE in such a setting?

It seems like the most common depictions of neutral characters have to either never kill anyone or anything, which defeats the whole purpose, or they switch sides so often that any sane response to anyone spending more than a few minutes in their company would be to permanently shut their impossible to please nagging up and loot the body.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:13 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Quote:
Originally posted by Klesst:
Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
considering my lust for gasoline fumes and other brain-nailing inhalants.

I'm glad you included other inhalants, I was beginning to think you were a low life trailer trash for sniffing gasoline. Everyone sense the 70's knows that Liquid Gold furniture polish is the Shit. (disclaimer: will cause brain damage, but that would be an improvement for most of you).

Hell no; I am a beast of rareified tastes. I only huff the finest, premium grade gasoline.

Liquid Gold is too lemony for my tastes; I find that freon has a delightfully skull-jarring boquet, however. I have been known to attach myself to airconditioners like a vampire just to get a whiff.

I find the inhalation of any chemical fumes repulsive. I am of the thought that only clean air, and the occasional farmland cowshit infused air, should be inhaled. I only add cowshit air because it is good for one's sinuses and sexual stamina.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:17 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Bytemite:
Quote:
Yes, agreeing to disagree is like being bi-sexual or agnostic, or playing a True Neutral character in DnD. We are in compelte agreement, or as Fred Durst once said, agreeance.

Most of the entertainment in Fantasy or Sci-Fi settings is to poke sticks into various all-good or all-evil races and light them on magical fire, and the rest of the time is resisting the urge to do the same to the dumb fools giving you epic loot. So I've always wondered, how do the True Neutral types fare, or even SURVIVE in such a setting?

It seems like the most common depictions of neutral characters have to either never kill anyone or anything, which defeats the whole purpose, or they switch sides so often that any sane response to anyone spending more than a few minutes in their company would be to permanently shut their impossible to please nagging up and loot the body.

Your observations are keen. Refusal to commit to a side is just as irritating in the half-life of DnD as it is in the non-life of the Real World.

Once, when I was pretending to be a devious rogue, I traveled in the company of a true neutral Druid who obsessively whined about "balance." His refusal to pick a side did double duty as a philosophy and personality. The Druid was so irritating, and so unreliable, that I announced anyone guilty of using healing magics on him would be shanked in their sleep. Sadly, as a druid, when his time came he had very little interesting loot.

It occurs to me that because he disagreed with me, he not in fact true neutral, but rather, Chaotic Evil.

Hence, this thread must be amended: those who disagree with me are chaotic evil.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:21 AM

Kane, if you like cowshit, you may enjoy huffing jenkem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkem

Jenkem is real; jenkem is rad. I have several awesome recipes if you are interested.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:22 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:

I find the inhalation of any chemical fumes repulsive. I am of the thought that only clean air, and the occasional farmland cowshit infused air, should be inhaled. I only add cowshit air because it is good for one's sinuses and sexual stamina.

Not all of us have access to the good Shit. There isn't a cow within miles of my trailer park and even if there was I wouldn't want to hang out with a bunch of pretentious manure whiffers.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:33 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by Klesst:
Quote:
Originally posted by kaneman:

I find the inhalation of any chemical fumes repulsive. I am of the thought that only clean air, and the occasional farmland cowshit infused air, should be inhaled. I only add cowshit air because it is good for one's sinuses and sexual stamina.

Not all of us have access to the good Shit. There isn't a cow within miles of my trailer park and even if there was I wouldn't want to hang out with a bunch of pretentious manure whiffers.

Manure sniffers are the least pretentious of us all. I'd strongly suggest finding a new trailer park within driving distance of some sort of bovine ass. It will change your life....

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:40 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Kane, if you like cowshit, you may enjoy huffing jenkem.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jenkem

Jenkem is real; jenkem is rad. I have several awesome recipes if you are interested.

It appears to be just a dream. A fantasy. I have sewage fermenting all over my house, most notable my sink and un-flushed toilet, and have been huffing over them for ten minutes....nothing. I believe it is a pipe dream made up to give hope to all who need rancorous odors to be happy. The El Dorado of huffers.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 7:53 AM

Kane, god and santa and democracy may be bullshit, but jenkem is real. Please find below my recipe for delicious jenkem.

Ingredients
2-liter bottle
1 liter assorted human waste
hot summer
trunk of car

Directions
place human waste in bottle; place bottle in trunk on hot summer day. wait one week.

Use

Properly inhaling your jenkem is tricky. Over the week in your trunk, the human waste has partially fermented, and produced tremendous amounts of rad intoxicating fumes. When you open the bottle, the fumes will try to escape you, because they don't want you to be high. Hence, open the bottle and immediately place it in your mouth. Suck mightily with a regular huffing motion. Nausea may ensue, but if you don't feel the need to yak, the jenkem will not have the desired effect.

You'll be high as a child soldier in no time!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 8:08 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
Kane, god and santa and democracy may be bullshit, but jenkem is real. Please find below my recipe for delicious jenkem.

Ingredients
2-liter bottle
1 liter assorted human waste
hot summer
trunk of car

Directions
place human waste in bottle; place bottle in trunk on hot summer day. wait one week.

Use

Properly inhaling your jenkem is tricky. Over the week in your trunk, the human waste has partially fermented, and produced tremendous amounts of rad intoxicating fumes. When you open the bottle, the fumes will try to escape you, because they don't want you to be high. Hence, open the bottle and immediately place it in your mouth. Suck mightily with a regular huffing motion. Nausea may ensue, but if you don't feel the need to yak, the jenkem will not have the desired effect.

You'll be high as a child soldier in no time!

This seems to easy to be true. Does vomit count as a form of human waste? And where on earth do the fumes get the nerve to decide I shouldn't be high?
If I do actually get the fumes into my lungs and experience the desired effect, when I fart later that night should I try to capture it in a jar? Would it not be more potent than the original a form of high-tess?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 8:15 AM

Of course its easy; if it weren't, it never would have discovered by the braindamaged.

Trial and error demonstrates that huffing flatulence, while rad and funny, will not get you high. Jenkem will get you high; jenkem will change your life.

Vomit doesn't really work the same as doo-doo and pee-pee, so I wouldn't recommend adding it to your jenkem bottle. You could, if you are a foodie, add a little bit of vanilla or truffle shavings for a touch of class. Just remember: get it in your lungs. Keep it in your lungs. Bliss awaits.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 8:27 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
malfeasors.

I strongly agree with your use of this beautiful word, yet I strongly disagree with your judgement of chocolate.

Must I now fully detest your wrongness or ignore it to better enjoy your righteous vocabulary?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 10:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AgentRouka:
Quote:
Originally posted by mincingbeast:
malfeasors.

I strongly agree with your use of this beautiful word, yet I strongly disagree with your judgement of chocolate.

Must I now fully detest your wrongness or ignore it to better enjoy your righteous vocabulary?

From the sound principles expounded in this thread, even a single disagreement demonstrates moral turpitude and willigness to do evil. Hence, while you may agree that malfeasor is an excellent word, if you disagree with my stance on chocolate, you must determine that I am an evil creature and treat me accordingly. Note that evil is often more appealing than good.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 11:02 AM

Freedom is Important because People are Important

"Note that evil is often more appealing than good."

Hello,

This is especially true of any female DS9 character in any alternate universe episode.

Kira in leather or latex? I'm a convert.

--Anthony

Due to the use of Naomi 3.3.2 Beta web filtering, the following people may need to private-message me if they wish to contact me: Auraptor, Kaneman, Piratenews. I apologize for the inconvenience.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, August 20, 2010 11:08 AM

malfeasor. From latin, Mal, bad (thanks to River Tam for the citation) and facere, to do. malfeasor. evil doer.

if W had used the word instead of "evil doers" he would've seemed so dashing, competent and poetic...instead of so W.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER

POST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS

Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:31 - 564 posts

Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:13 - 7497 posts

human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:06 - 952 posts

Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts

US debt breaks National Debt Clock
Sun, November 24, 2024 14:13 - 33 posts

The predictions thread
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:15 - 1189 posts

The mysteries of the human mind: cell phone videos and religiously-driven 'honor killings' in the same sentence. OR How the rationality of the science that surrounds people fails to penetrate irrational beliefs.
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:11 - 18 posts

In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:05 - 4762 posts

Sweden Europe and jihadi islamist Terror...StreetShitters, no longer just sending it all down the Squat Toilet
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:01 - 25 posts

MSNBC "Journalist" Gets put in his place
Sun, November 24, 2024 12:40 - 2 posts

Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sun, November 24, 2024 10:59 - 422 posts

The Islamic Way Of War
Sun, November 24, 2024 08:51 - 41 posts

VIEW MORE TOPICS

FFF.NET SOCIAL