REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

2 new subsidiaries of the 0bama administration

POSTED BY: HARDWARE
UPDATED: Thursday, April 7, 2011 07:42
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1082
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 8:28 AM

HARDWARE


http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/06/washington-post-and-cbs-receiving-mo
ney-from-obamacare-slush-fund
/
Quote:


By Matthew Boyle
The Daily Caller
Two mainstream news organizations are receiving hundreds of thousands of taxpayer dollars from Obamacare’s Early Retiree Reinsurance Program (ERRP) — a $5 billion grant program that’s doling out cash to companies, states and labor unions in what the Obama administration considers an effort to pay for health insurance for early retirees. The Washington Post Company raked in $573,217 in taxpayer subsidies and CBS Corporation secured $722,388 worth of Americans’ money.

“It is fine with me if they continue covering the ObamaCare debate,” said Rep. Marsha Blackburn, Republican of Tennessee, in an e-mail to The Daily Caller. “When NBC used to cover energy issues, they identified themselves as a subsidiary of General Electric. CBS and Washington Post just have to disclose that they are subsidiaries of the Obama Administration.”

The ERRP, which Republicans call a slush fund, provides taxpayer money to Obama administration-selected states, companies and labor unions with already-in-place early retiree health insurance programs, and aims to make certain that their employees who retire early still have health insurance coverage before they reach Medicare eligibility age. Almost $2 billion of the $5 billion fund, which was supposed to last until 2014, has already been distributed to corporations. New projections expect the funding to run out before the end of 2012, if not sooner.

At a Friday morning hearing, the House Energy and Commerce Committee’s Subcommittee on Oversight and Investigations, chaired by Rep. Cliff Stearns, Florida Republican, asked Center for Consumer Information & Insurance Oversight (CCIO) official Steven Larsen for how the administration decides who gets a slice of the $5 billion pie – and how the application process works. In his response, Stearns referred to the fact that corporations like General Electric, Verizon and AT&T in addition to several labor unions were getting taxpayer funding.

Stearns was not impressed. “This program is providing ‘free’ money to corporations, states, unions, and pension plans,” the Congressman said in an e-mail to TheDC. “In addition, the Washington Post and CBS received funding under this program. How can the Washington Post and CBS be impartial on the issue of health care when they received funding under the health care law?”

CBS Corporation spokesman Gil Schwartz told TheDC that newsroom employees, like any other CBS employees, are indeed allowed to take the taxpayer subsidies.

“Yes they are,” Schwartz said. “Why wouldn’t newsroom employees be allowed access to that money like all other CBS employees?”



Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2011/04/06/washington-post-and-cbs-receiving-mo
ney-from-obamacare-slush-fund/#ixzz1IliKwwlT




Why don't I have a surprised feeling? Looks like 2 news organizations I can automatically discount when it comes to upcoming election news.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 9:50 AM

KANEMAN


That is crazy.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:00 AM

DREAMTROVE


You just can't make this stuff up. ROFL. I get where they get the justification, but that's pretty unbalanced. I guess Obama's days of an unfavorable press are coming to an end :biggin:


That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 11:54 AM

KPO

Sometimes you own the libs. Sometimes, the libs own you.


Presumably the fund is there for a reason - should media corporations be exempt?

It's not personal. It's just war.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 1:15 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Okay, so the premise put forth here is that ANY corporation that gets ANY kind of government funding can automatically be discounted as any kind of source for useful info?

Cool. Thanks for confirming that I can never trust a corporation like ExxonMobil or Halliburton. Or General Electric, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Boeing, AMGeneral, etc.

Didn't the Bush administration actually pay reporters to "plant" stories? The name Judith Miller comes to mind for some reason, along with some at several other news outlets. Heck, when Miller was proven to be a liar, she was hired by FauxNews and given a big raise. Go figure...



"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 2:54 PM

HARDWARE


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Okay, so the premise put forth here is that ANY corporation that gets ANY kind of government funding can automatically be discounted as any kind of source for useful info?

Cool. Thanks for confirming that I can never trust a corporation like ExxonMobil or Halliburton. Or General Electric, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Boeing, AMGeneral, etc.

Didn't the Bush administration actually pay reporters to "plant" stories? The name Judith Miller comes to mind for some reason, along with some at several other news outlets. Heck, when Miller was proven to be a liar, she was hired by FauxNews and given a big raise. Go figure...



"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill



Once more, slowly, for the special ed students we have posting here; just because Johnny did it does not mean you can do it.

And I'd expect those media outlets to reveal they get funding from the fedgov.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 6, 2011 5:13 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Hardware:
Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Okay, so the premise put forth here is that ANY corporation that gets ANY kind of government funding can automatically be discounted as any kind of source for useful info?

Cool. Thanks for confirming that I can never trust a corporation like ExxonMobil or Halliburton. Or General Electric, General Dynamics, Lockheed Martin, Northrup Grumman, Boeing, AMGeneral, etc.

Didn't the Bush administration actually pay reporters to "plant" stories? The name Judith Miller comes to mind for some reason, along with some at several other news outlets. Heck, when Miller was proven to be a liar, she was hired by FauxNews and given a big raise. Go figure...



"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill



Once more, slowly, for the special ed students we have posting here; just because Johnny did it does not mean you can do it.

And I'd expect those media outlets to reveal they get funding from the fedgov.




No, it just means you never had a bad word to say about it when Johnny did it. Or maybe you could point us all to your posts railing against such things back then.


"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 7, 2011 2:25 AM

HARDWARE


Actually Kwicko, I'm not a fan of the republicans antics, let alone Bush's. Afghanistan, good, justifiable. Iraq? Operation Clean Up After Daddy.

They also had a shill in the White House press room pitching softball questions.

And wasn't 0bama's administration supposed to be about openness and transparency?

Administration fail.

The more I get to know people the more I like my dogs.

...and he that has no sword, let him sell his garment, and buy one. Luke 22:36

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 7, 2011 5:17 AM

KANEMAN


"And wasn't 0bama's administration supposed to be about openness and transparency?"

I'll answer. NO, never was supposed to be, the Great Deceiver always knew he was giving the liberals just what they wanted. Daddy in the whitehouse taking care of them from cradle to grave. Never ask daddy why. You could get a spanking.




.

Kwicko, I formally condemn your mother for not aborting you. Yeah, I'm sure her brother was happy to have a son, but you are inexcusable....

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, April 7, 2011 7:42 AM

FREMDFIRMA



Ah yes, good ole Gannongate and the VNR flap...

Still, I don't see why any of you are even pretending this is anything new, Lincoln arrested newsies who didn't shill for him, so did Wilson, and while Hearst may not have invented Yellow Journalism but he certainly codified and refined it, not to mention the CIA and project MOCKINGBIRD.

Shit man, everybody buys off the media, hell even *I* buy off the media, at least certain factions of the Ann Arbor News and local Indymedia group, you'd be amazed at how much coverage (or non-coverage, if you want) you can buy with a nice dinner and some electronics - IndyMedia in particular is susceptible to gadget-bribery.

The fact that Obama is fulla shit ain't exactly no secret by now either - so I don't really see WHY y'all are arguing here unless ya just like to argue.

The best way to lob a match into this tinderbox is to set the werewolves of the paparazzi on them, just don't expect the accounts to be all that accurate, or coherent (talkin bout YOU, John.) but at least it'd put them on notice - of course if you REALLY wanted to start some shit, you'd talk elements of the US Military into applying threats and pressure to spring Bradley Manning...

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL