REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

For the record

POSTED BY: KANEMAN
UPDATED: Saturday, April 16, 2011 18:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 859
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:38 PM

KANEMAN


Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?
Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?
Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?
Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?


38 billion...lol...Really? hilarious

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:54 PM

DREAMTROVE


Noted.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:00 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.

Quote:


Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?



Probably not, but you teabaggers would never vote for him, so what's your point?

Quote:


Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?



You mean $350 million. The "budget cuts" that the GOP-baggers "won" actually turn out to be a touch over $350 million. With an "m", not a "b". But that will never stop you from voting for whomever runs with the (R) next to their name (but you're really not a Republican. Really. )

Quote:


Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?



Yes. You and the party you support 100% of the time have already proven that. You had the chance to cut the defense budget and cut military (war) spending, and you instead decided that it was far better to gut spending on social programs that help the poor and elderly, that take away from the working class and middle class and give to the rich, who are already increasing their wealth (and not creating any jobs) at record levels.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:39 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I do not think Ron Paul would spend anything on war. Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.

Plus no war unless Congress declares war. The old fashioned way. With a declaration.

--Anthony


Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 4:57 PM

DREAMTROVE



Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 6:55 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.




Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.



help me on that DT....isolatisionist...





NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, March 28, 2026 19:11 - 6888 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, March 28, 2026 17:51 - 9949 posts
Khamenei, One of Most Evil People in History, is Dead
Sat, March 28, 2026 15:35 - 244 posts
The Honeymoon is Over
Sat, March 28, 2026 12:37 - 411 posts
The Republic of Virtue and Technocracy
Sat, March 28, 2026 12:35 - 37 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Sat, March 28, 2026 12:33 - 20 posts
'A Failed Medical School': How Racial Preferences, Supposedly Outlawed in California, Have Persisted at UCLA
Sat, March 28, 2026 12:18 - 4 posts
FBI agent flees USA screaming, 'Beware the next false flag attack -- they're all insane!'
Sat, March 28, 2026 11:07 - 13 posts
David Hasselhoff OD DOA?
Sat, March 28, 2026 11:05 - 6 posts
Bolton is out, finally!
Sat, March 28, 2026 11:03 - 39 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Sat, March 28, 2026 10:54 - 418 posts
FLEE CALIFORNIA!
Sat, March 28, 2026 10:15 - 230 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL