REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Romney lies again...blatantly

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Saturday, August 18, 2012 08:40
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 683
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, August 18, 2012 8:40 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I feel much the same as the author; Romney running around spouting about Obama "cutting Medicare", when Obama's plan is to cut overpayment and ABUSES, while Romney/Ryan have EXACTLY the same amount of cuts in their "plan" (and MORE), but intend to use those cuts to give more tax breaks to the rich!
Quote:

And then there's Romney:
Quote:

The latest from the Romney campaign is that the President is “robbing” $716 billion from Medicare. I must say, I’m outraged by the bald baloney-slicing Romney is attempting. It goes back to the cover story I wrote about the deaths of my parents. Romney and Ryan want to take the country in the precise opposite direction from sanity when it comes to end of life issues.

the bottom line on the cost reductions in the Romney-Ryan and Obama Medicare packages is pretty much the same. The question is, how do you get there? Romney-Ryan relies on mythology, the notion that a “free” market in Medicare will reduce the costs (and will reduce government spending by $6400 per senior citizen on average in anticipation of these efficiencies). But we’ve had an experiment in private Medicare delivery the past few years. It’s called Medicare Advantage and, as Kate has reported, it costs, on average, 14% more than standard fee-for-service Medicare.

Obama gets his many of his reductions by eliminating the bonuses to private insurers that participate in Medicare Advantage. He would also reduce some payments to hospitals. But the most important reforms in the Affordable Care Act have to do with the wasteful fee-for-service nature of Medicare as it now stands. Obama promotes electronic record keeping and reviews best medical procedures to see what really works and what’s really wasteful. He also encourages medical group practices to see how much money they would save–and allows them to keep some of those savings–if they try a “team” approach where doctors are paid salaries instead of paid for each test and procedure they perform.

It is impossible to know how much these reforms will save. “The Congressional Budget Office didn’t give us very much on the scoring here, since it’s something new,” an Administration Official told me. But the savings could be significant, if the results from the Geisinger Medical group in Pennsylvania are any gauge–a 10% reduction in cost, perhaps. (Of course, Romney would mischaracterize this as a cut).

But the more important consideration here is that the President’s plan is a far more humane way of going about the business of end-of-life medicine, as I found when Geisinger took over, and coordinated, the care of both my parents. As I wrote in June, I was made to feel part of a team, apprised of each new development as my parents declined, without having to chase down and organize the various specialists who’d been treating them. This is the model toward which Obamacare is pointing.

The Republicans hate it. Their answer, which–like supply-side economics–has proven to be an utter failure (see Medicare Advantage above) is to inject market discipline into the process. Let the elderly choose their health plans, let the plans compete for customers. I’m all for market disciplines and choice. It might not be a bad idea to extend the choices that will be part of Obamacare to people up to the age of 75. But there has been zero evidence that markets make much of a difference when it comes to elderly care. And I would have hated to watch my proud, but addled, father trying to make a wise choice in a market that is extremely complicated. (And believe me, he would have insisted on making that choice, even though he couldn’t hold a thought from one moment to the next.)

Maybe it’s because I’ve just been through a very painful experience, but the Republican flummery on this issue hits me harder than any position taken by either party on any other issue. This is a case of common decency. We really need to respect, and care for, our elders–and also our children who will be elderly when many of these reforms are enacted.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
TRUMP AND HIS SUPPORTERS ARE NAZI PEDOPHILES
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:50 - 538 posts
From the Desk of Donald J Trump
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:48 - 292 posts
Israelis protest judiciary reform
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:44 - 4 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:42 - 5675 posts
Obama's attempted Leftist coup of Israel fails. Bibi wins again!
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:42 - 10 posts
Midterms 2026
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:31 - 173 posts
Britain Sux: Baby-stealing doctor was paid $70,000 PER WEEK by the German Nazi Queen of Babylon
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:22 - 4 posts
Israel massacres Israeli death camp
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:06 - 10 posts
And it begins...
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:05 - 20 posts
Clean energy indeed!
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:02 - 4 posts
Taliban winning in Afghanistan
Mon, July 21, 2025 13:02 - 219 posts
MAGA losers
Mon, July 21, 2025 12:55 - 160 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL