REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Low-Skilled Workers Get Raw Deal Under Obamacare

POSTED BY: JONGSSTRAW
UPDATED: Saturday, May 25, 2013 07:35
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1117
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, May 24, 2013 4:31 AM

JONGSSTRAW


http://www.realclearpolitics.com/articles/2013/05/23/low-skilled_worke
d_get_raw_deal_under_obamacare__118516.html



Somebody's lobbyist worked hard for those exceptions. They should have mandated both catastrophic and preventative.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 7:53 AM

REAVERFAN


We can be sure that rightwingers will do everything they can to subvert and ruin any and all aspects of Obamacare, and we'll hear about it through sources like real clear politics.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 8:20 AM

HKCAVALIER


I would rather get my news from a site that doesn't expect its writers to write like asshole forum trolls. Christ, who can even finish reading such an article, who isn't already completely onboard with its hateful premise?

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 12:15 PM

JONGSSTRAW


The Wall Street Journal is a troll site??? That may be what liberal gnomes believe, but normal people consider it a respected and honest source for economic news.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 12:40 PM

HKCAVALIER


Um? When did RCP become the Wall Street Journal? The source you posted says Michael Barone is a political analyst for the Washington Examiner and a contributer to Fox News. WTH, Jongs?



HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 3:05 PM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


RCP quotes the WSJ or the authors of the WSJ piece in about 3 or 4 paragraphs. Jong's implication is that ALL the rest is from WSJ. It would be interesting to get the WSJ piece and compare the 2 word for word, but I'm too lazy for that.

It's heart warming to see the sudden concern of RCP, the WSJ and right wingers in general to suddenly care about low-skilled (and probably low-paid) workers. Couldn't possibly be just blind opposition to anything Obama wants to do. Of course not...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, May 24, 2013 3:56 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Well, to be truthful why not just write "low skilled workers get raw deal under corporations". Because, yanno, the biggest problem that low-skilled workers have is NOT from the gubmint!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, May 25, 2013 7:35 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Bing-go! But it does sicken me. The Republicans played such games around Obamacare, and Obama and the Dems caved at every turn, now we'll start finding out what they hid in it, and it will probably only get worse.

If our government WORKED, like if both parties had the good of the people and the country at heart...yeah, right. I realize Dems/Obama caved left and right because they thought it was better than nothing, and single payer didn't have a snowball's chance in hell, AND they're not like the right, willing to "stand for principle" and flush the baby with the bath water, but my hopes that Obamacare could be improved over time like SSI and Medicare are fast fading.

When one party makes it's sole, entire focus defeating a President and anything, ANYTHING he might agree with, the country and the people are who pay the price. And boy, is we payin'!

It would be amusing if it weren't so sick: In essence, the right was quite happy to go on having us bankrupted by health-insurance companies and let taxpayers foot the bill for the uninsured, so they fought tooth and nail and pretty much stripped Obamacare of all the good stuff it COULD have done, only to make the situation quite possibly WORSE in the end, without coming up with ANYTHING themselves--because, of course, they were quite happy to go on having us bankrupted by health-insurance companies and let taxpayers foot the bill for the uninsured!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, July 30, 2025 00:12 - 5710 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Tue, July 29, 2025 23:29 - 2680 posts
PREDICTIONS THREAD (v.2)
Tue, July 29, 2025 21:29 - 170 posts
Cuomo should thank Mamdani for making him look like the safe, stable choice for NYC mayor
Tue, July 29, 2025 21:28 - 18 posts
No Thread On Topic, More Than 17 Days After Hamas Terrorists Invade, Slaughter Innocent Israelis?
Tue, July 29, 2025 20:52 - 42 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Tue, July 29, 2025 17:20 - 825 posts
The limits of free speech
Tue, July 29, 2025 17:20 - 71 posts
"Russia" is OVER
Tue, July 29, 2025 16:17 - 119 posts
NASA Boeing problems...Outsourcing NASA to Arab Emirates and to INDIA
Tue, July 29, 2025 13:41 - 33 posts
Why does nobody in America use public transport
Tue, July 29, 2025 13:21 - 27 posts
Putin's Russia
Tue, July 29, 2025 11:43 - 86 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Tue, July 29, 2025 11:38 - 187 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL