REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Who will hold Eric Holder accountable?

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 16:06
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 519
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, May 29, 2013 4:06 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

National Journal’s Ron Fournier has been on a Justice Department-accountability tear. At issue: Attorney General Eric Holder intends to meet this week with the Washington bureau chiefs of various news organizations, and word is that the session will be off the record. Fournier doesn’t like the plan:

Ron Fournier@ron_fournier

.@mlcalderone @ErikWemple @DylanByers Takes just 1 chief to declare mtg open and recorded. Let Holder decide whether to leave or be quoted

Ron Fournier @ron_fournier

Re Holder convening bureau chiefs on leak probes: He may ask that meeting be off record. Chiefs should decline, record and report

Ron Fournier @ron_fournier

Takes just 1 chief to declare mtg open and recorded. Let Holder decide whether to leave or be quoted. Don't negotiated. Just file


The Erik Wemple Blog has reached out to top editors at six Washington-centric publications. By posting time, we got feedback from three.


Martin Baron, executive editor of The Washington Post, said, “I prefer that any meeting be on the record. That said, journalists routinely participate in off-the-record sessions, whether they prefer those conditions or not, and then continue to report on events. I am going to this meeting in order to represent our interests as journalists and to raise our concerns. I’ll also listen to what the Attorney General has to say. I trust that our journalists will report on this as vigorously as they would any other subject.”

The New York Times, however, will not participate in the session, said Editor in Chief Jill Abramson. “It isn’t appropriate for us to attend an off-the-record meeting with the attorney general. Our Washington bureau is aggressively covering the department’s handling of leak investigations at this time,” she added.

And Ryan Grim, the Washington bureau chief of the Huffington Post, said, “Off-the-record would not fly. … I don’t need to go in there with a tape recorder and wiretap the meeting. But I imagine I’m free to talk about what’s said in there.”

Talk, perhaps. Publish? That’s another matter. A Justice Department official confirmed to the Erik Wemple Blog that two meetings of Washington bureau chiefs on Thursday and Friday would be off the record. Another round of discussions will pull in media executives and counsel under the same off-the-record ground rules. What it all means is that the folks in attendance can’t emerge from the meeting and write accounts of the meeting’s ins and outs.

Asked why on earth the meeting about media stuff between media people and the government would be off the record, this Justice Department official responded with a statement, on the condition that the official not be named: “This format will best facilitate the candid, free-flowing discussions we hope to have in order to bring about meaningful engagement.”

Not to mention minimal public enlightenment. What will likely happen here is a classic and most absurd game: Attendees at the meeting — both media reps and Justice Department officials — will give rundowns to reporters who were not in attendance, likely on background (i.e., for publication but without their names attached). News pieces will be pieced together on such sourcing. The low point: Reporters could well end up quoting their own bosses as “sources.” A total embarrassment, in other words.

On the bright side, the “off the record” stipulation doesn’t mean that media types cannot discuss the existence of the meeting. Phew!

Here’s the full statement from a Justice Department official on the proceedings:


Attorney General Eric Holder will hold meetings with several Washington bureau chiefs of national news organizations in the next two days as part of the review of existing Justice Department guidelines governing investigations that involve reporters. This review, which was announced by President Obama last Thursday, is consistent with the Attorney General’s long standing belief that protecting and defending the First Amendment is essential to our democracy. These meetings will begin a series of discussions that will continue to take place over the coming weeks. During these sessions, the Attorney General will engage with a diverse and representative group of news media organizations, including print, wires, radio, television, online media and news and trade associations. Further discussions will include news media executives and general counsels as well as government experts in intelligence and investigative agencies.

UPDATE 8:25: The AP is also staying out of the fray, on account of the off-the-record ground rules.



http://www.washingtonpost.com/blogs/erik-wemple/wp/2013/05/29/who-will
-hold-eric-holder-accountable
/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, October 19, 2025 17:17 - 9099 posts
The push for digital ID and CBDC
Sun, October 19, 2025 14:49 - 1 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, October 19, 2025 14:04 - 6155 posts
No Kings protests flop?
Sun, October 19, 2025 13:23 - 73 posts
Soviet Union 2
Sun, October 19, 2025 12:57 - 35 posts
Ellen Page is a Dude Now
Sun, October 19, 2025 12:15 - 280 posts
Watch: CNN Tells Viewers Monkeypox Is Not Sexually-Transmitted
Sun, October 19, 2025 11:58 - 33 posts
The predictions thread
Sun, October 19, 2025 11:45 - 1253 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Sun, October 19, 2025 11:42 - 3641 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Sun, October 19, 2025 11:40 - 210 posts
Botched census count ‘accidentally’ handed Democrats 6 extra House votes
Sun, October 19, 2025 11:34 - 1 posts
Spooky Music Weird Horror Songs...Tis ...the Season...... to be---CREEPY !
Sun, October 19, 2025 09:47 - 67 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL