Quote:

---

US Cites Al Qaeda in Global Terror Alert
State Department's alert stems from the same threat that led to closure of some US embassies.

08/02/2013


http://abcnews.go.com/US/video/us-cites-al-qaeda-global-terror-alert-1
9852043

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
WTF are you talking about? Oh, wait- you don't know either. Nevermind.

---

Quote:

---

But maybe it has to do with the prison breaks in Iraq and Pakistan. Or maybe it has to do with Snowden being granted temporary asylum. What better way to get the public screaming for more surveillance than by jacking up the threat level?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Is it safe yet?

Um...with Barry as Prez...will it ever be safe? Or are doing a scene from "Marthon Man"?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Seriously. If this was such a panic / crisis / BFD, why wait until Sunday to close the embassies ?

And this alert is to last for ALL of August, if not longer ?


( I'm SURE this has zero to do w/ the CNN report on Benghazi, right ? )

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
I've been saying he's the same since six days into his FIRST term.

And I can't stand any of them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
I've been saying he's the same since six days into his FIRST term.

And I can't stand any of them.

---

While far from the same, he DID package himself as the anti- W.

Said he'd close Gitmo in his first year in office. How's that workin out ?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Actually there's a much simpler reason, upon investigation.

They suddenly realized what all those people the CIA was selling guns wanted them for, and that those people didn't like us.

OOPS.

Above all things, I loathe incompetence.

-F

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
SO last time , it was Obama and/or Hillary's fault for doing nothing.

This time, they release a CYA alert, in case something happens, that they seem to think might.

Which after all is what a terror threat level warning IS: We think something might be gonna happen.But you don't like that either.

Just how are they supposed to respond to the "Have you stopped beating your wife yet?" dilemma you put them in? Besides O, Hillary, and John Kerry all resigning from public office and leaving town to go live in a cave somewhere?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
There were warnings a plenty before Benghazi, and no, it wasn't just that it was 9- 11 , or that the compound had previously been attacked.

There was 'chatter', and what'd Hillary do ? Ignore calls for more security, and then " SOMEONE " called off any attempt at all to send in help.

---

Quote:

---

Libyan officials warned Washington D.C. that an attack on the consulate was imminent days before the attack happened according to the documents the Obama admin turned over to satisfy Senate questions regarding "who changed the talking points" on Benghazi.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/03/06/Latest-Benghazi-Scapegoa
t-Now-Press-Officers-Edited-Al-Qaeda-Out-Of-Talking-Points

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Citations WANTED, perhaps, but not needed.

---

Quote:

---

Libyan officials warned Washington D.C. that an attack on the consulate was imminent days before the attack happened according to the documents the Obama admin turned over to satisfy Senate questions regarding "who changed the talking points" on Benghazi.

http://www.breitbart.com/Big-Peace/2013/03/06/Latest-Benghazi-Scapegoa
t-Now-Press-Officers-Edited-Al-Qaeda-Out-Of-Talking-Points

There were multiple advance warnings for such an attack, and this has been gone over many times before. But if you're not going to take my word for it, or any citations I offer, do your own research. But you'll likely believe the spin from Jay Carney ahead of anything else.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
There's nothing wrong w/ Breitbart that isn't every bit as wrong w/ any other source. In fact, they're likely a whole lot better.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:

Quote:

---

Again, you're flat out delusional.

Such are the rantings of those w/ small minds, unable to cope w/ reality. Placing delusions of grandeur or fabricating all manner of fairy tales to tell themselves

you're just another example of the twisted, petty and deranged mind of a Leftist, who feels the need to stalk those with whom they disagree

---

Rap: "I said I'd TRY. ... I'm making an honest effort"

There's a thread you might find very interesting called "Agree or Disagree?" You should give it a listen.

---