REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Stand Your Ground Law May Well Bite The Dust

POSTED BY: SHINYGOODGUY
UPDATED: Wednesday, November 6, 2013 00:08
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1625
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, November 1, 2013 4:25 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


2 cases that will soon dominate the airwaves and internet:

Marissa Alexander and Jordan Davis.

Marissa Alexander, an abused black woman who fired off a warning shot without harming anyone gets 20 years.

Jordan Davis, a 17 year old black student, shot and killed by a white man, Michael Dunn, following an argument over loud music. Fired off 10 shots and tried to flee the scene. Several witnesses stepped up and reported the license plate of his car to the police. He was arrested.

Why arrest and convict a woman who had been battered and abused by her husband when all she did was fire a warning shot. And why would a man flee the scene after firing off 10 shots, then later claim self defense under the Stand Your Ground law. Dunn actually went to his car to retrieve his gun and squeezed off 10 rounds. That's not Stand Your Ground, that's pure hatred.


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 1, 2013 8:54 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Probably not. Neither case is a blow towards 'stand your ground'. Certainly not the first cas...

After Alexander exited the bathroom and re-entered the master bedroom, Gray left the bedroom and headed to the living room where his sons were located. At that point, Alexander left the master bedroom, passing Gray, his two children, and the unobstructed front and back doors of the house on her way to the garage. Once in the garage, she retrieved a handgun from her vehicle’s glove box and then went back into the kitchen, where she “pointed it in the direction of all three [v]ictims.” Although Gray put his hands in the air, Alexander fired the gun, “nearly missing [Gray's] head” and sending a bullet “through the kitchen wall and into the ceiling in the living room.”

Alexander was the aggressor here, and had every opportunity to flee. She did not. It wasn't her house. The ground , wasn't hers to stand.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 1, 2013 3:46 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Speaking of Stand Your Ground, in Florida,
Quote:

Sanity in Florida? George Zimmerman's Town Bans Guns for Neighborhood Watch Volunteers

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - The Florida city where neighborhood watch leader George Zimmerman shot and killed unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin is changing the rules on how civilian patrols can operate to help prevent a recurrence and revive the program's reputation.

The new rules, to be released at a community meeting on November 5 in Sanford, Florida, will state explicitly that residents acting under the authority of neighborhood watch may not carry a firearm or pursue someone they deem suspicious.

"Neighborhood watch was always intended to be a program where you observe what is going on and report it to police. In light of everything that has gone on, that's what we're really going to go back and push. That's what this program is and that's all it is," said Shannon Cordingly, spokeswoman for the Sanford Police Department.

"People in the community are nervous to join a group (neighborhood watch) that was tarnished in the media and got a bad image with everything that happened. We really want to put those fears to rest and get the community going on the program," Cordingly said.

Today's neighborhood groups often are untrained and unsupervised by police, vary in their dedication to the job, and remain unregistered with either the sheriffs' association or local police agencies.

In 2011, when Zimmerman organized a watch group in his gated neighborhood, Sanford police offered a handbook and a presentation by a police volunteer explaining the role of the group in helping deter crime.

Sanford's new rules are laid out in a more detailed handbook and will require neighborhood watch groups to undergo training, register members with the police department and regularly update their status with the department, Cordingly said.

The neighborhood watch program will be overseen by the department's new full-time three-officer community relations unit, she said.

Cordingly said the police department for the first time will map out the locations and keep track of neighborhood watch groups.

She said any neighborhood watch member who violates the rules, including carrying a weapon, will face removal from the program but will not be charged with a crime.

Martin's family in April settled their wrongful death claim for Trayvon's death against The Retreat at Twin Lakes subdivision for what was reportedly at least $1 million. http://news.yahoo.com/florida-city-bans-guns-neighborhood-watch-volunt
eers-170449357--finance.html


Perhaps that will prevent another Zimmerman from taking the law into his own hands...or not.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, November 1, 2013 8:31 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
The new rules, to be released at a community meeting on November 5 in Sanford, Florida, will state explicitly that residents acting under the authority of neighborhood watch may not carry a firearm or pursue someone they deem suspicious.

"Neighborhood watch was always intended to be a program where you observe what is going on and report it to police. In light of everything that has gone on, that's what we're really going to go back and push. That's what this program is and that's all it is," said Shannon Cordingly, spokeswoman for the Sanford Police Department.


Much as it rooks me to agree with a cop on anything, a volunteer neighborhood *watch* shouldn't be packing heat, nor engaging, ever.
Which was my primary issue with that prick Zimmerman to begin with.

Of course, Detroit might be a special case in that their own police force is more of a predator to the citizens than the local criminals, but as a rule if the situation is bad enough to need armed support, using Contracted personnel is a better solution as they usually have a minimum standard of training, solid background checks and better legal defense options if a situation does go south - plus the spiffy uniforms damp down the whole conditioned-response massively overblown hysterical freakout (something I feel contributes to the violence) over someone carrying defensive hardware.

They're not that expensive, as I have previously mentioned there's at least one neighborhood which pays for theirs via taking up a collection and offering trade (one lady launders their uniforms) and so far that's worked out pretty well, and best of all if your Contracted personnel start harrassing the protectees or acting abusive you can FIRE them.
Of course, having to pay someone else to do the job the police won't cause they're too busy chasing those forfeiture dollars and ADDING crime and violence to society via the "War on (some) Drugs" kind of sticks in the craw of a lot of people, leading to the question of why we need em.

While not the best of solutions around here the Contract people strive to keep the peace and prevent a situation from going down, and when it does anyway they pull damage control while the actual LEO people wind up serving a more or less janitorial function, coming in after to clean up the mess and take reports - which is okay, cause hell if I wanna pat people down and haul em off to central booking, I dunno where they been*...

Anyhows, I still put a lot of this one on the homeowners org, they damn well shoulda contracted it, and they KNEW Zim was off his nut and let him run wild anyways, so there's liability there, IMHO.

-Frem

*-This is a running joke between me and the local deputies.
"Did you pat him down ?"
"I ain't touchin him, I dunno where he's BEEN!" *shudder*

They don't seem inclined to let me live that one down any time soon.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 2, 2013 7:22 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


GZ didn't take the law into his own hands, Niki . He defended himself.

Odd, no comments on the FACTS of the case I posted.

Huh.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, November 2, 2013 5:58 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Well given you didn't post any facts and every little bullshit story you tried to sell was quickly and firmly discredited while you were laughed at, why would they ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 2:45 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


True, a neighborhood "watch" should be just that. In New York, we have the Auxiliary Police, who wear uniforms and wear badges - but they carry no weapons and are trained not to engage. They watch and report.

So when I first heard of the Zim case I was surprised to hear that he was packing. It would have been an open and shut case here, but the knee-jerk reactionaries who believe that it's their right to shoot first and ask questions later, feel it's their duty to shoot.

He put himself in harms way.

The Marissa Alexander case: I need to bone up on the particulars, then I'll comment.


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 10:32 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:

Well given you didn't post any facts and every little bullshit story you tried to sell was quickly and firmly discredited while you were laughed at, why would they ?

-F



Learn to read, genius.

( 2nd time posting, for the slower folks on the board )

After Alexander exited the bathroom and re-entered the master bedroom, Gray left the bedroom and headed to the living room where his sons were located. At that point, Alexander left the master bedroom, passing Gray, his two children, and the unobstructed front and back doors of the house on her way to the garage. Once in the garage, she retrieved a handgun from her vehicle’s glove box and then went back into the kitchen, where she “pointed it in the direction of all three [v]ictims.” Although Gray put his hands in the air, Alexander fired the gun, “nearly missing [Gray's] head” and sending a bullet “through the kitchen wall and into the ceiling in the living room.


http://mediatrackers.org/florida/2013/07/16/no-marissa-alexanders-conv
iction-was-not-a-reverse-trayvon-martin-case-in-florida



Sorry Frem, but the twisted, dark fantasy world in which you live does not extend past your small cranium. Please make a note of it.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 11:33 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Yeah, Shiny, that's about the sum total of it.

Since there is NO ABSOLUTE PROOF one way or another, nobody can ever know if Zimmerman "defended himself"--just like "Obama shut down the government", Rap will continue repeating that bullshit until the cows come home. He HAS to; it's the only way to keep himself convinced.

The fact is Zimmerman DID take the law into his own hands...the Stand Your Ground law, for one thing. Given he was told by "the law" to not follow Martin, he took it into his own hands to do so anyway. Given where he lives has banned Neighborhood Watch people from carrying guns, they've made a pretty clear statement on where THEY stand. Given Stand Your Ground is being reconsidered in numerous places, that's yet another statement. What Zimmerman did was show the FLAW of the law, and people are paying attention. Just because a law gets passed doesn't make it a good law, as we've seen hundreds of times.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 12:15 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

Yeah, Shiny, that's about the sum total of it.

Since there is NO ABSOLUTE PROOF one way or another, nobody can ever know if Zimmerman "defended himself"--just like "Obama shut down the government", Rap will continue repeating that bullshit until the cows come home. He HAS to; it's the only way to keep himself convinced.




Actually, there is proof, in the physical evidence, which you oddly ignore.

And it's not BS, in the least. Barry and Reid did shut down the govt by refusing to pass a budget which the House voted on and passed. Pretty straight forward and easy to understand. Even for you.


Quote:



The fact is Zimmerman DID take the law into his own hands...the Stand Your Ground law, for one thing. Given he was told by "the law" to not follow Martin, he took it into his own hands to do so anyway. Given where he lives has banned Neighborhood Watch people from carrying guns, they've made a pretty clear statement on where THEY stand. Given Stand Your Ground is being reconsidered in numerous places, that's yet another statement. What Zimmerman did was show the FLAW of the law, and people are paying attention. Just because a law gets passed doesn't make it a good law, as we've seen hundreds of times.




The Zimmerman case had nothing to do w/ SYG. The 9-1-1 dispatch ( hardly " The law " ) told GZ there was no need to follow Trayvon. YOU have no proof what so ever that GZ failed to comply.

SYG is a perfectly fine law, and should not be changed. It played no part in the tragic death of Trayvon.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 4:47 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
The Zimmerman case had nothing to do w/ SYG. The 9-1-1 dispatch ( hardly " The law " ) told GZ there was no need to follow Trayvon. YOU have no proof what so ever that GZ failed to comply.


No proof other than crime scene photos, shell casings, a dead body and an autopsy you mean ?

So what, Martin was a vampire who grabbed the guy and teleported somewhere else, cause otherwise how else would Zimmerman have been that far from his car and the location he was told to remain at, hmm ?

Unless you have some OTHER bizarre bullshit "explaination" why the incident occured some distance away which involves Zim *not* failing to comply and following Martin.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 4:52 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!




There is no 'b.s.' explanation in the first place, so there can't be ANOTHER one.

The jury heard the evidence, went over it, and gave a verdict.

SYG law had zero to do w/ the case, at all, which is what this thread is all about.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, November 3, 2013 10:44 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
So what, Martin was a vampire who grabbed the guy and teleported somewhere else, cause otherwise how else would Zimmerman have been that far from his car and the location he was told to remain at, hmm ?

Unless you have some OTHER bizarre bullshit "explaination" why the incident occured some distance away which involves Zim *not* failing to comply and following Martin.

-F



Interesting that in this case, it's a citizen's duty to comply with a request by law enforcement. Strange how having to comply with a request by TSA agents makes them tyrannical and legitimate targets for killing.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 5:33 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Huh!?

Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
So what, Martin was a vampire who grabbed the guy and teleported somewhere else, cause otherwise how else would Zimmerman have been that far from his car and the location he was told to remain at, hmm ?

Unless you have some OTHER bizarre bullshit "explaination" why the incident occured some distance away which involves Zim *not* failing to comply and following Martin.

-F



Interesting that in this case, it's a citizen's duty to comply with a request by law enforcement. Strange how having to comply with a request by TSA agents makes them tyrannical and legitimate targets for killing.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 5:54 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Yes, this thread has to do with SYG and it's inevitable repeal. Your comment is that SYG had nothing to do with the Zimmerman case. Of course, the fact that the police mentioned SYG has no bearing whatsoever.

So here's my comment:

Zimmerman claimed self-defense against a kid who had no weapon. He used deadly force (something that cops professionally train for), was told not to follow, and got out of his car despite the fact that the real police were on their way.

If he feared so much for his life, why oh why did he get out of his car?
That would have been my first question to my fellow jurors. He completely ignored the dispatcher and put himself in harm's way. Please explain to me why, if he was in fear for his life, did he get out of the car. It makes no sense. A normal person, in fear of possible bodily harm or threat to life, would stay put and wait for the authorities.

Tell me that a normal sane person, thinking that someone is suspicious and lurking about in the dark looking for trouble, would open the door to his car and think to himself:

"I'm afraid, so I'll get out of my car, follow this potentially bad person around in the dark, and see what happens."

Don't make some shit up. That was his testimony. He spoke clearly. He got out of the car to see where he went and suddenly he (Trayvon) jumped out of a bush (that wasn't there) and attacked him.

So why did he get out of the car and look to see where he went, when he was told not to?

Please enlighten and dazzle me...................


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


There is no 'b.s.' explanation in the first place, so there can't be ANOTHER one.

The jury heard the evidence, went over it, and gave a verdict.

SYG law had zero to do w/ the case, at all, which is what this thread is all about.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 5:58 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


I would like to see that 2011 neighborhood watch handbook. I'm surprised the prosecutors didn't present that into evidence, or did I miss something.


SGG

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Speaking of Stand Your Ground, in Florida,
Quote:

Sanity in Florida? George Zimmerman's Town Bans Guns for Neighborhood Watch Volunteers

ORLANDO, Florida (Reuters) - The Florida city where neighborhood watch leader George Zimmerman shot and killed unarmed black teenager Trayvon Martin is changing the rules on how civilian patrols can operate to help prevent a recurrence and revive the program's reputation.

The new rules, to be released at a community meeting on November 5 in Sanford, Florida, will state explicitly that residents acting under the authority of neighborhood watch may not carry a firearm or pursue someone they deem suspicious.

"Neighborhood watch was always intended to be a program where you observe what is going on and report it to police. In light of everything that has gone on, that's what we're really going to go back and push. That's what this program is and that's all it is," said Shannon Cordingly, spokeswoman for the Sanford Police Department.

"People in the community are nervous to join a group (neighborhood watch) that was tarnished in the media and got a bad image with everything that happened. We really want to put those fears to rest and get the community going on the program," Cordingly said.

Today's neighborhood groups often are untrained and unsupervised by police, vary in their dedication to the job, and remain unregistered with either the sheriffs' association or local police agencies.

In 2011, when Zimmerman organized a watch group in his gated neighborhood, Sanford police offered a handbook and a presentation by a police volunteer explaining the role of the group in helping deter crime.

Sanford's new rules are laid out in a more detailed handbook and will require neighborhood watch groups to undergo training, register members with the police department and regularly update their status with the department, Cordingly said.

The neighborhood watch program will be overseen by the department's new full-time three-officer community relations unit, she said.

Cordingly said the police department for the first time will map out the locations and keep track of neighborhood watch groups.

She said any neighborhood watch member who violates the rules, including carrying a weapon, will face removal from the program but will not be charged with a crime.

Martin's family in April settled their wrongful death claim for Trayvon's death against The Retreat at Twin Lakes subdivision for what was reportedly at least $1 million. http://news.yahoo.com/florida-city-bans-guns-neighborhood-watch-volunt
eers-170449357--finance.html


Perhaps that will prevent another Zimmerman from taking the law into his own hands...or not.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 6:07 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Yes, this thread has to do with SYG and it's inevitable repeal. Your comment is that SYG had nothing to do with the Zimmerman case. Of course, the fact that the police mentioned SYG has no bearing whatsoever.

So here's my comment:

Zimmerman claimed self-defense against a kid who had no weapon. He used deadly force (something that cops professionally train for), was told not to follow, and got out of his car despite the fact that the real police were on their way.



If TM was the aggressor, and jumped GZ, that he didn't have a weapon ( other than his bloodied knuckles ) is irrelevant. If he was going all MMA on GZ, that could be seen as using deadly force as well.


Quote:



If he feared so much for his life, why oh why did he get out of his car?
That would have been my first question to my fellow jurors. He completely ignored the dispatcher and put himself in harm's way. Please explain to me why, if he was in fear for his life, did he get out of the car. It makes no sense. A normal person, in fear of possible bodily harm or threat to life, would stay put and wait for the authorities.

Tell me that a normal sane person, thinking that someone is suspicious and lurking about in the dark looking for trouble, would open the door to his car and think to himself:

"I'm afraid, so I'll get out of my car, follow this potentially bad person around in the dark, and see what happens."

Don't make some shit up. That was his testimony. He spoke clearly. He got out of the car to see where he went and suddenly he (Trayvon) jumped out of a bush (that wasn't there) and attacked him.

So why did he get out of the car and look to see where he went, when he was told not to?

Please enlighten and dazzle me...................


SGG



You're retrying the case, or attempting to, in a thread about SYG.

Why ?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 7:50 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SHINYGOODGUY:
Huh!?

Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
So what, Martin was a vampire who grabbed the guy and teleported somewhere else, cause otherwise how else would Zimmerman have been that far from his car and the location he was told to remain at, hmm ?

Unless you have some OTHER bizarre bullshit "explaination" why the incident occured some distance away which involves Zim *not* failing to comply and following Martin.

-F



Interesting that in this case, it's a citizen's duty to comply with a request by law enforcement. Strange how having to comply with a request by TSA agents makes them tyrannical and legitimate targets for killing.




http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=56614


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 4, 2013 1:44 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Interesting that in this case, it's a citizen's duty to comply with a request by law enforcement. Strange how having to comply with a request by TSA agents makes them tyrannical and legitimate targets for killing.


When did I ever mention duty to comply ?
Zim "passed the buck" by contacting law enforcement and as default security policy when you pass that buck, you PASS it - LEO personnel get very damn annoyed (and I honestly don't blame them) when local security calls them in to handle a situation and then still meddles, it's stupid, tactically unsound and just an all around recipe for disaster.

They gave him good advice, clear instructions - whether or no he had a legal duty in that respect is immaterial, his actions after that point deserve nothing but condemnation.

Worth remembering I do this for a living, folks.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 5, 2013 8:26 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Interesting that in this case, it's a citizen's duty to comply with a request by law enforcement. Strange how having to comply with a request by TSA agents makes them tyrannical and legitimate targets for killing.


When did I ever mention duty to comply ?



"Unless you have some OTHER bizarre bullshit "explaination" why the incident occured some distance away which involves Zim *not* failing to comply and following Martin."

Quote:

Zim "passed the buck" by contacting law enforcement and as default security policy when you pass that buck, you PASS it - LEO personnel get very damn annoyed (and I honestly don't blame them) when local security calls them in to handle a situation and then still meddles, it's stupid, tactically unsound and just an all around recipe for disaster.

They gave him good advice, clear instructions - whether or no he had a legal duty in that respect is immaterial, his actions after that point deserve nothing but condemnation.

Worth remembering I do this for a living, folks.

-F



Maybe I'm just confused by your apparent dicotomy about police, airport security, etc. They're jackbooted tyrannical thugs who deserve to die, but you should follow their advice. I guess that they could be efficient jackbooted tyrannical thugs (sure there's a tvtropes for that somewhere).


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, November 6, 2013 12:08 AM

FREMDFIRMA



When you, of your own free will, call upon those jackbooted thugs to stomp all over a situation for you, and they tell you to stay the fuck out the way (politely, but essentially that), might just behoove you to do exactly that, yes ?

There's quite a few dumbass guards in the ground cause they failed to back off and when the badge bearing horde showed up all trigger happy, got mistaken for the perp and filled with lead.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
The Hill: Democrats and the lemmings of the left
Thu, December 12, 2024 08:05 - 12 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, December 12, 2024 01:38 - 4931 posts
COUP...TURKEY
Wed, December 11, 2024 21:38 - 40 posts
Dana Loesch Explains Why Generation X Put Trump In The White House
Wed, December 11, 2024 21:21 - 7 posts
Alien Spaceship? Probably Not: CIA Admits it’s Behind (Most) UFO Sightings
Wed, December 11, 2024 21:18 - 27 posts
IRAN: Kamala Harris and Biden's war?
Wed, December 11, 2024 19:34 - 18 posts
Countdown Clock Until Vladimir Putins' Rule Ends
Wed, December 11, 2024 19:32 - 158 posts
A.I Artificial Intelligence AI
Wed, December 11, 2024 19:04 - 251 posts
Who hates Israel?
Wed, December 11, 2024 19:02 - 77 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, December 11, 2024 17:59 - 4839 posts
Jesus christ... Can we outlaw the fuckin' drones already?
Wed, December 11, 2024 17:55 - 3 posts
Turkey as the new Iran
Wed, December 11, 2024 17:42 - 45 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL