Quote:

---

The world's only 'married' lesbian threesome are expecting their first child.
Doll, Kitten and Brynn, from Massachusetts, were joined together in a marriage-style ceremony last August and are expecting a daughter in July.
Kitten, 27, is pregnant after undergoing IVF treatment using an anonymous sperm donor, and the trio eventually plan to have three children - one for each of them.

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2611020/Meet-worlds-married-
lesbian-threesome-baby-make-four-July.html#ixzz2zl5f6A3f

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by G:


Yeah, from the Bible!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
The third member of this "marriage" is not legally wed to either of the other two. She was "handfasted," which can count as a legal marriage for two, but not three people.

Whether multiple marriage partners should be legal or not is another discussion.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
The third member of this "marriage" is not legally wed to either of the other two. She was "handfasted," which can count as a legal marriage for two, but not three people.

Whether multiple marriage partners should be legal or not is another discussion.

---

Doll, Kitten and Brynn Young married in a ceremony in August 2013, when each of their fathers walked them down the aisle. All three women wore white wedding gowns and exchanged rings.

The so-called 'throuple' worked with a specialist family lawyer who drew up the paperwork and drafted the ceremony so that all three of them were obligated and bound to each other .

While Brynn and Kitten are legally married, Doll is handfasted to both so the threesome are as equally married to each other as legally possible.


http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2611020/Meet-worlds-married-
lesbian-threesome-baby-make-four-July.html#ixzz2zlDtL8lE

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
Dammit, all the good stuff happens now! To think that I could have married the Belsky twins, both cheerleaders by the way, causes me great consternation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
Your initial post sounded like scorn and derision.

Maybe you were just pointing out the whole "this is gonna complicate things" angle, but it sounded bad.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:



So are you okay with it or not?


If you don't think it's "bad", why did you bring it up?


And please tell us all how this negatively affects you, exactly.


I'll hang up and wait.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Coward.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:


Coward.

---

How so ? I called this, and now it's actually happening.

How does that make YOU feel ? Angry ? Bitter? Upset ?

Why ?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
Yeah, what exactly is your point?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Few years ago, " same sex " marriage wasn't a thing either.

Now it is.

It's funny that some ignore the WEDDING which took place, and the happy THROUPLE ,as it's being called, with their rings and such.

' Nope, didn't happen! NOT MARRIED ! '

OK.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Funny that you ignore that only two of the women are legally married.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:
Yeah, what exactly is your point?

---

That there was such a push to redefine the meaning of 'marriage', that no one stopped to think that it might not end w/ just same sex marriage, but now will include polygamy as well.

Who are we to deny 3 people from sharing their love with each other.

Or 4. Or 7. Or 2 people and their dog.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Or 4. Or 7. Or 2 people and their dog.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Niki2:

Quote:

---

If 7 people and their dog want to dress as in white, exchange rings and declare their love for one another, they can CURRENTLY do that.

---

Yup. Why bother further? Isn't Rap already ridiculous enough for you?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
The third member of this "marriage" is not legally wed to either of the other two. She was "handfasted," which can count as a legal marriage for two, but not three people.

Whether multiple marriage partners should be legal or not is another discussion.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Or 4. Or 7. Or 2 people and their dog.

---

Except the dog can't give consent. Neither can children for that matter.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
The third member of this "marriage" is not legally wed to either of the other two. She was "handfasted," which can count as a legal marriage for two, but not three people.

Whether multiple marriage partners should be legal or not is another discussion.

---

That's racist!! And sexist!! And misogynistic!! We must pass laws and things to protect these victims from disenfranchisement, and stuff! And give them free food and money and healthcare like prostate cancer tests for each of them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Would you recognize it as a marriage ?

Pretty simple point.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by m52nickerson:
Funny that you ignore that only two of the women are legally married.

---

Article says all three are married, there was a ceremony which married all 3, 3 rings were exchanged, and yet you want to deny them the ability to claim they are all married.

Why can't you reppect their wishes ?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I love the childish attempts at insults ( for no apparent reason ) almost as much as I love how oblivious folks here are about the posted story.

2 are married, and the third is as legally bound to each of the married partners as can be managed, at this time. Why ? Why bother w/ legality and such, when, as y'all commonly say here, they could ALREADY go through what ever ceremony they want!

BUT DON'T CALL IT MARRIAGE !

( even though the posted story, and the actual 'trouple', describes it exactly as that - a marriage )

Is none of this sounding even the tiniest bit familar ?


Gay couples can have a civil union, w/ the LEGAL benefits of straight married couples...

THAT'S A MARRIAGE! You BIGOT!!

So, this THREESOME isn't a marriage ?

And it apparently offends some to even TRY to call it that.

Which is exactly what all 3 of them wanted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by AURaptor:
I love the childish attempts at insults ( for no apparent reason ) almost as much as I love how oblivious folks here are about the posted story.

2 are married, and the third is as legally bound to each of the married partners as can be managed, at this time. Why ? Why bother w/ legality and such, when, as y'all commonly say here, they could ALREADY go through what ever ceremony they want!

BUT DON'T CALL IT MARRIAGE !

( even though the posted story, and the actual 'trouple', describes it exactly as that - a marriage )

Is none of this sounding even the tiniest bit familar ?


Gay couples can have a civil union, w/ the LEGAL benefits of straight married couples...

THAT'S A MARRIAGE! You BIGOT!!

So, this THREESOME isn't a marriage ?

And it apparently offends some to even TRY to call it that.

Which is exactly what all 3 of them wanted.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by ElvisChrist:



You still can't answer the questions posed to you:


What impact does it have on YOU, exactly?


What do you care whether 2, 3, or 147 people say they're "married", so long as they are all consenting adults?

---