REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

So, when I hear Iraq is being taken over by I.S.I.S. ...

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Friday, October 10, 2014 20:15
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 11867
PAGE 1 of 3

Thursday, June 12, 2014 10:15 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


This is what comes to my mind -



I'm thinking - " Alright! Iraq, you could do worse. "

And not so much this -



The EVIL splinter cell of al Qaeda, which is too violent for most militant jihadists!

*******

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, which on Tuesday seized control of the Iraqi city of Mosul, has become one of the most powerful terrorist groups in the world. Here are a few details about it.

Q. What is the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?

A. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has been designated by the United States as an international terrorist organization. It operates in Iraq and Syria and has as its goal the establishment of an Islamic caliphate, or state, in the area now occupied by Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. It is also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and sometimes as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria.

Q. What is its relationship to al Qaida?

A. ISIS was once considered an affiliate of al Qaida, but the two groups have broken over ISIS’ role in Syria. Al Qaida has criticized ISIS for being too brutal and has complained that ISIS’ zeal to establish an Islamic state has distracted from the current push to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad. Last year, al Qaida chief Ayman al Zawahiri ordered ISIS’ leader, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, to withdraw his forces from Syria. Baghdadi ignored the order.

Q. Which is more powerful, al Qaida or ISIS?

A. There is no simple answer to that question but ISIS’ recent military victories and its control of a swath of land larger than many countries in the Middle East suggest that its military power, if not its influence, now exceeds al Qaida’s. It has fielded a conventional army that has bested the Iraqi military and has resisted assaults in Syria by al Qaida’s affiliate there, the Nusra Front. While ISIS’ radical philosophy has been denounced by many jihadis as too bloodthirsty, its military success is likely to win it new adherents. Lastly, unlike al Qaida, whose strength is dependent on “affiliates” that operate in different countries, ISIS is centrally controlled.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2014/06/10/3500203/some-answers-about-the-isla
mic.html#storylink=cpy

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 2:00 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Uh oh, Spaghetti-O's!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 3:56 AM

SHINYGOODGUY


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
This is what comes to my mind -



I'm thinking - " Alright! Iraq, you could do worse. "

And not so much this -



The EVIL splinter cell of al Qaeda, which is too violent for most militant jihadists!

*******

The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria, which on Tuesday seized control of the Iraqi city of Mosul, has become one of the most powerful terrorist groups in the world. Here are a few details about it.

Q. What is the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria?

A. The Islamic State of Iraq and Syria has been designated by the United States as an international terrorist organization. It operates in Iraq and Syria and has as its goal the establishment of an Islamic caliphate, or state, in the area now occupied by Iraq, Syria and Lebanon. It is also known as the Islamic State of Iraq and the Levant and sometimes as the Islamic State of Iraq and Greater Syria.

Q. What is its relationship to al Qaida?

A. ISIS was once considered an affiliate of al Qaida, but the two groups have broken over ISIS’ role in Syria. Al Qaida has criticized ISIS for being too brutal and has complained that ISIS’ zeal to establish an Islamic state has distracted from the current push to topple Syrian President Bashar Assad. Last year, al Qaida chief Ayman al Zawahiri ordered ISIS’ leader, Abu Bakr al Baghdadi, to withdraw his forces from Syria. Baghdadi ignored the order.

Q. Which is more powerful, al Qaida or ISIS?

A. There is no simple answer to that question but ISIS’ recent military victories and its control of a swath of land larger than many countries in the Middle East suggest that its military power, if not its influence, now exceeds al Qaida’s. It has fielded a conventional army that has bested the Iraqi military and has resisted assaults in Syria by al Qaida’s affiliate there, the Nusra Front. While ISIS’ radical philosophy has been denounced by many jihadis as too bloodthirsty, its military success is likely to win it new adherents. Lastly, unlike al Qaida, whose strength is dependent on “affiliates” that operate in different countries, ISIS is centrally controlled.

Read more here: http://www.thestate.com/2014/06/10/3500203/some-answers-about-the-isla
mic.html#storylink=cpy



Pretty much like the Tea Party and The Republicans............ha, ha.....

Seriously, let them do each other in. We should butt out and use only drones. Truth be told, they've been going at it for thousands of years, long before America came into existence.

What about terror plots against us? When they finish killing each other off, drop a bomb and be done with it. That will send a message to the rest of the Jihadists. Problem solved!


SGG

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 6:24 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Looks like we're gonna do some airstrikes, but I really think the cows are out of the barn now. Too late.

Obama was more busy w/ airlifing illegal children to red states in the SW to concern himself w/ Iraq.

Remember, al qaeda is 'decimated', and its core leadership is on the run.

( But fret not! Obama will release more soon ! )

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 9:46 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Islam isn't " thousands " of years old.

But that's a minor point .

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 11:31 AM

THGRRI


OK, this is what the Republicans have been saying from the start. It they go back as they did here and start showing clips on what was said to get us into this war there will be no reprieve for those guilty of all the lies. I can see them starting to sweat and the harder they push this onto Obama the more these kinds of tapes should be aired in the news.


http://www.msnbc.com/all-in/watch/john-mccain-told-you-so-279987779524


si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 12:14 PM

THGRRI



A reminder of some of the things said by The Republicans to justify invading Iraq. I look at this along with what I learned about the Middle East, especially in the last decade and I find it hard to blame Obama.

I am watching the experts discuss this amongst themselves. I have no idea at the moment what we should do. This is is a mess.


http://zfacts.com/iraq-war-quotes

Who benefited:

http://readersupportednews.org/news-section2/308-12/16561-focus-cheney
s-halliburton-made-395-billion-on-iraq-war


si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 1:31 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Looks like we're gonna do some airstrikes, but I really think the cows are out of the barn now. Too late.

Obama was more busy w/ airlifing illegal children to red states in the SW to concern himself w/ Iraq.

Remember, al qaeda is 'decimated', and its core leadership is on the run.

( But fret not! Obama will release more soon ! )

You blame the President when you ought to blame Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki. I assume Iraq is NOT the 51st State of the USA.



Iraq's Problems Are Not Ones That America Can Solve
—By Kevin Drum www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2014/06/iraqs-problems-are-not-ones-ame
rica-can-solve

| Thu Jun. 12, 2014 2:56 PM EDT

One of the things that liberals chattered about endlessly in the latter stages of the Iraq War—and which seemed to annoy conservatives just as endlessly—was the simple claim that Iraq's problems were fundamentally political, not military. There would be no lasting peace in Iraq unless and until there was a political accommodation between the Kurds, the Shia, and the Sunni—especially the latter two. Unfortunately, Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki seemed completely uninterested in reaching any sort of genuine power-sharing agreement with the Sunni minority that had ruled Iraq in Saddam's day, and no amount of cajoling from Americans swayed him even a little. Without that, any kind of durable peace in Iraq was out of reach, so it made sense for us to leave in 2011. Why remain when there was little we could do that would truly make a difference?

This is why our withdrawal from Iraq is no more than a tiny peripheral factor in the growing jihadist Sunni rebellion that's overwhelming Iraq right now. Ditto for our reluctance to arm "moderates" in the Syrian civil war. Laying the blame there is mostly just a tired but convenient talking point for the Fox News set and the dwindling but noisy band of unrepentant neocons. Marc Lynch takes up the story from there:

The more interesting questions are about Iraq itself. Why are these cities falling virtually without a fight? Why are so many Iraqi Sunnis seemingly pleased to welcome the takeover from the Iraqi government by a truly extremist group with which they have a long, violent history?

....The most important answers lie inside Iraqi politics. Maliki lost Sunni Iraq through his sectarian and authoritarian policies. His repeated refusal over long years to strike an urgently needed political accord with the Sunni minority, his construction of corrupt, ineffective and sectarian state institutions, and his heavy-handed military repression in those areas are the key factors in the long-developing disintegration of Iraq. In late 2012, protests had swelled across Sunni areas of Iraq, driven by genuine popular anger but backed by many of the political forces now reportedly cooperating with ISIS’s advance (essential background here). The vicious assault on the Huwija protest camp by Iraqi security forces, in the midst of political negotiations, galvanized hostility to the Iraqi state and paved the way for growing popular support for a returning insurgency. Maliki’s heavy-handed security response to the escalating insurgency across Anbar, including the bombardment of Fallujah, has predictably driven more and more Sunnis into their ranks. Maliki’s purges of the Sunni leadership discredited or removed Sunni leaders willing to play the inside game, and pushed some of them toward supporting insurgency. His exclusionary policies, attempts to monopolize power and rough security practices radicalized a Sunni community that might have been brought into the system following the civil war. Iraq’s political class as a whole has done little better.

Lynch offers a few additional thoughts on whether Maliki is likely to change course in the face of the threat from ISIS insurgents. So far, it doesn't seem likely. And as long as that's true, there's little reason that America should get involved in Iraq's ongoing sectarian war yet again.


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 1:47 PM

THGRRI


Thank you, I was too lazy to put that much effort into explaining it all to those who can not read. That sounds harsh but if they could and understood some of the history they would not be so quick to place blame.

Unless to them the facts do not matter?

si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 3:07 PM

THGRRI


New Strategy Vindicates Ex-Army Chief Shinseki

http://www.nytimes.com/2007/01/12/washington/12shinseki.html?_r=0

si shen

I say go ahead to all of you here who think you can criticize this mans service to the United States.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 7:13 PM

JONGSSTRAW


ISIS butchers leave 'roads lined with decapitated police and soldiers'

Battle for Baghdad looms as thousands answer Iraqi government's call to arms as jihadists bear down on capital

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2655977/ISIS-militants-march-B
aghdad-trademark-bullet-head-gets-way-control-north.html




Almost Ba'raq, almost.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 7:21 PM

THGRRI


I guess we never should have went there in the first place. Who's idea was that again? I can't seem to remember.

si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 8:05 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
I guess we never should have went there in the first place. Who's idea was that again? I can't seem to remember.

si shen



Everyone who voted in favor of using force ?


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 8:11 PM

JONGSSTRAW


"I am very optimistic about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You're going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You're going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government." ... Joe Biden

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 8:17 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
"I am very optimistic about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You're going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You're going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government." ... Joe Biden



" If you like your plan, you can keep it.

Period. "

It never ends w/ these folks.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 9:40 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
"I am very optimistic about Iraq. I mean, this could be one of the great achievements of this administration. You're going to see 90,000 American troops come marching home by the end of the summer. You're going to see a stable government in Iraq that is actually moving toward a representative government." ... Joe Biden



Quote:

Auraptor
Everyone who voted in favor of using force ?



The congress did not vote to go into Iraq they voted to give Bush the authority to go. First he needed to exhaust all other venues. He used that vote like a get out of jail free card and headed right in.

Cowards one and all who voted to let the president make the final decision. Even if he had the vote, it was his administration that sold to the country a bunch of garbage to justify going. Then made the judgment to go. It’s all documented.

Joe Biden was speaking to what was going on at the time. What was he supposed to say, he saw this coming if he didn't? It was time to come home and beyond that we were told to leave. Iraq is a sovereign nation and if they say go we have to go.

si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 9:51 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


We've been funding and supporting al Qaida for years, directly when they were blended in with the anti- Soviet "freedom fighters" in Afghanistan, and indirectly through Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

We helped the Saudis and Qataris ship weapons into Libya to topple Qaddafi, then ship the weapons out again to Syria thru Benghazi. The Saudis and Qataris were in something of a race to see who could supply more weapons to al Qaida in Syria (thru Turkey). We provided political cover - painting the jihadists as "rebels" who only wanted "democracy", and provided military training in Jordan. I posted about this many months ago.

Now that al Qaida is being forced out Syria, thanks to Assad, they're finding a new home in Iraq.

You can't arm and supply a bunch of wild-eyed fanatics, point them in the direction you want them to go, and then think you're going to stuff them back in the bottle once you're done with them. Our "realpolitik" has come back to bite us in the ass... again. We should be more careful who we choose as our friends and allies. I think we're fortunate that the blowback hasn't been worse.

BTW-
What does shi shen mean?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 10:27 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
We've been funding and supporting al Qaida for years, directly when they were blended in with the anti- Soviet "freedom fighters" in Afghanistan, and indirectly through Saudi Arabia and Qatar.

We helped the Saudis and Qataris ship weapons into Libya to topple Qaddafi, then ship the weapons out again to Syria thru Benghazi. The Saudis and Qataris were in something of a race to see who could supply more weapons to al Qaida in Syria (thru Turkey). We provided political cover - painting the jihadists as "rebels" who only wanted "democracy", and provided military training in Jordan. I posted about this many months ago.

Now that al Qaida is being forced out Syria, thanks to Assad, they're finding a new home in Iraq.

You can't arm and supply a bunch of wild-eyed fanatics, point them in the direction you want them to go, and then think you're going to stuff them back in the bottle once you're done with them. Our "realpolitik" has come back to bite us in the ass... again. We should be more careful who we choose as our friends and allies. I think we're fortunate that the blowback hasn't been worse.

BTW-
What does shi shen mean?



First when you are referring to giving arms to those in Afghanistan who were fighting the Soviets. They were not quite Al Qaida yet. Not even close.

Yes we helped topple Qaddafi. That was a good thing despite what you believe. The rest of what you say is no more than unsubstantiated ramblings.

Shi shen means reaper in Chinese as far as I can tell.


si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 10:29 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Best interest for Barry to keep his planned tee time then, huh ?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 10:45 PM

JONGSSTRAW


There are thousands of Americans in Baghdad, and thousands of Iraqis that work with those Americans. They're all in fear for their lives and they all want to get out now. Al Qaeda is an hour away and armed with captured American weapons that used to belong to the Iraqi Army.

President Obumfuck didn't lift a finger to save Fallujah or Mosul or Tikrit from the jihadist slaughter. Now he's flown to California to play golf, as Baghdad is about to be encircled. His advisers are briefing him and Susan Rice on how they're gonna blame a Tawney Kitaen-Whitesnake video for the Baghdad genocide. And then Hillary will say "What difference does it make now?"

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, June 13, 2014 11:43 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


I wonder - for all our spying and snooping into intl emails and telephony, did our intelligence agencies not see this coming?

And - hmmm. Very short-sighted to think that what happens in Iraq stays in Iraq. It's exactly that short-sighted thinking that had you shitting bricks on 9/11.



OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 2:20 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

First when you are referring to giving arms to those in Afghanistan who were fighting the Soviets. They were not quite Al Qaida yet. Not even close.
Please carefully read what I wrote.

First of all, the Afghanis that we gave arms to called themselves "mujahideen" or "jihadists". These mujahideen eventually became warlords. However, fighting with the mujahideen (and using some of the same shoulder -fired Stinger missiles that we gave them) were...
Quote:

Many Muslims from other countries assisted the various mujahideen groups in Afghanistan. Some groups of these veterans became significant players in later conflicts in and around the Muslim world. Osama bin Laden, originally from a wealthy family in Saudi Arabia, was a prominent organizer and financier of an all-Arab Islamist group of foreign volunteers; his Maktab al-Khadamat funnelled money, arms, and Muslim fighters from around the Muslim world into Afghanistan, with the assistance and support of the Saudi and Pakistani governments.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mujahideen

Osama bin Laden in Afghanistan fighting the Soviets


Quote:

Yes we helped topple Qaddafi. That was a good thing despite what you believe.
Well. We took a secular, stable, prosperous nation where women had equal rights and people were educated and turned it into a clusterfuck of poverty, factional fighting and jihadism. You're right- that was a GREAT thing! [/snark]

Quote:

The rest of what you say is no more than unsubstantiated ramblings.
I substantiated all that with my first posts. I'm not about to do it all over again just for you. But hre is something of more recent vintage

Quote:

US Weapons for Al Qaeda: Saudi Arabia to Supply Syria Terrorists with Anti-Aircraft Missiles

http://www.globalresearch.ca/wsj-report-saudi-arabia-to-supply-us-paid
-syrian-insurgents-with-anti-aircraft-missiles/5368960


Also
Quote:

After the Benghazi attack, there were public reports of Libyan arms, including these types of anti-aircraft missiles, being smuggled to the Syrian resistance fighting Bashar Assad’s regime.

On September 14, 2012, three days after Stevens was killed, Sheera Frenkel, a correspondent for the Times of London, reported from Antakya, Turkey:

A Libyan ship carrying the largest consignment of weapons for Syria since the uprising began has docked in Turkey and most of its cargo is making its way to rebels on the front lines, The Times has learnt.

Among more than 400 tonnes of cargo the vessel was carrying were SAM-7 surface-to-air anti-aircraft missiles and rocket-propelled grenades (RPGs), which Syrian sources said could be a game-changer for the rebels.



http://www.nationalreview.com/article/349231/%5Btitle-raw%5D-jim-gerag
hty/page/0/3


If you don't believe me, you can look it up for yourself. If you don't look it up for yourself, you can remain in ignorance.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:57 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Yanno, it occurs to me.... the occupation of Iraq by ISIS ... this might BE Obama's foreign policy. I know that the admin was never too enthralled by Prime Minister al-Maliki, who refused to sign an agreement of forces (I believe it's called), which would have allowed a residual US force in Iraq. That's ONE way to dump an uncooperative foreign leader... bring in the replacements! I think what will happen is that in effect Iraq will be partitioned, except rather than being partitioned into three (Kurds in the north, Sunnis in the center and Shias in the south) the north (and its oil) will be taken over by the Sunni ISIS. With all of the attendant blood-letting.

SO don't expect Obama to do much about this; as awful as it looks, it's prolly all part of the plan.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:47 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Yanno, it occurs to me.... the occupation of Iraq by ISIS ... this might BE Obama's foreign policy. I know that the admin was never too enthralled by Prime Minister al-Maliki, who refused to sign an agreement of forces (I believe it's called), which would have allowed a residual US force in Iraq. That's ONE way to dump an uncooperative foreign leader... bring in the replacements! I think what will happen is that in effect Iraq will be partitioned, except rather than being partitioned into three (Kurds in the north, Sunnis in the center and Shias in the south) the north (and its oil) will be taken over by the Sunni ISIS. With all of the attendant blood-letting.

SO don't expect Obama to do much about this; as awful as it looks, it's prolly all part of the plan.



SIGNYM if you go into each case scenario looking for something you will find it through imagined fantasies. You have the unfortunate habit of letting your conspirist side dictate what the information you gleam means. If you expect foul play by this country (as you appear to do) you will see it. Real or illusory.

si shen

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:21 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


The reason why I see foul play by this country - like shipping arms to al Qaida in Libya and Syria - is because we do it so often.

AFA ISIS (or ISIL) is concerned, we'll know which way their flag blows by observing whether or not they attack Israel or Saudi Arabia itself. Because that's one thing the original al Qaida never did... attack Israel or Saudi Arabia.

Since ISIS didn't attack Israel while they were in Syria (and Syria shares a border with Israel)


I don't see that ISIS would attack Israel even less conveniently from Iraq. But this issue needs kept in mind for observation. It would be interesting if Iraq is de fact divided, and if Israel and Saudi Arabia remain unmolested. I would take it at that point to be strong evidence that ISIS is a convenient tool of USA foreign policy.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:30 AM

THGRRI


SIGNYM you clam we do things without prof and or misrepresent, why we do what we do. I think the world is too complicated for you to grasp. Why do I say that? Because your approach to why this or that is being done never changes, while what is being done and why is always in flux.

si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 11:30 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Siggy, Medusa's older uglier sister, slithers along on her slimy belly right into the unwashed arms of the terrorists she loves so dearly.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:02 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I think the world is too complicated for you to grasp
And yet, you're the one who reduces the world to the simple concept of USA good, everyone else bad, who refuses to encounter our history, and who also refuses to consider various alternatives and explanations. For example, the idea that ISIS may be a tool of our foreign policy... I put that out as an idea, not a conclusion, but I also added what I think we could be looking for in terms of evidence. I'm sorry, child, but the person who seems to want to keep things simple is you.

Quote:

Because your approach to why this or that is being done never changes, while what is being done and why is always in flux.
The reason WHY the USA does this or that hasn't really changed in the past 20 years; it's all about "full spectrum dominance" and total world control.

But if you think I'm harsh about the USA, you should ask me sometime what I think about China and Russia. I can be pretty critical of them too.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:13 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

I think the world is too complicated for you to grasp
And yet, you're the one who reduces the world to the simple concept of USA good, everyone else bad, who refuses to encounter our history, and who also refuses to consider various alternatives and explanations. For example, the idea that ISIS may be a tool of our foreign policy... I put that out as an idea, not a conclusion, but I also added what I think we could be looking for in terms of evidence. I'm sorry, child, but the person who seems to want to keep things simple is you.



Actually that is what you do. Ignore everyone else, USA bad. Reread what you post. It is right there to see.

si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:16 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I added more to my post about China and Russia. I have criticisms of them, too- particularly China. But we weren't talking about China or Russia in this thread.

And the point remains that... the point remains... about the Saudi's and our support of al Qaida, and whether ISIS is our tool or a real splinter group that even the Saudi Royal family should worry about. (You see? I can be critical of Saudi Arabia too! )

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:19 PM

THGRRI


SIGNYM: I will post this in both threads we are currently debating in and call it a day as far as you and I are concerned in these two threads. We can do battle when something new arises.

Loved it buddy.


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 12:29 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Indeed, real life calls.

Not to make light of the situation, but here is a group of people who are, if anything, even more cynical than I am.

Read the comments, they're a hoot!

http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2014-06-13/gruesome-footage-isis-atrocit
ies-reveals-al-qaeda-jihadists-will-stop-nothing

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 1:01 PM

THGRRI


George H.W. Bush leaps in to bolster GOP in Georgia Senate race:

Way ta go George!

http://www.trbimg.com/img-539bbebb/turbine/la-pn-george-bush-georgia-s
enate-nunn-20140613-001/600


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 6:27 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
There are thousands of Americans in Baghdad, and thousands of Iraqis that work with those Americans. They're all in fear for their lives and they all want to get out now. Al Qaeda is an hour away and armed with captured American weapons that used to belong to the Iraqi Army.

President Obumfuck didn't lift a finger to save Fallujah or Mosul or Tikrit from the jihadist slaughter. Now he's flown to California to play golf, as Baghdad is about to be encircled. His advisers are briefing him and Susan Rice on how they're gonna blame a Tawney Kitaen-Whitesnake video for the Baghdad genocide. And then Hillary will say "What difference does it make now?"






" Boy, this job sure does suck, but someone has to do it ! "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 6:49 PM

THGRRI


Please do not beat me with a big stick but……..

They did the same thing to Bush as he golfed during both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. It too goes with the job.


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 7:26 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
There are thousands of Americans in Baghdad, and thousands of Iraqis that work with those Americans. They're all in fear for their lives and they all want to get out now. Al Qaeda is an hour away and armed with captured American weapons that used to belong to the Iraqi Army.

President Obumfuck didn't lift a finger to save Fallujah or Mosul or Tikrit from the jihadist slaughter. Now he's flown to California to play golf, as Baghdad is about to be encircled. His advisers are briefing him and Susan Rice on how they're gonna blame a Tawney Kitaen-Whitesnake video for the Baghdad genocide. And then Hillary will say "What difference does it make now?"






" Boy, this job sure does suck, but someone has to do it ! "


And what of Baghdad? I'm wrong?

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 7:28 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Yanno, it occurs to me.... the occupation of Iraq by ISIS ... this might BE Obama's foreign policy."

I agree, the thing to look for is patterns of attack and restraint.




OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 9:11 PM

REAVERFAN


I suppose some of you are old enough to remember what happened when we left Vietnam?

Wars for profit don't leave countries in better shape.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:02 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


G, wow you must really have a grudge against me. Apparently, so much so that you can't even read straight!
Quote:

Yanno, it occurs to me.... the occupation of Iraq by ISIS ... this might BE Obama's foreign policy.-Signy

And in Syria too? All to get Maliki out? Lot of trouble for something that a check with a lot of zeros could fix in a day. Or fewer zeros and an accident. I think the worst part is how you marginalize the ISIS by assuming they can't be a real group, full of their own will and self determination, that they could only exist to do our bidding. That seems rather single and self-centric. You could be in the US foreign service (the one you hate) with thinking like that.-G



You missed the part where I said
Quote:

For example, the idea that ISIS may be a tool of our foreign policy... I put that out as an idea, not a conclusion, but I also added what I think we could be looking for in terms of evidence.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, June 14, 2014 10:24 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Please do not beat me with a big stick but……..

They did the same thing to Bush as he golfed during both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. It too goes with the job.


si shen





One GINORMOUS difference... Bush stopped playing golf, while Obama has played more golf than any President - ever.

And he's teeing it up again this weekend. Again.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 11:37 AM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by THGRRI:
Please do not beat me with a big stick but……..

They did the same thing to Bush as he golfed during both the Afghanistan and Iraq wars. It too goes with the job.


si shen





One GINORMOUS difference... Bush stopped playing golf, while Obama has played more golf than any President - ever.

And he's teeing it up again this weekend. Again.



You know I think I remember that? Still, I felt the pressure he was under demanded a few rounds of golf. I also liked his father and what better advisor, so being out there with him would be a good thing.

si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 1:34 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

I have a small forum grudge against smart people who have wonky ideas.
Tant pis

Quote:

I did see you qualify your idea. I thought that was a hedge though, that over under [???] you believed it more than not. I know what we did in Afghanistan. I believe we'll go to some very extreme lengths to foil Russia. But all this [just] to depose Maliki? Wild idea.
Maliki isn't the sum total of the Iraq government. There is the Parliament, the army, the judiciary which are dominated by Shias. By sending in a new (Sunni) army, Saudi Arabia gets a whole new do-over. It makes sense from the Saudi POV. And all of those Saudi and Qatari arms shipments to al Qaida in Libya and al Qaida in Syria are real, consequential events. Did ISIS (funded and armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar) wind up in Iraq on purpose, or was this accidental? This is an idea that bears further observation.

Just a comment here:

The USA government is a master of creating set-pieces, and the people are masters of being fooled. I thought the Gulf of Tonkin incident smelled fishy, even back then. The first invasion of Iraq... another set-piece. The second invasion of Iraq... clearly another set-piece: the ridiculous assertions, the moving goalposts, the ever-increasing demands (by the west), the whipping up of the population into a frenzy of fear. Panama- according to that set-piece, Noriega was a major drug runner. Well, Noriega was deposed, and the flow of drugs... from Colombia, where they'd always been coming from... never slowed down. So much for that! Grenada- another set-piece. Libya- yet another set piece, this one about the Arab Spring and how Qaddafi was brutally killing freedom-loving people and small children. It was all fake. Ukraine- yet another set-piece about how those horrible Russians are attempting a land-grab.

People don't seem to realize that our government .. yours too, and Russia, and China... think nothing of making shit up whole cloth. In response to the first thought that comes to mind for most people ...But... but.. they wouldn't DO that! the answer is... Oh yes they will. They already have.

It never fails- pure fiction is being pushed and swallowed as "credible ideas". It seems that people would rather swallow familiar poison than be free thinkers. And when they hear an idea that doesn't fit in with the official narrative, they call it "wonky" and dismiss it.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 2:16 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

I have a small forum grudge against smart people who have wonky ideas.
Tant pis

Quote:

I did see you qualify your idea. I thought that was a hedge though, that over under [???] you believed it more than not. I know what we did in Afghanistan. I believe we'll go to some very extreme lengths to foil Russia. But all this [just] to depose Maliki? Wild idea.
Maliki isn't the sum total of the Iraq government. There is the Parliament, the army, the judiciary which are dominated by Shias. By sending in a new (Sunni) army, Saudi Arabia gets a whole new do-over. It makes sense from the Saudi POV. And all of those Saudi and Qatari arms shipments to al Qaida in Libya and al Qaida in Syria are real, consequential events. Did ISIS (funded and armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar) wind up in Iraq on purpose, or was this accidental? This is an idea that bears further observation.

Just a comment here:

The USA government is a master of creating set-pieces, and the people are masters of being fooled. I thought the Gulf of Tonkin incident smelled fishy, even back then. The first invasion of Iraq... another set-piece. The second invasion of Iraq... clearly another set-piece: the ridiculous assertions, the moving goalposts, the ever-increasing demands (by the west), the whipping up of the population into a frenzy of fear. Panama- according to that set-piece, Noriega was a major drug runner. Well, Noriega was deposed, and the flow of drugs... from Colombia, where they'd always been coming from... never slowed down. So much for that! Grenada- another set-piece. Libya- yet another set piece, this one about the Arab Spring and how Qaddafi was brutally killing freedom-loving people and small children. It was all fake. Ukraine- yet another set-piece about how those horrible Russians are attempting a land-grab.

People don't seem to realize that our government .. yours too, and Russia, and China... think nothing of making shit up whole cloth. In response to the first thought that comes to mind for most people ...But... but.. they wouldn't DO that! the answer is... Oh yes they will. They already have.

It never fails- pure fiction is being pushed and swallowed as "credible ideas". It seems that people would rather swallow familiar poison than be free thinkers. And when they hear an idea that doesn't fit in with the official narrative, they call it "wonky" and dismiss it.






A. What are you suggesting signym Saudi Arabia is behind this? That is what it looks like.

Quote:


By sending in a new (Sunni) army, Saudi Arabia gets a whole new do-over. It makes sense from the Saudi POV.



B. You suggest here Saudi and Qatari arms shipments are purposely being given to Al Qaeda in Libya and Syria. I would like some proof of that please. Or is this just conjecture.

Quote:



And all of those Saudi and Qatari arms shipments to al Qaeda in Libya and al Qaeda in Syria are real, consequential events.



C. You seem to be implying something, what? Reading you’re other posts with this one I know what it is but I would like to hear it from you.

Quote:



Did ISIS (funded and armed by Saudi Arabia and Qatar) wind up in Iraq on purpose, or was this accidental? This is an idea that bears further observation.



D. Please explain what it is you are saying and what the Gulf of Tonkin has to do with any of this.

Quote:


The USA government is a master of creating set-pieces, and the people are masters of being fooled. I thought the Gulf of Tonkin incident smelled fishy, even back then.



E. What again does this have to do with what is going on in Iraq?

Quote:


Panama- according to that set-piece, Noriega was a major drug runner.



F. You are pulling incidents now from everywhere with no context and interjecting them into a discussion about Iraq and terrorists.

Quote:


Panama- according to that set-piece, Noriega was a major drug runner.
this one about the Arab Spring and how Qaddafi was brutally killing freedom-loving people and small children



G. You’re all over at this point and I see no reason to continue.

Quote:


Ukraine- yet another set-piece about how those horrible Russians are attempting a land-grab.



I’m no expert but I think this shows a subjective approach don’t you?


In stories, newspapers, and the spoken word, people all over the world are trying to convince you to think as they do. They are bombarding you with facts and figures, opinions and projections. It is up to you to create order within this chaos and find the patterns that will help you to understand what is true, what could be true, and what is outright false.

That didn’t take long. You like to post subjectively and then bitch when I answer objectively. I hope in the future when everyone see this kind of posting they call you on it. Time for 1kiki to show up.


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 3:39 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

A. What are you suggesting Saudi Arabia is behind this? That is what it looks like.
What I'm suggesting is that Saudi Arabia might be partially behind this, or at least reacting postively. Saudi Arabia does have regional ambitions, yes.

Quote:

B. You suggest here Saudi and Qatari arms shipments are purposely being given to Al Qaeda in Libya and Syria. I would like some proof of that please. Or is this just conjecture.
I posted link to the articles when I first brought this up several months ago, as the other posters here should remember. I just posted more links yesterday, in this very thread, right under the picture of Osama bin Laden fighting the Soviets in Afghanistan. I'm not going to keep posting links ad infinitum. Look it up yourself.

Quote:

C. You seem to be implying something, what? Reading you’re other posts with this one I know what it is but I would like to hear it from you.
What I'm saying is that Qatar and Saudi Arabia shipped weapons... I don't mean a few AK-47s here and there, but literally dozens of plane loads and tons of arms shipped on boats. That's what I'm saying.

As far as the remainder of my post, where I reference the whoppers that various administrations foisted on people ... I thought my point was rather clear- don't accept ideas just because they're commonly-held and found in mainstream media, and don't dismiss them because they're out of the mainstream. Just try and fit ideas to facts.

In other words, I'm making the same point that you are
Quote:

In stories, newspapers, and the spoken word, people all over the world are trying to convince you to think as they do. They are bombarding you with facts and figures, opinions and projections. It is up to you to create order within this chaos and find the patterns that will help you to understand what is true, what could be true, and what is outright false.
The difference between you and me is that I reference facts while you like to get personal.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 4:18 PM

THGRRI



BEIRUT, Lebanon — "The fevered struggle between Saudi Arabia and Iran for regional dominance has for years aggravated nearly every conflict across the Middle East as the two nations armed, funded and encouraged each other’s adversaries". I agree with this. I am not familiar with your link so here is mine.

http://www.nytimes.com/2014/06/07/world/middleeast/as-iran-gains-influ
ence
-

What I do not agree with is your assertions about what is being done, by who and why. You come off as making things up to suit your purpose.

You say Qatar and Saudi Arabia shipped weapons into Syria. Yes, they have and still are. It is what you imply about them giving them to Al Qaeda at our behest that I contest. You posted a comment about Al Maliki that was dead on. Then you also suggested this was why we may behind the terrorists going into Iraq, and that is what disillusions me. When you know you are being outrageous you include the word “maybe”. You always go a thought to far and betray yourself as biased.

Quote:


As far as the remainder of my post, the own where I reference the whoppers that various administrations foisted on people



I could post facts and then take them out of context as well. I choose not to do so. You do it all the time. I could go back through your old posts and show how you do this constantly. I choose not to. I will just use the burning of the Royal Chinese Fleet as an example and leave it at that. All you had to do was come back and say bad example, but instead you and your friend doubled down.

As I said. I think you are a very sharp person. Perhaps smarter or even much smarter than I am. It is your preconceived opinions that distorts your truths and leaves you wide open to criticism.


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 5:02 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


The US has a repeated and well-known history of faking reasons to get into undeclared wars it was already determined to engage in. I'm not sure how those historical facts are not relevant to this particular situation. Unless you can show why THIS TIME it's different, having done it multiple times in the past, it must be a consideration that it's doing it now.



OONJERAH - We are too dumb to live and smart enough to wipe ourselves out.
"You, who live in any kind of comfort or convenience, do not know how these people can survive these things, do you? They will endure because there is no immediate escape from endurance. Some will die, the rest must live."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 15, 2014 5:05 PM

THGRRI


Exactly what you always do. Talk to the hand I'm not interested in debating nonsense with you.




“1kiki, you magnificent bastard! I read your book! ”

si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2014 9:23 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

is that you seem to totally dismiss that ISIS could be just what it looks like it is, that the only way to explain them is to look for a hidden agenda, or a US agenda, that they can't just be what there have been for thousands of years in the Middle East - sectarian violence.
It could be just what it appears to be. How many times do I have to repeat that? Are you unused to people tossing out ideas for discussion without necessarily being 100% for them? That would be unusual for this forum- most people here are 100% behind whatever they post. But that's not the case in this thread. So do you suppose you could get off the topic of how I "seem" to you, and perhaps on to the topic of how we could demonstrate this one way or another?

Whatever it is we're looking at, it has to be big enough not to hide- we can't depend on WILKILEAKS to cough up secret communiques for us!

So I came up with two possible ideas... that if ISIS doesn't attack Israel or Saudi Arabia itself- then it is still following the underlying rules of al Qaida. Another potential piece of evidence is how the USA responds... if our government does not engage in robust pushback, and/or does not ask Iran for help... then perhaps this is another piece of evidence that ISIS is not entirely unwelcome.

But whatever ISIS is, it got a big boost directly from Saudi Arabia, and a boost from the USA either directly (assistance with shipping arms from Libya to Syria) or indirectly in the form of tacit approval. Those tons of weapons propelled ISIS into much greater effectiveness than they would have had otherwise. They could be like the mujahideen in Afghanistan, biting the hands that fed them

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2014 10:18 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Muslims killing Muslims ... does it get any better than this? And with thousands of them being summarily machine-gunned, and hundreds of 'em getting their heads chopped off, it's almost as good as the years of Syrian carnage or the season 4 finale of Game Of Thrones. Can't wait for the Iranians to start killing the Sunni ISIS so we'll at least have a little balance to the glorious spectacle.

Hey Obama, good plan ... Thanks! But don't you dare go all Nobel Prize humanitarian mushy now and interfere with this. Stay on the golf course.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 16, 2014 12:21 PM

THGRRI


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

But whatever ISIS is, it got a big boost directly from Saudi Arabia, and a boost from the USA either directly (assistance with shipping arms from Libya to Syria) or indirectly in the form of tacit approval. Those tons of weapons propelled ISIS into much greater effectiveness than they would have had otherwise. They could be like the mujahideen in Afghanistan, biting the hands that fed them



To think that ISIS is sanctioned by the United States is nuts plain and simple. Don’t give me this I said maybe bullshit. They are an offshoot of Al Qaeda. An offshoot of the worst kind. Why then not go right after them? Because they are aligned with the Sunnis in the area who have been mistreated by the Maliki government. If we just start killing them it will create more enemies for us. We need to think long term. What Obama is saying to Malaki is too fix this. Get the Sunni’s, Shiites and Kurds together and make a more representative government. We wish to help but you must fix what started this in the first place or going after them will do little more than start a civil war. (We may be stuck with that)

You in your ultimate wisdom suggest Obama is using this to somehow get the Malaki government to do his bidding. Maybe? Again, asinine because you imply that, that bidding is different from what Obama speaks of. Again, he wants the Malaki government to bring the Sunni’s into discussions and give them more representation. Your suggesting anything else is nuts.

You say we are supplying ISIS with weapons. (either directly or indirectly) Haven’t you heard all the criticisms of Obama holding back too much with Syria? Haven’t you heard the press conferences where he suggests he is doing so because he can’t guarantee the weapons won’t fall into the wrong hands? This is an incredibly hard situation to navigate. What are you reading that gives you such a distorted reality? Or are you not reading but just browsing for cut and paste ideas that fit your narrative?

Something else to consider. Going after ISIS without discrimination and not confronting Maliki will be seen by the Sunni as an attack against all Sunni. They will see it as us taking the side of the Shiites, in what is happening currently all around the Middle East; a Sunni, Shiites war. Being perceived by either side as picking a side would be disastrous.

You need to look up at the bigger picture signym or you will miss what is really going on. Again what you speak of is maybe’s, what if’s, and could be’s. Your focus is on a blade of grass in a field of wheat. The rest comes from your imagination.


si shen



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:42 - 4886 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, December 4, 2024 13:16 - 4813 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:37 - 427 posts
Pardon all J6 Political Prisoners on Day One
Wed, December 4, 2024 12:31 - 7 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, December 4, 2024 07:25 - 7538 posts
My Smartphone Was Ruining My Life. So I Quit. And you can, too.
Wed, December 4, 2024 06:10 - 3 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Tue, December 3, 2024 23:31 - 54 posts
Vox: Are progressive groups sinking Democrats' electoral chances?
Tue, December 3, 2024 21:37 - 1 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:35 - 962 posts
Trump is a moron
Tue, December 3, 2024 20:16 - 13 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, December 3, 2024 11:39 - 6941 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Mon, December 2, 2024 21:22 - 302 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL