Quote:

---

“In commenting on this important bill, I stated that I was not comfortable with the definition of ‘affirmative consent’ that was being used because it left room for misinterpretation,” Bocchino said in a statement. “Some of my colleagues, both Republicans and Democrats had shared similar reservations in the committee discussion. In a sarcastic remark I referenced a situation where more than two people might be present at an intimate encounter where the point of consent was reached as ‘some kind of party.’ It was an unfortunate phrase to use because it was misconstrued by some who apparently wanted to undermine my support for this important legislation.”

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by Wishimay:
http://www.washingtonpost.com/news/post-nation/wp/2015/03/26/gay-right
s-groups-criticize-indiana-religious-liberties-law/?wprss=rss_homepage
You guys have seen this one right?

---