REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

GOOGLE: THE HALLIBURTON OF THE OBAMA ERA

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 20, 2013 09:15
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 762
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 7:07 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Nestled among the lofty rhetoric of “hope and change,” Barack Obama made a core promise during the 2008 campaign that he would put an end to the corporate cronyism that has long pervaded the political system. “The days of sweetheart deals for Halliburton will be over when I’m in the White House," he proclaimed.

What President Obama left out however, was that the days of sweetheart deals for his cronies had only just begun–with his chief corporate advocate, Google, quickly emerging as the Halliburton of his administration. Fortunately, Attorney General Greg Abbott has taken a firm stand on behalf of the citizens of Texas to hold the Internet giant accountable.

Though Google recently faced serious federal antitrust charges that might have broken up other companies, it emerged virtually unscathed just two months after President Obama won re-election with significant financial and creative assistance from the company and its executives.

Under Abbott’s leadership, Texas was the first state to step up when the Federal Trade Commission failed to do its job at the national level. The failure to hold Google accountable to federal laws and regulations enforced on competitors has made the Texas-led probe all the more critical. After investigating Google’s practices for nearly 3 years, Abbott spearheaded a five state probe into the company’s practices, with California, Ohio, New York, and Oklahoma following Texas’ lead.


An investigation by the FTC found that Google illegally manipulated search results to favor its own products, scraping content from other websites without any provision allowing those with objections to opt-out, and imposing restrictions that prevent portability of search advertising campaigns across AdWords and other platforms.

While the company was under investigation, however, they contributed $25,000 to honor the FTC Chairman Jon Leibowitz. Unfortunately this is not the first time Google donated money to recognize top regulators while in the midst of a government investigation. According to a recent Bloomberg report, in October 2011, Google spent $80,000 to honor Federal Communication Commission Chairman Julius Genachowski and Commissioner Michael Copps, despite an ongoing investigation into Google’s Street View product.

The result of Google’s questionable lobbying efforts: the Internet giant walked away from the federal case with a non-binding "handshake" agreement in which it says it will make minor changes to some of its search functions. Moreover, there is no way for the FTC or any other agency to enforce the terms of the agreement should Google decide not to comply. When the federal government refuses to step in and stop cronyism, it’s up to the states to blow the whistle.More at http://www.flashreport.org/featured-columns-library0b.php?faID=2013031
311065518


My take: I decry TO THE HEAVENS cronyism, applaud Texas for taking them on, and wish ALL good luck to anyone who challenges them or anyone else getting unfair breaks. On the other hand, I'd rather have an information conglomerate getting special treatment than an oil giant. Both can do immeasurable harm, but just personally, I prefer Google, if it comes to that.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:22 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Wha?
Google has 2 ex executives and stockholders as US Pres and VP? Google starts a war, and makes a ton of profits on cost-plus, no-bid contracts?
I could go on...

Sounds like sour grapes from an anti-Obama source: a really small potatoes, chump change corruption charge, over a very subtle, if even provable, statistical practice.

Nowhere in the same league as Halliburton.

I'd like to hear more about the character and history of the source of the accusation.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 8:58 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
Wha?
Google has 2 ex executives and stockholders as US Pres and VP? Google starts a war, and makes a ton of profits on cost-plus, no-bid contracts?
I could go on...

Sounds like sour grapes from an anti-Obama source: a really small potatoes, chump change corruption charge, over a very subtle, if even provable, statistical practice.

Nowhere in the same league as Halliburton.

I'd like to hear more about the character and history of the source of the accusation.



Yeah, not seeing the Halliburton comparison, really.

And the FTC investigated the anti-trust case for 19 months. Hardly swept under the rug Which is not to say they're innocent: Google has long since moved past their "Dont be evil" decree.

So, maybe there is something to this - but its not in the same league as Haliburton.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 20, 2013 9:15 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


I looked up Flashpoint.com. Getting past the jargon and baffle-speak on their homepage, it sounds like they're a search engine of some sort.

I'm not current on all the IT world jargon, and all the different flavors of search engine marketing and intent, but that's what it sounds like, which makes them a competitor of Google. SO that's their skin in the game.

Not that I'm a fan of Google- I normally use ALtaVista, which has been around a LONG time, and is now a subsidiary of Yahoo. SO Google could have done something wrong, something illegal, subtle or obvious, I don't know. They're way too "pop" for my taste-- anything that that many folks use and like is probably up to no good.

SO the answer is to use another Search engine- there are lots of 'em out there.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
End of the Democratic Party (not kidding)
Tue, November 5, 2024 14:18 - 56 posts
Disgruntled Tepublicans vow to move to Australia
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:53 - 76 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:47 - 639 posts
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:44 - 4515 posts
The kids are the ones who will remember...
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:42 - 5 posts
A thread for Democrats Only
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:32 - 6920 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:15 - 4676 posts
Now we get everything we ever wanted! It's a Celebration!!!!
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:11 - 3 posts
Mid-Term Elections 2022. Hey Jack, I Was Right
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:08 - 412 posts
Oh well
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:06 - 29 posts
Are You- Democrat or Republican
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:04 - 55 posts
With apologies to JSF: Favorite songs (3)
Tue, November 5, 2024 13:03 - 67 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL