REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Jezus, and they scream about us taking guns AWAY!

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Wednesday, April 3, 2013 12:09
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2866
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 6:25 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


This is sickening:
Quote:

In Georgia, town requires gun ownership

Nelson, a small Georgia city north of Atlanta, is requiring the head of virtually every household to own a firearm, the city's clerk told CNN Tuesday.

The community's five-member council voted unanimously to approve the measure Monday night.

The proposal was modeled on a similar law in nearby Kennesaw, a measure that has been on the books since 1982. Nelson, which numbers around 1,300 people, is the second city in the state to mandate gun ownership.

"In order to provide for the emergency management of the city, and further in order to provide for and protect the safety, security and general welfare of the city and its inhabitants, every head of household residing in the city limits is required to maintain a firearm, together with ammunition therefore," the ordinance said.

People with physical or mental disabilities are exempt from the law, as are "paupers," felons, and those who oppose gun ownership based on belief or religious doctrine.

Councilman Duane Cronic recently said that the law would give every family the right to protect themselves and their property "without worrying about prosecution for protecting themselves." http://www.cnn.com/2013/04/02/us/georgia-gun-requirement/index.html?hp
t=hp_t2


Sooo, you pay taxes to employ police and buy their guns and ammo, AND they're gonna FORCE you to pay for guns and ammo too? Why oh why didn't we let the South secede when we had the chance??

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 7:37 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Yeah, sigh, I know (nd actually it's more complicated than that, Lincoln wasn't really the "hero" many remember him as)...but "SUM" of those parts...



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 9:51 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


I find this difficult to reconcile with my notion that all small town white southerners in any position of power are racists, more or less publicly.
Do they really want all of the black households down there in the slums, or "the bottoms", or the black neighborhood, whatever they call it, to be armed?

Or are the exceptions for felons and paupers really code words for "black folks?"

I will admit that that is MY notion, MY prejudice, MY bias, not necessarily supported by facts. But I would walk into the town looking out for any sign of that.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 11:10 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

are the exceptions for felons and paupers really code words for "black folks?"

I would guess they have ways of making that the case...Either that, or maybe they figure the African Americans in the slums, etc., ARE already armed, they're what's being armed AGAINST, so what the hey...

but that may be MY own prejudice, too...



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 11:19 AM

FREMDFIRMA



More a token measure than anything, and it *DID*, undeniably, unarguably, work for Kennesaw, GA.
The "gunfights on every corner" never appeared, the social violence never happened, and when that became clear it was ignored as hard as possible by those making those predictions, who then denied them utterly.

However, whether or not a measure of that nature would have any realistic effect is more dependent on the culture of a town than the actual percentage of weapons ownership, and said measures when enacted have so far not whatever been enforced in any way, shape or form, so it is more token affirmation than actual legislation - which is a waste of resources albeit a mild one.

One should not use the legislative process to make such a statement though, on that one I can agree.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, April 2, 2013 12:19 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Sooo, you pay taxes to employ police and buy their guns and ammo, AND they're gonna FORCE you to pay for guns and ammo too? Why oh why didn't we let the South secede when we had the chance??



Cops don't carry guns to protect you or your home. They carry guns to protect themselves.

Compare the per capita murder rate to Kennesaw GA to Chicago, NY, or any other area where guns are banned.

" Prior to enactment of the law, Kennesaw had a population of just 5,242 but a crime rate significantly higher (4,332 per 100,000) than the national average (3,899 per 100,000). The latest statistics available – for the year 2005 – show the rate at 2,027 per 100,000. Meanwhile, the population has skyrocketed to 28,189.


Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2007/04/41196/#FIeIFjoTytzr32Kr.99 "




Makes perfect sense, and is anything but 'sickening'.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 5:51 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Quote:

are the exceptions for felons and paupers really code words for "black folks?"

I would guess they have ways of making that the case...Either that, or maybe they figure the African Americans in the slums, etc., ARE already armed, they're what's being armed AGAINST, so what the hey...

but that may be MY own prejudice, too...





I looked the place up on Wikipedia. It's 50 miles North of Atlanta, and described as a "suburb". I looked at sattelite pix of it on Mapquest: it looks like one of those late 60's suburbs here in California. Big lots, lots of open space, curvy streets that bend like pretzels and don't get anywhere, no through streets. Only difference: from the air, a lot of the homes look like trailers.

Demographically, Georgia is about 70/30 % black white. This town is 89/9 %, in 2 counties that run 90 + percent white.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 6:34 AM

PENQUIN11


Quote:

Originally posted by NEWOLDBROWNCOAT:
I find this difficult to reconcile with my notion that all small town white southerners in any position of power are racists, more or less publicly.
Do they really want all of the black households down there in the slums, or "the bottoms", or the black neighborhood, whatever they call it, to be armed?

Or are the exceptions for felons and paupers really code words for "black folks?"

I will admit that that is MY notion, MY prejudice, MY bias, not necessarily supported by facts. But I would walk into the town looking out for any sign of that.



Sweeping generalizations are not very nice. I have lived my entire life in the South, and there is racism present, and it isn't that rare. However, racists make up a minority of the general population.

"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it the most?"- Mark Twain

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 7:41 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


The problem, Penguin, is that even a minority can exert power to harm others, and if the South doesn't have the "biggest" minority of racists in America, they definitely have the most POWERFUL one.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 11:46 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:The problem, Penguin, is that even a minority can exert power to harm others, and if the South doesn't have the "biggest" minority of racists in America, they definitely have the most POWERFUL one.




What the hell does that suppose to mean ? Do you even know ?

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, April 3, 2013 12:09 PM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Quote:

Originally posted by penquin11:
Quote:

Originally posted by NEWOLDBROWNCOAT:
I find this difficult to reconcile with my notion that all small town white southerners in any position of power are racists, more or less publicly.
Do they really want all of the black households down there in the slums, or "the bottoms", or the black neighborhood, whatever they call it, to be armed?

Or are the exceptions for felons and paupers really code words for "black folks?"

I will admit that that is MY notion, MY prejudice, MY bias, not necessarily supported by facts. But I would walk into the town looking out for any sign of that.



Sweeping generalizations are not very nice. I have lived my entire life in the South, and there is racism present, and it isn't that rare. However, racists make up a minority of the general population.

"But who prays for Satan? Who, in eighteen centuries, has had the common humanity to pray for the one sinner that needed it the most?"- Mark Twain



And I admit it; I wrote so, right there. You quoted it.

MY subsequent post, with demographic stats, is enough for me at least. I would suggest that those 2 counties, and that town, are products of white flight, just as racist as those old towns with billboards saying, " Nigger, don't let the sun go down on your ass in this town. "

Which suggests, to me , that arming the citizens of the town is a way to make SURE that black folks stay away.

But remember, I am not a judge making this determination- I'm just a private citizen observing something in the news from 2000 miles away. I wield no power, no authority, make no decision in any matter concerning this town, or the people who live there. The demographics suggest that my analysis might be correct. I do not feel compelled to go there and interview folks to get eyewitness opinions. It looks like it might be some sort of de facto segregation, to me. But it affects me not-- it's there and I'm here.

And the question I asked, "Are these code words to exclude black people?" is still a valid historical question. There will be no true answer spoken by any person, from far away or there. Observation of events, over a long period of time, will reveal one, maybe.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sat, November 23, 2024 10:01 - 7494 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:59 - 4753 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:21 - 944 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Sat, November 23, 2024 09:11 - 182 posts
Elections; 2024
Sat, November 23, 2024 08:57 - 4795 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Sat, November 23, 2024 07:23 - 421 posts
Idiot Democrat Wine Mom
Sat, November 23, 2024 05:26 - 1 posts
Where is the 25th ammendment when you need it?
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:40 - 11 posts
Thread of Trump Appointments / Other Changes of Scenery...
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:33 - 41 posts
Biden admin quietly loosening immigration policies before Trump takes office — including letting migrants skip ICE check-ins in NYC
Sat, November 23, 2024 01:15 - 3 posts
RCP Average Continues to Be the Most Accurate in the Industry Because We Don't Weight Polls
Sat, November 23, 2024 00:46 - 1 posts
why does NASA hate the moon?
Fri, November 22, 2024 20:54 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL