Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
"GOP Telegraphs Mass Filibuster Of Obama’s Top Judges"
Friday, August 2, 2013 5:29 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:Senate Republicans are standing firm by their threat to block every one of President Obama’s nominees to the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals, insisting on eliminating all three vacant seats on the country’s second most powerful court. The first of Obama’s three picks, Patricia Millett, was narrowly approved Thursday by the Judiciary Committee on a party line vote of 10-8. Every Republican voted against her, although they didn’t criticize her or take issue with her qualifications. They merely argued that the court is under-worked and that nobody ought to fill those seats. “I have nothing against her but we should not be adding to that bench,” Sen. Orrin Hatch (R-UT), a senior Republican on the committee, told TPM on Thursday afternoon. Republicans appear to be united behind Sen. Chuck Grassley’s (R-IA) legislation to reduce the number of active judges on the D.C. Circuit court from 11 to eight. He proposes eliminating one seat, transferring one to the Second Circuit and transferring another to the 11th Circuit. (During the Bush administration, Grassley led a successful effort to reduce the size of the D.C. Circuit court from 12 to 11.) “It’s way overstaffed,” Sen. Jeff Sessions (R-AL), another Judiciary Committee member, told TPM on Thursday. “It does not need these judges, and we don’t have the money.” Democrats flatly dismiss the Grassley effort as a ploy to maintain the strong conservative tilt of the court, which often has the final word over the constitutionality of executive power decisions and has invalidated various executive actions by President Obama, on issues like labor and environmental regulations and recess appointments. They argue that despite the court’s relatively low caseload, it takes extraordinarily complex cases. “The D.C. Circuit decides some of the most important cases in our nation, with significant impact on the lives of all Americans,” said Senate Judiciary Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT). “This court must be allowed to operate at full strength, and to that end, I applaud the Judiciary Committee’s approval of Patricia Millett’s nomination today.” If Republicans stand by their threat and filibuster, it’ll leave Democrats with a tough choice: either back off and concede defeat, or threaten to roll back the filibuster on a partisan basis via the nuclear option and confirm the judges by themselves. A number of senators, especially supporters of abortion rights, worry about what a future Republican president and Senate majority might do with that power. If Republicans filibuster Millett, Senate Democrats face significant pressure to invoke the nuclear option. Democrats’ other option is to negotiate with Republicans to let some, if not all, of the nominees through. But that would be difficult given what’s at stake, unless party leaders can credibly threaten to change the rules if Republicans maintain their blockade. When TPM asked Sessions if Republicans should worry about Democrats potentially going nuclear, he smiled, as if to preemptively call bluff. “Unless Democrats are prepared to say they’ll never filibuster a federal judge or never filibuster a cabinet person, I don’t think that their threat should be given much weight,” Sessions said. “If they say [Republicans can’t filibuster nominees] then they’ll bind themselves to that if we have a Republican president.” Excerpts from http://tpmdc.talkingpointsmemo.com/2013/08/gop-telegraphs-mass-filibuster-of-top-judicial-nominees.php?ref=fpa
Friday, August 2, 2013 6:14 AM
SIGNYM
I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.
Friday, August 2, 2013 6:34 AM
NEWOLDBROWNCOAT
Friday, August 2, 2013 6:52 AM
Friday, August 2, 2013 8:43 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SIGNYM: They can change the rules to make a filibuster more difficult. Right now, all anyone has to do is stand up for 30 seconds (or less) and say "I intend to filibuster". That means there is no barrier whatsoever against blocking the will of the majority, on items large and small. You should make people stand up and talk - literally, or allow only five filibusters in a year, or insert any number of other impediments or inconveniences into the process.
Friday, August 2, 2013 12:14 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL