The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name by SIGNYM

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The WEF’s Stakeholder Capitalism Is Just Global Fascism By Another Name

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Thursday, November 17, 2022 07:13
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 313
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, November 10, 2022 4:31 AM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

By Brandon Smith

The concept of “fascism” was originally entered into the Encyclopedia Italiana by Italian philosopher Giovanni Gentile, who stated that “Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.” Benito Mussolini would later take credit for the quote as if he had written it himself, but it’s important to note because it outlines the primary purpose of the ideology rather than simply throwing the label around at people we don’t like as a dishonest means to undermine their legitimacy.

Despite the fact that leftists today often attack conservatives as “fascists” because of our desire to protect national boundaries and western heritage, the truth is that all fascism is deeply rooted in leftist philosophies and thinkers.

Mussolini was a long time socialist, a member of the party who greatly admired Karl Marx. He deviated from the socialists over their desire to remain neutral during WWI, and went on to champion a combination of socialism and nationalism, what we now know as fascism. Adolph Hitler was also a socialist and admirer of Karl Marx, much like Mussolini. It is actually hard to find where Marx, the communists and the fascists actually differ from each other – A deeper sense of nationalism seems to be one of the few points of contention.

Though Marx saw the existence of nation states as temporary to the proletariat and to the ruling class, he noted that the industrialists were erasing national boundaries anyway. Marx argues in the Communist Manifesto with some optimism:

“National differences and antagonisms between peoples are already tending to disappear more and more, owing to the development of the bourgeoisie, the growth of free trade and a world market, and the increasing uniformity of industrial processes and of corresponding conditions of life.”

Marx saw the development of corporate power as useful and the next necessary step towards socialism, noting that joint-stock companies (corporations) and the credit system are:

“The abolition of the capitalist mode of production within the capitalist mode of production itself.”

In other words, corporations are viewed as a tool for the eventual transition to a socialist “Utopia” and the death of free markets. Once again, we see there is very little difference in motive between the political left and the fascists. The natural progression of every form of Marxism, communism, socialism, fascism etc. all ultimately lead to a kind of globalist ideology and erasure of cultural separation. The methods might differ slightly but the end result is the same. Some think this is a good thing, but it is actually quite poisonous.

Globalism requires an overarching social dynamic, a single hive mind, otherwise it cannot survive. If people have the ability to choose or create better options (or different options) for living then globalism loses significance. The existence of choice has to be erased. This is a behavior that the political left has fully embraced and they are more than happy to work hand-in-hand with corporate oligarchs to make their ideal system a reality. Long gone are the days of the anti-corporate progressive – They LOVE corporate dominance, but only if those companies promote and enforce leftist models for society.

Mussolini’s fascism is at the root of the very corporate governance that leftists applaud and lust after today. They have far more in common with fascists than they realize.

The new fascism is a re-branded philosophy best represented by something called “Stakeholder Capitalism.” It is a term often used by globalists at the World Economic Forum and the head of the WEF, Klaus Schwab. The media friendly definition of Stakeholder Capitalism is:

A form of capitalism in which companies do not only optimize short-term profits for shareholders, but seek long term value creation, by taking into account the needs of all their stakeholders, and society at large.

But who are “all stakeholders” in the opinion of the WEF?

Well, according to Klaus Schwab they are all of human civilization, now and in the future. In other words, the goal of SHC is for corporate leaders and globalist bureaucracy to take responsibility for the entire world, not just their own employees, shareholders and profits. And such leaders would not be acting as individuals, they would be acting as a collective. In other words, SHC requires all major corporations to act as a single unit with a single purpose and a unified collectivist ideology – An ideological monopoly.

As Klaus Schwab states:

“The most important characteristic of the stakeholder model today is that the stakes of our system are now more clearly global. Economies, societies, and the environment are more closely linked to each other now than 50 years ago. The model we present here is therefore fundamentally global in nature, and the two primary stakeholders are as well.

…What was once seen as externalities in national economic policy making and individual corporate decision making will now need to be incorporated or internalized in the operations of every government, company, community, and individual. The planet is thus the center of the global economic system, and its health should be optimized in the decisions made by all other stakeholders.”

The SHC concept is deceptive on its very face because it pretends as if corporations will be held accountable by the public within some form of “business democracy,” as if the public will have a vote on what the corporations do. In reality, it will be corporations telling the public what is acceptable to think and do and corporations in conjunction with governments using their power to punish people who do not agree.

The great magic trick is that these same unified corporations use the shield of “private property” and business rights as a means to control society without repercussions. After all, a primary principle of conservatism and the US constitution is private property rights. So, stepping in to disrupt corporate governance would be violating one of our own beloved ideals. It sounds like a Catch-22, but it’s really not.

As mentioned above, corporations are at their very core a socialist concept: They are created through government charter, handed legal personhood and given special protections from government. They are NOT free market entities, and Adam Smith, the originator of most free market ideals, stood against corporations as destructive and prone to monopoly.

As long as they receive protections from government including monetary stimulus and bailouts, corporations should not enjoy the same private property protections as regular businesses do. They are parasitic creations, alien to the natural business world. In a freedom-based society they would be dismantled to prevent authoritarian outcomes.

Stakeholder Capitalism is also an incredibly arrogant premise because it assumes that corporate leaders have the wisdom or objective intelligence to expand their role beyond business and into social and political spheres. This has already happened in many respects with much chaos created, but open corporate governance is the end game and it is anything but objective or benevolent.

What are some examples of this kind of corporate/political governance (fascism) in action?

How about Big Tech social media censorship leaning HEAVILY against conservatives and liberty activists? How about evidence of collusion between Big Tech companies and government, such as the Biden Administration and the DHS working closely with Twitter and Facebook to actively remove voices and viewpoints they don’t like? How about corporate leaders colluding to destroy conservative based social media competitors like Parler?

How about ESG loans funded by corporate backers such as Blackrock or globalist non-profits like the Rockefeller Foundation?

If all corporate lenders applied ESG to their loan practices, all individuals and businesses would have to adopt leftist social ideologies and dubious environmental claims in order to have access to credit. ESG is a monetary incentive created by corporate elites to keep all other businesses in line. If it continues, ESG could wipe out political opposition to globalism in the span of a single generation.

And, what about the Council For Inclusive Capitalism? This is the most blatant expression of open global fascism I have ever seen, with money elites and politicians working in concert with the UN and even religious leaders like Pope Francis. Their goal is to institute a single centralized world governing platform built around the same agendas outlined in ESG and SHC, making corporations members of a new global council which they refer to as “The Guardians.” They aren’t even trying to hide the conspiracy anymore, it’s right out in the open.

Klaus Schwab takes special care to mention often that global crisis events are the “opportunity” that is needed to push the public into the arms of Stakeholder Capitalism through a nexus point called “The Great Reset.” Meaning, he thinks that widespread fear and desperation must exist (or be engineered) to perpetuate the SHC framework quickly.

Obviously, the globalists are on a shrinking timeline, though it’s hard to say why. They are tearing off the mask faster in the past two years than they have in the previous decade. More than likely they understand to some degree that if they go too slow the public will have time to mount a defense against them.

They will conjure all kinds of distractions and scapegoats to prevent liberty minded people from hitting them back. They’ll aim us at Russia, they’ll aim us at China, they’ll aim us at useful idiots among the leftists. They’ll aim Russia, China and the leftists at us. They will try to send us to war, they will call us insurrectionists, they will call us terrorists, they will say we started the whole collapse and that we are to blame for the world’s ills. None of this matters. What matters is that the globalists at the top pay the price for the harm they cause.

When the head of the snake is removed, only then can we sort out who is to blame; who were the heroes, who were the villains, and who were the idiots. Only then can we rebuild with true freedom in mind.

https://alt-market.us/the-wefs-stakeholder-capitalism-is-just-global-f
ascism-by-another-name/

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 10, 2022 12:50 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

It's along article, but if you read the first few oaras you'll get the gist.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE someone poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 10, 2022 12:54 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

SECOND, in case you once again doubt the definition of fascism, perhaps you should take it from the man who first defined it

Quote:
Giovanni Gentile, 30 May 1875 – 15 April 1944) was an Italian[3][4] neo-Hegelian idealist philosopher, educator, and fascist politician. The self-styled "philosopher of Fascism", he was influential in providing an intellectual foundation for Italian Fascism, and ghostwrote part of The Doctrine of Fascism (1932) with Benito Mussolini.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Giovanni_Gentile

Quote:
Giovanni Gentile Socialist

Even though Fascism is generally considered a far-right ideology both Gentile and Mussolini started off as members of the Italian Socialist party.....

The Fascist state made membership to trade union compulsory. It then directly controlled all the trade unions to suppress any opposition and to reward those who supported it.

These measures exemplify another crucial aspect of the economy of Fascism, namely, corporatism.

The main similarity between socialism and fascism is that they are both collectivistic ideologies.

Gentile did not believe in individualism, as he thought it led to selfishness.

Corporatism is a political and economic ideology that advocates structuring society according to groups, each controlling an aspect of society, for example, agricultural, business, scientific, and military. The key to corporatism is that all these groups will be working towards “common interests”, in the case of Fascism, these “common interests” will be the ones dictated by the state. Corporatism is often considered in relation to capitalism. While both embrace private property, Capitalism emphasises the accumulation of capital for individual benefit. Corporatism can therefore be understood as the economic system that links Fascism to Socialism on one side, and to Capitalism on the other.

The problem being that Gentile assumed that private owners would behave ideally (That's the problem with idealism!) instead of in their own interest. In practice, private business owners used fascism to control the state for their own benefit.

Yanno, like we have today.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE someone poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 10, 2022 1:47 PM

JAYNEZTOWN

The man behind the curtain or the Deep State got weird, the CNNs, the Foxnews, the BBCs they all became this weird drugged out of their mind Gonzo journalist ... not that any others Russia Pravda Today is much better because everywhere now it gets even worse.

An insane asylum of perverted Liars chasing another bullshit story go blast out disinfo 24/7 across the whole planet.

I think we are seeing something new today, mostly undefined by news media but maybe already seen in a Scifi Dystopian movie

The WEF has been a suspect for a while and so has the IMF, Military Industial Complex and Fed, the WHO and Bank of International Settlement and Others

In the past we had great readings of info.

Before we had big old books where people got info, many different languages and Library. At one time you had to travel to old news archives go to a Library and in more modern time part of a Library comes to peoples homes, with a printing press and door to door salesmen we had collections of Encyclopedia, people making books got together to form definition, write references, books of history, science and biology all combined into a small Library inside peoples homes... Britannica, Columbia, Ukrainian Soviet Encyclopedia a multi-purpose encyclopedia of Ukraine, maybe the Soveit citizen got it for free and was expected to know it, issued in the USSR, some much older of Regional interest going back in ancient Rome and China, the compendium providing summaries of knowledge, maybe it was always 'biased' but

then it went online

24/7 news cycle pushes the hypnotic to the Max it truly mindfucks people

If a clownshow stupefied, it cons, bamboozles ...then is it Fascist?

Fascism, political ideology and mass movement that dominated many parts of central, southern, and eastern Europe between 1919 and 1945 and that also had adherents in western Europe, the United States, South Africa, Japan, Latin America, and the Middle East.
https://www.britannica.com/topic/fascism

and its all on blogs and wikis and now

any shill or agenda comes in and starts to edit

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Yanno, like we have today.

In the past yes it was 'Progressive' Dutch and British guys had World spanning companies of Tea that started Wars but its much faster now

Today is different and soon we may have the MegaCorp Fascism of BigTech

I've been to a few place and depending on where you stand 'Left' or 'Right' can greatly change by the local view points, I tend not to use FarRight or not use FarLeft Socalist to describe it but instead use something like

Anti-Freedom Militant Authoritarian

It can not be so easy to read a longer phrase like this for simpler minded but it avoids the confusion of the clown show, the Radical Left blaming Radical Right or Radical Righter also blaming Radical Leftist.

different websites give different definition

'Fascism is a far-right, authoritarian, ultranationalist'

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fascism

Fascism is a political ideology located on the far right of the political spectrum. Although sometimes appearing syncretic with superficial borrowings of populist issues and symbols from the moderate and far left, fascism is at its core radically nationalist, authoritarian, anti-intellectual and committed to violent action. Internationalism, tolerance of dissent and reasoned deliberation are conceived as forms of weakness and a betrayal of the nation.

https://history.fandom.com/wiki/Fascism

,

https://www.conservapedia.com/Fascism

Fascism is a big government, totalitarian, economic, political, and statist ideology that arose in early twentieth century Europe and came to dominate the social and political systems

https://rationalwiki.org/wiki/Fascism

Fascism is a term applied to a fairly diverse range of historical regimes but is generally agreed to refer to a brand of far-right totalitarianism characterized by its obsession with the nation and often race, severe regimentation of society and the economy, and extreme levels of political violence aimed at purifying and expanding the state.

https://infogalactic.com/info/Fascism

Fascism is a form of radical authoritarian far left tyranny. that came to prominence in early 20th-century Europe. Influenced by national syndicalism. fascism originated in Italy during World War I. Fascism is statist in nature

but there is some infighting inside these sites, wikipedia itself unsure what fascism means

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Fascism

,

wiki sucks?

https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=5&t=2532

,

https://wikipediasucks.co/forum/viewtopic.php?f=11&t=2574

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 17, 2022 7:13 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

Do they really run elections inside other nations?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE