REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Stand with Arizona

POSTED BY: AURAPTOR
UPDATED: Sunday, May 16, 2010 11:28
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 9587
PAGE 2 of 4

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:25 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Wulfie, have you noticed that the only one "crying raciss" is you?

Of course you haven't. You're not bright enough to notice your own idiocy.


BTW, I see you added a new word to your vocabulary: "progs". Which Republican talking head taught you that one? RushBo? GlenBeck? Bill Orally?


Go back to telling us all how "independant" [sic] you are. I'm sure we'll believe you.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:28 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


By the way, what exactly do you mean when you say "The Arizona law might actually work"?

You mean it might make Arizona the right-wing police state you fantasize about? That *IS* what you're after, right? I mean, it's what you advocate.

Why don't you move to Arizona? I'm sure you'd like it there. I doubt your wife would, though.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:30 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

On the topic of the dangers of illegal immigration, it appears that a film director named 'Rodriguez' has recently gone undercover to produce a documentary about the problem.

See the story here: http://www.nydailynews.com/entertainment/movies/2010/05/06/2010-05-06_
robert_rodriguez_cuts_illegal_trailer_for_machete_to_protest_arizona_immigration.html


There is also a clip from the documentary included in the article.

The imagery is rather disturbing, so you may not want to view this at work.

--Anthony

P.S. I hope my attempts at humor do not ruin my reputation as a serious contributer.



"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner




I heard the promo the other day; I thought it was hilarious. Actually, I thought it was a joke, then heard that it wasn't - it's an actual real movie, and it's just fortuitous timing that it's coming out now.





Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:33 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Sorry Kwick...

Did I go ahead and hit a nerve?

Or blow the whole prog game wide open?

Silly me.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:36 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Why don't you move to Arizona? I'm sure you'd like it there. I doubt your wife would, though.


I'd love to move to Arizona cept I'm no fan of hot, desert, or a backyard full of Mexican illegals who may not take kindly to me turning my dog on folks who hop my fence or turning my gun on folks who hop my dog.

In Ohio my backyard has deer and they don't shoot back, sue, or try to take jobs away from legal immigants. On the other hand...they can't cook and they leave my yard looking terrible.

Hmm...maybe we need to rethink our border strategy.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:52 AM

STORYMARK


"Hero"'s from Ohio? Explains a lot.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 10:56 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Storys from Cali? Or the blue gags of the East?

Explains a lot.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 11:17 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I think the part of the immigration laws that has a good chance of working is simply a stronger version of a recently enacted law from a year or two ago:

Come down hard on those who hire illegals.

Remove incentive, and you remove the desire to be here.

On the other hand, I'm from a part of the country where the illegal immigrants are made legal as soon as they step on US soil. It's a fairly prosperous region. Maybe we should use it as an example. Making illegals legal would not inevitably destroy society.

--Anthony


"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 11:26 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



So, when it's just a bunch of dirty, low life illegals, it's not really kidnapping ?

Is that what I'm hearing ?

Next you'll be telling us it's not " rape " if the girl is an illegal....

Please, go back to the door and pick up the brain you clearly checked by mistake. You're gonna need that here.

I offered up info that there were several hundred kidnappings in the Phoenix area. YOU want to quibble over the "true " numbers, if they've gone down by a minor amount of 10,20, or 30 from the previous year ? You're ignoring the big picture here, and it's plain as to why.

It was asked where I was getting this info, and I showed you. It wasn't pulled out of thin air, it wasn't FOX news, but in fact it was ABC. Nothing you sited refutes what I posted, all you have is empty dismissal.

You should also note, that this story was posted a full year before the passage of the Law. That should give anyone w/ the ability of basic understanding as to WHY this bill was necessary, and that it was a long time coming.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 11:29 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
"Hero"'s from Ohio? Explains a lot.



Care to elaborate ? What does it explain ?






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 11:49 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
I hope every Hispanic law enforcement officer in Arizona shows up to demand every white protester's papers. Should be fun.



That's whacha call a 'strawman argument'.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Straw_man

90% of hispanics demand export of hispanic illegal aliens.

Who do you think loses their jobs first?


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 12:32 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

So, when it's just a bunch of dirty, low life illegals, it's not really kidnapping ?

Is that what I'm hearing ?

Next you'll be telling us it's not " rape " if the girl is an illegal....



Or it's not torture if they're not a citizen...

... or if you're just drowning them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 1:31 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"So, when it's just a bunch of dirty, low life illegals, it's not really kidnapping?"

Hello,

Interesting.

Let me see if I can follow the logic.

You want to stem the tide of illegal immigration, citing excessive kidnapping statistics in Phoenix as one reason why.

It turns out that the excessive kidnapping statistics are due to the cayote tactics in smuggling in illegal immigrants.

These criminal smuggling networks are functioning to get past our border security.

If there was no border security, then there would be no need for the criminal smuggling of illegals.

Without criminal smuggling, there would be no kidnapped illegals being ransomed to their families.

Eliminating border security would eliminate the kidnapping problem in Phoenix.

...

I agree with your argument.

--Anthony


"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 2:03 PM

MOMCARP


Unless something directly affects people, they just don't get it.
25 years ago in CA, drywall companies started going out of business because their competitors were hiring cheap illegal labor. Then the concrete, tile, plumbing and carpentry trades were basically taken over by illegals.
The only trade I know of that hasn't been usurped by the "undocumented" is electrical, because you need to be certified, and that's next.
Don't have any idea what all these legal tradespeople are doing for work now...I guess they found work in fast food.
The ones that can still find work have taken a big pay cut to be able to compete with the illegals.
Just sayin...



Whatever works...Mom

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 2:22 PM

DREAMTROVE


I find this deeply disturbing. Possible Suspcion of illegal immigration in arizona is a pretty clear racial identifier. What's even more disturbing than the loons who support the idea is the psychos who thought it up in the first place.

Skipping the partisan nonsense, since I know that if a democrat had come up with this, aerator or AURAptor as those who don't have auto spell check on call him, would be picking it apart as an exempt of the inherit racism of the democratic party dating back to the Jackson, instead of extolling the virtues of the bill, should there be any, but seriously folks...

This is madness. Tony nailed it. I don't know if you have to remove the border patrol, lest chavez send an army or alqaeda invade, but stop harassing mexicans, let them cross the border, and also us. I mean, there's no threat here, in fact, the mexican civil war exists entirely because of our war on drugs. We could just let them have their policy we have ours, and have an open border. They do it all over Europe.

And, yes, sure, some non-mexicans will be arrested, but very, very few. As Frem said, its like the fugitive slave act. My great grand father was the only white man ever convicted under the fugitive slave act, and they begged him to take a dismissal. His response: "no, I want to be on the wrong side of this law, because the law is wrong." This law is wrong, and someone is going to have to take the fall for it to get rid of it, someone with enough power to bring the suit that should follow.

Oh, footnote. I find it unsettling that most of these loons are on my side of the aisle. To people who think they should support this because its the right wing thing to do, in say, failing any of the more obvious constitutional and simple moral argument, at least this one should strike home: You know what happens to a political party that is even perceived as attacking or alienating 15% of it's own constituency does best? Loses.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 2:22 PM

DREAMTROVE


arch, double post. Oh, and Arizona ice tea is from ny like me, so don't boycott it.;)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 2:23 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

Despite the humor I have tried to inject into this debate, (perhaps poor humor) I actually do take this issue seriously. And no, I don't actually suggest that we eliminate border security.

However, I do suggest that we should make legal immigration and the path to citizenship an exceptionally simple and straightforward process. 'Illegal' people (a term that makes me shake my head) are only able to provide cheap labor because they are illegal. Once legalized, they are recognized by government and are issued rights and responsibilities. This transforms an under-the-table workforce into a legally regulated workforce.

I think that the current strong laws against hiring illegal immigrants (I support these) coupled with easy paths to legal immigration and citizenship would eliminate many of the problems we see.

All without forcing US citizens to whip out proof of citizenship at the whim of police officers.

This solution seems so logical to me that I don't know why it hasn't gained bipartisan support.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 3:11 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by momcarp:
Unless something directly affects people, they just don't get it.
25 years ago in CA, drywall companies started going out of business because their competitors were hiring cheap illegal labor. Then the concrete, tile, plumbing and carpentry trades were basically taken over by illegals.
The only trade I know of that hasn't been usurped by the "undocumented" is electrical, because you need to be certified, and that's next.
Don't have any idea what all these legal tradespeople are doing for work now...I guess they found work in fast food.
The ones that can still find work have taken a big pay cut to be able to compete with the illegals.
Just sayin...



Whatever works...Mom




The mistake you're making, Mom (can I call you "Mom"?) is that you're conflating my not going into absolute total freakout mode for not getting that there's an issue, or not caring.

Illegal immigration IS an issue. Hiring illegals IS an issue. I'm not prepared to go totally batshit over-the-top and throw out Fourth Amendment protections chasing after a tiny percentage of people who MIGHT be doing something illegal.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 3:32 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:


The mistake you're making, Mom (can I call you "Mom"?) is that you're conflating my not going into absolute total freakout mode for not getting that there's an issue, or not caring.

Illegal immigration IS an issue. Hiring illegals IS an issue. I'm not prepared to go totally batshit over-the-top and throw out Fourth Amendment protections chasing after a tiny percentage of people who MIGHT be doing something illegal.



It's funny how you say you're not prepared to go batsh*t over - the - top over this new law, yet that's exactly what you do, in claiming it does anything like throwing out the 4th Amendment.

The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.

If one's rights are violated, it's not because of this new law.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 3:54 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


The right of the people to be secure in their persons, houses, papers, and effects, against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause, supported by Oath or affirmation, and particularly describing the place to be searched, and the persons or things to be seized.



Find in there where it says "reasonable suspicion" and a "lawful contact" are enough to search and/or seize someone.

Then show me in that new law - OR in its rushed amendments - where it says that before you can stop someone and ask for their papers, you have to have a sworn warrant giving your probably cause.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:12 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important



"It's funny how you say you're not prepared to go batsh*t over - the - top over this new law, yet that's exactly what you do, in claiming it does anything like throwing out the 4th Amendment."

Hello,

He never said he wasn't prepared to go batsh*t over the new law. He said he wasn't prepared to go batsh*t over illegal immigration.

At least not batsh*t enough to create a law that might aid the police in circumventing our rights.

Something I think you and I disagree on, Auraptor, is our views of laws.

You view laws in the light of what they are supposed to do. I view laws in the light of what they can be made to do.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:16 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Thank you for that, Anthony. You nailed it exactly.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:32 PM

DREAMTROVE


Anthony,

I know you try to be the reasonable guy, but there is a time to be unreasonable, and that was sort of my point. There isn't a middle ground that I can take on this issue. I don't even think it's an issue. I'm purposefully not responding to people who support racism here.

The position is a trick. I read this a while ago from someone who knew Henry Regnery, IIRC, it went something Like this: the absurd held firm will eventually persuade the sane to compromise with it, for something in between, hence the sane agree to be insane, and the truth will be compromised with falsehood.

Ergo, it's potentially the point of the entire argument.

So, taking my own position, that there is no problem, because I can't see a good reason why a mexican is not free to wander unannounced around the US as we are, as native americans are, just as the French are free to roam around Germany, which is far preferable than when this all happened with weapons. I suspect quite strongly that the powers that be really don't care about it either, but they do care that people are undocumented, because there are humans walking about the country off camera without their RFID chips etc. But yeah, I get that this is not a consensus opinion, still, that doesn't
Mean that those who simply oppose the existence of people of Latino extraction ace a point. They don't have a point, they have bigotry, and a new clever way to disguise it.

Here's another troublesome detail. The whole thing was introduced by Bush out of nowhere, it was not an issue that was being discussed politically outside of storefront.org, until suddenly George w bush suggests that its an issue. I was working third party at the time, and one of the parties out of nowhere started circulating this anti-Mexican garbage. It was on the high end of creepy, because i happened to know that no one involved was in the leqst bit racist, and one of them was Latino. What does this mean? Soon aftter that lou dobbs was hammering out this nonsense, I donator know if he'd taken the position before, but he took it with gusto. I think that the third party crowd had been promised ballot access if they acted as the propaganda farm for the new racism.

This was about the time i dropped out, but I stayed in touch enough to argue with them about the so called issue, which was hardly dressed up at all, it was really primitive, and came across as just blatant racism with nowhere to hide. You got the feeling that if you son much as ate mexican food you were part of the problem. Thing is, there was no problem. The civil war, started really by Bush/Obama, hadn't started yet, and the only real issue with immigration was slave labor, and the outraged were on the side of the mexicans.

So, the propaganda first had to convince you that there was a problem, and that we should all acknowledge it and then we can deal with this issue of what essentially was being promoted as mexican inferiority, So, sure, now when I see it with some more years of Refinement, it is very recognizable, and before anyone compromises with it, just make sure you know what your compromising with.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:43 PM

DREAMTROVE


I think you give Rap to much credit on politics. Every once in a while he posts an original idea, but most of his political thought seems to consist of talking points and unchecked support for what he assumes is his party's position. Rap should be listened to when it comes to the overuse of the word frack in Caprica.

I don't think arguing with a talking point is a decent use of time, my arguments with the GOP have yielded me nothing, they don't change their position, and they wont even call.

Rap, don't worry, they're not watching, you can come down off of the race wagon now, your check will still be deposited ;)

Seriously, man, it's bugging me. You don't want to take the hit for this one. Going down for your support of racism is no kind of way to go, just ask wulfie.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:51 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Anthony,

The people of AZ have had enough of the lawlessness and crime caused by illegals. They're not fed up with immigration, or brown skinned people, but the problems caused by massive illegal immigration.

That's the sole issue here. The Federal Gov't isn't doing its job, so the states will have to take up the slack.

That's all that is going on here.

If you're not going batsh*t, over - the - top crazy on the issue of illegal immigration , then that's the problem. The citizens of AZ have resoundingly said they favor this law, as a means to control the problem they're faced with, and live with, every day.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 4:54 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I am one of the citizens of Arizona, and I can tell you that it doesn't matter how bad a problem is, or how upset it makes people.

Laws that have a strong potential for abuse are not the answer.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:06 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

So, taking my own position, that there is no problem, because I can't see a good reason why a mexican is not free to wander unannounced around the US as we are, as native americans are, just as the French are free to roam around Germany, which is far preferable than when this all happened with weapons. I suspect quite strongly that the powers that be really don't care about it either, but they do care that people are undocumented, because there are humans walking about the country off camera without their RFID chips etc.


I think there *IS* a problem; I just don't think it's anywhere near as drastic or earth-shattering as others seem to think it is. And to be honest, the powers that be don't think so, either. Which is why they don't actually want to DO ANYTHING about it; the right wants to get the likes of Rappy riled up, so he'll donate money to their cause, and the left wants to get he likes of me riled up, for the same reason.

Thing is, the right WANTS those illegals here, because they hire so many of them as a show of what greatness can be accomplished if you have no regulations at all, and the left wants them here because they're paying into a system they'll never collect from.

But what the right DOESN'T want to do is hold employers responsible for their own actions. They seem to think that asking an employer to verify eligibility for employment is an unwarranted intrusion by big government (when it's been a requirement at every job I've ever held), but for some reason they don't think stopping people on the street with no probable cause and no warrant is NOT an unwarranted intrusion into one's privacy - provided, of course, that those people are the right shade of brown.



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:11 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Dream, a small word of advice: Ditch the auto-complete and auto-correct features on your iPad. You're a better writer than your posts indicate, and it's all because your computer is trying to out-think you, which it's not effective at doing, and very clumsy in its attempts. It's one of my pet peeves with my iPod as well.


Small quibble. It's just that it's rendering some of your posts barely readable, which is a damned shame, because I know you, and that's not your style.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:11 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

I am one of the citizens of Arizona, and I can tell you that it doesn't matter how bad a problem is, or how upset it makes people.

Laws that have a strong potential for abuse are not the answer.

--Anthony



The majority of your fellow citizens disagree with you. They disagree that it doesn't matter how bad the problem is, as well as this law having a " strong potential " for abuse.






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:13 PM

ANTIMASON


ok then, if the Arizona law is just simply unacceptable.. whats the solution?

if its racist to want an orderly immigration policy... maybe the more important question should be as Americans, are we even entitled to enforce our borders and regulate immigration? can we secure the border, can we document people who are living and working here? if immigration is a 'human right'.. does this same principle apply to me, if say.. i want to pick up and move to Mexico(or anywhere else in the world)? it turns out they would be much less accepting then we have been tradionally. in other words.. i can go anywhere, for whatever reason, documented or not, and the people of that town or city or country have no say or jurisdiction? if this is the argument being made.. maybe someone should tell that to Mexico

if we wanted to go just by precedent, does anyone recall that in times past, it was common for a culture to literally create a walled fortress around a settlement? im not advocating this, but unless someone wants to argue that such an act is implicity racist.. i think the whole discrimination accusation falls flat

personally, i am all for unlimited, unrestricted travel!... in theory. but then again, we dont have a libertarian society where such a stance might actually be practical. no.. we live in an ever expanding social wellfare state. unfettered, inconsequential immigration sounds great.. until we get the bill for billions of dollars in tax payer subsidies going to foreign nationals. my family lived in s. California for awhile. you want to know what i think's unfair? my little sisters education being completely undermined and compromised by a classroom full of students whos first language was spanish. or spending 1 hr in the emergency room, with a busted knee, before even being seen, because illegals were using the place as a doctors office. and ya know.. i dont care if theyre Irish immigrants pouring in here... its the same result. lets not pretend that european immigrants were never a point of contention either.. this has nothing to do with 'brown people'

but notice, its America that is unjust for wanting to create a sustainable immigration policy... nevermind that we are generous to let anybody in here.

i never hear any criticism of the Mexican and S. American governments, that are so corrupt that people are fleeing these places by the millions. one thing being clearly demonstrated by these protests is that they arent just coming here to work. theyre here, demanding citizenship and equal access to social services. too bad all this energy wasnt commited to reforming the countries they have ruined(on account of their own political incompetence). the gall, to come here demanding things from Americans, when they have lacked the courage or organisation or resolve to reform the countries of their own births! if its not their responsibility, whos is it? why is there never any pressure placed on them? we're responsible for accepting all the worlds downtrodden.. makes me wonder where ill flee, when all the worlds refugees have come and overwhelmed the fabric of our society






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:26 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

I am one of the citizens of Arizona, and I can tell you that it doesn't matter how bad a problem is, or how upset it makes people.

Laws that have a strong potential for abuse are not the answer.




Oh, Anthony - you obviously have no idea where you live or what you're talking about. [/sarcasm]

And yeah, Draconian laws and over-reaching law encroachment (this goes way beyond law "enforcement" and well into encroachment) efforts are the textbook examples of how NOT to react to a problem. As I've pointed out, this law *claims* to be aimed at well under 4% of our population, when in reality it's just a wedge which is being used to pry the Fourth Amendment apart. If the law is allowed to stand, it set precedent that what we do to one group, we can do to EVERY group. Anyone old enough to remember when police PROMISED not to ever pull anyone over just for not wearing their seatbelt?

And Rap, spare us your phony indignation and your crocodile tears about the poor, abused illegals who are the "kidnap victims". You don't give two fucks about these people, as you've so often and so adequately pointed out already, so don't try to blow smoke up our asses by claiming that your concern is for them.

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:35 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

And Rap, spare us your phony indignation and your crocodile tears about the poor, abused illegals who are the "kidnap victims". You don't give two fucks about these people, as you've so often and so adequately pointed out already, so don't try to blow smoke up our asses by claiming that your concern is for them.


That's the best you can muster ?

I'm not the one dismissing the kidnappings and harsh treatment of an entire group of people, simply because it doesn't fit my argument - THAT'S YOUR DEPARTMENT!






Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first."

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 5:58 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"The majority of your fellow citizens disagree with you. They disagree that it doesn't matter how bad the problem is, as well as this law having a " strong potential " for abuse. "

Hello,

I like to think that our Constitution serves, amongst other things, to protect against the tyranny of the majority.

As for that self-same majority? Somehow I missed the vote.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:01 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"I'm not the one dismissing the kidnappings and harsh treatment of an entire group of people, simply because it doesn't fit my argument"

Hello,

I actually don't think your argument was ever, "We must stem the tide of illegal immigrants so that we can stop the rampant kidnapping of illegal immigrants."

Unless you honestly want to suggest that it was?

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:03 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"i never hear any criticism of the Mexican and S. American governments"

Hello,

I hereby criticize the Mexican and S. American governments. They are just awful.

I want to be much, much better than they are.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:06 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by antimason:
ok then, if the Arizona law is just simply unacceptable.. whats the solution?



If I say I don't have any easy solutions, does that mean we should automatically jump to the worst "solution"? If memory serves, weren't you of the "do nothing" persuasion when it came to healthcare reform? What was YOUR solution to that issue? Since you didn't have an easy, workable solution, can we assume that you approve fully of the insurance mandate? Or can we deduce that while you might not know what the answer IS, you know what answer you DON'T WANT?

You're offering a false dichotomy, a non-choice. "If you don't like this, then what?" That's rather like telling someone they have terminal cancer, 6 months to live, and then handing them a .45 and telling them if they don't have a better solution, they really should shoot themselves. Now. Sooner would be better, because we need the room and the medicine for people who aren't needlessly wasting oxygen.


Quote:

if its racist to want an orderly immigration policy... maybe the more important question should be as Americans, are we even entitled to enforce our borders and regulate immigration? can we secure the border, can we document people who are living and working here? if immigration is a 'human right'.. does this same principle apply to me, if say.. i want to pick up and move to Mexico(or anywhere else in the world)? it turns out they would be much less accepting then we have been tradionally. in other words.. i can go anywhere, for whatever reason, documented or not, and the people of that town or city or country have no say or jurisdiction? if this is the argument being made.. maybe someone should tell that to Mexico


It's not racist to want an orderly immigration policy. That's where you're conflating the issues. Applying one set of standards TO EVERY SINGLE PERSON WHO COMES INTO THE COUNTRY is not the issue. If it were, there'd be no issue at all. We're talking about this because there's a new law on the books that is NOT treating everyone equally, and is designed from its inception to single out a particular group of people based solely on their appearance.

And as I've pointed out before, do you REALLY want to make the case for America by pointing out how bad Mexico is? Really? Pointing out how tough their rules are, as a way to show how tough ours should be, doesn't seem like the smart choice.

Let's take gun ownership, for instance. It's damned near impossible to legally own a gun in Mexico. Should we do that here? Wouldn't it cut down drastically on crime, both here AND there, if guns weren't so easily obtainable here?

[note to Frem: I'm *NOT* arguing that or going down that road; I'm merely using that ludicrous example as being illustrative of the kind of arguments that line of logic can take you through.]

Quote:


if we wanted to go just by precedent, does anyone recall that in times past, it was common for a culture to literally create a walled fortress around a settlement? im not advocating this, but unless someone wants to argue that such an act is implicity racist.. i think the whole discrimination accusation falls flat



That really doesn't make very much sense. But while you're at it, how often were Jews welcomed into those walled cities?

Quote:


personally, i am all for unlimited, unrestricted travel!... in theory. but then again, we dont have a libertarian society where such a stance might actually be practical.



So your logic is that, since we don't have a libertarian paradise, the next closest thing is to have a right-wing fascist police state? If you don't have your libertarian society, how does passing ever-more-intrusive laws regulating who and where people can be move you in any way CLOSER to that libertarian ideal?

See, THIS is where "libertarians" and tea baggers, as they tend to express themselves here, lose me completely. They SAY they want freedom for everyone, freedom from government intrusion and involvement - but when it comes down to brass tacks, they always seem to end up siding with big government and forceful rounding up of people who aren't them. How exactly is that any different from fascism?

Quote:


no.. we live in an ever expanding social wellfare state. unfettered, inconsequential immigration sounds great.. until we get the bill for billions of dollars in tax payer subsidies going to foreign nationals. my family lived in s. California for awhile. you want to know what i think's unfair? my little sisters education being completely undermined and compromised by a classroom full of students whos first language was spanish.



Why was your little sister in public school? You don't believe in public schools, remember? Why didn't you pay for her to go to private school? Why were you so willing to live off the government tit for your sister's education, and why are you so quick to deny others that same largesse?

Quote:

or spending 1 hr in the emergency room, with a busted knee, before even being seen, because illegals were using the place as a doctors office. and ya know.. i dont care if theyre Irish immigrants pouring in here... its the same result. lets not pretend that european immigrants were never a point of contention either.. this has nothing to do with 'brown people'


And you know those people in the ER were illegal... HOW, exactly? Did you ask to see their papers? Or was it because they were in the ER? Wouldn't that make YOU illegal, too?

I don't pretend that European immigrants were never a point of contention. You seem to want to pretend that they were never singled out for discrimination ("No Italians!" signs, and "No Irish Need Apply" postings on the job board), or that it wasn't wrong to single them out. It was wrong then, and still is. Only this time it's aimed primarily (if not SOLELY) at "brown" people. To say that it's not is disingenuous at best, lying at worst.

Quote:


but notice, its America that is unjust for wanting to create a sustainable immigration policy... nevermind that we are generous to let anybody in here.



Hey, if you want to tear down the Statue of Liberty, I'm sure there are some people who'd love to fly a few airliners into it for you. I mean, since you want that besotted poem inscribed on its base gone so bad, you wouldn't mind if we just tore the whole bitch down and melted her for scrap, right? I mean, it's not like the founders of this nation ever wanted it to be a beacon of hope or a shining dream of what could be. "Give us your tired, your poor... Just not so many of them, and not so well-tanned, please."

Quote:


i never hear any criticism of the Mexican and S. American governments, that are so corrupt that people are fleeing these places by the millions. one thing being clearly demonstrated by these protests is that they arent just coming here to work. theyre here, demanding citizenship and equal access to social services.



If you haven't heard that criticism, you're deaf, you're lying, or you're asleep. And where are these throngs of illegals "demanding citizenship"? I thought you were JUST arguing a couple days ago that the whole reason they came here was to work for less than minimum wage. Aren't you contradicting yourself when you claim that they aren't here to work?


Quote:

too bad all this energy wasnt commited to reforming the countries they have ruined(on account of their own political incompetence). the gall, to come here demanding things from Americans, when they have lacked the courage or organisation or resolve to reform the countries of their own births!


As I've pointed out to you already, your own forebears did it. This nation is rich with history of people who fled nations for multitudes of reasons - wars, religious persecution, greener pastures, a better opportunity, or just because they were unpopular in their home countries. And every single one of them came here "demanding" nothing more than these illegals are "demanding": a chance to make for themselves a better life. And your entire attitude seems to be, "Fuck you, pal. I got mine, so nuts to you. Now get out."

Where did your ancestors come from? Why didn't they stay and try to reform their own country? Are you the product of weaklings, or cowards, or traitors, or deserters? Could they not organize, or were they so detestable that no decent country would have them? Yet you'd sit here in judgment of people who are fleeing death squads in nations where there can be no justice, where they can have no voice, and you're only too happy to tell them to shut the hell up and go back to where they belong, because while you're glad that your ancestors weren't turned away, you don't owe anyone else the same opportunities they were given by people far better and more American than you.

Quote:

if its not their responsibility, whos is it? why is there never any pressure placed on them? we're responsible for accepting all the worlds downtrodden.. makes me wonder where ill flee, when all the worlds refugees have come and overwhelmed the fabric of our society


I'll tell you this: You won't be welcome in Arizona.




Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:10 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

And Rap, spare us your phony indignation and your crocodile tears about the poor, abused illegals who are the "kidnap victims". You don't give two fucks about these people, as you've so often and so adequately pointed out already, so don't try to blow smoke up our asses by claiming that your concern is for them.


That's the best you can muster ?

I'm not the one dismissing the kidnappings and harsh treatment of an entire group of people, simply because it doesn't fit my argument - THAT'S YOUR DEPARTMENT!




Care to show me where I did that?


By the way, you HAVE dismissed the kidnappings and harsh treatment (torture) of entire groups of people. You call them "terrorists", even though no evidence supporting that claim is required, no charges brought, no trial forthcoming. And you've said over and over again that you're fine with it.

So again, stop pretending that you care about these people. It's been made abundantly clear that you don't, and never have, and never will.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:14 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
Hello,

I am one of the citizens of Arizona, and I can tell you that it doesn't matter how bad a problem is, or how upset it makes people.

Laws that have a strong potential for abuse are not the answer.

--Anthony



The majority of your fellow citizens disagree with you. They disagree that it doesn't matter how bad the problem is, as well as this law having a " strong potential " for abuse.




Heck, the MAJORITY of your fellow citizens voted for Al Gore in 2000. The MAJORITY of your fellow citizens favor a strong public option in health care. The MAJORITY of your fellow citizens voted overwhelmingly for Barack Obama for President, and voted in sweeping majorities of Democrats in both Houses of Congress.

Are you saying you ALWAYS support the majority, because they're always clearly right? Have you never thought the majority of your fellow citizens was wrong?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:18 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AnthonyT:
"i never hear any criticism of the Mexican and S. American governments"

Hello,

I hereby criticize the Mexican and S. American governments. They are just awful.

I want to be much, much better than they are.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner




You crazy dreamer, Anthony! You're nuts if you think we can be a better nation by NOT acting like corrupt, despotic, tyrannical banana republics! Maybe these right-wingers should change their party affiliation from Republican to Banana Republican.



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:28 PM

MOMCARP


It's been said that in the future, wars will be fought over water...(or is it food?) When people are piled upon people, everyone's quality of life goes in the toilet. This seems to be the destiny of areas of So Cal...
In the city next door to us, there are at least 200,000 "undocumented guests" throwing trash in the street, standing in the parking lot at Home Depot, parking decrepit old cars on their lawns, pushing 4 or 5 kids around in a shopping cart, etc.
When I worked on a crew that bought lunch from a "taco truck", one day I found 2 large pieces of broken glass in my burrito.
When I was kidding around with a plasterer I know and remarked; "in a couple of years, us gringos will be in the minority" He somewhat ominously replied; "You already are"
The ones who are crying "Arizona facist state!" have never been directly affected by illegals, and I have no sympathy.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:51 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


MomCarp, that's a load of BS. I live in Texas. You might have heard of it; we have a few illegals here, to put it mildly. And I spent more than 25 years working in print shops. I've known illegals, and I've had illegals gunning for my job. I fought back by being one of the best printers in an award-winning shop.

If you can't compete with the illegals, that sounds like an issue with employers who are hiring illegals and should be held legally responsible, and it sounds like you're just not doing your job well enough to set yourself apart from crews who'll do the job for less. Sometimes you have to compete by doing a BETTER job, not a cheaper one. People will still pay for quality, and if you can't make it, then as you've said, I have no sympathy. I've competed with illegals, and I've beaten them.

And in a free market, should they NOT be allowed to compete against you for the customer's dollars? If you can't compete, isn't that YOUR problem, not theirs? Now you want to round people up because they're forcing you to work harder, while the righties say the only way to make it in America is through hard work. Aren't you really upset that these illegals are doing a better job of chasing the American Dream than you are?

You righties confuse me. You SAY you want free trade and free market economies, then you turn around and say you can't compete in a free market against people who are willing to underbid you. If you obeyed your own beliefs, you'd fold up shop and move on to where you CAN compete, because the market where you are is obviously saturated.

At the same time, the right in general WILL NOT support tougher sanctions on employers or tougher regulations to make it harder to hire illegals in the first place. Rather than take away their incentive to come here, you'd rather waste time and money on a never-ending quest to round them all up and try to send them home.



Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:52 PM

ANTIMASON


Arizonas in a tough spot.. but ultimately, i think a state has the right to enforce immigration policy. if anyone has the say, its the people of Arizona. besides, the federal government isnt doing it, because it doesnt intend to. the federal government will just as soon give Arizona over to the UN or mexico..

ill tell you what i wont do.. and thats accept a microchipped ID card, so that i as a citizen can be monitored 24-7

you know what i think would be a good compromise? bring down the entitlement/wellfare state/government regulatory structure, and maybe then we can allow unfettered immigration and citizenship.

what are these people protesting?? the right to live here, without applying for citizenship? the problem isnt tourists or even documented workers- the problem is illegal immigration(ie people living or settling here, without citizenship)! the issue has become citizenship, and the accompanying social services/entitlements that come with it

this country has always had a history of migrant workers.. going back, we were less dependant on government to subsist. this is why the concept of liberty is so important- you can work wherever, educate wherever, consume whatever! just dont come crawling to the collective(government) if you make some poor choices along the way. prior to this century, thats how people DID survive.. and immigration wasnt an issue. this is what im saying.. the status of citizenship has changed.

those of you on the left, what do you want? you say this bill is racist, is it racist to enforce immigration laws? you want to allow these people to live here freely, without documentation. as a libertarian i get that! i want free trade and freedom of choice. however on the the other hand you want a massive public safety net that you feel everyone should contribute to. which is it? because the math will not add up.






NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 6:54 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


By the way, don't cry too much over losing SoCal and Arizona to Mexico. They already owned it, and just let us borrow it for a few generations. Or, if you're of another stripe, we stole it fair and square. And they're stealing it back. It's all good, as long as you're on the winning side, but it kinda sucks when you lose, huh?

Mike

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:04 PM

MOMCARP


This law is not an infringement of the 4th amendment (which applies to legal citizens, anyway)
It is an attempt to enforce existing law.
Let's be clear on one point,since 1950something, anyone visiting this country is required to carry paperwork stating the purpose of their presence here. Seems pretty fair.
The number of times I've been pulled over for a burned out tail light, driving 100mph or whatever; invariably the officer asks for paperwork. I don't feel that this is in violation of my civil liberties.
I am a mom, and a carp, you can call me either.
Nice to meet you...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:04 PM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


"The ones who are crying "Arizona facist state!" have never been directly affected by illegals, and I have no sympathy."

Hello,

Either the problem is as bad as you suggest, and as a Phoenix resident, I *must* have been directly affected by illegals... and still think the law is wrong...

Or the fact that I *haven't* suffered at the hands of these illegals means that there's really not that much of a problem.

--Anthony

"Liberty must not be purchased at the cost of Humanity." --Captain Robert Henner

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:05 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Meh, I made a rather reasonable and practical set of suggestions on this in another thread, only to have it utterly ignored, which is the usual response for that kinda thing, so I will simply point out that this policy is racist and unconstitutional, and therefore it doesn't matter whether 1%, 50% or even 100% of the people of Arizona support it, it's still racist and unconstitutional - human rights bein universal and applying to either everyone, or no one.

So, in regards to the thread title, I will borrow a quote from Captain America which seems ever so appropriate to the situation at hand.

"No. YOU move."

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:23 PM

MOMCARP


I am always confused when someone uses the term "unconstitutional" in connection with citizens of another country. How does our constitution apply to citizens of Mexico, South America, etc.?
An American can never become a Mexican citizen (please correct me if I'm wrong) own property, vote, or collect public assistance.
In America, citizens of other countries march through the streets by the thousands demanding American citizenship. Is there a bit of a disparity here?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:28 PM

ANTIMASON


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:

If you can't compete with the illegals, that sounds like an issue with employers who are hiring illegals and should be held legally responsible



force a private businessmen to pay a wage above what someone else might work for? instead of obstructing the free market forces, why not remove these excessive mandates and regulations and let people decide for themselves where they want to work and spend their money?

Quote:

and it sounds like you're just not doing your job well enough to set yourself apart from crews who'll do the job for less. Sometimes you have to compete by doing a BETTER job, not a cheaper one. People will still pay for quality, and if you can't make it, then as you've said, I have no sympathy. I've competed with illegals, and I've beaten them.


see, thats exactly why we should let the free market decide these things, and not politicians

Quote:

And in a free market, should they NOT be allowed to compete against you for the customer's dollars? If you can't compete, isn't that YOUR problem, not theirs? Now you want to round people up because they're forcing you to work harder, while the righties say the only way to make it in America is through hard work. Aren't you really upset that these illegals are doing a better job of chasing the American Dream than you are?


i think its less the competition for jobs(although thats part of the resentment), but more so the burden on social services. all things being equal, i think Americans are willing to compete for work. but paying into an ever demanding safety net, only for that money to be dispersed to people who just cannot contribute equally is just completely unfair and unsustainable; and im not someone who whines about 'fairness' very often..

Quote:

You righties confuse me. You SAY you want free trade and free market economies, then you turn around and say you can't compete in a free market against people who are willing to underbid you. If you obeyed your own beliefs, you'd fold up shop and move on to where you CAN compete, because the market where you are is obviously saturated.


thats true, and i think thats a bit hypocritical too. but at the same time, i can sympathize, if only in that American business are put under such a heavy tax/regulatory burden, that it doesnt always 'pay' anymore to take the straight and narrow. once again, i just think when the government comes in and price fixes(nevermind the govt caused inflation), it just puts Americans at yet another disadvantage. but i agree, as you said, competition is the key to the free market

Quote:

At the same time, the right in general WILL NOT support tougher sanctions on employers or tougher regulations to make it harder to hire illegals in the first place. Rather than take away their incentive to come here, you'd rather waste time and money on a never-ending quest to round them all up and try to send them home.


change the minimum wage laws, and you take away the incentive to hire illegals. if you punish the employers, they wont hire anybody! the company doesnt exist for the employees, it exists for the owner/shareholders/investors. the government may want to come in and take it over, and force the company to be a harbinger of social equality, but that doesnt make it so



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:29 PM

MOMCARP


Have you ever been in close proximity (as in a work situation) to an undocumented, non English speaking person for 8 hours? Or issued directions to workers in Spanish because you were the only person on a jobsite who spoke English?
Many Americans are egocentric in that they believe everyone should speak English; but the same can be said of "immigrants" who refuse to learn English.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, May 10, 2010 7:38 PM

ANTIMASON


sorry Frem, i never saw the suggestions. if i find a minute ill hunt them down.. (or you can just refresh our memories)

but as for 'human rights', in recent history thats been a codeword for 'entitlements'. people dont have the 'right' to healthcare. people dont have the 'right' to housing, and they certainly arent entitled to demand citizenship anywhere they want. we have rights as individuals, which means we have liberties that are granted to us as sovereign beings. but one of those is not to invade someone elses property and demand their assets. now if they want to declare war against the U.S., they can legitimately reclaim this land. but otherwise...

we already have a massive government that is unsustainable! we dont need more people on the wellfare rolls... and thats all i can think of. bring down the wellfare/entitlement state, and we can talk about anarchy

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, April 28, 2024 19:12 - 6319 posts
Dangerous Rhetoric coming from our so-called President
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:10 - 2 posts
You can't take the sky from me, a tribute to Firefly
Sun, April 28, 2024 18:06 - 294 posts
Scientific American Claims It Is "Misinformation" That There Are Just Two Sexes
Sun, April 28, 2024 17:44 - 24 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:47 - 3576 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, April 28, 2024 15:39 - 2314 posts
Russian losses in Ukraine
Sun, April 28, 2024 02:03 - 1016 posts
The Thread of Court Cases Trump Is Winning
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:37 - 20 posts
Case against Sidney Powell, 2020 case lawyer, is dismissed
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:29 - 13 posts
I'm surprised there's not an inflation thread yet
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:28 - 745 posts
Slate: I Changed My Mind About Kids and Phones. I Hope Everyone Else Does, Too.
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:19 - 3 posts
14 Tips To Reduce Tears and Remove Smells When Cutting Onions
Sat, April 27, 2024 21:08 - 9 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL