Wikileaks paid by Mossad to censor secrets for Israel by piratenews

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Wikileaks paid by Mossad to censor secrets for Israel

POSTED BY: PIRATENEWS
UPDATED: Tuesday, December 14, 2010 09:02
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3493
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, December 13, 2010 9:51 AM

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

Israeli jews igenocide Israeli Semites with white phosphorus in Gaza

WikiLeaks 'struck a deal with Israel' over diplomatic cables leaks

A number of commentators, particularly in Turkey and Russia, have been wondering why the hundreds of thousands of American classified documents leaked by the website last month did not contain anything that may embarrass the Israeli government, like just about every other state referred to in the documents. The answer appears to be a secret deal struck between the WikiLeaks “heart and soul”, as Assange humbly described himself once [1], with Israeli officials, which ensured that all such documents were 'removed' before the rest were made public.

Israeli jews genocide Israeli Semites with white phosphorus in Gaza

According to an Arabic investigative journalism website [2], Assange had received money from semi-official Israeli sources and promised them, in a “secret, video-recorded agreement,” not to publish any document that may harm Israeli security or diplomatic interests.

Israeli jews genocide Israeli Semites with white phosphorus in Gaza

The sources of the Al-Haqiqa report are said to be former WikiLeaks volunteers who have left the organisation in the last few months over Assange's “autocratic leadership” and “lack of transparency.”

In a recent interview with the German daily Die Tageszeitung, former WikiLeaks spokesperson Daniel Domscheit-Berg said he and other WikiLeaks dissidents are planning to launch their own whistleblowers' platform to fulfil WikiLeaks's original aim of “limitless file sharing.” [3]

Mr Domscheit-Berg, who is about to publish a book about his days 'Inside WikiLeaks', accuses Assange of acting as a “king” against the will of others in the organisation by “making deals” with media organisations that are meant to create an explosive effect, which others in WikiLeaks either know little or nothing about. [4]

Furthermore, Assange's eagerness for headline-grabbing scoops meant that WikiLeaks had not been able to 'restructure' itself to cope with this surge of interest, insiders add. This has meant that smaller leaks, which might be of interest to people at a local level, are now being overlooked for the sake of big stories. [5]

According to the Al-Haqiqa sources, Assange met with Israeli officials in Geneva earlier this year and struck the secret deal. The Israel government, it seems, had somehow found out or expected that the documents to be leaked contained a large number of documents about the Israeli attacks on Lebanon and Gaza in 2006 and 2008-9 respectively. These documents, which are said to have originated mainly from the Israeli embassies in Tel Aviv and Beirut, where removed and possibly destroyed by Assange, who is the only person who knows the password that can open these documents, the sources added.

Indeed, the published documents seem to have a 'gap' stretching over the period of July - September 2006, during which the 33-day Lebanon war took place. Is it possible that US diplomats and officials did not have any comments or information to exchange about this crucial event but spent their time 'gossiping' about every other 'trivial' Middle-Eastern matter?

Following the leak (and even before), Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu said in a press conference that Israel had “worked in advance” to limit any damage from leaks, adding that “no classified Israeli material was exposed by WikiLeaks.” [6] In an interview with the Time magazine around the same time, Assange praised Netanyahu as a hero of transparency and openness! [7]

According to another report [8], a left-leaning Lebanese newspaper had met with Assange twice and tried to negotiate a deal with him, offering “a big amount of money”, in order to get hold of documents concerning the 2006 war, particularly the minutes of a meeting held at the American embassy in Beirut on 24th July 2006, which is widely considered as a ‘war council’ meeting between American, Israeli and Lebanese parties that played a role in the war again Hizbullah and its allies. The documents the Al-Akhbar editors received, however, all date to 2008 onwards and do not contain “anything of value,” the sources confirm. This only goes to support the Israel deal allegations.

Notes:

[1] http://www.wired.com/threatlevel/2010/09/wikileaks-revolt/
[2] http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/977/36/
[3] http://www.taz.de/1/netz/netzpolitik/artikel/1/vom-hacker-zum-popstar/
[4] http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,732212,00.html
[5] http://www.spiegel.de/international/germany/0,1518,719619,00.html
[6] http://www.haaretz.com/print-edition/news/netanyahu-wikileaks-revelati
ons-were-good-for-israel-1.327773
[7] http://www.time.com/time/world/article/0,8599,2034040-2,00.html
[8] http://www.syriatruth.info/content/view/986/36/

http://www.indybay.org/newsitems/2010/12/07/18665978.php

http://forum.prisonplanet.com/index.php?topic=194615.0

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 13, 2010 11:39 AM

FREMDFIRMA

A. The Izzie counter-intel folk actually know their ass from a hole in the ground ?

B. Without us backing them up 100% all the time no matter how wrong they are, they'd just about dry up and blow away.

C. Given A&B, if the chance existed to rip them off in the bargain, Julian certainly would have taken it.

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 13, 2010 11:48 AM

CANTTAKESKY

If this is true, it sounds a lot like blackmail--maybe going both ways.

Can't Take (my gorram) Sky
------
Everything I say is just my opinion, not fact.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 13, 2010 12:01 PM

FREMDFIRMA

Well, CTS - ponder this, if Israel were to lose our unconditial, unilateral support, politically, militarily and financially...

What would HAPPEN to them ?

So why should someone with an axe to grind split their attack between them and us, when taking us to pieces wins the whole ballgame in a single blow ?

The money is just bonus points.

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, December 13, 2010 4:13 PM

CANTTAKESKY

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
So why should someone with an axe to grind split their attack between them and us, when taking us to pieces wins the whole ballgame in a single blow?

I think you lost me.

So...are you saying these alleged negotiations with Israel don't make sense? That attacking the USA is the same as attacking Israel at the same time? Therefore it is all BS?

Can't Take (my gorram) Sky
------
Everything I say is just my opinion, not fact.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:16 AM

FREMDFIRMA

I'm saying that if they bribed Julian to withhold information that made them look bad (most of which is already public knowledge, the public just doesn't seem to give a shit) he may well have just taken the money and laughed up his sleeve, because if he destabilizes the US and we cut off our support for Israel, that act alone will do far worse to them than a million released documents of already-known atrocities.

Why bother smashing the top floor when you can blow out the foundations and make the whole bloody thing come down, yes ?

-F

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 4:35 AM

CANTTAKESKY

Quote:
Originally posted by Fremdfirma:
he may well have just taken the money and laughed up his sleeve, because if he destabilizes the US and we cut off our support for Israel, that act alone will do far worse to them than a million released documents of already-known atrocities.

Ahhh... yeah, yeah... I gotcha now. Sorry that I'm a bit slow on the uptake sometimes. I can't think cleverly like that, even if it is spelled out for me. Terrible.

Can't Take (my gorram) Sky
------
Everything I say is just my opinion, not fact.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, December 14, 2010 9:02 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

$500,000 bail, house arrest in mansion for spook.

Quote:
The 39-year-old appeared at City of Westminster Magistrates’ Court for a fresh bail appeal, backed by a host of celebrity supporters and hundreds of protesters.

He was granted conditional bail for £240,000, thanks in large part to an address being put forward where the Australian national could reside.

Vaughn Smith, a former Army captain who founded and runs the journalist Frontline Club, offered his 600-acre country estate as a bail address as well as a financial surety.

During a previous bail application a week ago it is thought the judge was unimpressed with a PO Box address in Australia which was put forward.

The Army's Frontline Club sounds like a front for MI6.

Wikileaks to uncensor 3,700 Israeli warcrime docs censored by Wikileaks?
http://fireflyfans.net/mthread.asp?b=18&t=46858

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE