A Bizarre Theory. by FREMDFIRMA

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

A Bizarre Theory.

POSTED BY: FREMDFIRMA
UPDATED: Wednesday, November 14, 2012 08:14
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1050
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, November 8, 2012 7:32 AM

I wonder if it ever occured to anyone that perhaps the confidence of Rove and the rest of them was perhaps because they had some actual, logical reason to EXPECT those results, as in they had some foreknowledge or awareness of some factor which might indeed have made it happen that way ?

Now here's a little speculation, just wild ass theorizing, really.

Suppose that some years back, there was this candidate, we'll call him Foliage.
Now Foilage was about as bright as his name, but some of his advisors were quite clever, and got the notion that if they owned and operated the process of collecting and more importantly COUNTING the votes, it allowed them to ensure their will regardless of anything else.

Of course, these strange results did not pass without notice, first came denial, then suspicion, then investigation, the latter being private because no one else wanted or dared to ask some of the questions involved.

Enter a collective we'll call the Muckers, the Muckers are people who work for Foliage and his backers, who's job it is to make sure things go as planned.

And of course the front man in time changed from Foliage to Robot, but this changed nothing of consequence, and the game went on.

Only....

Enter another collective, and we'll call them the Skells - they hate Foilage and Robot, and having been "in the loop" for some time, have obtained the source codes and operational information of all those pretty little machines, as well as access to previous nefarious alterations claimed as "errors" or "glitches" and the means by which they were done.

So the day comes, and every time a code is altered to flip votes by the Muckers, the Skells flip it back, every time negative votes are uploaded by the Muckers, the Skells put them back, on and on and round and round this goes, and suddenly there's a lot of VERY upset people in the Foliage/Robot establishment.

Just, you know, a wacky conspiracy theory, is all.

-Frem

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 8, 2012 7:38 AM

STORYMARK

Seems reasonable.

He expected to win Ohio - because he had the receipt!

Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 8, 2012 8:34 AM

JONGSSTRAW

It's actually pretty basic. Rove and others like Morris, Gallup, and Rasmussen badly miscalculated the demographics. Three million fewer Republicans voted for Romney than voted for McCain in 2008. And simultaneously, Obama outperformed their skewed models, capturing roughly the same percentages as 2008, but with a larger non-white voter base. The so-called enthusiasm gap was either a planted political myth or an epic failure to grasp the new realities of the voting populace.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 8, 2012 9:24 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

Don't know how many of you saw this before the election...

http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-retired-nsa-analyst-proves-gop
-is-stealing-elections/article20598.html

"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 8, 2012 9:43 AM

OONJERAH

That's Damning!

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, November 13, 2012 8:25 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

http://www.amazon.com/An-American-Story-Brad-Johnson/dp/B0002QG98E

https://www.google.com/search?q=battle+of+athens+tennessee

Which is why fluoride is in the water, mercury is in vaccines and dental fillings, and barium aluminum chemtrails are in the air. It's the Pax.

Game over.

All that's left is the inevitable shooting, bombing, napalm and nuking.

Bow to your New World Order*.

*a wholy owned subsidiary of the trillionaire jew banksters

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, November 14, 2012 3:33 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up

Quote:
Originally posted by Kwicko:
Don't know how many of you saw this before the election...

http://www.ukprogressive.co.uk/breaking-retired-nsa-analyst-proves-gop
-is-stealing-elections/article20598.html

Interesting strategy. Be able to steal enough votes to win in all 50 states, and arrange it so you lose.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, November 14, 2012 5:02 AM

BYTEMITE

It would explain why Fox News was so shocked.

Frem has suggested that another group tampered the vote back the other direction. There is not much evidence for it beyond that elections are both always a mess, and always extremely predictable despite media coverage.

I think elections are rigged, and I will continue to think it until I am wrong about an election.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, November 14, 2012 8:14 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...

Byte, for once I also subscribe to your conspiracy theory. I've long considered the possibility...perhaps more than possibility...and when they came along with voting "machines" it seemed even more PROBABLE to me. Didn't know until I read that article, however, that so many on the right owned so much of the voting machines.

On the other hand, I have difficulty believing so much effort would have been put into voter SUPPRESSION if they already knew they had it locked up.

But I agree with Jong for the most part. Sometimes the simplest answer is the right one...isn't there a saying about that or something?

Listening to some pundits debate it last night and agree with one of the things they said. The shock was a result of right-wing MEDIA, which has an investment in hate and anger but nothing to lose by an election. They hollered so loudly about a "landslide" for Romney that of course their audience bought into it; kinda surprises me the Big Guys did, since they should know better, but I think they bought into it too. Poor babies.

Tit for tat got us where we are today. If we want to be grownups, we need to resist the ugliness. If we each did, this would be a better reflection on Firefly and a more welcome place. I will try.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE