This woman is a hero by 6ixStringJack

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

This woman is a hero

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 26, 2022 10:54
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1588
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, June 2, 2021 4:54 PM

https://legalinsurrection.com/2021/06/im-a-mom-seeking-records-of-crit
ical-race-and-gender-curriculum-now-the-school-committee-may-sue-to-stop-me/

Seriously... Fuck the racist and sexist Democrats running our entire educational system now.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:28 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

In a different state, but here we see that Libtards are, in fact, the most intolerant and incapable of open discussion group there is.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/neighbour-gives-virginia-mother-middle-21502
2589.html

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:44 PM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

And you're a good example of rational, topic-based discussion? As an example of your 'rational' discussion style - for example, you calling people who disagree with you Libtards at every turn? - or seeking out posts by people here who happen to disagree with you to personally troll them?

Like that?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:48 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:

And you're a good example of rational, topic-based discussion? As an example of your 'rational' discussion style - for example, you calling people who disagree with you Libtards at every turn? - or seeking out posts by people here who happen to disagree with you to personally troll them?

Like that?

You're saying I personally troll other people here?

linkys?

I generally only refer to folk who act like a Libtard, post like a Libtard, are illogical like a Libtard, are irrational like a Libtard, as Libtards. Folk who don't exhibit the characteristics of Libtards are normally not referred to as Libtards by me.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 3, 2021 7:53 PM

SECOND

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at https://www.mediafire.com/two

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

Seriously... Fuck the racist and sexist Democrats running our entire educational system now.

What is critical race theory, the school of thought enraging Nicole Solas?

Senators have condemned it. Fox News rails against it. What is this much-maligned theory, and why are we hearing so much about it now?

In America’s never-ending culture wars, a new phrase has begun popping up with ever-increasing frequency: critical race theory.

Senators have spoken out against it. Parents have fought their school boards over it. Fox News mentions it so often that it sometimes refers to it just by its initials, CRT.

One such headline concerned Nicole Solas, a mother in South Kingstown, Rhode Island. Ms Solas, who says her young daughter just started school, suspected that it was teaching her the dreaded CRT. She demanded to see the curriculum.

After meeting resistance, Ms Solas filed over 160 public records requests, according to local reports. Exasperated, the school board met to consider suing her to stop. The drama earned her an interview on Fox & Friends.

“I have a lot of questions,” Ms Solas told the hosts. “They’re teaching something that they’re trying to hide from you… They’re being opaque about it.”

What is that “something”? What school of thought could be so heinous that American parents – and the TV stations they watch – are up in arms over it?

The Encyclopaedia Britannica defines critical race theory as an “intellectual movement and loosely organized framework of legal analysis based on the premise that race is … a socially constructed (culturally invented) category that is used to oppress and exploit people of colour.”

Officially organised in 1989, the theory essentially acknowledges what modern progressives call “systemic racism” – discrimination that’s not just acted out by individuals, but baked into our society’s institutions.

“Critical race theorists hold that the law and legal institutions in the United States are inherently racist,” the encyclopaedia goes on, “insofar as they function to create and maintain social, economic, and political inequalities between whites and nonwhites, especially African Americans.”

Republican pundits and politicians, however, present it differently. When conservatives complain about critical race theory, they often say it accuses people – not institutions – of inherent racism.

“Critical race theory asserts that people with white skin are inherently racist, not because of their actions, words or what they actually believe in their heart – but by virtue of the colour of their skin,” Rep Ralph Norman, South Carolina’s Republican congressman, said at a press conference earlier this month.

He was flanked by several other members of the House GOP’s Freedom Caucus, including the conservative firebrand Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene, as they unveiled a bill to stop the teaching of CRT.

Rep Lauren Boebert of Colorado put it more simply.

“Democrats want to teach our children to hate each other,” she said.

Experts say this misrepresents critical race theory, whether or not it’s on purpose.

“I’m not really sure that the conservatives right now know what it is or know its history,” Andrew Hartman, a history professor at Illinois State University, told NPR.

But that might be beside the point. What critical race theory represents to conservatives, Mr Hartman says, is a threat to the idea that America has already solved its racism problem.

“Conservatives, since the 1960s, have increasingly defined American society as a colourblind society, in the sense that maybe there were some problems in the past but American society corrected itself and now we have these laws and institutions that are meritocratic and anybody, regardless of race, can achieve the American dream,” the professor said.

Critical race theory gets in the way of that idea, so according to Republican leaders, it must be stopped.

“Families did not ask for this divisive nonsense,” Senate Republicans wrote in a scathing letter to the US Department of Education. “Voters did not vote for it. Americans never decided our children should be taught that our country is inherently evil.”

There’s also another, simpler reason for opposing the theory: it’s a way to get votes.

Christine Matthews, president of Bellwether Research, says President Biden’s popularity – polls consistently show more than 50 per cent of Americans support him – means Republicans have to look elsewhere for reasons voters should turn on Democrats. In lieu of a polarising president, the GOP needs an issue “as extreme and threatening to white culture as possible.” A plot to indoctrinate children with anti-American ideology appears to fit that bill nicely.

“I think it’s just one more addition to the culture war that the Republicans really want to fight and it’s what they want to make the 2022 midterms about,” Ms Matthews told NPR.

So as the 2022 elections get closer, expect to hear the phrase “critical race theory” more than ever.

More at www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/critical-race-th
eory-republicans-conservatives-b1858633.html

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, June 3, 2021 11:18 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Your opinion doesn't matter, Second.

Go post on Twitter. The fat pink haired weirdos will welcome you into that echo chamber with open arms.

--------------------------------------------------

Give me liberty or just come shoot me in my house. I'm so over this ridiculous reality.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 4, 2021 4:47 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

Quote:
You're saying I personally troll other people here?

Are you claiming you don't troll people here? Jeeze, I don't even have to pull out examples of you trolling me. All I need to do is pull out examples from the 'Garden' thread of you insulting Jack and him replying that if you were going to keep doing that that he wasn't going to respond anymore.

Do you remember that at all? Because you (very briefly - 3 posts iirc) tried to pretend to not be an asshole, so I know you must have read it. But then again, maybe you were drunk.

Quote:
I generally only refer to folk who act like a Libtard, post like a Libtard, are illogical like a Libtard, are irrational like a Libtard, as Libtards. Folk who don't exhibit the characteristics of Libtards are normally not referred to as Libtards by me.

So when you refer to 'Libtards' - none of whom you know in real life som you have no clue as to whether or not they "act ... post ... are illogical ... and irrational like a 'Libtard'" - you're not calling entire groups of unknown people names?

I have to say, you and THUGGER are opposite bookends for smarts (or lack thereof) and being - yanno - hate-filled.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 4, 2021 5:06 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

Quote:
Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Quote:
You're saying I personally troll other people here?
Are you claiming you don't troll people here? Jeeze, I don't even have to pull out examples of you trolling me. All I need to do is pull out examples from the 'Garden' thread of you insulting Jack and him replying that if you were going to keep doing that that he wasn't going to respond anymore.

Do you remember that at all? Because you (very briefly - 3 posts iirc) tried to pretend to not be an asshole, so I know you must have read it. But then again, maybe you were drunk.

having an ongoing conversation with him since early May - you call that trolling?
Tell you what, if 6ix states that I am trolling him, I am certainly willing to cease. I've already ceased numerous unproductive facets of that exchange, so discontinuing the whole thing won't be any water off mt back.

Quote:
Quote:
I generally only refer to folk who act like a Libtard, post like a Libtard, are illogical like a Libtard, are irrational like a Libtard, as Libtards. Folk who don't exhibit the characteristics of Libtards are normally not referred to as Libtards by me.
So when you refer to 'Libtards' you're not calling entire groups of unknown people names?

An entire group, defined by them acting as Libtard, would be a fair target to being referred to as Libtard.

For example, almost everybody who states as fact that 2 + 2 = 5 is clearly a Libtard. That statement does not conform with reality.
Likewise, all people who claim that having massive budget cuts will reduce the budget all the way from $900 Billion down to $1.1 Trillion, they are also all Libtards. That math also does not comport with reality, only with Libtard Maths.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, June 4, 2021 12:07 PM

6IXSTRINGJACK

I wouldn't call my interactions with JSF in the Garden thread trolling. It's actually been very helpful to me so far, although I know in many ways it's not been helpful in the way that he intended it to be.

He did insult me several times there, or at the very least it very much appeared so in a written form. I won't abide that, so I let him know that (A) I do things on my own time frame, (B) before I do something that is going to be labor and/or cost intensive and/or that requires me going into that pit of a crawl space I need to agree there is a benefit of doing it, and (C) that I've still got a billion other things on my plate right now that I'm trying to balance out.

Aside from teaching tech to family, I don't like teaching people stuff at all. I have zero patience for it. I let them know at my last job that I wasn't going to teach anybody how to do the job either, and if they really liked how I did things well enough to want me to do so that they could give me a manager position.

I'm glad that JSF has been around to throw ideas out there and that he stopped with the insults. I let the huge bolding of the yellow paint marker thing slide, because he is helping me and that little dig is nothing comared to the guy whispering to his wife for me to get a haircut and a vaccine when they entered the store behind me the other day. Totally not worth blowing up and losing help over.

But yeah... I don't like the Libtard thing. It's only slightly better than Roomba's Nazi thing was.

I think at the end of the day, except for Brenda (obviously) and Sigs (most of the time), we're all pretty confrontational people.

That's going to probably be amplified now that the worst of the worst here are gone and all we really have left is Second and Ted.

Try to be nice to each other.

--------------------------------------------------

Give me liberty or just come shoot me in my house. I'm so over this ridiculous reality.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, September 3, 2022 3:52 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

I got another Weekly Update email from Judicial Watch:

School District Settles with Coach Fired for Objecting to Critical Race Theory

David Flynn has been a devotee of Dedham Massachusetts High School his whole life. As a student, he led the football team to a championship, then became the assistant football coach for four years, and eventually took the role of head coach in 2011.

However, he was abruptly fired in 2021 after exercising his right as a parent-citizen to raise concerns about critical race theory and Black Lives Matter propaganda in his daughter’s seventh-grade history class.

We took his case, and we’re pleased to announce that he settled his civil rights lawsuit against his former employers at Dedham Public Schools.

“The past two years have been difficult for me and my family. I thank my family, friends, and everyone else who reached out for their continued support,” said Coach Flynn. “With Judicial Watch’s help, I can move on from this challenging situation knowing that by raising my concerns through the appropriate channels I made a difference for the students and families of Dedham Public Schools. I hope other parents can learn from this and not back down from fighting for what is best for their families.”

As part of the settlement, the Superintendent of Dedham Public Schools, Michael Welch, acknowledged “the important and valid issues” raised by Flynn and specific changes in school policies because of Flynn’s complaint, including banning teachers from promoting Black Lives Matter to students online.

The Superintendent’s acknowledgment is the result of a February 2021 lawsuit filed in the United States District Court for the District of Massachusetts against the superintendent, high school principal, and high school athletic director for retaliating against Flynn for exercising his First Amendment rights (Flynn v. Forrest et al. (No. 21-cv-10256)).

The superintendent wrote in the letter that Flynn’s concerns were valid and that the school district is amicable to the settlement:

Dear Dave,

I hope you and your family are well. I am writing this letter to acknowledge the important and valid issues you raised regarding the Dedham Public Schools and the subsequent lawsuit you filed in federal court. I am pleased that we are able to amicably settle this matter after the recently filed appeal of the court’s decision.

First and foremost, I want to acknowledge and validate the concerns you initially raised regarding your daughter’s experiences at Dedham Middle School. You had every right to inquire about these issues, and you followed the appropriate steps in attempting to learn more. You correctly pointed out that the 7th grade social studies curriculum had significantly changed and parents were not informed of these changes. In probing this matter further, you discovered that the district’s website did not accurately reflect the new curriculum content, and parents were unable to understand what was being taught. Your legitimate questions prompted additional conversations at the School Committee level that ultimately led to the establishment of a Curriculum Advisory Committee that now brings together parents, community members, and district educators to broadly review and more thoroughly communicate curriculum changes and concerns. Curriculum updates are a necessary and important part of the work of school districts, and effectively communicating these improvements is a critical component of this process.

Your initial inquiry triggered a larger internal conversation about the district’s oversight in the teaching of these new curriculum units. More specifically, the sequencing of the curriculum’s identity unit and the virtual use of a Black Lives Matter emoji t-shirt by a teacher sparked a series of intense conversations about teacher autonomy and the importance of balanced messaging and viewpoints in the classroom. As you pointed out, positive intentions can often have unintended negative impacts on students. Ultimately, I directed staff to remove these t-shirt emojis and instructed them to not wear these in the classroom in the future.

Finally, I understand that after you raised these concerns at the classroom level, you left that initial conversation expecting to hear directly from the building principal. It appears this was unclear within the school and you did not hear back in a timely manner. I am sorry for this breakdown. Effective two-way dialogue among parents and school staff is the foundation of mutual trust. While we pride ourselves on this connection, in this particular instance this fueled frustration and identified room for improvement.

I regret that these initial justifiable concerns ultimately led to where we are today. As you have indicated, I appreciate your recognition of the opportunity to have improved the trajectory of this sequence. With this settlement, I hope we are able to put any divisions behind us and begin the important work of healing through better conversations and listening.

I recognize the school district's opportunity to improve based upon the issues you have identified, and I thank you for raising them. As educators, I believe we can always learn from our experiences. Thank you for your many years of dedicated commitment to the development of student-athletes in Dedham.

Sincerely,
Michael J. Welch
Superintendent

This is a remarkable victory for Coach Flynn, as his federal civil rights lawsuit resulted in the Dedham School District admitting that he was absolutely right to be concerned about the district introducing a new, controversial CRT-style curriculum without parental notice or involvement. And Coach Flynn also appreciates that the teachers will no longer be able to use virtual learning to push Black Lives Matter symbols. It shouldn’t have taken a federal civil rights lawsuit for the school district to do the right thing. We hope other school officials take note that they must treat parental curriculum concerns with respect and avoid radical indoctrination of children.

Our lawsuits and FOIA requests on critical race theory and other leftist extremism are extensive:

Earlier this month, we sued on behalf of a Minneapolis taxpayer over a teachers’ contract that provides discriminatory job protections to certain racial minorities. The lawsuit was filed against the superintendent of the Minneapolis Public Schools, the Minneapolis Public Schools, and the Minneapolis Board of Education for violating the Equal Protection Guarantee of the Minnesota Constitution.
In July 2022 we sued the U.S. Department of Defense for records related to the United States Naval Academy implementing critical race theory in the training of naval recruits.
Records produced in April 2022 from the National Credit Union Administration (NCUA) show the government agency responsible for regulating credit unions required “inclusion and unconscious bias training” for the agency’s employees and contractors and offered advice on how to recognize and address alleged “microaggressions” in the workplace.
Records produced in February 2022 from the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau (CFPB) included a PowerPoint presentation titled “Race and gender based microaggressions” that was used for training at the organization.
Two sets of records we obtained in November 2021 related to the teaching of critical race theory in Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS), Maryland’s largest school system, included a training course with information about a book titled “Antiracist Baby” that introduces the youngest readers to “the concept and power of antiracism,” and says it’s the “perfect gift” for “ages baby to age 3.”
Records from Loudoun County, VA, obtained in October 2021 revealed a coordinated effort to advance critical race theory initiatives in Loudoun County public schools despite widespread public opposition.
A training document provided to us in October 2021 by a whistleblower in the Westerly School District of Rhode Island, details how its schools are using teachers to push critical race theory in classrooms. The training course was assembled by the left-leaning Highlander Institute and cites quotes from Bettina Love, from whom the Biden administration distanced itself publicly after her statements equating “whiteness” to oppression.
Records produced in June 2021 by Wellesley Public Schools in Massachusetts confirmed the use of “affinity spaces” that divide students and staff based on race as a priority and objective of the school district’s “diversity, equity and inclusion” plan. The school district also admitted that between September 1, 2020, and May 17, 2021, it created “five distinct” segregated spaces.
Heavily redacted records we obtained in May 2021 from Montgomery County Public Schools (MCPS) in Maryland included documents related to their $454,000 “Anti-racist system audit” and critical race theory classes. Students were taught that the phrase “Make America Great Again” was an example of “covert white supremacy.”

Why Gen. Mark Milley Should Be Court-Martialed

Chris Farrell, our Director of Investigations & Research and a former U.S. Army intelligence officer, has identified the most egregious examples of treasonous subversion by a commissioned officer since Benedict Arnold. And that officer currently is at the top of the military hierarchy, no less. Here is Chris’ report in The Washington Times.

Gen. Mark A. Milley, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, should be subject to an Article 32 Hearing under the provisions of the Uniform Code of Military Justice for his conduct and statements as memorialized in the Bob Woodward book “Peril,” and the Aug. 8, 2022, New Yorker magazine excerpt of a forthcoming book by Susan B. Glasser and Peter Baker.

An Article 32 Hearing is the military equivalent of a civilian grand jury, and should probable cause of the commission of a crime be established, it would lead to Gen. Milley’s court-martial. The Army has an affirmative duty to maintain good order and discipline, especially with regard to senior leader misconduct.

History provides an example of a senior officer engaged in misconduct. Assistant Chief of the Army Air Service Brig. Gen. Billy Mitchell was court-martialed in 1925 for remarks to the press concerning two deadly military aviation accidents.

Mitchell made the following offending statements: “These incidents are the direct result of the incompetency, criminal negligence and almost treasonable administration of the national defense by the Navy and War Departments,” and “The bodies of my former companions in the air molder under the soil in America, and Asia, Europe and Africa, many, yes a great many, sent there directly by official stupidity.”

On Dec. 17, 1925, Mitchell was found guilty of “conduct of a nature to bring discredit upon the military service.” The court suspended Mitchell from rank, command, and duty, with the forfeiture of all pay and allowances for five years. Mitchell resigned from his commission as an Army officer on Feb. 1, 1926. Some would say that history vindicated Mitchell, with the coming of World War II. Nonetheless, Mitchell paid the price for press statements outside the scope of his authority and for his insubordination.

Gen. Milley called his communist Chinese military counterpart in October 2020 and January 2021 with unauthorized promises and assurances of advanced warnings of U.S. military intentions and actions. America learned of these contacts through the book “Peril,” authored by Mr. Woodward and Robert Costa. In the book, Gen. Milley is quoted as saying, “General Li, I want to assure you that the American government is stable and everything is going to be OK. We are not going to attack or conduct any kinetic operations against you.” And then, reportedly, Gen. Milley said this: “General Li, you and I have known each other for five years. If we’re going to attack, I’m going to call you ahead of time. It’s not going to be a surprise.”

Gen. Milley admitted to making the calls. A spokesman for Gen. Milley stated that Gen. Milley acted within his authority as the senior military adviser to the president and the secretary of defense, yet Gen. Milley failed to consult any civilian authority, a fact confirmed by Christopher Miller, the former acting secretary of defense, and by former President Donald Trump.

Former Secretary of State Mike Pompeo, a graduate of West Point and an Army officer, as well as a lawyer, congressman and former director of the CIA, described Gen. Milley’s actions: “If you had a senior military leader, who is simply an adviser, tell the Chinese Communist Party that they would get notice of an attack, this rivals anything we’ve seen in our nation’s history.”

Mr. Woodward and Mr. Costa “obtained” a copy of a call transcript between Gen. Milley and House Speaker Nancy Pelosi concerning Mr. Trump and nuclear weapons. The book provides detailed quotes from both Gen. Milley and Mrs. Pelosi. In one exchange, Mrs. Pelosi at length attacks Mr. Trump, saying “they couldn’t even stop him from an assault on the Capitol,” and that “he’s crazy. You know he’s crazy. He’s been crazy for a long time.”

“So don’t say you don’t know what his state of mind is. He’s crazy and what he did yesterday is further evidence of his craziness. But anyway, I appreciate what you said.”

Gen. Milley responds to Mrs. Pelosi, “Madam Speaker, I agree with you on everything.”

Gen. Milley obviously cooperated in some manner with Mr. Woodward. Freedom of Information Act requests for call transcripts were stonewalled by the Pentagon. Gen. Milley is hiding the information from the American people and forcing a current lawsuit in federal court to compel him to release information he selectively leaked to friendly reporters.

Mr. Baker and Ms. Glasser make clear that Gen. Milley loathed Mr. Trump and was grossly insubordinate. The authors quote Gen. Milley saying, “F—- that s—-, I’ll just fight him” [President Trump], and, “If they want to court-martial me, or put me in prison, have at it. But I will fight from the inside.” A general “fighting from the inside” against the president is the very definition of subversion.

Gen. Milley must be held to account for his conduct and selectively leaked statements. His conduct goes far beyond the controversy of the Mitchell court-martial. Mitchell pales by comparison. His reported actions, if true, are the most egregious examples of treasonous subversion by a commissioned officer of the United States since Maj. Gen. Benedict Arnold.

Hundreds of Adult Migrants Pose as Minors to Dodge Deportation

The Biden administration’s border crisis makes a mockery of the rule of law. If the administration doesn’t follow the law, why would a foreign national trying to game our immigration system? Our Corruption Chronicles blog has the details.

As if the crisis along the southern border were not bad enough, adult illegal immigrants are posing as minors to enter—and stay in—the U.S. since typically those under 18 are welcomed with open arms. The government refers to them as Unaccompanied Alien Children (UAC) and hundreds of thousands have entered the country in the last few years. The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) is charged with caring for illegal aliens under the age of 18 and the agency spends millions of dollars annually to house, medically treat, entertain, and school UAC who come mainly from Central America. Undoubtedly, illegal immigrant minors are almost always allowed to remain in the U.S. and quickly disbursed to a government-funded shelter upon arrival at the border.

The special treatment has led to even more criminal behavior by those already breaking the law entering the U.S. illegally. In El Paso alone, Customs and Border Protection (CBP) confirms that more than 655 adult migrants posing as minors have been busted in fiscal year 2022. This week the agency announced that the El Paso Sector has recently seen an unusual amount of activity involving adults posing as minors to dodge deportation. In one of the incidents agents identified 10 adults posting as UAC while in custody. CBP has a limited time to transfer UAC to HHS custody once the illegal border crossers are vetted and there begins the journey to stay in the U.S. Bigger criminal enterprises are behind the imposter plots, according to federal authorities. “Transnational Criminal Organizations exploit migrants convincing them to pose as minors in order to be processed as such” said El Paso Sector Border Patrol Chief Gloria I. Chavez. “Identity fraud is a common tactic used by TCOs to take advantage of migrants who do not know the legal consequences of their actions as they attempt to deceive authorities.”

The frontline Homeland Security agency says three adults posing as minors were also discovered recently using counterfeit documentation at the El Paso Sector Central Processing Center in Texas. The illegal immigrants, a 21-year-old female, 22-year-old female and 22-year-old male, are from Guatemala and were part of a group of 13 apprehended by federal agents in the area. “The three were encountered, along with nine unaccompanied children from Guatemala and one adult,” CBP writes in a statement. “These individuals pose as minors in order to avoid expulsion.” In a separate incident this month three males from Guatemala, ages 18, 25 and 26, intentionally posed as minors to remain in the U.S. Federal agents detected discrepancies between their stories and documentation presented in their failed attempt to pass as minors.

In yet another incident made public this month, CBP officers at El Paso’s Ysleta Station, which is responsible for 16.7 miles of the international boundary along the Rio Grande River, discovered a group of what appeared to be eight minors later determined to be from Guatemala crossing the border illegally. Two of the illegal immigrants pretending to be underage turned out to be imposters, according to the feds. One was a 22-year-old male and the other a 19-year-old female. As in the other cases, agents, though overwhelmed with an onslaught of illegal immigration, detected discrepancies during interviews. CBP warns that individuals who attempt to pose as unaccompanied children may face charges under American laws that prohibit false statements to federal agents and conspiracy to defraud the U.S.

The last thing the country’s disastrous immigration system needs is more UAC. American taxpayers already spend a fortune to accommodate them through HHS’s Office of Refugee Resettlement (ORR), which funds and oversees dozens of state-licensed care facilities to house the young migrants when they arrive in the U.S. In fiscal year 2021 ORR housed an unprecedented 122,731 UAC, according to government figures, and this year’s budget is a whopping $8.76 billion. HHS projects that in 2022 it will accommodate approximately 149,000 and between 500 and 600 daily for the remainder of the fiscal year, which ends in September. Last year the overwhelming majority of illegal immigrant minors in U.S. custody, approximately 72%, were over 14 years of age and 66% were male. Nearly half (47%) of the underage migrants came from Guatemala, 32% from Honduras, 13% from El Salvador and 8% from other countries.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, October 26, 2022 10:54 AM

JAYNEZTOWN

Quote:
Originally posted by second:

He was flanked by several other members of the House GOP’s Freedom Caucus, including the conservative firebrand Rep Marjorie Taylor Greene, as they unveiled a bill to stop the teaching of CRT.

Rep Lauren Boebert of Colorado put it more simply.

“Democrats want to teach our children to hate each other,” she said. .

I feel this woman could have her own thread, maybe she does but I did not see it or can not remember

Marjorie Taylor Greene accuses left of attacking her after another reported ‘swatting’ call made to her home
https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-politics/marjorie
-taylor-greene-police-prank-called-home-b2210946.html?src=rss

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE