GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Lunch with the cast (sans Gina)

POSTED BY: GRAYFURY
UPDATED: Sunday, December 11, 2005 17:39
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 7786
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:23 AM

GRAYFURY

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:27 AM

NIKNAK


Just had a look out of curiosity. Current bid $499! There are some wealthy and obsessed fans out there.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 4, 2005 6:22 AM

PIFFLE101


I already paid to much for the Flan..So Im gonna for go the lunch.

-------------------------------------------------
Because Dancers are tough,mean...Chicas!! -Summer Glau

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 4, 2005 7:58 AM

BATMARLOWE


If could afford it. I'd be bidding.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 4, 2005 4:26 PM

TINFOIL


Can anyone loan me, say, $550? Please?

=)

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 4, 2005 5:57 PM

BROWNCOATER


Can't afford it. But Gina would have to be there.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, December 7, 2005 8:05 AM

ASHE


Wow, it ended with a total of $865. I love the show, I'm a fan and if I didn't just get back from Vegas I would be going to the Flanvention. I don't know if I would pay that much to have lunch with everyone, and Joss and Gina won't be there.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:36 PM

BRUISERSMOM


Quote:

Originally posted by Byrd101:
What a bunch of bull. Even now, there won't be a sequel, not a chance. The only people who saw this movie were the fans + change, and that's not enough. I've heard the stories, all the damn stories about how people walked into a movie theater and saw 50 people who, they say, are first timers, and really enjoyed the movie. How the hell do they know what other people are thinking... 50 people especially. But look at the numbers: $24 Million, and not even $40 Million worldwide. And they say there will be a sequel, or a tv series, or whatever the hell people think is able to be produced after a movie just bombed at the box office. Look at "Saw II", "Saw II" cost $4 Million to make and has already grossed $30 Million in the US alone. Now that's what it takes to get a sequel going, a strong opening. Not some sad $10 Million in the first weekend. And they say, well compared to the per-theater gross, it did rather well, but not really, not at all. "Serenity" earned about $4160 per screen, and all that after "lots" of attention, or somewhat too little I say. And compared to the first "Saw" movie with little favor prior to the film ended up grossing over $18 Million in its first weekend alone, with $7895 per screen, at a production budget of $1,200,000 (that's right $1.2 Million). And I got my info from the-numbers.com so I ain't making this stuff up.



You already posted this message a gazillion times on another thread.

"You can keep a dog; but it is the cat who keeps people, because cats find humans useful domestic animals."--George Mikes

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, December 11, 2005 5:39 PM

BRUISERSMOM


I heard that one ticket went for $1000. I wish that I had that kind of money to burn. I'd have a good income, a house, my student loans paid off, my retirement vested and a nice car already, if I had that much money to spend. Life would be nice.

"You can keep a dog; but it is the cat who keeps people, because cats find humans useful domestic animals."--George Mikes

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL