Question by zill222

GENERAL DISCUSSIONS

Question

POSTED BY: ZILL222
UPDATED: Wednesday, October 9, 2002 04:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 2868
PAGE 1 of 1

Monday, October 7, 2002 7:45 AM

In the beginning of the show when book is talking he says that humanity found another solar system. Does this mean that there is only one solar system? with hundreds of planets? so there isn't faster than light travel like all the other space sci-fi shows?

Remember, dropping 500 ft is not a big problem unless you are 499 or less ft above the ground

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, October 7, 2002 8:48 AM

HOBBES

One Solar System is most likly correct...
However both the hick in the bar - The Train Job - and Mal - Bushwhacked, when he is talking about how the Reavers went wacko - both said galaxy, rather then system. Also the Blue Hand people - The Train Job - mentioned 86 million miles (as a big number) which is intra-system distances

Of course that could be simple writers mistakes.

-------------------------------------------------
May the road rise to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May you be in heaven an hour before
The Devil knows you’re dead.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, October 7, 2002 8:50 AM

ZICSOFT

Quote:
Originally posted by zill222:
In the beginning of the show when book is talking he says that humanity found another solar system. Does this mean that there is only one solar system? with hundreds of planets? so there isn't faster than light travel like all the other space sci-fi shows?

They've been frustratingly sparse with that kind of detail, but basically, yeah, that's the case. I wrote a little speculation about how you can have 100s of worlds in one solar system:

http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=2&t=624#4564

But I'm beginning to think that they're just not worrying about technical details at that level.

JOSS, WHERE'S MY CHECK???!!!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, October 7, 2002 4:15 PM

ZICSOFT

Quote:
Originally posted by Hobbes:
Also the Blue Hand people - The Train Job - mentioned 86 million miles (as a big number) which is intra-system distances

Thanks for finding that, I plain missed it. Anyway, 86 million miles across is certainly bigger than our solar system (about 10 million), but it's nothing like the distance between stars.

How to describe the difference. Well, interstellar distances are often measured in light years. A light year is about 5,800,000,000,000 miles. Stars in our neighborhood are about 5 light years apart. So that 86 million miles is only one 30,000th of the way to the next system!

(Since this is an American show, I'm assuming that one million = 1,000,000. I could do start over with European millions, but I'm getting a headache.)

The big mystery here is that Anglo-American units are still around. Can't believe people are still resisting metricization five centuries from now!

Anyway, this is consistent with my pet theory that the Firefly solar system is much more massive than ours. And astronmers have actually observed such systems. Here's my previous speculation on that subject: http://www.fireflyfans.net/thread.asp?b=2&t=624#4564

JOSS, WHERE'S MY CHECK???!!!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, October 7, 2002 4:48 PM

DELVO

86 million miles is less than the distance from the Earth to the sun, which is 93 million. But what about 86 billion? Are we sure he really said million? And how exactly would that mean that all of these planets are in the same solar system? It could be that he's just talking about travelling within one of a hundred solar systems.

There's no way these hundred inhabitable/terraformable planets are all in one solar system. It's scientificly ludicrous in more ways than I could list. But even in the show they've already told us plainly that that's not the case, not only with references to travelling of the whole galaxy and people going nuts in the emptiness of deep space, but also with the thing about the Alliance being comprised of the central planets. (The center of a solar system is a star, and any inhabitable/terraformable planets must be a certain distance away from it, forming a sphereoidal region in which no planet is central.)

No, he's GOT to be referring to the beginning of the process when he says "a new solar system", and later developments in chronological order with "a hundred worlds".

About the units, I just figure they're translated for our convenience. Centons and Cycles and such would be really cheesey.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, October 8, 2002 3:01 AM

HOBBES

I can consider multiple systems because that makes much more sense, I was just using the one system bit because that's all the show has told us.

My pet theory is that they have (say) 15-odd systems. The inner 4 or 5 are the Central Worlds. The others count as the frontier. All the systems have a planet or 2 and 3 or 4 moons each.
Systems are connected through wormholes (so the 86 million miles - not including wormhole distance - makes sense).
Offical wormholes are garrisoned by the Alliance and unoffical wormholes are used by our crew, pirates/smugglers/whatever...

-------------------------------------------------
May the road rise to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May you be in heaven an hour before
The Devil knows you’re dead.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, October 8, 2002 10:02 AM

HOBBES

It would be hard (if not impossible) to launch an invasion between solar systems with Slower then Light (STL) ships. So... The Central Worlds own one system, the brown-coats own another. No way is one going to fight the other with STL ships. Back to one system.

They've mentioned at least one planet (Persephone), and a couple of moons. If they keep having more planets and moons (new ones) without ever going FTL then we know they're stuck in one system.

Quote:
and inter-system cargo will be sent by unmanned, or sparcely manned cargo vessels, not faster then light space ships.

The Serenity is a cargo ship and it's always sublight. I never mentioned FTL cargo haulers insystem, I was thinking fixed wormholes.

P.S. Check out Revelation Space, Chasm City, and Redemption Ark (all by Alister Reynolds) for Slower-Than-Light Science Fiction.

-------------------------------------------------
May the road rise to meet you.
May the wind be always at your back.
May you be in heaven an hour before
The Devil knows you’re dead.

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, October 8, 2002 8:27 PM

SHUGGIE

Quote:
Originally posted by Zicsoft:
(Since this is an American show, I'm assuming that one million = 1,000,000. I could do start over with European millions, but I'm getting a headache.)

You're thinking about billions. A European million is identical to an American one. Also I don't know about the rest of Europe but the American standard for a billion (1,000,000,000) is almost the standard in the UK - the older European/British billion (1,000,000,000,000) is not really used much any more.

Shug

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, October 9, 2002 4:45 AM

ZICSOFT

Quote:
Originally posted by Shuggie:
Also I don't know about the rest of Europe but the American standard for a billion (1,000,000,000) is almost the standard in the UK - the older European/British billion (1,000,000,000,000) is not really used much any more.

I've also noticed that your guys have started to Americanize your spelling (colour -> color, ise -> ize). Now if we can just get you to stop overcooking your vegtables...

JOSS, WHERE'S MY CHECK???!!!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE