Sign Up | Log In
BUFFYVERSE
Another SMG movie
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 9:55 AM
ZICSOFT
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:37 AM
NOVAGRASS
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:43 AM
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 10:48 AM
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:03 PM
MOJOECA
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:11 PM
MILLERNATE
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:31 PM
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 12:37 PM
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 1:37 PM
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 3:41 PM
Quote:Originally posted by mojoeca: I'd prefer BtVS end after season 7 actually.
Quote: And I don't believe she's being typecast -- her movie roles have been pretty diverse, given her talents. But those movies just suck. --- Joe
Tuesday, June 25, 2002 8:42 PM
BLAISE
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 3:50 AM
Quote:Originally posted by millernate: Actually I don't know that SMG is all *that* talented compared to a lot of the actresses out there. In the early days of Buffy she just had so much energy that I thought she'd develop. Now, though this may just be because she's played the same part so long, it seems like she's going "Well, I could do more but I can just coast and it'll be good enough". Not that she's bad but she could have been so much more... Nathan- who saw Sarah as one of the really promising actresses back around 1998. P.S. I really don't want her to play Buffy past season 7 so that isn't it either.
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:04 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Novagrass: Again, I agree. She played the devious bitch in Cruel Intentions (and All My Children), the sweet chef in Simply Irresistible, the vapid Daphne in Scooby Doo, the cannon fodder in Scream 2/I Know What You Did Last Summer, and played them all pretty well. She's certainly not type-cast... it's just that she (or her agent?) has yet to choose a good movie to be in.
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 4:49 AM
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:40 AM
BOBKNAPTOR
Quote:Originally posted by Blaise: IMO, I loved Cruel Intentions, and I loved SMG in it. One of those slutty arty movies. I just LOVED it.
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 9:57 AM
Quote:Originally posted by millernate: Except for the part about Simply Irresistable. That was another stock character- the sad, unsuccessfull businessperson. THe character was not really written as a "Dumb Blonde". Also, I don't see why Scream 2 should get mentioned as she didn't really even *have* a character in that, it was just one of those "Here's a well known person, look we killed her" type roles :).
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 2:39 PM
MARINO
Wednesday, June 26, 2002 6:01 PM
Quote:Originally posted by MarinO: IMO, I'm sort of leaning the same way in my opinion of her talents as MILLERNATE, which isn't to say that she's not talented. I feel she's remarkably skilled as an actress, but whether due to her character's plotlines or her own hesitancy to really pull out all the stops, I found her earlier work on BUFFY more impressive than her latest.
Thursday, June 27, 2002 6:23 AM
Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:21 AM
Thursday, June 27, 2002 7:54 AM
Quote: Fametracker.com did a "fame audit" on SMG. The news isn't good. But what do these people know anyway?
Thursday, June 27, 2002 8:33 AM
Thursday, June 27, 2002 9:25 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Novagrass: fameaudit: Well, that about sums up my opinion. For those of you who said her performances have been lack lately, just look over at her performance in "The Body." Her first 15 minutes in that episode rival the best television acting I've ever seen.
Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:09 PM
Thursday, June 27, 2002 12:46 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Zicsoft: Yet she pulled it off. (If your heart didn't break when she said "We're not supposed to move the...", check the lost and found -- it's probably there.) Anybody who thinks this stuff is easy knows Jack about acting.
Thursday, June 27, 2002 1:19 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Novagrass: Another great thing about The Body: Sarah Michelle Gellar didn't shed a tear. Everything was subtle... and nothing was overdone in her performance.
Sunday, June 30, 2002 3:49 AM
HAKEN
Likes to mess with stuffs.
Quote:Gellar, who has proved to be such a terrific actress in "Buffy the Vampire Slayer," and who showed a devilish spark of fun in "Cruel Intentions," bops her way mindlessly through this movie.
Sunday, June 30, 2002 9:17 AM
Monday, July 1, 2002 6:38 AM
PANDORA
Monday, July 1, 2002 7:11 AM
Monday, July 1, 2002 7:18 AM
Quote: A 16-year-old girl who has to go out and slay vampires when she'd rather be partying can be flip and over-the-top all the time. A 21-year-old who's just transited from a very literal heaven to harsh, abrasive, painful reality is just a little bit more restrained. Especially when she has to pretend that Everything is Fine. In my opinion, she totally nailed the secretive sense of pain such a person would feel. It's as if she were playing the part as an autist -- a syndrome with a rather similar set of symptoms.
Monday, July 1, 2002 8:35 AM
Quote:Originally posted by FREELANCER: BUFFY SUCKS I hated buffy after the fist two episode in the first year! I was glad when wb said no more and killed her at the end of season 5 ( GOOD RIDENCE) because those no account actor &actresses wanted more money! Then it got a repreve from upn and was signed for two more season ( ),so don't wine about SMG makeing bad movies ,thats the sort of actress she is just sucks!!! I do watch angle ,and its a hundred time's better! FREELANCE
Monday, July 1, 2002 10:13 AM
Quote:Originally posted by millernate: See this is part of the problem. For that portrayal to work you have to make the audience feel your pain, your depression (to really see what I'm talking about I'd recommend the excellent foreign film Blue by the late Krzysztof Kieslowski). Here we saw it portrayed effectively but that's was all as it didn't draw us in and make Buffy's feelings our feelings.
Monday, July 1, 2002 10:14 AM
Monday, July 1, 2002 10:33 AM
Quote:See this is part of the problem. For that portrayal to work you have to make the audience feel your pain, your depression
Monday, July 1, 2002 10:41 AM
Quote:Originally posted by bobknaptor: But I disagree that SMG didn't have it this season's portrayal of Buffy. This season hit home for me more than any other simply by virtue of her introspection and hidden pain. I have really enjoyed every season of Buffy, but until S6, I never identified with her.
Monday, July 1, 2002 3:18 PM
Quote:Originally posted by FREELANCER: I do watch angle ,and its a hundred time's better! FREELANCE
Monday, July 1, 2002 3:44 PM
TIEKA
Monday, July 1, 2002 3:52 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Zicsoft: Well, I don't think I can ever identify with somebody like that. But Gellar's portrayal of Buffy Ressurrected hit painfully close to home. And no, I've never crawled out of a grave. Close enough though. You'll forgive me my lack of specifics -- it's pretty personal. Let me put it another way. SMG ROCKS! NO DISSENT ON THIS ISSUE WILL BE TOLERATED!
Monday, July 1, 2002 6:38 PM
Quote:Originally posted by FREELANCER: GET A LIFE YOU NO ACCOUNT PRICK,AND I HATE BUFFY FREELANCER
Monday, July 1, 2002 8:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by FREELANCER: It's been my misfortune to have words come back at me for no other reason then to have someone think that they have grasp of the lingo. I appricate the thought however was aware that I mispelled two words before the posting ,however to have the abilty to say you suck(WITH A GRIN) with nothing other then Havard word grammer only prove's the point Buffy t.Vamp. killer only attracts the brain dead loonatick (that might have been misspelled) class of people who have no life, no morgage , no hope of ever getting laid!!! I however have all of that and sometimes the abilty to watch tv. so next time you want to give me a grammer lesson remember that I don't give a bamm and move on!!! BESIDES FIREFLY IS COMMING AND THATS WHAT I'VE BEEN LOOKING FORWARD TOO! FREELANCE
Tuesday, July 2, 2002 5:54 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Haken: Ooops...didn't mean to delete every single one of FREELANCER's post from this thread. Oh well. I should really spend some time and create a better management tool.
Tuesday, July 2, 2002 7:26 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL