REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Cops demand 8-Million GPS locators per year from one cellphone company

POSTED BY: PIRATENEWS
UPDATED: Monday, December 7, 2009 11:47
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 690
PAGE 1 of 1

Thursday, December 3, 2009 8:59 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


No search warrants, of course. One more reason I don't have a cellphone.

Surveillance Shocker: Sprint Received 8 MILLION Law Enforcement Requests for GPS Location Data in the Past Year
www.eff.org/deeplinks/2009/12/surveillance-shocker-sprint-received-8-m
illion-law


Quote:

At the ISS conference, Soghoian taped astonishing comments by Paul Taylor, Sprint/Nextel's Manager of Electronic Surveillance. In complaining about the volume of requests that Sprint receives from law enforcement, Taylor noted a shocking number of requests that Sprint had received in the past year for precise GPS (Global Positioning System) location data revealing the location and movements of Sprint's customers. That number?

EIGHT MILLION.

That doesn't count requests for basic identification and billing information, or wiretapping requests, or requests to monitor who is calling who, or even requests for less-precise location data based on which cell phone towers a cell phone was in contact with. That's just GPS. And, that's not including legal requests from civil litigants, or from foreign intelligence investigators. That's just law enforcement. And, that's not counting the few other major cell phone carriers like AT&T, Verizon and T-Mobile. That's just Sprint.



That's a lot of errant girlfriends.



"The Constitution is just a goddamned piece of paper!"
-President George Bush Jr, convicted drunk driver

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 3, 2009 9:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Alas, too true.

Which is why I give to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) which protects YOUR electronic privacy and access.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 3, 2009 10:59 AM

FREMDFIRMA



What I find annoying is how fast they roll over and lick the jackboots with slobbering glee despite having "privacy policies" which say they will not do so - I laughed right in the face of a cell phone executive last week when you started mentioning customer privacy and called him on it so hard the fucker RAN from me.

Cowardly bitch.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 3, 2009 11:16 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


The link was from the EFF. I too give to them.

This stuff just depresses me.

I have nothing else to add.


***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 3, 2009 12:19 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!


I bet they charge the cops a fee to snitch on their customers.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, December 4, 2009 7:11 AM

OUT2THEBLACK


Quote:

Originally posted by piratenews:
No search warrants, of course. One more reason I don't have a cellphone.




The reason I've got 7 of them...

Heh , heh...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, December 7, 2009 11:47 AM

FREMDFIRMA



A little update data on this, much of which is REALLY damning.

http://arstechnica.com/telecom/news/2009/12/sprint-fed-customer-gps-da
ta-to-leos-over-8-million-times.ars


Quote:

That's potentially millions of Sprint/Nextel customers who not only were probably unaware that their wireless provider even had an Electronic Surveillance Department, but who certainly did not know that law enforcement offers could log into a special Sprint Web portal and, without ever having to demonstrate probable cause to a judge, gain access to geolocation logs detailing where they've been and where they are.

I note that there's BEEN problems already with law enforcement officers or their relatives stalking people this way, and that is softballing it, cause depending on the software they can also listen in whether the phone is on or not.

I had discovered some of this before it was officially outed cause a cellphone company employee was harrassing a girl, and had even even put some of the conversation her family had at dinner about the matter out of context on her answering machine, which really freaked her out, all the while the company denying it was even *possible* to do the very things they're admitting to now.

Luckily we got his ass on something unrelated and had him tossed in slam for it, whereupon a few bucks and a couple cartons of smokes got exchanged for some lessons in civil conduct.

A will also note that this is a complete sidestep of due process and the company should be liable for it since it's in direct violation of their own printed "privacy policy" - excuse me while I laugh derisively at the very notion.
Quote:

"In the electronic surveillance group at Sprint, I have 3 supervisors. 30 ES techs, and 15 contractors. On the subpoena compliance side, which is anything historical, stored content, stored records, is about 35 employees, maybe 4-5 supervisors, and 30 contractors. There's like 110 all together."

All of those people are there solely to serve up customer data to law enforcement, and other comments by Taylor indicate that his staff will probably grow.


And that goes on YOUR bill folks, they slobberingly suck up to and lick the jackboots, and YOU pay for it, how do you like that ?

And of course, they dare not actually take a stand, what with government contracts in the making and just how hard the cartel can come down on em - look at what happened to Qwest and it's execs for not bending the knee if you don't believe that.

And here's one final thought for you, as bad as it already is - the logging system either doesn't work or is disabled, so that eight million is a lowball estimate, and they have neither evidence nor proof that ONLY law enforcement has access to the system, something which you ought to think about, given that shit like this is one way credit and identity theft occurs, but no, they blame YOU, despite handing you over on a plate.

I can say with some certainty that law enforcement are not the only ones with access to that system, or at least as soon as a week ago they were not.

Aren't you tired of paying for your own abuse ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME