Not to gloat or anything. And yeah, I'm proud of it: [quote]California continues to take the national lead in environmental protection. The California ..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

California Adopts First Statewide Green Building Code

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Sunday, January 24, 2010 17:11
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 336
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, January 24, 2010 8:19 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Not to gloat or anything. And yeah, I'm proud of it:

Quote:

California continues to take the national lead in environmental protection. The California Building Standards Commission voted unanimously this week to approve the first statewide green building code.

Taking effect January 2011, the nation's first mandatory green building code – dubbed "CalGreen" – lays out specific constraints for newly constructed buildings. It requires builders to install plumbing that cuts indoor water use by as much as 20 percent, to divert 50 percent of construction waste from landfills to recycling, and to use low-pollutant paints, carpets, and floors.

It also mandates inspection of energy systems to ensure that heaters, air conditioners, and other mechanical equipment are working efficiently. And for non-residential buildings, it requires the installation of water meters for different uses.

The code also allows local jurisdictions, from San Francisco to Los Angeles, to retain stricter green building standards, if they already exist, or to adopt stricter versions of the state code if they choose. It's the first state in the nation to mandate a green building code.

Environmental and green building groups largely welcomed the new code, though they took issue with certain aspects of it.

"We applaud the state of California for being the first state in the country to raise the floor on acceptable, green building standards," said Jason Hartke, vice president of national policy for the US Green Building Council, a Washington D.C.-based nonprofit.

He adds that the statewide standards adopted will "significantly save water and energy, improve indoor air quality, and create jobs at the same time."

Buildings represent 40 percent of all carbon emissions and over 70 percent of electricity use, Mr. Hartke notes, and the new standards thus would help California meet emissions targets under its new global warming law.


Meeting New Emissions Targets
The law, AB32, requires the California Air Resources Board to develop regulations and market mechanisms to ultimately reduce California's greenhouse-gas emissions by 25 percent by 2020. Mandatory caps for significant sources of emissions will begin in 2012.



http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/california-adopts-statewide-green-bui
lding-code/story?id=9638290





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 24, 2010 5:11 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Well, while hopeful, I am always reminded of what the road to hell is paved with...

I mean, anyone here never had a cussin fit over low-flow toilets that wind up using MORE water cause they don't work the first bloody time ?

Or the hassle, waste and sanitary issues with the near constant failure to work ?

Sure, they *have* gotten better over recent years, but those things were a freakin disaster - I am surprised there's been no innovation or improvement of the basic design of the device, honestly.

And then there was MBTE, which got pushed and shoved, and everyone (like me) who pointed out the problems got sneered off as a baby seal clubber, etc etc...

And now we're STILL cleaning up the enviro-damage from that shit, being right is no comfort when it's about such bloody awful things.

I also have some longterm concerns about florescent lighting, as now so many folk will just pitch them in the trash unaware that many of the components are toxic and the dead bulbs should be taken to specific places - and I know some folk with conditions that react badly to florescent lighting.

On the plus side though, we have replaced much of our security lighting with them at site three after I pointed out to the maintainence folk that it was only after a severe and quick temperature change that the lights blew like popcorn, and the florescent ones do not have that problem and thus last longer, while using less power.
Although we had a brownout a while back, and all the florescents died while the incandescents did not, bleh.

Still, I hope to hell they thought this all the way through, cause good intentions are noble and all, but one must make allowances for the fact that these "bright ideas" have to work in the real world.

Not knockin it, mind you... just, concerned.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME