REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Newt Gingrich: Shoe Bomber an American Citizen (Not PN)

POSTED BY: KWICKO
UPDATED: Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:45
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1319
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, February 10, 2010 6:40 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)




http://tpmtv.talkingpointsmemo.com/?id=4719630


3:00 minutes in.


Newt defends Mirandizing shoe-bomber Richard Reid, because, he says, "Richard Reid was an American citizen."

Once again, it seems the Republicans feel like they're entitled to not only their own opinions, but their own facts as well!



Mike

Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:23 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Yeah, I caught that one. And also when Stewart, after the interview, made a point of clarifying it.

The rest of the interview I found frustratingly stupid however; Gingrich didn't answer any of Stewart's points, but immediately changed the subject with more outrageously stupid statements, and Stewart didn't pin him down on it more than once or twice, and then not seriously.

Gingrich looked like the complete ass he is; I've more enjoyed the interviewees with a sense of humor, or those who can actually address the subject! Gingrich couldn't come close to keeping up, so he sidestepped everything and spouted party line...borrring.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:34 AM

STORYMARK


Hardly surprising. The shoe-bomber is the fly in their current "Obama's weak" ointment. So, to avoid their hypocrisy being thrown in their face every time - they just lie outright and hope no one will call them on it - and when it comes to the media.... it generally works.

Shouldn't Wulfie or Rappy be here to tell us he really was, and it's all just a librul conspiracy or something....



"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:38 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Shouldn't Wulfie or Rappy be here to tell us he really was, and it's all just a librul conspiracy or something....





You've already closed your mind to logic and reason, so why should I even bother ? Of course, you've already distorted my view before I've given it, but that's to be expected by those who hate.



The T.Rex they call JANE!


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:04 AM

RUE

I have a vote and I'm not afraid to use it!


"You've already closed your mind to logic and reason ..."

What about facts ? Do facts show up anywhere on your radar ? At all ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 8:20 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I like their new tactic, that mirandizing him meant we didn't get information from him or didn't get it fast enough, despite the fact that he's been singing like a bird from almost the start.

It goes to their belief that torture is the ONLY way to get information, again despite all the facts to the contrary.

I grimace every time I hear one of them spout this shit, and the one about okay, so he talked, but looka at all the leads we missed because of the time it took to get the information--despite proof that multiple waterboarding didn't bring any valid results (or at least, if one believes it DID, didn't for months!).

Absolutely blows my mind sometimes, how far some will reach to discount something or "prove" something else...one tactic is proven wrong, hey ho, jump to another!





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:15 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Shouldn't Wulfie or Rappy be here to tell us he really was, and it's all just a librul conspiracy or something....





You've already closed your mind to logic and reason, so why should I even bother ?



Oh, please, do share with us the logic and reason of claiming he was a citizen when he was not.


Or, remain silent and prove once again what a dishonest chickenshit you are.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:16 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by rue:
"You've already closed your mind to logic and reason ..."

What about facts ? Do facts show up anywhere on your radar ? At all ?

***************************************************************

Silence is consent.



Only the RapFacts (read: lies).

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:27 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

Oh, please, do share with us the logic and reason of claiming he was a citizen when he was not.





The shoe bomber isn't a citizen ? Which is it ? I thought you were saying he was. Why does it matter? It's not my argument. I've not commented on either side of this issue. Is that how you want to have discussion? Pigeon hole me into taking a side in an argument that Newt got himself into ?


Or do you want to just hurl profanities at each other instead, as I see you've already commenced on doing, all on your own.

Gee, how inviting.



NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 9:31 AM

STORYMARK



When did I say he was a citizen????

Now you're just making shit up. Or have you just given up entirely on trying to read?

I was just wondering which entirely made-up "facts" you were referring to.....? Clearly, yet another RapFact - inconsistent with reality.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 12:11 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Rap: First sentence in thread:
Quote:

Newt defends Mirandizing shoe-bomber Richard Reid, because, he says, "Richard Reid was an American citizen.
He's British.
Quote:

I've not commented on either side of this issue
No, you haven't. You just jumped in out of nowhere to jack the thread onto yourself.

Folks, was it this bad when he was here before? Did everyone buy into his taunts and spend the majority of the time in RWED fighting with him? Aren't there more interesting things here? Don't you GET that this is all he's here for?

It's just a shame; I miss the way it was, with adult conversations and stuff.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 2:55 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

Folks, was it this bad when he was here before? Did everyone buy into his taunts and spend the majority of the time in RWED fighting with him? Aren't there more interesting things here? Don't you GET that this is all he's here for?






Unfortunately, yeah. Pretty much.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 3:01 PM

CHRISISALL


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Don't you GET that this is all he's here for?


It's like duck huntin' Niki, the target's there, ya gotta shoot.
I guess it's a guy thing.


The laughing Chrisisall

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:00 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

When did I say he was a citizen????

Now you're just making shit up. Or have you just given up entirely on trying to read?

I was just wondering which entirely made-up "facts" you were referring to.....? Clearly, yet another RapFact - inconsistent with reality.




Did you chew on too much lead paint as a child ? I quoted your post, directly, and then commented on the quote.

I didn't make up any " shit ", I didn't " lie ", all you're doing is taking the cowards way out and instantly resorting to childish name calling and accusing me of replying to imaginary quotes which you yourself made.

Where's that get fun, exactly? Makes you look like a total ass, is all.





Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 4:10 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2: me
Quote:

I've not commented on either side of this issue
No, you haven't. You just jumped in out of nowhere to jack the thread onto yourself.

Folks, was it this bad when he was here before? Did everyone buy into his taunts and spend the majority of the time in RWED fighting with him? Aren't there more interesting things here? Don't you GET that this is all he's here for?

It's just a shame; I miss the way it was, with adult conversations and stuff.



niki - I was responding to Storymark, and in no way did I " jack the thread ". It's all right there, for anyone to read, if you're not too lazy, stupid or full of yourselves. It's clear that you children are doing this on purpose, asking me questions, and then feigning ignorance and incredulity when I give you nothing but a straight answer.

Just not in the least bit impressed w/ the lot of you.



Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 6:56 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

When did I say he was a citizen????

Now you're just making shit up. Or have you just given up entirely on trying to read?

I was just wondering which entirely made-up "facts" you were referring to.....? Clearly, yet another RapFact - inconsistent with reality.




Did you chew on too much lead paint as a child ? I quoted your post, directly, and then commented on the quote.

I didn't make up any " shit ", I didn't " lie ", all you're doing is taking the cowards way out and instantly resorting to childish name calling and accusing me of replying to imaginary quotes which you yourself made.

Where's that get fun, exactly? Makes you look like a total ass, is all.



You're lying.

Here's what Story posted:

Quote:


Oh, please, do share with us the logic and reason of claiming he was a citizen when he was not.



He's referring to Newt's claim that Richard Reid *IS* a U.S. citizen, when clearly he never was. He was a British citizen. Now he's in an American prison, yet still not an American citizen.

Story was quite clearly asking you to expound on the logic and reason of Newt making such a claim which is easily disproved.

And here's your reply immediately after his:

Quote:


The shoe bomber isn't a citizen ? Which is it ? I thought you were saying he was. Why does it matter? It's not my argument. I've not commented on either side of this issue. Is that how you want to have discussion? Pigeon hole me into taking a side in an argument that Newt got himself into ?



He asked you to explain the reason and logic behind claiming the man was a U.S. citizen, to which you asked if he "isn't a citizen?" and portraying Story as saying he *IS*, which he clearly never said.

So yes, you're making shit up, and you're a liar.


Quote:

Just not in the least bit impressed w/ the lot of you.



Yes, the lot of us are singularly unimpressed with you, as well.

It's a wonder you even post here, since it seems to be so beneath you to do so.

Mike

Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:18 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Nope, you're wrong. I'm not lying.

Quote:

Quote:

" Oh, please, do share with us the logic and reason of claiming he was a citizen when he was not."


He's referring to Newt's claim that Richard Reid *IS* a U.S. citizen, when clearly he never was. He was a British citizen. Now he's in an American prison, yet still not an American citizen.

Story was quite clearly asking you to expound on the logic and reason of Newt making such a claim which is easily disproved.



Nope. Not " quite clearly ". I never commented one way or the other on Newt's position. The quote which I copied was directly what Story posted. From that EXACT QUOTE, nothing there suggests I even care , one way or the other. I took no position. You're ASSuming that, since I agree w/ Newt on certain topics, that , like you do, I'd blindly take his side, even w/ out having heard both sides. I didn't. I made no assertion, took no sides, and thus have no opinion on the matter. Story asked me a question, falsely thinking I had already taken Newt's side on this.

I didn't lie. You, as you so often are, are wrong.


Quote:


He asked you to explain the reason and logic behind claiming the man was a U.S. citizen, to which you asked if he "isn't a citizen?" and portraying Story as saying he *IS*, which he clearly never said.

So yes, you're making shit up, and you're a liar.



Clearly, that's not what was in Story's quote, which is what I went on , so your claim that I *knew* is fallacious and patently absurd. But then, we are talking about YOU.

I'm not making any " shit " up. I pwned you, and that makes you feel bad, embarrassed and a bit humiliated. Now to save what little dignity you THINK you still have, you continue w/ this faux indignation. toss around insults and pretend you're fooling anyone.

You're not.


Quote:

It's a wonder you even post here, since it seems to be so beneath you to do so.



Well, you're right about that last part. Kudos

And even though YOU are beneath me, I guess someone has to do the slumming, and keep the likes of you in check.

I consider it my public service to the FF 'verse.



Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 11, 2010 7:36 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Let me know how that works out for ya, Rappy. I've been busting your ass up and down these boards for years now. So much, in fact, that you FUCKING RAN AWAY LIKE A LITTLE TINY BABY last time I owned your ass.

I'll be only too happy to continue doing so.

As for your lying and making shit up, I posted Story's posts, and your responses. To say that they don't say what they clearly DO say is a lie, by you. Again.

Have you ever told the truth about ANYTHING?

Mike

Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 7:39 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


In fairness (hahahaha) we have to go back before Story's remark that Ripster is choosing to quote so he can shift the blame:

Story made a snark
Quote:

Shouldn't Wulfie or Rappy be here to tell us he really was, and it's all just a librul conspiracy or something....
You chose to jump in, without knowing (or caring?) about the issue and respond
Quote:

You've already closed your mind to logic and reason, so why should I even bother ?
Your response made it look like you were saying he WAS an American citizen, which elicited Story’s
Quote:

Oh, please, do share with us the logic and reason of claiming he was a citizen when he was not.
and away it all went. Story's was a response to you seeming to indicate that you DID think he was a citizen.

Perhaps a simple misunderstanding? If so, why didn’t you respond to the ISSUE, rather than just coming in and jacking the thread with a snark—which is exactly what it is, when you come in and snap at people without caring what it is they’re writing about, and turn the entire thread into an argument about YOU.

Now, is THIS plain enough for you to see what actually happened? You haven't been lying, just starting from a post two down from the beginning...or choosing to start? Respond, if you will, to the ACTUAL chronology of events, and quit using Story to whine about your treatment. You're the one who hopped in to make a snark which made you look the way it did.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 7:50 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Let me know how that works out for ya, Rappy. I've been busting your ass up and down these boards for years now. So much, in fact, that you FUCKING RAN AWAY LIKE A LITTLE TINY BABY last time I owned your ass.

I'll be only too happy to continue doing so.

As for your lying and making shit up, I posted Story's posts, and your responses. To say that they don't say what they clearly DO say is a lie, by you. Again.

Have you ever told the truth about ANYTHING?



You're a dick. There's all manner in truth about that.

And you're still whining about the non issue w/ massive and plenty? Seriously, you've never once been able fully finish the touching up your silly straman here.

I was using 2 different words to describe 2 different things. There's no reason I should deny I posted it, only in what ever the hell it was you were falsely claiming I said. Which still remains a mystery. See, if you'd only focus on what I *DO* say, instead of trying to twist my words and dreaming up shit to vilify me for, then you could keep your story straight, and wouldn't get all tangled up in lies and distortions.

But you have your " way ". I suppose.



Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 8:01 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
. Story's was a response to you seeming to indicate that you DID think he was a citizen.

I had made no comment, either way, on status of citizenship, or of Newt's position. It was wrong for Story to suggest my view for me on the matter, on which I had made none.

Quote:


Perhaps a simple misunderstanding? If so, why didn’t you respond to the ISSUE, rather than just coming in and jacking the thread with a snark—which is exactly what it is, when you come in and snap at people without caring what it is they’re writing about, and turn the entire thread into an argument about YOU.

I didn't jack any thread. I was asked a direct question, and replied. Had I NOT replied, I'd have been accused ( wrongly again ) of ducking and running away. In essence, I was forced to agree or take an adversarial stance on a topic I hadn't bothered to read up on. And I choose to read up on what ever the hell which interest me. I'm not some puppet, to be led around when folks ask me .. " what do you think about this topic ? Don't know about it? Well, read up and then be prepared to be attacked, for what ever the hell side you take ". Sorry, it don't work that way. Might be for you, but not for me.

Quote:

Now, is THIS plain enough for you to see what actually happened? You haven't been lying, just starting from a post two down from the beginning...or choosing to start? Respond, if you will, to the ACTUAL chronology of events, and quit using Story to whine about your treatment. You're the one who hopped in to make a snark which made you look the way it did.




Oh, it's very plain enough to see. It always has been. I wasn't USING Story in any way, and wasn't in the least bit 'whining'. It's others who have the ax to grind, which say a great deal more about them ( you ) than it does me. Were it not for the history of it all, I'd find this mildly amusing. But instead, it's a bit sad, to be honest.



Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 8:18 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I get it. What others have said about you is becoming clear to me now.

No, if you'd kept quiet, the snark would have passed, maybe with another crack, maybe completely ignored. Your coming in made it look like you were saying he was a citizen, and nicely DID jack the thread onto discussion of you.

You were most definitely NOT asked a question, it was a snark...here, since you seemed to have missed it, is the specific statement ONCE AGAIN:
Quote:

Shouldn't Wulfie or Rappy be here to tell us he really was, and it's all just a librul conspiracy or something....
A rhetorical question; to anyone with half a brain, a snark.

You responding that Story had
Quote:

closed your mind to logic and reason, so why should I even bother ?
, aside from being supurfluous (why DID you bother, if you thought it not worth it?), did make you look like you were disagreeing.

I see how it is now. You respond (to any mention of you?) without thinking, or even caring what the issue is about, then complain that you were attacked/misunderstood/whatever, and go on to say you "had" to respond because you were asked a question and if you DIDN'T respond, X would happen. Notice Wulf didn't take the bait, probably recognized it for the snark it was, and either didn't find it worth his time to respond or wasn't interested in the issue at hand. Nobody accused him of running, nor would they have accused you.

So I see your method completely now, and will remember in future. Not sure if it indicates you're not very bright, or that you're so determined to stir up trouble tha it's deliberate. Either way, it's pathetic.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 9:59 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

And you're still whining about the non issue w/ massive and plenty? Seriously, you've never once been able fully finish the touching up your silly straman here.



Straman? What's a straman?

But back to your post... WHAT THE HELL ARE YOU EVEN TALKING ABOUT?

Do you now have me confused with Rue? Are you still prattling on about THAT post?

You really need to speak with your doctor, because the current round of meds he's got you on is rendering you even more incoherent than usual, and that's saying something!

Quote:


I was using 2 different words to describe 2 different things. There's no reason I should deny I posted it, only in what ever the hell it was you were falsely claiming I said. Which still remains a mystery. See, if you'd only focus on what I *DO* say, instead of trying to twist my words and dreaming up shit to vilify me for, then you could keep your story straight, and wouldn't get all tangled up in lies and distortions.



Again, I think you got drunk and wandered into the wrong thread. This thread is about something else entirely. And you're wrong; at least THAT much is consistent!

Quote:

But you have your " way ". I suppose.


Is that better than a plan?


Mike

Work is the curse of the Drinking Class.
- Oscar Wilde

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 10:01 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:


Oh, it's very plain enough to see. It always has been. I wasn't USING Story in any way, and wasn't in the least bit 'whining'. It's others who have the ax to grind, which say a great deal more about them ( you ) than it does me. Were it not for the history of it all, I'd find this mildly amusing. But instead, it's a bit sad, to be honest.



Stop whining!


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 11:07 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Newtie Knutie stepped in it, then in his "correction" he stepped anew. He's getting up in years now, and has made some embarrassing gaffes in recent months. He tried to correct it by saying he meant to say Jose Padilla, not Reid, but by then the high ground was lost. The real point he should have made, that the old Newt would have made, is that there is a 2006 Law passed by Congress that allows these enemy combatants/terrorists to be tried by military tribunal, and it was upheld by the Supreme Court. When the shoe bomber was captured that law did not exist. Also Reid was clearly a nuttier-than-normal whack-job terrorist who seemed to have acted like a lone wolf. But his prosecution amidst all the other Bush/Cheney/Rumsfeld felgercarb made no sense to me at the time, which was quite consistent with everything else they were doing which was making no sense either.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 12:45 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

I see how it is now. You respond (to any mention of you?) without thinking, or even caring what the issue is about...
I did here, because so often I've been falsely accused of ducking questions. Yes.

Quote:

then complain that you were attacked/misunderstood/whatever, and go on to say you "had" to respond because you were asked a question and if you DIDN'T respond, X would happen. Notice Wulf didn't take the bait, probably recognized it for the snark it was, and either didn't find it worth his time to respond or wasn't interested in the issue at hand. Nobody accused him of running, nor would they have accused you.

Or Wulf didn't see it.. OR Wulf hasn't had the same history as I have on this forum... OR... maybe,..I'm not Wulf ? Gee, different folks respond differently. Shocker, huh?

Quote:

So I see your method completely now, and will remember in future. Not sure if it indicates you're not very bright, or that you're so determined to stir up trouble tha it's deliberate. Either way, it's pathetic.


Oh, it's none of the above. I'm just setting the record straight. And it's clear, from seeing how many here are stuck on stupid, that simply because of my views, I will be vilified, called names, lied about and generally mocked, whether I do or don't reply to anything on these boards. Got it.





Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 12:59 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

I've been falsely accused of ducking questions
IT WASN'T A QUESTION, NOR DIRECTED AT YOU PERSONALLY, it was a snark ABOUT YOU ande Wulf; I realize this appears to be a difficult concept for you to understand, but please do try. You still have never even acknowledged that, just gone on to whinge and moan and point fingers. It's amazing.

You didn't set no record straight--you took off on a rant because of your own jumping into a thread to respond to a snark, then kept insisting it was Story's fault and that you were being picked on!

WE set the record straight by showing you clearly the chronology of posts--another thing you seem to have difficulty grasping...
Quote:

Or Wulf didn't see it.. OR Wulf hasn't had the same history as I have on this forum... OR... maybe,..I'm not Wulf ? Gee, different folks respond differently. Shocker, huh?
OR you jumped in without thinking or even reading what the thread was about... OR you inserted yourself in the thread to get attention... OR you wanted to provoke people so you could whine about how you're treated... OR you just like stirring things up. Gee, could be any, or more than one...

The bottom line is that YOU inserted YOURSELF in response to a humorous snark, responded in such a way as to cause others to believe you were disagreeing with the statement made in Story's post, then took off on one of the thread-jacking, assinine flame wars you seem to be particularly good at starting. That's all there is to this thread, and it didn't deserve that much.

I'm beginning to think you have dyslexia or some other difficulty which causes you to be unable to track simple things. Either that or it's deliberate; in which case, it's pretty sad.




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 8:13 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



niki

you sure do make a lot of assumptions about how others should react.

I know you wish you were me, but you're not. So try not to worry about it too much, k ?





Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 12, 2010 10:56 PM

GINOBIFFARONI


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Quote:

I've been falsely accused of ducking questions
IT WASN'T A QUESTION, NOR DIRECTED AT YOU PERSONALLY, it was a snark ABOUT YOU ande Wulf; I realize this appears to be a difficult concept for you to understand, but please do try. You still have never even acknowledged that, just gone on to whinge and moan and point fingers. It's amazing.

You didn't set no record straight--you took off on a rant because of your own jumping into a thread to respond to a snark, then kept insisting it was Story's fault and that you were being picked on!

WE set the record straight by showing you clearly the chronology of posts--another thing you seem to have difficulty grasping...
Quote:

Or Wulf didn't see it.. OR Wulf hasn't had the same history as I have on this forum... OR... maybe,..I'm not Wulf ? Gee, different folks respond differently. Shocker, huh?
OR you jumped in without thinking or even reading what the thread was about... OR you inserted yourself in the thread to get attention... OR you wanted to provoke people so you could whine about how you're treated... OR you just like stirring things up. Gee, could be any, or more than one...

The bottom line is that YOU inserted YOURSELF in response to a humorous snark, responded in such a way as to cause others to believe you were disagreeing with the statement made in Story's post, then took off on one of the thread-jacking, assinine flame wars you seem to be particularly good at starting. That's all there is to this thread, and it didn't deserve that much.

I'm beginning to think you have dyslexia or some other difficulty which causes you to be unable to track simple things. Either that or it's deliberate; in which case, it's pretty sad.











Either you Are with the terrorists, or ... you Are with the terrorists

Life is like a jar of Jalapeño peppers.
What you do today, might Burn Your Ass Tomorrow"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 13, 2010 7:59 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I shouldn't laugh, Gino, but it IS funny. Dyslexia runs in my husband's family, both his brothers and his son have it. It means being VERY careful in giving directions, and to this day it's "down to Washington" and "up to L.A." when he speaks of them. We joke about it, but it's got to be very difficult to live with.

Nonetheless: right on!



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 13, 2010 9:54 AM

GINOBIFFARONI


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
I shouldn't laugh, Gino, but it IS funny. Dyslexia runs in my husband's family, both his brothers and his son have it. It means being VERY careful in giving directions, and to this day it's "down to Washington" and "up to L.A." when he speaks of them. We joke about it, but it's got to be very difficult to live with.

Nonetheless: right on!





I think I might have a form of it as well...

if I start typing fast with both hands I sometimes type words backwards.... correct spelling but backwards... weird right

I learned to type in the army, typing code group which look like gibberish, but you need to be accurate... and back then I never did that.

Maybe too many crashes playing hockey over the years lol



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 13, 2010 9:58 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Wow, that's one I never heard! I know when I get typing fast, "the" always comes out "teh", but that's pretty impressive; correctly spelled but backward! Too bad you can't make a living with such a talent, I'm sure there must be a demand somewhere...



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 13, 2010 10:55 AM

GINOBIFFARONI


I'm also sort of ambidextrous which may be part of the problem.

I can write right or left, shoot a pistol right or left, use a right or left hockey stick, etc

the longest word I have typed backwards was six letters ( spelled correctly anyway )

I think its a brain wiring thing




Either you Are with the terrorists, or ... you Are with the terrorists

Life is like a jar of Jalapeño peppers.
What you do today, might Burn Your Ass Tomorrow"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:39 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:

When did I say he was a citizen????

Now you're just making shit up. Or have you just given up entirely on trying to read?

I was just wondering which entirely made-up "facts" you were referring to.....? Clearly, yet another RapFact - inconsistent with reality.




Did you chew on too much lead paint as a child ? I quoted your post, directly, and then commented on the quote.

I didn't make up any " shit ", I didn't " lie ", all you're doing is taking the cowards way out and instantly resorting to childish name calling and accusing me of replying to imaginary quotes which you yourself made.

Where's that get fun, exactly? Makes you look like a total ass, is all.





Director: Bureau of Bigfoot Affairs



Yes, you quoted it you halfwit - you just didn't understand.

I never claimed that he was a citizen - that was Newt. You then attributed it to me - thus the lie you blithering moron.





"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:43 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:

Quote:


He asked you to explain the reason and logic behind claiming the man was a U.S. citizen, to which you asked if he "isn't a citizen?" and portraying Story as saying he *IS*, which he clearly never said.

So yes, you're making shit up, and you're a liar.



Clearly, that's not what was in Story's quote, which is what I went on , so your claim that I *knew* is fallacious and patently absurd. But then, we are talking about YOU.



I asked in the post directly preceding the one you quoted. But what a shocker - Rappy being dishonest.

No wonder you insist you never lie - you don't grasp what "true" is. Thus, the good ol' RapFacts.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, February 16, 2010 11:45 AM

GINOBIFFARONI




Smells like.... Rap Facts





Either you Are with the terrorists, or ... you Are with the terrorists

Life is like a jar of Jalapeño peppers.
What you do today, might Burn Your Ass Tomorrow"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL