Geez, guys; it's a photo, it's gorgeous, what else does it matter? "Animal models"??? ..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

'Hired' wolf photographer stripped of title

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Saturday, February 20, 2010 07:33
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 778
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, February 19, 2010 12:52 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Geez, guys; it's a photo, it's gorgeous, what else does it matter? "Animal models"???
Quote:

The winner of one of the world's most prestigious photography competitions has been stripped of his title for allegedly hiring a trained wolf to stage the winning shot.

Jose Luis Rodriguez's image of "the storybook wolf" was chosen from 43,000 entries to win the Veolia Environnement Wildlife Photographer of the Year award in October 2009.

Just three months later and after what they called a "careful and thorough investigation," the judges disqualified Rodriguez for breaking the rules.

"The competition rules clearly state that photographs of animal models may not be entered into the competition," said Louise Emerson, head of business strategy at Britain's Natural History Museum.

Rodriguez is said to "strongly deny" the wolf in his photo is a model. According to his Web site, the multi award-winning nature photographer is a regular contributor to nature and ecology journals and has more than 30 years' experience in the industry.

Emerson said the judging panel was reconvened to investigate allegations that the winning photo was of "Ossian," a trained wolf available for hire from a nature park near Madrid.

"Canada Real Open Center hires out Ossian to a number of people and they said this image could be the wolf Ossian," Emerson said.

The judges put their evidence to the photographer along with a series of questions, but said Rodriguez's answers failed to erase their doubts.

"I'm not at liberty to discuss his answers but he gave us five very, very full statements -- they didn't substantiate the original story," Emerson said.

The photo purports to show one of Spain's wild Iberian wolves, which are said to be wary of humans who see them as a threat to game and livestock.

The statement released with the photo said: "José Luis risked a slow shutter-speed to reveal the moonlit sky and conjure up the atmosphere of the place. He switched from using his Nikon D2X to a Hasselblad so he could get the exact framing that he had in mind."

It is the first time in the competition's 45-year history that a winner has been disqualified. The rules also impose a lifetime ban on ejected entrants.

"We trust photographers to follow the rules and 99.99 percent of the time that happens. We're really sad that this has happened," Emerson said.

A new winner will not be selected as the initial judging is done "blind" and Emerson said that will not be possible now that the photographs are on public display.







NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2010 1:05 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Lesson ?

No ringers when photographing wildlife.




NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 19, 2010 11:35 PM

FREMDFIRMA



So...

Then who has to ticket the bear for unlicensed exotic dancing ?
http://vodpod.com/watch/1445213-the-lawdog-files-class-ii-beverage-ale
rt


-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2010 12:16 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:

"The competition rules clearly state that photographs of animal models may not be entered into the competition," said Louise Emerson, head of business strategy at Britain's Natural History Museum.

The photo purports to show one of Spain's wild Iberian wolves, which are said to be wary of humans who see them as a threat to game and livestock.



It's a cool shot, but he clearly cheated.

Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
The statement released with the photo said: "José Luis risked a slow shutter-speed to reveal the moonlit sky and conjure up the atmosphere of the place. He switched from using his Nikon D2X to a Hasselblad so he could get the exact framing that he had in mind."



That's not moonlight, that's a flash, and that's definitely NOT a slow shutter. The wolf model would be blurred if it was.

Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2010 6:10 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I know, that's all easy to see--it was a poor attempt at faking it, pretty much anyone can see it's a flash. Stupid of him to say it was the moon and a slow shutter speed.

I just meant it's a gorgeous shot--there's nothing in the rules they mention about flash, etc., he just screwed up saying that. But whether the wolf is a "model" or not doesn't change the beauty of the shot--especially as it WON. I just thought it was a shame.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2010 6:51 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:I know, that's all easy to see--it was a poor attempt at faking it, pretty much anyone can see it's a flash. Stupid of him to say it was the moon and a slow shutter speed.

I just meant it's a gorgeous shot--there's nothing in the rules they mention about flash, etc., he just screwed up saying that. But whether the wolf is a "model" or not doesn't change the beauty of the shot--especially as it WON. I just thought it was a shame.





How would the shot be any less impressive if it was taken remotely ? I mean, if the camera was set up to trigger on movement..... I dunno. It's a great pic. Not a photo shopped pic of a wolf, but an actual event, of a beautiful animal.



Bones: "Don't 'rawr' her!"
Booth: "What? she'rawred' me first.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:29 AM

PIZMOBEACH

... fully loaded, safety off...


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:I know, that's all easy to see--it was a poor attempt at faking it, pretty much anyone can see it's a flash. Stupid of him to say it was the moon and a slow shutter speed.

I just meant it's a gorgeous shot--there's nothing in the rules they mention about flash, etc., he just screwed up saying that. But whether the wolf is a "model" or not doesn't change the beauty of the shot--especially as it WON. I just thought it was a shame.




How would the shot be any less impressive if it was taken remotely ? I mean, if the camera was set up to trigger on movement..... I dunno. It's a great pic. Not a photo shopped pic of a wolf, but an actual event, of a beautiful animal.




It would be better if the wolf had a chicken in it's mouth.

Scifi movie music + Firefly dialogue clips, 24 hours a day - http://www.scifiradio.com

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 20, 2010 7:33 AM

FREMDFIRMA



I was gonna a picnic basket in it's jaws with a red hood dangling from one corner...


-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL