Heard a discussion when this came out of why the hell Steele hasn't been fired; apparently he's being held accountable for this scandal? The response wa..."/>
Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Why is this Michael Steele's fault?
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:15 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:The Republican National Committee staffer fired Monday for getting the committee to finance for an outing at a risqué Hollywood nightclub was Young Eagles director Allison Meyers, CNN has learned from multiple GOP sources. Several young donors attended Voyeur, the Los Angeles nightclub at the center of the latest RNC controversy, after a Young Eagles event in February. Erik Brown, a GOP consultant from Orange County who picked up the tab, was able to have the nearly $2,000 charge reimbursed by the committee in February. As director of the Young Eagles program since early 2009, Meyers was tasked with cultivating younger Republican donors in their 30s and 40s. She was dismissed from her position on Monday after news of the outing became the latest in a series of headaches for the RNC and its chairman, Michael Steele.
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:44 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:54 AM
RIVERLOVE
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: I'm sure it's just a matter of trying to hold Steele responsible for the actions of some of his underlings, since he's the man at the top of the party. I have little doubt that he WILL be replaced after the mid-terms, but it would be worse for the GOP to dump him NOW than it will be after the election. He really hasn't done a very good job of either raising money for the party, nor for setting the tone within the party, and that's doubtless why he'll be out by mid-November. As for how any of this is his fault? It's not, but that hardly matters in political theater at this level. That's an inconvenient truth, but a truth nonetheless. When John Edwards screwed around on his wife, did it change anything in this country in any substantive way? Nope, but it still had a serious impact on the political futures and careers of several of his key staff members, associates, and advisers, because he specifically lied to them when he told them he wasn't having an affair, and they went out and lied to the press about it. Are they responsible for it? Nope, but they're tainted by it. That's the reality of politics It's pretty accepted common knowledge that the Democrats are going to lose seats this November. But I think Steele's being set up; if the GOP just gains seats but fails to gain control of the House and Senate, it will be seen by many within the party as a failure on Steele's part. I get the distinct impression that he's being set up to fail so he can be pushed out and replaced with more of a "true believer" instead of a moderate, which is what he comes across as within the party now. "I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:04 AM
MINCINGBEAST
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:08 AM
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:02 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:27 PM
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:54 AM
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:01 AM
HERO
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:30 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Quote: His role is to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.
Quote: But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:05 AM
SIMONWHO
Quote:Originally posted by mincingbeast: i actually feel sort of bad for michael steele. he is equal parts carlton and grover, both of whom i admire, and he cannot be held accountable for the decay of his party.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:05 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Hero: Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy. Thats not his role. He is not an office holder, he's a manager, like Howard Dean is for Democrats. His role to to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money. Like Dean, he is often in the media spotlight and has been so throughout the past year. But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson. That role falls to the President, Governors, Congresspersons, Senators, etc. H "Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:07 AM
Quote:Originally posted by SimonWho: Quote:Originally posted by mincingbeast: i actually feel sort of bad for michael steele. he is equal parts carlton and grover, both of whom i admire, and he cannot be held accountable for the decay of his party. Weird, I thought I'd be the only one to see him as a cross between a muppet and the annoying one from Fresh Prince of Bel Air. Still, bondage strip clubs ftw!
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:22 AM
Quote:Thats not his role. He is not an office holder, he's a manager, like Howard Dean is for Democrats. His role to to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.
Quote:So Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel (Bill Clinton’s former White House adviser), and James Carville think that Howard Dean ought to be replaced. The comments circulating around the blogs regarding the “chuck Dean on his keister” proposal agree pretty consistently that the idea is a stupid one, and if you mean stupid for the Democratic Party, I agree. But if you mean that the proposal is stupid from the point of view of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville, you haven’t thought it through. What the Clintons, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville are so upset about isn’t that Democrats lost, because overall Democrats won and won big. No, what they’re upset about is that some of their pet candidates, hand-picked by them and fed loads of cash by them — such as Tammy Duckworth — lost. Instead, Democrats candidates to whom the Clinton-Emanuel-Carville insider machine didn’t give much cash were the Democrats who won. The Clintons, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville are upset because so many of the Democrats who won this past Tuesday aren’t beholden to their machine, and so can’t be controlled by them. Replacing Howard Dean with one of their stooges is not just smart for them but imperative if they want to maintain their grip on the Democratic Party. In short, this is not a struggle about the best interests of the Democratic Party. This is a power struggle between the ever-more powerful Dean machine and the fast-fading Clinton machine.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:44 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Jongsstraw: But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:52 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Small point of clarification: Howard Dean is NOT the chairman of the DNC any more; that post now belongs to Tim Kaine, who took over the position from Dean the day after Obama's inauguration. I still don't know why Dean was replaced, or if it was his decision or the party's - or Obama's, as head of the party (in fact, at least, if not in name and title).
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:03 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Maybe, as Frem pointed out, that's the price of loyalty to the party - a bullet in the back of the neck, metaphorically speaking.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:32 PM
Quote: That's the price of loyalty to EITHER party...
Quote:...that's the price of loyalty to the party...
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:01 PM
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Quote:Originally posted by Riverlove: Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy. He rarely comes out in public, and when he does it's always to a safe haven like his pal Hannity. As RNC Chairman, he is ultimately responsible for the disasterous selection of McCain as Presidential nominee, and he is accountable for the election debacle that ensued. As far as I'm concerned he must be fired as soon as possible. Of course the Libs and Dems love the guy. Just like the NY Times loved McCain as the Repub candidate so much they promoted him when he was running a distant third. It's amazing to me how accomodating the RNC has been over the last few years to the needs and wishes of their opponents.
Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:05 PM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL