Heard a discussion when this came out of why the hell Steele hasn't been fired; apparently he's being held accountable for this scandal? The response wa..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Why is this Michael Steele's fault?

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Wednesday, March 31, 2010 16:05
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1473
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:15 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Heard a discussion when this came out of why the hell Steele hasn't been fired; apparently he's being held accountable for this scandal? The response was that the Repubs didn't need another dust-up right now, and it would make more sense to get rid of him around the 2010s. It kind of surprises me, he's been in the middle of so much controversy so often, I'd think they'd want to get rid of the potential of more. I also don't understand why he's to blame for this one, given he wasn't involved? And doesn't this kind of thing happen on both sides? Must be slow news day or something...
Quote:

The Republican National Committee staffer fired Monday for getting the committee to finance for an outing at a risqué Hollywood nightclub was Young Eagles director Allison Meyers, CNN has learned from multiple GOP sources.

Several young donors attended Voyeur, the Los Angeles nightclub at the center of the latest RNC controversy, after a Young Eagles event in February. Erik Brown, a GOP consultant from Orange County who picked up the tab, was able to have the nearly $2,000 charge reimbursed by the committee in February.

As director of the Young Eagles program since early 2009, Meyers was tasked with cultivating younger Republican donors in their 30s and 40s.

She was dismissed from her position on Monday after news of the outing became the latest in a series of headaches for the RNC and its chairman, Michael Steele.

http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/?fbid=QCatxzr9QHv


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:44 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


I'm sure it's just a matter of trying to hold Steele responsible for the actions of some of his underlings, since he's the man at the top of the party.

I have little doubt that he WILL be replaced after the mid-terms, but it would be worse for the GOP to dump him NOW than it will be after the election. He really hasn't done a very good job of either raising money for the party, nor for setting the tone within the party, and that's doubtless why he'll be out by mid-November.

As for how any of this is his fault? It's not, but that hardly matters in political theater at this level. That's an inconvenient truth, but a truth nonetheless. When John Edwards screwed around on his wife, did it change anything in this country in any substantive way? Nope, but it still had a serious impact on the political futures and careers of several of his key staff members, associates, and advisers, because he specifically lied to them when he told them he wasn't having an affair, and they went out and lied to the press about it. Are they responsible for it? Nope, but they're tainted by it. That's the reality of politics

It's pretty accepted common knowledge that the Democrats are going to lose seats this November. But I think Steele's being set up; if the GOP just gains seats but fails to gain control of the House and Senate, it will be seen by many within the party as a failure on Steele's part. I get the distinct impression that he's being set up to fail so he can be pushed out and replaced with more of a "true believer" instead of a moderate, which is what he comes across as within the party now.





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 7:54 AM

RIVERLOVE


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
I'm sure it's just a matter of trying to hold Steele responsible for the actions of some of his underlings, since he's the man at the top of the party.

I have little doubt that he WILL be replaced after the mid-terms, but it would be worse for the GOP to dump him NOW than it will be after the election. He really hasn't done a very good job of either raising money for the party, nor for setting the tone within the party, and that's doubtless why he'll be out by mid-November.

As for how any of this is his fault? It's not, but that hardly matters in political theater at this level. That's an inconvenient truth, but a truth nonetheless. When John Edwards screwed around on his wife, did it change anything in this country in any substantive way? Nope, but it still had a serious impact on the political futures and careers of several of his key staff members, associates, and advisers, because he specifically lied to them when he told them he wasn't having an affair, and they went out and lied to the press about it. Are they responsible for it? Nope, but they're tainted by it. That's the reality of politics

It's pretty accepted common knowledge that the Democrats are going to lose seats this November. But I think Steele's being set up; if the GOP just gains seats but fails to gain control of the House and Senate, it will be seen by many within the party as a failure on Steele's part. I get the distinct impression that he's being set up to fail so he can be pushed out and replaced with more of a "true believer" instead of a moderate, which is what he comes across as within the party now.





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions



That is intelligent, thoughtful, and well-written. Good post!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:04 AM

MINCINGBEAST


i actually feel sort of bad for michael steele. he is equal parts carlton and grover, both of whom i admire, and he cannot be held accountable for the decay of his party.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 8:08 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I agree, Mike; succinctly put. And he certainly hasn't helped make people want to donate to them! I know it's political theater, I guess to me it just makes no sense. And I agree about Edwards--I actually voted for him in the primary, even tho' I knew it wouldn't go anywhere. Thank gawd it didn't; how could he be so idiotic as to think it wouldn't come out? The ego of these guys sometimes floors me!

I voted for him, as I've said before, because he was talking about things back then that all the politicians began talking about and still are, far later. It seemed like just enough people didn't hear him--something like Ron Paul in some ways; great ideas, nobody's listening!

It just seems stupid to me to blame him for this kind of silliness...lord knows enough has come out of his own mouth to self-defeat, why pile on something he had nothing to do with?

Politics is such a strange, stupid world...


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 1:02 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Because they need a scapegoat, and with typical Republican "values" (yanno, like *coughgaghack* Loyalty) they've selected someone no longer really "useful" to their agenda to end up holding the bag.

Same story as always, just a little more obvious as they get more desperate.

And it OUGHT to serve as an object lesson to the rest of their useful little idiots, but it won't, oh well.

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, March 30, 2010 4:27 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Thing is, Steele's failures - if they ARE his at all - are in letting some of this stuff ever percolate up to the mainstream media in the first place. The 75-page powerpoint presentation highlighting "fear" and "tschochkes" as methods to gain donations. Allowing this expense report not only to be reimbursed, but to make it into an FEC filing with THE NAME OF THE STRIP CLUB POSTED TO IT.

Now, as with Obama, it's not his job to actually pore over all these reports; it's his job to hire the right people and get them the damned message to NOT let shit like this happen. So while this ISN'T his "fault", it IS to a degree his responsibility, or at least that's how it will be portrayed.

But for absolute certain, they ARE setting him up for a fall, as far as I can see. And in a way, that seems a bit of a shame. Like Howard Dean at the DNC, I can't really see what he's done that's so horribly wrong (Dean engineered Obama's 50-state campaign, and pretty much pioneered the idea that you fight for every single vote in every single district of every single state, instead of just pushing money into areas where you already know you're going to win), but somebody - some individual with more power than the President, or some group, or some conglomerate of groups - has decided that he needs to go.

At least, that's the distinct feeling I get from all this. And when I say it's a bit of a shame, I mean it; Steele seems like a pretty honorable guy, in spite of our decided differences. He's stood up and taken the heat for some of the stuff that others no doubt should have been fired for; he's stood his ground and told his detractors to either fire him, or shut up and get on board with his gameplan.




"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 1:54 AM

RIVERLOVE


Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy. He rarely comes out in public, and when he does it's always to a safe haven like his pal Hannity. As RNC Chairman, he is ultimately responsible for the disasterous selection of McCain as Presidential nominee, and he is accountable for the election debacle that ensued. As far as I'm concerned he must be fired as soon as possible. Of course the Libs and Dems love the guy. Just like the NY Times loved McCain as the Repub candidate so much they promoted him when he was running a distant third. It's amazing to me how accomodating the RNC has been over the last few years to the needs and wishes of their opponents. I expect that the necessary changes will not occur in time to make any significant impact either in 2010 or 2012. Americans have a very short memory. And Republicans have proven to be completely self-destructive. So all this hype over Repub victories in November is quite humorous to me. They consistently underestimate Obama, they also underestimate Pelosi and Reid, and if they cannot out-strategize those people, I have little faith that they can regain power in America. Seems like just yesterday Mr. Know-It-All Dick Morris was making the Fox News rounds guaranteeing that Hillary Clinton would be the next President. The political winds shift rapidly in America. Rest assured, the Dems are not planning on surrendering in November, and Steele will, as usual, be two or three steps behind them and their re-election efforts.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:01 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy.


Thats not his role. He is not an office holder, he's a manager, like Howard Dean is for Democrats. His role to to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.

Like Dean, he is often in the media spotlight and has been so throughout the past year. But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson. That role falls to the President, Governors, Congresspersons, Senators, etc.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 3:30 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:


His role is to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.

He's been a miserable failure at all of that.
Quote:

But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson.
Maybe that's how things were pre-2000 election. Everything changed after that, or hadn't you noticed.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:05 AM

SIMONWHO


Quote:

Originally posted by mincingbeast:
i actually feel sort of bad for michael steele. he is equal parts carlton and grover, both of whom i admire, and he cannot be held accountable for the decay of his party.



Weird, I thought I'd be the only one to see him as a cross between a muppet and the annoying one from Fresh Prince of Bel Air.

Still, bondage strip clubs ftw!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:05 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by Hero:
Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:
Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy.


Thats not his role. He is not an office holder, he's a manager, like Howard Dean is for Democrats. His role to to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.

Like Dean, he is often in the media spotlight and has been so throughout the past year. But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson. That role falls to the President, Governors, Congresspersons, Senators, etc.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.



Small point of clarification: Howard Dean is NOT the chairman of the DNC any more; that post now belongs to Tim Kaine, who took over the position from Dean the day after Obama's inauguration.

I still don't know why Dean was replaced, or if it was his decision or the party's - or Obama's, as head of the party (in fact, at least, if not in name and title).


Now, as to the charge that Steele has done an awful job: In all fairness, what has he had to work with? Republican party identity - those who self-identified themselves as Republicans - hit a modern age all-time low of less than 20% of Americans polled after the '08 election. I think you'd have to admit that Steele has done a pretty remarkable job of bringing those numbers up, and of trying to get the message out to the folks in the middle.

A year ago, even some prominent right-wing pundits were predicting the possible end of the party. Now they're talking seriously about the very real possibility of taking control of the House or the Senate, or possibly even both. Everybody knows they aren't going to win a veto-proof majority no matter what, but they could actually be a real force in the legislature again.

Seems many on the right are quick to forget Steele's contributions to that result. Maybe, as Frem pointed out, that's the price of loyalty to the party - a bullet in the back of the neck, metaphorically speaking.




"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 5:07 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by SimonWho:
Quote:

Originally posted by mincingbeast:
i actually feel sort of bad for michael steele. he is equal parts carlton and grover, both of whom i admire, and he cannot be held accountable for the decay of his party.



Weird, I thought I'd be the only one to see him as a cross between a muppet and the annoying one from Fresh Prince of Bel Air.

Still, bondage strip clubs ftw!




I always picture him doing The Humpty Hump!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:22 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

Thats not his role. He is not an office holder, he's a manager, like Howard Dean is for Democrats. His role to to manage party resources, coordinate a national message, find suitable candidates, and raise money.
Yes. He's done a lousey job, and to credit him with bringing up the number of Repubs isn't valid--LOTS has done that, and I think Steele is one of the more minor players in that.

I always thought his being put as head of the GOP was a move intended to counteract Obama's nomination, as Palin's was to counteract Clinton. They seem to have been happy to lay everything bad at his feet ever since.

As to Howard Dean, this is something I heard, and I think it's apropos:
Quote:

So Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel (Bill Clinton’s former White House adviser), and James Carville think that Howard Dean ought to be replaced. The comments circulating around the blogs regarding the “chuck Dean on his keister” proposal agree pretty consistently that the idea is a stupid one, and if you mean stupid for the Democratic Party, I agree. But if you mean that the proposal is stupid from the point of view of Bill Clinton, Hillary Clinton, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville, you haven’t thought it through.

What the Clintons, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville are so upset about isn’t that Democrats lost, because overall Democrats won and won big. No, what they’re upset about is that some of their pet candidates, hand-picked by them and fed loads of cash by them — such as Tammy Duckworth — lost. Instead, Democrats candidates to whom the Clinton-Emanuel-Carville insider machine didn’t give much cash were the Democrats who won. The Clintons, Rahm Emanuel and James Carville are upset because so many of the Democrats who won this past Tuesday aren’t beholden to their machine, and so can’t be controlled by them. Replacing Howard Dean with one of their stooges is not just smart for them but imperative if they want to maintain their grip on the Democratic Party.

In short, this is not a struggle about the best interests of the Democratic Party. This is a power struggle between the ever-more powerful Dean machine and the fast-fading Clinton machine.

http://irregulartimes.com/index.php/archives/2006/11/11/machine-democr
ats-maneuver-to-oust-howard-dean
/

Dunno if that's the whole answer, but it makes sense. I liked Dean, and thought he did a damned good job in the position. To me, Steele's not even in the same league.




"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:44 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Jongsstraw:
But they are not supposed to be out there every day as some sort of official spokesperson.

Maybe that's how things were pre-2000 election. Everything changed after that, or hadn't you noticed.


I don't think the record supports what you've said. On one hand you have the RNC's Steele where you are complaining that he is not acting the way you describe. On the other you have DNC's Dean who is rarely in the media spotlight unless its for either a gaffe of some kind or a policy disagreement with the President.

So if neither party is behaving in the manner you think things have become since 2000...then perhaps the job has not changed even if your expectations have.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 7:52 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Small point of clarification: Howard Dean is NOT the chairman of the DNC any more; that post now belongs to Tim Kaine, who took over the position from Dean the day after Obama's inauguration.

I still don't know why Dean was replaced, or if it was his decision or the party's - or Obama's, as head of the party (in fact, at least, if not in name and title).


Your right. See, if I didn't know that its because he's not out there constantly cheerleading like some folks say they should be.

Anyway, Dean's term was up and there's also some kind of tradition about the President as de facto party leader being able to staff in his own people. So while the choice is often comepetive in out of power years, its generally the President's choice for years the party has power.

H

"Hero. I have come to respect you." "I am forced to agree with Hero here."- Chrisisall, 2009.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:03 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by Kwicko:
Maybe, as Frem pointed out, that's the price of loyalty to the party - a bullet in the back of the neck, metaphorically speaking.


That's the price of loyalty to EITHER party, Mikey, look at Dean, screwed over by his own with the help of the media so Kerry could take a dive against his fellow bonesman, and then screwed AGAIN, because the very instant they got finished using him to climb to power, he became a liability cause his values would contradict their ACTUAL intentions instead of whatever bullshit they shovelled to the masses to get there.

And Dean knew better, and I don't feel sorry for him, he went back to lickin their boots after they kicked him instead of manning up and going indie, so he deserved exactly what he got.

None of these feckless curs deserve an ounce or scrap of loyalty at all, and it's only because of those so terribly ignorant, foolish, or malicious that offer it to them, that they have any power at all.

Why should I have sympathy for the fools who enable things, and then whine about the results of what they willingly enabled, when the other half of the dark empire takes power and uses those things against the very fools who enabled them ?

I warned em, and I pointed out that both sides are stupid that way and will eventually hand us rational folk all we need to crush them without even realizing it, and they go right on doin it.

And I even called it square on what was going to HAPPEN to the damn useful idiots when they were no longer useful, and my my doesn't a recent incident in Michigan look a hell of a lot like that, yes ?

Told y'all once before, I saw this train a-comin twenty and some years ago, I know exactly where it's goin and how, the only question is a matter of the final destination, and that depends on whether folks find some good sense in time or not, cause that train is headed for a wall, and for mine own, I'd like to derail the goddamn thing before impact.

And all the while the rest of ya sit there and argue about whether to speed up or slow down, fighting over a brake that wouldn't work if you *did* try to apply it.


-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 12:32 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:



That's the price of loyalty to EITHER party...



Which is why I said

Quote:

...that's the price of loyalty to the party...


... implying ANY party. Sometimes what I *don't* say is as telling as what I *do* say. :)

And I *still* wish Dean would go Indy. He won't, though, for fear that he'd tank the Democrats and hand too much power to the right in the process. But he really SHOULD, especially with the tea-baggers pulling votes from Republicans.




"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:01 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


By the way, if ANYONE on the left thinks Steele's done a terrible job and should be replaced, they'd be better off thinking he's done a terrible job and should be there for a long, long time to come! What more could you ask for than to have an incompetent enemy leading the opposing force? That should be like Christmas every day if you think he's done a bad job of it.

Me, I think he's done remarkably well given the situation that was left to him after the Bush debacle. I *should* want him fired just for the discord it would sow in the party and the muck-up it would make of the mid-terms, but I don't think it's the smart move, and I don't think it's going to happen.

And if you stop and think about it a minute, you'll realize that there's really no "there" there; seriously, if *I* - as partisan a lefty as anyone here - am saying that a Republican shouldn't be fired for what he had nothing to do with, that really ought to tell you that there's not much to this whole thing.





"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero, Real World Event Discussions


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 2:31 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!




Quote:

Originally posted by Riverlove:

Steele is a gutless coward and an incompetant. As a Black man and a leader of a national party, he has been sorely invisible during the last few years. He could have been, should have been, out there in the media every single day calling out and challenging Obama on everything, and he could have done it from a place of national prominance. But no, instead hiding and remaining silent is his legacy. He rarely comes out in public, and when he does it's always to a safe haven like his pal Hannity. As RNC Chairman, he is ultimately responsible for the disasterous selection of McCain as Presidential nominee, and he is accountable for the election debacle that ensued. As far as I'm concerned he must be fired as soon as possible. Of course the Libs and Dems love the guy. Just like the NY Times loved McCain as the Repub candidate so much they promoted him when he was running a distant third. It's amazing to me how accomodating the RNC has been over the last few years to the needs and wishes of their opponents.



It's called The Peter Principle, Controlled Opposition, The Magical Negro and Log Cabin Republicans.

The previous RNC chair was a sodomite faggot. So of course RNC loves 'lesbian' tranny titty bars.

$20-million missing from RNC after Michael Steele got the job...
http://www.dallasnews.com/sharedcontent/dws/dn/opinion/viewpoints/stor
ies/DN-parker_01edi.State.Edition1.266e07b.html




"If I have to cross a line to blow that bitch out of the sky, I will."
-FBI Agent Erica Evans, V

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, March 31, 2010 4:05 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Just to change title back to what it was...

Screw you, PN.


"I'm just right. Kinda like the sun rising in the east and the world being round...its not a need its just the way it is." The Delusional "Hero", 3/1/10

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

FFF.NET SOCIAL