We're not there yet, by a long shot...[quote] GOP candidates Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle and Nikki Haley have captured the attention of the countr..."/>

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Year of the Woman? Not quite

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Monday, November 1, 2010 08:32
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 387
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, October 31, 2010 11:50 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


We're not there yet, by a long shot...
Quote:

GOP candidates Christine O'Donnell, Sharron Angle and Nikki Haley have captured the attention of the country this election season, but they're just a few of the record number of women pursuing office this year.

More than 160 women congressional and gubernatorial candidates won their primaries and will be on the ballot next week, leading some observers to dub 2010 the "Year of the Woman."

This year's record-breaking numbers are encouraging, but deceiving, said Siobhan "Sam" Bennett, president of the Women's Campaign Forum.

"We're ranked 90th in the world in the number of women in elected office. We trail behind Cuba and Afghanistan," she said, citing data from the Inter-Parliamentary Union on the percentage of women in national parliaments.

"[People] look at Hillary Clinton's run for Congress. She's secretary of state. They look at [House Speaker] Nancy Pelosi and say, 'Oh, we got there! We have parity,' " Bennett said. "Nothing could be further from the truth."

Bennett worries that for the first time in more than 30 years, we'll see a backslide in the percentage of women in Congress, particularly among Democrats.

Democrats are expected to lose seats in the House and Senate, and the female lawmakers in office are overwhelmingly Democratic.

There are 13 Democratic women in the Senate, compared to just four Republican women. In the House, there are 56 women who are Democrats and 17 who are Republicans.

"The deeper problem underneath all this is we do not have a pipeline or a bench of women prepared to step up and run for the inevitable number of women that we are going to lose this cycle," added Bennett, who was the Democratic nominee for Pennsylvania's 15th District in 2008.

http://www.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/10/28/women.candidates/index.html?hpt
=Sbin





Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off





NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 31, 2010 2:35 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Niki, what's irritating ME about it, is that the ones we have are such nutters!

Angle, Palin, Pelosi, Hillary ?

Seriously, it makes me CRINGE, it does.
Thankfully, yes, there are plenty of women in politics these days who are not batshit crazy, but they don't seem to rack us as much media coverage, alas.

Damn am I gonna miss Jenny Granholm as Governor, she was pretty handy at it even in the face of insane levels of sabotage, malice, and obstructive bitter partisanship on behalf of the local GOP, and I fear the complete implosion of our state socially and economically lies just around the corner her no longer able to stand in it's path and defy it.

Hell of a lady, she is, even if I don't always agree with her - and here's a thought to stoke a few right wing nightmares....

If they ever change the rules so they can push AH-nold forward for prez - it ALSO opens the door for Jenny, who'd run him flat in a heartbeat.

-Frem

I do not serve the Blind God.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, October 31, 2010 5:29 PM

DREAMTROVE


At least this one is bi-partisan, but I still disagree.

Sure, a number of feminists I know have been ranting some rage against these women which falls flat because the feminists I know are also democrats, and they don't like that the women are republicans, and they don't want the GOP to win that victory.

Sure, the female candidates, yes, many of them are corkers. But have you scanned the bulk of male candidates? Politicians suck.

Consider our first prominent blacks: Thomas, Rice, Powell. Is this what the black community *wants* representing them? Probably not. But you gotta start somewhere.

I mean, it's very rare that I can find any politician who I can muster any support for at all who has any chance of winning. So sure, Sharon Angle isn't perfect, but she's running against Harry Reid.

On that note, I said that it would be great for the Dems to lose Reid as majority leader, but now I head that Schumer is already campaigning for the position to replace Reid. Trust me, you guys don't want Schumer. He's a racist and a cretin. Why can't the Dems pick someone like Lahey? Oh, TPTB, right...


Anyway, so, sure, Hilary is an evil bucket of slime. OTOH, she replaced Rice who replaced Powell who replaced Albright. Albright is a genocidal lunatic. And track it back, it doesn't get any better. I went back to Henry Kissinger and I couldn't find one secretary of state who had a moral character high enough that I would trust them as a cell mate in a prison block.

Another thing that really hasn't been looked at enough: The offices of our govt. Obama is doing a fairly poor job as president. Maybe not as bad as the last one, or Clinton, but again, track it back. How many *good* presidents have there been? Kerry said he wanted to be "just like Truman or Johnson." Both Truman and Johnson *intentionally* attacked and killed hundreds of thousands if not millions of civilians! These men weren't just bad at their jobs, they were fucking evil.

So, when people say "bad for a president" there's a lot of competition[/rant]

sorry, I got carried away there.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 1, 2010 7:43 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Quote:

don't like that the women are republicans, and they don't want the GOP to win that victory.
Bullshit. That's partisan blindness, in my opinion. There may be anti-female bias, but if there is, it's not because they're Republicans. Certainly the left doesn't want the right to win power, that's the usual thing, but it's not because women have been put up, it's the quality (or more, lack thereof) of those candidates.

Thank you, DT, for your rant. I was thinking about that just a couple of days ago, and trying to track back to a "good" President. I went as far back as Eisenhower to one I could honestly say I BELIEVE was good. Obviously any President screws up, and maybe we should recognize that anyone who WANTS to be President probably has an agenda in the first place...or is batshit crazy and just wants the power!

I may well be prejudiced toward Ike because he was Prez when I was still young and naive, and possibly partly because I met him on the "tarmack" (reads muddy mess) of Kabul's only airport when he visited there, but in my view, I see more serious flaws in every President since then.

Also in my opinion, both Carter and Ford weren't ever given the credit they had coming to them, and Nixon wasn't as crazy as we remember. Almost all of them did SOMETHING right, and a lot of things wrong. I don't think there was such a thing as a "great" President, ever, to be honest. Maybe it's not possible to BE one, given how many things a Prez has to deal with.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 1, 2010 8:32 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Consider our first prominent blacks: Thomas, Rice, Powell. Is this what the black community *wants* representing them? Probably not. But you gotta start somewhere.


C'mon, man - really?

No love for Thurgood Marshall? MLK?

Thomas, Rice, and Powell are far from "our first prominent blacks"; they're second-generation at least!

Sorry, but this kind of revisionism really galls me. With statements like this out there, it's only a matter of time before someone starts thinking that Barack Obama was the first black man who ever ran for any office! (By the way, Jesse Jackson ran for President way back in '84, and again in '88, y'know)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Another Democrat Attempt to Control Democracy Fails
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:38 - 49 posts
Countdown Clock, Trump Going to Jail
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:37 - 1487 posts
PREDICTIONS THREAD (v.2)
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:30 - 133 posts
#notquitemetoo
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:24 - 10 posts
Hollywood exposes themselves as the phony whores they are
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:20 - 39 posts
Is anyone else still slightly creeped out by the Japanese?
Thu, November 7, 2024 12:11 - 178 posts
Elections; 2024
Thu, November 7, 2024 11:50 - 4619 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Thu, November 7, 2024 11:46 - 165 posts
'Flat-Earth' movement or Flat Earther cult is growing...in 2023 & 2024 not the 1400s
Thu, November 7, 2024 11:40 - 47 posts
The Honeymoon is Over
Thu, November 7, 2024 10:27 - 329 posts
Why The Cold War Between Tech CEOs and Trump Is About To Go Nuclear
Thu, November 7, 2024 10:20 - 86 posts
Everything I Wrote Was True And Accurate. So Why Did Facebook Purge My Work?
Thu, November 7, 2024 10:16 - 7 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL