4G Cellular... Doesn't exist? by AnthonyT

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

4G Cellular... Doesn't exist?

POSTED BY: ANTHONYT
UPDATED: Thursday, December 2, 2010 17:46
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 800
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 4:51 PM

Freedom is Important because People are Important

http://money.cnn.com/2010/12/01/technology/4g_myth/index.htm?source=cn
n_bin&hpt=Sbin

Hello,

I just learned there is no 4G industry standard... and the one group that officially defined 4G is being ignored.

So 4G means... whatever the seller decides it means. Be wary.

--Anthony

Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 5:04 PM

DREAMTROVE

It's far more complicated than it seems. Back in the days of talk, the world was divided into two technologies, CDMA and GSM. This has developed into a two-network myth, where there are CDMA-based systems, and GSM-based ones. Really there are at least half a dozen technologies in a modern modem, and they're not really a relation to anything. Companies are just trying to keep customers.

The best bet is to get devices with the widest range of technologies for modems. Better yet if they can be either manually or automatically turned off so they're not all draining power at once.

Even 3G isn't a standard. Speeds vary, and 3G phones are not nec. compatible with one another. 4G only exists in cities, and there it can be patchy and pointless. These generation models for computer products have always been more marketing campaigns than real technologies.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, December 1, 2010 8:02 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)

As I understood it, the 4G "standard" is phones and wireless networks moving data at 100Mb/sec, and none of the U.S. networks come close.

Ah, I see the article listened to the same "How Stuff Works" podcast I did, because they make exactly the same points. :)

I liked this quote:

Quote:

"It's very misleading to make a decision about what's 4G based on speed alone," said Stephanie Vinge-Walsh, spokeswoman for Sprint Nextel. "It is a challenge we face in an extremely competitive industry."

Yeah. *Almost* as misleading as claiming your 3Mbps network is really "4G"... :)

Oh, and for the record (the world record, that is), scientists in Pisa, Italy ran an uninterrupted 12-hour experiment with throughput speeds of over 1.2 TERABITS per second. And we're wishing we had speeds up to a tenth of a gig per second...

This Space For Rent!

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, December 2, 2010 6:47 AM

DREAMTROVE

Mike, you make a good point. If you actually measure speeds that networks deliver, it's often well short of what they promise. Your typical broadband is still delivering 56k, esp. on cellular.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, December 2, 2010 5:46 PM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!

4G means it gives you a Goddamned brain tumor 4 times faster than a regular phone.

Or 4Goddamned brain tumors for the price of 1Goddamned brain tumor.

No shit.

A 1G phone is at 2.5GHz, same freq as a microwave oven. 4G is 10GHz?

"Rigor mortis -- the new Viagra."
-Dollhouse, Topher Brink, Epitaph 2: Return

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE