This surprises exactly who?[quote]The Bush administration used a White House political office as a "boiler room" to support Republican congressional cand..."/>
Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Comes to light Bush broke the law...again!
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 11:33 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Quote:The Bush administration used a White House political office as a "boiler room" to support Republican congressional candidates in violation of federal law, a report released Monday by an independent government watchdog agency concludes. The findings of the report by the Office of Special Counsel echo those of a 2008 House Oversight Committee investigation, which concluded that the activities of the Office of Political Affairs during the administration of President George W. Bush represented a "gross abuse of the public trust." The Office of Special Counsel report addresses alleged violations of the Hatch Act, a 1939 law meant to prevent using federal employees and resources in political activities. It forbids most federal employees from engaging in political activity while on duty and forbids the use of federal funds altogether. The White House political unit, or OPA, has typically been used in an advisory role to help keep the president, appointees and others briefed on political matters, according to the Office of Special Counsel, an independent federal agency responsible for enforcing the Hatch Act. But the agency's investigators found that the Bush-era political affairs office went well beyond that role. Its functions were so intertwined with those of the GOP that at one point employees of the Republican National Committee were working out of OPA offices. "OPA employees, particularly during the 2006 midterm election season, methodically coordinated administration support to aid the campaigns of Republican candidates," according to the report. Investigators found that White House political office employees improperly coordinated travel by high-ranking political appointees, including Cabinet members, particularly in support of Republican members of Congress whom the White House had designated as vulnerable in the 2006 election. The agency also found that the administration and executive agencies did not always properly categorize such travel as political and failed to get reimbursed by campaigns, as federal law requires. The investigation also concluded that some 75 political briefings conducted by White House political office staffers were improper because they were held in government offices, during working hours or were conducted by employees who weren't exempt from the Hatch Act prohibition on political activity. "In 2006, the partisan political activity of OPA staff was not incidental to the functions of the office," the report said. "Instead, the OPA director and deputy director focused the time and energy of OPA staff to help advance the Republican Party's electoral prospects, thereby transforming the office into a setting akin to a political boiler room." Karl Rove, who as a deputy chief of staff to Bush oversaw the White House's 2006 political strategy, did not return a telephone message seeking comment. In testimony included in the report, Kenneth Mehlmann, who set up Bush's political affairs office and served as its first director, said the office was "by definition" partisan. He said the office took care to separate official and political functions, going so far as to give OPA staffers a second set of computers, printers, e-mail accounts and telephones for use on partisan work.
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:27 PM
FREMDFIRMA
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 1:46 PM
WHOZIT
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 2:01 PM
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:11 PM
Tuesday, January 25, 2011 3:36 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:01 AM
CANTTAKESKY
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: I swear, the more we learn, the more it's obvious that Bush/Cheney/Rove should have been imprisoned!
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:29 AM
KANEMAN
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 5:49 AM
Quote:Originally posted by kaneman: John F Kennedy wire-tapped innocent Americans and had sex with a famous blonde, lets dig him up, put the piece of his head that was blown off.. back on, and then slap it back off.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 7:38 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 8:23 AM
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 10:10 AM
STORYMARK
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by kaneman: John F Kennedy wire-tapped innocent Americans and had sex with a famous blonde, lets dig him up, put the piece of his head that was blown off.. back on, and then slap it back off. Seriously. Niki continues this nonsense by digging up a bit of inconsequential tripe , which every single elected member in D.C. has likely done, to some degree or another, and acts as if we need some Nuremberg trial over it. It's been two years, and I guess since Obama is falling flat on his face, Niki seems to think that by conflating the " But Bush ! " mantra, over and over, that'll draw attention away from the real crooks in the WH at present. Sad. " I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 11:12 AM
Quote:Originally posted by Storymark: Coming from a guy who spent a decade going "but Clinton..." as an attempt to derail any criticism of your holy Dubya, that's pretty damned funny.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 1:25 PM
Quote:Clinton lied, and was impeached for it. Not so with Bush. And you're wrong about the "but Clinton " claim. Those remarks were valid. Clinton said nearly exactly the same things about Iraq and Saddam as Bush, yet the Left only criticized Bush. Why is that ?
Quote:Bill Clinton, President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice on December 19, 1998, but acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House.
Wednesday, January 26, 2011 2:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2:Ooo, that argument's a loser:Quote:Clinton lied, and was impeached for it. Not so with Bush. And you're wrong about the "but Clinton " claim. Those remarks were valid. Clinton said nearly exactly the same things about Iraq and Saddam as Bush, yet the Left only criticized Bush. Why is that ? How about because Bush STARTED A WAR WITH IRAQ, which Clinton didn't?...And did it by lying to Congress and the American people, by the way.
Quote:Bill Clinton, President of the United States, was impeached by the House of Representatives on charges of perjury and obstruction of justice on December 19, 1998, but acquitted by the Senate on February 12, 1999. Two other impeachment articles, a second perjury charge and a charge of abuse of power, failed in the House. So he wasn't impeached, except by one House of Congress, which makes it not a formal impeachment. Clinton lied, nobody argues that. But Bush lied about things having to do with our national defense, our civil rights, and SO much more, there is just no comparison. So where were you righties to cry fowl when he did?
Quote: Clinton broke one law; Bush broke many, including international law, to the point where he can't travel to some countries without risking arrest! How much more does anyone need to know? Whatever Clinton did, Bush bested him many times over, and Obama is continuing what Bush started, which is a clear argument against letting any President break laws and avoid the Constitution; once one gets away with it, the others will follow. By the way, if perjury and abuse of power were impeachable offenses in the eyes of the House, why WASN'T Bush impeached? Can you actually claim he did neither?
Thursday, January 27, 2011 8:12 AM
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL