REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

For the record

POSTED BY: KANEMAN
UPDATED: Saturday, April 16, 2011 18:55
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 785
PAGE 1 of 1

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:38 PM

KANEMAN


Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?
Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?
Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?
Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?


38 billion...lol...Really? hilarious

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 15, 2011 5:54 PM

DREAMTROVE


Noted.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:00 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:
Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.

Quote:


Do you think Dennis Kucinich would spend trillions on war?



Probably not, but you teabaggers would never vote for him, so what's your point?

Quote:


Do you think our congress could argue over 38 BILLION without war?



You mean $350 million. The "budget cuts" that the GOP-baggers "won" actually turn out to be a touch over $350 million. With an "m", not a "b". But that will never stop you from voting for whomever runs with the (R) next to their name (but you're really not a Republican. Really. )

Quote:


Do you think kaneman would mind giving niggers, gays, women billions...if we did not spend TRILLIONS on war?



Yes. You and the party you support 100% of the time have already proven that. You had the chance to cut the defense budget and cut military (war) spending, and you instead decided that it was far better to gut spending on social programs that help the poor and elderly, that take away from the working class and middle class and give to the rich, who are already increasing their wealth (and not creating any jobs) at record levels.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 9:39 AM

ANTHONYT

Freedom is Important because People are Important


Hello,

I do not think Ron Paul would spend anything on war. Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.

Plus no war unless Congress declares war. The old fashioned way. With a declaration.

--Anthony


Assured by friends that the signal-to-noise ratio has improved on this forum, I have disabled web filtering.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 4:57 PM

DREAMTROVE



Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 16, 2011 6:55 PM

KANEMAN


Quote:

Originally posted by dreamtrove:

Quote:

Originally posted by kwicko:

Quote:

Originally posted by kaneman:

Do you think Ron paul would spend trillions on war?



Yes.



Mike,

I will give you the opportunity to retract that statement. Perhaps you thought Kane said Rand. I'm unsure that this would be a sound or accurate statement, but at least I would know where it was coming from.

That's what a ship is, you know - it's not just a keel and a hull and a deck and sails, that's what a ship needs.




Part of his central platform is an isolationist stance with zero foreign adventurism. "Trade with all, War with no one" sums up his policy.



help me on that DT....isolatisionist...





NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Privilege in the United States
Fri, July 25, 2025 20:23 - 198 posts
Do you feel like the winds of change are blowing today too?
Fri, July 25, 2025 20:18 - 2645 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Fri, July 25, 2025 19:00 - 1030 posts
Obama
Fri, July 25, 2025 18:53 - 90 posts
ROBOTS DANCING: Funny, creepy, or both?
Fri, July 25, 2025 18:47 - 15 posts
Trump Is Destroying Everything He Touches
Fri, July 25, 2025 18:42 - 484 posts
QAnons' representatives here
Fri, July 25, 2025 18:31 - 818 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Fri, July 25, 2025 17:32 - 5697 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Fri, July 25, 2025 14:23 - 8661 posts
American Hiroshima: yes to if, no to when
Fri, July 25, 2025 09:29 - 99 posts
A well regulated Militia
Fri, July 25, 2025 09:29 - 68 posts
Britain Sucks...Part 2
Fri, July 25, 2025 09:21 - 13 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL