REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The Great Texas Non-Miracle

POSTED BY: NIKI2
UPDATED: Monday, June 20, 2011 05:21
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1132
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, June 18, 2011 3:27 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Wasn't Texas supposed to be thriving even as the rest of America suffered? Didn't its governor declare, during his re-election campaign, that "we have billions in surplus"? Yes, it was, and yes, he did. But reality has now intruded, in the form of a deficit expected to run as high as $25 billion over the next two years.

Texas is where the modern conservative theory of budgeting — the belief that you should never raise taxes under any circumstances, that you can always balance the budget by cutting wasteful spending — has been implemented most completely. If the theory can’t make it there, it can’t make it anywhere.

How bad is the Texas deficit? Comparing budget crises among states is tricky, for technical reasons. Still, data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities suggest that the Texas budget gap is worse than New York’s, about as bad as California’s, but not quite up to New Jersey levels.

The point, however, is that just the other day Texas was being touted as a role model (and still is by commentators who haven’t been keeping up with the news). It was the state the recession supposedly passed by, thanks to its low taxes and business-friendly policies. Its governor boasted that its budget was in good shape thanks to his “tough conservative decisions.”

Oh, and at a time when there’s a full-court press on to demonize public-sector unions as the source of all our woes, Texas is nearly demon-free: less than 20 percent of public-sector workers there are covered by union contracts, compared with almost 75 percent in New York.

So what happened to the “Texas miracle” many people were talking about even a few months ago? The truth is that the Texas state government has relied for years on smoke and mirrors to create the illusion of sound finances in the face of a serious “structural” budget deficit — that is, a deficit that persists even when the economy is doing well. When the recession struck, hitting revenue in Texas just as it did everywhere else, that illusion was bound to collapse.

Ooops.
Quote:

The Texas legislature meets today for it biennial legislative session, and as I posted yesterday, it was expected that they would face a budget shortfall of between $21 and $25 billion. It turns out that those figures were just wishful thinking -- the actual budget shortfall is more than that.

The Texas Comptroller, Susan Combs, gave her official estimates for the upcoming biennium yesterday and the news was not good. According to Combs, the amount of money needed to maintain state services at its current levels (and remember, this is after three budget cuts have already been put in place) is about $99 billion. The amount of income the state can expect is $72.2 billion. That means the actual budget shortfall is projected to be about $26.8 billion (or 27.1% less than the amount needed to maintain the current pared-down level of services).

This certainly has to be disappointing for those touting the trickle down economic policies of the Republican Party. More than any other state in the Union, Texas has faithfully followed those policies -- having had a very conservative Republican leadership in both the governor's office and the legislature for many years now.

Texas doesn't have a state minimum wage law, has no state income tax ( and the taxes it does have are very regressive -- the kind of taxes Republicans love), is extremely corporate-friendly (even going so far as to give companies money and tax breaks to come to Texas), restricts government health insurance to only children and the disable (giving it the highest percentage of uninsured people at over 26%), funds its schools at one of the lowest per-pupil rates in the country (with a nearly 30% high school dropout rate), has some of the strongest anti-union laws in place of any state, ranks very low in median income for citizens and pay for state employees, and has deregulated most utilities (causing electric rates to climb to among the highest in the nation).

In short, Texas has followed the Republican game plan to the letter and it has resulted in a citizenry that is hurting and a government facing a financial disaster -- having one of the largest budget deficits in the country. Texas was supposed to be the "economic miracle" that showcased the Republican policies. What it really shows is that the Republican policies are the recipe for economic failure.

Governor Perry is trying to put a good face on this economic disaster saying, "I don't think it's the end of the world. I don't think it's apocalyptic." While it is not the "end of the world", it is as big an economic mess as that faced by any state (including California).

The governor has been bad-mouthing the federal government, and saying that it should be following the economic example of Texas. Now he must swallow his pride and depend on the federal government to help bail Texas out of the economic mess the Republicans have created. The federal government is offering Texas about $7 billion in stimulus money, and the governor is going to have to accept that money with his hat in hand.

That will still leave more than a $19 billion shortfall that the governor and the Republican legislature must make up. I don't think they can do it without raising taxes and robbing the state's "rainy day" fund -- both of which the Republicans assured voters they would not do. It should be interesting to see what they do now, especially since the voters (in a recent poll) said they didn't want education and human services to be cut -- the two largest areas of the state budget.

http://jobsanger.blogspot.com/2011/01/texas-economic-miracle-is-abject
.html


What did they do? Just what he said:
Quote:

The Republican committee chairman's southern accent turned plaintive as he urged legislators who had campaigned on preserving the state's $9.2 billion Rainy Day Fund to now break that promise to ease the budget pressure.

"If you want to close this shortfall through cuts alone, you have to either (completely) cut payments to Medicaid providers, cut payments to school districts or lay-off a substantial number of state employees," said state Rep. Jim Pitts, chairman of the House Appropriations Committee. "You would have to do these things immediately."

Magnifying the difficulty of the move here was that Pitts and other conservatives knew they had to get the state's -- and perhaps the nation's -- most outspoken advocate of budget cutting -- Gov. Rick Perry -- to climb down from the no-spending pledge with them. It took a week of convincing, but Perry, Lt. Gov. David Dewhurst and Speaker Joe Strauss -- all Republicans -- issued a statement on Tuesday approving a $3.2 billion withdrawal from the reserve fund to plug the budget hole, in addition to making $1 billion in cuts.

That deal will solve the budget problem -- until Aug. 31. Lawmakers still need to cut another $23 billion from the next two-year budget.

Perry, the state's longest serving governor, has signed every budget over the last 10 years and praised lawmakers for spending only what's necessary. Last week lawmakers pressed Perry's budget experts to help cut $4 billion from the current budget, but neither side could reach the goal.

So Perry relented, but his support for tapping the Rainy Day Fund now came with an ultimatum about the budget that begins Sept. 1.

"I remain steadfastly committed to protecting the remaining balance of the Rainy Day Fund, and will not sign a 2012-2013 state budget that uses the Rainy Day Fund," Perry warned. So the dilemma may return.

That Republican leaders' posture in the financial crisis came in stark contrast to their campaign rhetoric.

"Texas is better off than practically any state in the country," Perry said in September, well after the coming problem was identified. When asked about the budget deficit in December, Perry dismissed the question as speculative.

Even though Texas' budget shortfall is among the worst in the nation, Perry says Texas remains an example for other states.

Last week, he touted a Federal Reserve Bank statement forecasting that Texas could add more than 264,000 jobs in 2011. Proposed budget cuts, though, could lay-off 100,000 school employees, 60,000 nursing home workers and eliminate 9,600 state jobs this year.

Democrats question why Perry and Republican lawmakers would tap the Rainy Day Fund to pay bills to creditors due in August, but not to save jobs.

Using the fund, which is made up of revenue from oil and gas taxes, could "mitigate the cuts to our children's education, the zeroing out of pre-kindergarten, the zeroing out of college scholarships for all freshman starting in 2012 and 2013," Democratic state Rep. Mike Villarreal said.

But there is little for Democrats to do. Republicans hold every statewide office in Texas, two-thirds of the state House seats and 19 out of the 31 seats in the Senate. The main political division is between veteran conservatives and ultra-conservative Tea Party Caucus members.

State Rep. Debbie Riddle, a caucus member, said her constituents expect her to slash state spending. In the end, though, she voted to spend the Rainy Day Fund.

http://www.businessweek.com/ap/financialnews/D9M0NQ102.htm

So where’d all that trickle down, trickle down to? If it works so well, why is Texas in as bad shape as non-trickle-down California? Hmmmm?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 11:34 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Too much reality for Rappy I suppose.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:26 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


As a Texan, Niki, I'd love to argue with you and point out where your sources got it so wrong. As a realist, though, there's really nothing to argue, because it's all true.

The big difference between California's debt crisis and Texas's? Cali actually GETS SOMETHING for their spending! They have social safety nets; we can't even afford to fight a few fires without begging the federal government for money, and then railing against them if we don't get it, all while decrying their spending WHILE ENDORSING THE CHECKS!

Texas under its current "leadership" is a joke.

"Although it is not true that all conservatives are stupid people, it is true that most stupid people are conservatives." - John Stuart Mill

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 1:40 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Sig, I don't really expect any of our righties to touch this one, I'm guessing it's easier just to let it slide down the list and pretend it was never here.

As always, Mike, my heart goes out to you for where you live. And to think I was feeling sorry for NewOld being stuck in So. Ca. You just put things in perspective!


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 2:03 PM

BYTEMITE


>_> I don't consider myself very conservative, so I was wondering. I thought that trickle down was where you cut taxes supposedly so business has more money to spend and invest, which they don't do either, because in a bad economy, they tend to save and hold onto money since they can't be sure they'll get it back. People take less risks in a bad economy.

But that said, it seems like merely not raising taxes, and cutting the budget, is something different. I understand that there's some anger over programs that should be cut versus ones that are needing being cut instead. But I'm not sure what your meaning is here. Do you mean that you endorse deficit spending?

Staying within means seems like a safe economic strategy.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 3:26 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Staying within your means is of course the best strategy, and of course I don't endorse deficit spending per se. But we're already IN a deficit, a biggie, and what the Republicans want to do is cut programs--some of which are very important--while giving tax cuts to the rich, de-regulating business and continuing with subsidies to companies that are making gigantic profits in this horrible economy. Does that hit YOU as a good strategy?

Taxes on the rich have gone down steadily for a long time now; has it helped?
Why should corporations get subsidies when they're making huge profits while the rest of the country suffers?
Are you willing to trade an improved economy for companies being allowed to pollute, endanger their employees, etc?

Then there is moderation. The rich could be taxed more, and they'd STILL be way ahead of where they've been in the past (and, as you point out, since they don't invest that extra money anyway...). Corporations making obscene profits don't NEED subsidies; they've proven that. There are regulations that need changing and some need doing away with, but to allow companies to be unfettered isn't the answer either.

It's not a simple matter of "merely not raising taxes, and cutting the budget". They have specifically targeted things in the budget which help the poor, the elderly, the disabled, and our education system. At the same time, they defend trickle down to this day, and always will, despite any facts and PROOF to the contrary, and would rather die than put taxes on the rich back to any earlier level. That's POLITICS, it's not compromise, it's not moderation, it's not what's going to help our country.

Right now we need JOBS. For all their crying about it, the Republicans have yet to come up with a SINGLE jobs bill; they've been too busy defending tax cuts for the rich, getting rid of unions, making abortion impossible, attacking immigrants, making sure two people of the same sex who love one another can't marry, etc. The concept of putting some of the money all the above costs into some spending on INFRASTRUCTURE, which would both create jobs and improve demand for goods, doesn't fit their ideology. So here we sit, with them yet again stymying any attempt to fix the situation completely.

I've tried to answer as best I can, if that was aimed at me. If you're referring to Mike's remarks about California, I think he's saying that, while our Governors and legislators have made some terrible decisions (especially when it comes to the education system we were so proud of), they HAVE spent some of that money on safety nets. Perhaps too much in some cases, even I feel that way, but they got SOMETHING to show for their spending, whereas Texas is in just as bad shape, with nothing to show for it. That's not endorsing deficit spending.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 3:35 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


^^ What she said!


(I keep looking for the "Like" button...)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 3:38 PM

BYTEMITE


Ah. So the trickle down here is in corporate subsidies not being targeted by the budget cuts.

That makes more sense. Thanks for clarifying.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, June 19, 2011 4:21 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Too much reality for Rappy I suppose.



More denial of reality by the Left, more like it. No one from the sink hole that is California can even utter a word against Texas. This is nothing but sour grapes, and pure hatred of success, by the failing Left.

Texas has more businesses opening up, a growing population and a lower unemployment than CA, and it's not even remotely close. Y'all really do bore me, the way you go so far out of your way to paint what's good as bad, and what's bad as being good.

Pathetic.

All this shows is that, even in Texas, Obama's miserable economy is taking its toll.



" I do not love the bright sword for its sharpness, nor the arrow for its swiftness, nor the warrior for his glory. I love only that which they defend. "

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 20, 2011 1:58 AM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Too much reality for Rappy I suppose.



More denial of reality by the Left, more like it. No one from the sink hole that is California can even utter a word against Texas. This is nothing but sour grapes, and pure hatred of success, by the failing Left.

Texas has more businesses opening up, a growing population and a lower unemployment than CA, and it's not even remotely close. Y'all really do bore me, the way you go so far out of your way to paint what's good as bad, and what's bad as being good.



Texas also has among the fastest-growing unemployment numbers in the country, up from 7.7% to 8.0% while the rest of the country is trending the other way. And all those great jobs that are being created? They're low-paying and minimum-wage jobs.

Not sure when you started equating "a growing population" as in indicator of success. Seems to me it could just as easily be an indicator of Texas's failure to secure its borders, given all the whining from the right about how horrible illegal immigration has become.

Quote:


Pathetic.

All this shows is that, even in Texas, Obama's miserable economy is taking its toll.



Yes, "Obama's economy" started taking its toll here back in 2007. Wow, he really IS all-powerful!



If you ever said "Support the Troops!", you are a socialist. You've taken money from me, by force and at gunpoint, and you've given it to people who are on a mission I don't support, and are murdering others in my name, and I am given no choice in the matter.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 20, 2011 5:11 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:
Too much reality for Rappy I suppose.



More denial of reality by the Left, more like it.



Yes, the left, uh.... tricked Texas into hiding a $25 billion deficit.

Who's in denial? The poor, lonely, mentally stunted resident of RappyLand.

"I thoroughly disapprove of duels. If a man should challenge me, I would take him kindly and forgivingly by the hand and lead him to a quiet place and kill him."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, June 20, 2011 5:21 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Byte: that and their absolute refusal, for any reason and under any conditions, to "raise" taxes on the rich. Which isn't actually raising, as the tax cuts they're still enjoying were set to die, remember? They'll fight for "trickle down" until the day they die, because it forwards their agenda: making the rich richer. There's also the question of tax loopholes, which I think they'll probably defend just as hard, tho' I've heard talk someone is bringing them up, I think on the right, which is kewl.

You guys are talking to Raptor again...imagine what you could have done with those minutes, which you'll never get back again! It's not worth countering or clarifying what he says most of the time, especially when it's in response to something I wrote. I know essentially what it's going to be, and that it's going to be idiocy not worth responding to.


Hippie Operative Nikovich Nikita Nicovna Talibani,
Contracted Agent of Veritas Oilspillus, code name “Nike”,
signing off



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Kamala Harris for President
Wed, November 6, 2024 22:13 - 644 posts
That didn't take long...
Wed, November 6, 2024 22:08 - 36 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Wed, November 6, 2024 21:59 - 43 posts
Trump wins 2024. Republicans control Senate.
Wed, November 6, 2024 21:54 - 11 posts
Elections; 2024
Wed, November 6, 2024 21:46 - 4613 posts
Will Your State Regain It's Representation Next Decade?
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:54 - 111 posts
Get Woke, Go Broke
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:36 - 66 posts
Suspect arrested after attack on Paul Pelosi, American businessman, married to Nancy Pelosi Speaker of the United States House of Representatives
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:22 - 62 posts
Where are the Libertarians?
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:16 - 91 posts
Multiculturalism
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:07 - 54 posts
For the record.
Wed, November 6, 2024 20:00 - 224 posts
India
Wed, November 6, 2024 19:52 - 140 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL