Sign Up | Log In
REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS
Mass shooting at Elementary School
Friday, December 14, 2012 8:38 AM
STORYMARK
Friday, December 14, 2012 8:48 AM
NIKI2
Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...
Friday, December 14, 2012 9:01 AM
ANTHONYT
Freedom is Important because People are Important
Friday, December 14, 2012 10:02 AM
Quote:Why does America lead the world in school shootings? School shootings are far more frequent in America than in other countries. School is a safe place - until the unspeakable happens. Then, even though the risks are low, it is fair to ask, why does this still happen? Why here, in America? Let's be clear. There is no single, certain answer to these questions. The possible factors include failure by classmates, parents and school officials to see the warning signs; bullying and revenge; serious mental illness; violent role models; drugs; access to guns, and a culture that condones extremism. America has its share of these factors, but which are significant and which are more prevalent here than across the Atlantic? Warning signs Students do not become mass killers overnight. They nurse their fantasies and they leak evidence. Insults, threats and plans are posted on websites. Classmates often know when a student is ready to strike back. Parents hear rumblings and have accurate gut sensations. Within our country there are communities and neighborhoods and school districts that are relatively cohesive, vigilant and able to discuss warning signs of danger. There are some communities that are not as well integrated. They must be coached and helped. After Columbine and Virginia Tech and other notorious school shootings, new programs to share information were developed and several plots were nipped in the bud. This evolution of information sharing occurs in other countries, but it is difficult to measure, nation to nation, who is ahead and who is behind. I see no proof that America is losing this race to improve detection of warning signs. Bullying and revenge We have too many bullies and too many youngsters at the mercy of bullies. But we also have a growing system of anti-bullying school programs. Despite rumors to the contrary, the Columbine killers were not bullied. There is no evidence that America, compared to other nations, has more bullies, more bullying, more victimization, and more victims who are ticking time bombs, hatching plots of lethal vengeance. When boys are bullied they may fantasize about revenge. To dream of turning the tables on a bully is common to all eras, most cultures, and the source of drama, film and literature from the Elizabethan stage to the spaghetti Western. But whether a slowly evolving fantasy of mass murder is a product of mental illness, of bullying or of other sources, there are usually signs along the way. Major mental illness We do not have more major mental illness than most other countries. But we may be less caring of our mentally ill. Back in the Kennedy era, we launched community mental health programs to care for people with schizophrenia and similarly severe disorders, including depression. We wanted treatment available close to home, with compassionate supervision and with proper medication. The program was never fully funded and our American system of care leaves much to be desired. The most serious mental illnesses, schizophrenia and depression, often become overt in adolescence. A boy who is smart enough to get into a good college becomes deluded, obsessed, strange, scary - and he gets rejected, isolated and stuck in a fantasy world. Those fantasies can become lethal. These forms of mental illness are seldom the source of homicide (far more often they torment and demoralize the disturbed individual). We do not have a sophisticated system of care and protection. Violent role models Violent role models, on the street, in the cinema, in the news, have been with us for as long as I recall, and are not limited to America. But other parts of the world, such as Northern Ireland, the Balkans, the children's armies of Africa, the terrorist camps of the Middle East, have their violent role models. Drugs We do have drugs and a drug culture and aspects of this problem are more severe here than in many other parts of the world. Crime is connected to the drug trade and this crime can spill into the school. But the type of school shooting that occurs in the suburb is seldom connected to this urban issue. Access to guns Access to guns is a significant factor in American school shootings. If kids could not and did not bring guns to school, we wouldn't have Columbine, Virginia Tech or Chardon, Ohio. There have been crimes with knives and bats and fists. But school shootings are gun crimes. Kids with guns kill kids at school. I do not think America is an extremist nation, compared to other nations with bloody histories and despotic leaders. True, we have polarized political speech, and some of that speech is about access to guns. But the reason we have an American school shooting problem that exceeds other nations has to do with access to loaded weapons by kids who should not have that access. I'm not offering a gun control solution. But any serious attempt to prevent school shooting will have to attack the problem by determining who should not be armed, and preventing dangerous boys from bringing guns to school. Excerpts from http://globalpublicsquare.blogs.cnn.com/2012/02/28/why-does-america-lead-the-world-in-school-shootings/?iid=article_sidebar
Friday, December 14, 2012 10:38 AM
KWICKO
"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
Friday, December 14, 2012 10:53 AM
Quote:If kids could not and did not bring guns to school, we wouldn't have Columbine, Virginia Tech or Chardon, Ohio. There have been crimes with knives and bats and fists. But school shootings are gun crimes. Kids with guns kill kids at school.
Friday, December 14, 2012 11:48 AM
JONGSSTRAW
Friday, December 14, 2012 12:19 PM
Friday, December 14, 2012 12:33 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Anthony, I have a question. Bear with me. It won't seem like it makes any sense, but walk with me a bit. Was DWI ever a problem in this country?
Friday, December 14, 2012 12:39 PM
MAGONSDAUGHTER
Friday, December 14, 2012 12:53 PM
MAL4PREZ
Friday, December 14, 2012 1:04 PM
Friday, December 14, 2012 1:15 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Magonsdaughter: These things make the world a little nastier every time they happen. I remember after the Dunblane shooting in Scotland, kindergartens and creches all had coded security put in. Each time an atrocity happens, preventions are put in which make life more unpleasant.
Friday, December 14, 2012 2:32 PM
AURAPTOR
America loves a winner!
Quote:Originally posted by Niki2: I would ask "How many of these do we have to have before we do something about gun control--at least about semi-automatic weapons?", but I already know the gun bunnies will never allow it, and the NRA's power and money will keep ANY single thing from being done to limit ANYTHING having to do with guns. We have truly become a sick, sick society. Gawd help those people. Children...jezus...
Friday, December 14, 2012 2:43 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:Originally posted by Kwicko: Anthony, I have a question. Bear with me. It won't seem like it makes any sense, but walk with me a bit. Was DWI ever a problem in this country? Hello, You mean Driving While Intoxicated? Yes. It's a continuing concern. We used to call it DUI when I was younger.
Friday, December 14, 2012 2:45 PM
Quote:Originally posted by MAL4PREZ: Good god. The latest I hear - this was a mentally disturbed man. Apparently, rather than treatment, rather than health care, he got guns. Welcome to America.
Friday, December 14, 2012 2:47 PM
Quote:I think maybe we need to have the discussion.
Friday, December 14, 2012 2:51 PM
Quote:Guns are so much cheaper and easier to get than health care and treatment in this country, and generally seen as less of a social stigma than mental illness.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:07 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:I think maybe we need to have the discussion. Hello, What do you propose to do? --Anthony
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:08 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:Guns are so much cheaper and easier to get than health care and treatment in this country, and generally seen as less of a social stigma than mental illness. Hello, Are you saying that having a gun should be a social stigma?
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:09 PM
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:18 PM
Quote: So we can address the problem. We CAN have regulations that don't infringe your rights to own a gun. The Second Amendment calls for "a well regulated militia". Let's start regulating.
Quote:We can require liability insurance for every gun you own. You're still allowed to own your guns; you haven't been infringed upon. Insurance rates would vary, of course, based on the type of gun, your age, location, criminal background, number of children in your house, etc. Hey, sports cars cost more to insure than station wagons, right? Semi-automatic short-barreled rifles and handguns with large-capacity magazines would be more costly to insure than revolvers or bolt-action rifles or muzzle-loaders, for instance. Do you have to insure your guns? Nope. You'll only be required to show your proof of insurance when you want to buy ammo, go to the range, take your gun(s) with you anywhere, etc.
Quote:I say that the opportunity to mass murder children by delivering 100+ bullets in a short time should be frowned upon rather than defended as a basic 2nd amendment right.
Quote:I also say that a struggling human being walking into a mental health facility should get a pat on the back and public assistance rather than condemnation, disgust, and a future life lived a cardboard box in an alley.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:33 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:I say that the opportunity to mass murder children by delivering 100+ bullets in a short time should be frowned upon rather than defended as a basic 2nd amendment right. What sort of firing rate would you deem acceptable?
Quote:Quote:I also say that a struggling human being walking into a mental health facility should get a pat on the back and public assistance rather than condemnation, disgust, and a future life lived a cardboard box in an alley. I agree with this.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:39 PM
Quote:Originally posted by MAL4PREZ: Fuck the NRA. And I mean that in the most insulting way possible.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:41 PM
Quote:For hunting, more than 2 bullets is not needed, imho. In terms of self defense, 5 would do, though I'm willing to be argued up to 10. There is no sane reason a person needs to be packing more ready-to-fire ammo than that. Fuck the NRA. And I mean that in the most insulting way possible.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:44 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Hello, This has been my observation as well. When I was a kid, there were no school cops. There were no metal detectors. No visible security measures of any kind. It was just folk. Teaching and learning. I lament that kids today don't have that experience. --Anthony
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:45 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Nothing. To the contrary, much of what the NRA stands for would have likely HELPED keep this from even happening. "
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:47 PM
Quote:Originally posted by Magonsdaughter: Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Hello, This has been my observation as well. When I was a kid, there were no school cops. There were no metal detectors. No visible security measures of any kind. It was just folk. Teaching and learning. I lament that kids today don't have that experience. --Anthony Do all schools have cops, metal detectors etc in the US? Thankfully we don't have that here and I intend to do my damndest to make sure we never have to do so.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:50 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:For hunting, more than 2 bullets is not needed, imho. In terms of self defense, 5 would do, though I'm willing to be argued up to 10. There is no sane reason a person needs to be packing more ready-to-fire ammo than that. Fuck the NRA. And I mean that in the most insulting way possible. Hello, Are you proposing limits on what a gun can hold, or what a person can carry on their person?
Quote: I would oppose limits of 2 for rifles, 5 for handguns. It would outlaw the majority of guns manufactured since the late 19th century. However, I might consider some higher limitation if the constabulary shared such limitations.
PIRATENEWS
John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:53 PM
Quote:So how would you set limits? Is it about what best protects children from crazies, or what allows you to own pretty toys? Yes, I admit that that is a loaded question. Look at what happened today, and what's been happening for some time in America, and what America does differently than other countries. Fucking loaded questions apply today.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:55 PM
Quote:Originally posted by MAL4PREZ: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Nothing. To the contrary, much of what the NRA stands for would have likely HELPED keep this from even happening. " Too obvious, tool. Try again.
Friday, December 14, 2012 3:56 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote: So we can address the problem. We CAN have regulations that don't infringe your rights to own a gun. The Second Amendment calls for "a well regulated militia". Let's start regulating. Hello, We probably disagree on the meaning of the second amendment, but it's not necessary to discuss that in order to come to a reasonable accommodation. Quote:We can require liability insurance for every gun you own. You're still allowed to own your guns; you haven't been infringed upon. Insurance rates would vary, of course, based on the type of gun, your age, location, criminal background, number of children in your house, etc. Hey, sports cars cost more to insure than station wagons, right? Semi-automatic short-barreled rifles and handguns with large-capacity magazines would be more costly to insure than revolvers or bolt-action rifles or muzzle-loaders, for instance. Do you have to insure your guns? Nope. You'll only be required to show your proof of insurance when you want to buy ammo, go to the range, take your gun(s) with you anywhere, etc. I wonder if we would subsidize the cost of this insurance for people living at or near poverty, so as not to deprive them of their rights?
Quote: I also wonder if the completion of competence and safety courses could allow the insurance requirement to be waived or for rates to be reduced? Do you get a safe shooting deduction?
Quote: Would there be any control or cap on insurance fees? Or would the insurance requirement be a way to clandestinely outlaw guns for the everyman, leaving only the richest Americans capable of affording the luxury?
Quote: I also don't favor having to carry proof of insurance everywhere. It's probably possible to check on insurance status in a less intrusive way.
Quote: Quote:I say that the opportunity to mass murder children by delivering 100+ bullets in a short time should be frowned upon rather than defended as a basic 2nd amendment right. What sort of firing rate would you deem acceptable?
Quote: Quote:I also say that a struggling human being walking into a mental health facility should get a pat on the back and public assistance rather than condemnation, disgust, and a future life lived a cardboard box in an alley. I agree with this.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:00 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Quote:Originally posted by MAL4PREZ: Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: Nothing. To the contrary, much of what the NRA stands for would have likely HELPED keep this from even happening. " Too obvious, tool. Try again. what's the point? You lack the intellectual honest or capacity to answer a simple question.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:03 PM
Quote:It is unlawful to possess a firearm on public or private elementary or secondary school property. This prohibition shall not apply to a person with a firearm carrying permit, with permission from school officials, or while traversing school property with an unloaded firearm for the purpose of gaining access to lands open to hunting or for other lawful purposes, provided entry is not prohibited by school officials. http://www.usacarry.com/connecticut_concealed_carry_permit_information.html
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:04 PM
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:09 PM
Quote:To the same extent that such rates are subsidized for the poor with regards to auto insurance now?
Quote: Or to the same extent that we subsidize the cost of firearms for the poor? Are guns free? Can you have any gun you'd like, with no cost to you at all? Or have the very best guns been priced out of your reach? Have your rights to own such guns been infringed by their price?
Quote:Again, are there currently any controls on such things?
Quote:Personally, I think I'd rather carry the paper.
Quote:Bolt action was fast enough for Oswald, right?
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:10 PM
Quote:Originally posted by AURaptor: It's representative of how simplistic a person you truly are.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:12 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:So how would you set limits? Is it about what best protects children from crazies, or what allows you to own pretty toys? Yes, I admit that that is a loaded question. Look at what happened today, and what's been happening for some time in America, and what America does differently than other countries. Fucking loaded questions apply today. Hello, I would let the constabulary set the limits. They are in the profession of dealing with criminals, so presumably they know best what is necessary and what is overkill. Whatever they deem sufficient to deal with criminals is sufficient for me to deal with criminals. --Anthony
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:14 PM
Quote:My high school in 1980 had one cop, unarmed. It also was common to see gun racks in pickup trucks in the student parking lot, with rifles in them. I can't recall any shootings at school.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:15 PM
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:17 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Actually, I think the representation is meant to depict you.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:19 PM
Quote: Bullshit. Let's just wait from Frem to show up and share his opinion of those drawn to the "constabulary" and their ability to make decisions that lead to social peace and harmony. *insert BIG eyeroll* Not that I distrust all peace-keepers. There are some damn fine ones out there. But it is shear stupidity to trust those who live their lives in violence to lead us to a more peaceful way. Or haven't you been paying attention? BTW, don't think I haven't noticed your total cop-out. You asked my opinion, I gave it, and when I turned the tables you bailed and called on the authorities to tell you what to do? Come on, Anthony, you're better than that. You're more libertarian than that, anyway.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:27 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: Quote:My high school in 1980 had one cop, unarmed. It also was common to see gun racks in pickup trucks in the student parking lot, with rifles in them. I can't recall any shootings at school. Hello, You can go back some years and find that it was fairly easy for kids to get their hands on a gun. And it was unheard of to see these kinds of outrages. Even when we had gangsters running rampant with fully automatic Tommy guns, they had the good sense and sensibility not to mow down schoolchildren on purpose. Something more is afoot. Something has made us sicker. --Anthony
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:37 PM
Quote:Originally posted by ANTHONYT: You misunderstood my response, so I'll try to be clearer. I am willing to abide by any firearm restrictions that the police are willing to abide by themselves.
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:40 PM
OONJERAH
Friday, December 14, 2012 4:46 PM
Quote:And I would contend that part of that sickness just might be linked to how easy the access is to machines designed for nothing but killing. Sure, guns were available before, but at some point we as a society decided that semi-auto assault rifles were "cool" and "sexy", and more and more of us just had to have them.
Quote:Originally posted by Oonjerah: Personally, I'd rather read about Follow Up on Today's School Massacre. It is a terrible story, but I want to know what happened.
YOUR OPTIONS
NEW POSTS TODAY
OTHER TOPICS
FFF.NET SOCIAL