REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Boston bombing motive

POSTED BY: SIGNYM
UPDATED: Wednesday, May 1, 2013 09:35
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3181
PAGE 1 of 2

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:04 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


So, to more intelligent discussion.

Was the motive political or religious? I think a bit of both. People are complex, their passions dictated by many factors. I think the older brother, Tamerlan, began to identify closely with Muslims (as he saw them), but the actual motivation was his aggrievement over the invasions of Iraq and Afghanistan. Well, you don't have to be Muslim to be angry about slaughtering up to a million people. Add in the close identification with the victims and he went over the edge.


As far as the mother is concerned, she is obviously not a jihadist, just very very angry at the United States for the death of her son.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:23 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Im more concerned about the police/government response to this.

"Unlawful searches and seizures"? Ring any bells?

As to "Well, you don't have to be Muslim to be angry about slaughtering up to a million people. Add in the close identification with the victims and he went over the edge. "

I'm pretty sure you don't know any vets.

What? Going to start spitting on homecoming veterans and call them "babykillers"?

THIS is WHY most people HATE the left.

"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you... YOU are locked in here with ME."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:26 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


"Most people" don't hate the left, since "most people" account for 7 billion. A fact you don't recognize is that "most people" live outside of the USA. Or, are non-US citizens not people, in your view? That attitude would prolly explain why "most people" hate the USA right wing (and, parenthetically, the USA military.)

------------

But I agree with you on the government response issue. The kind of terrorism which is self-taught and not linked to recognized organizations is impossible to detect unless you go to the level of universal surveillance and thought-crime. A place I'm sure Obama is willing to go.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:38 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Sigh...a sincere attempt at deconstructing the REALITIES behind Boston's bombing, gets an immediate knee-jerk piece of assininity from Wulf. Dangit, I forgot I wasn't going to read his screeds anymore.

But to respond to your very valid post, I've seen a lot of this going around lately:
Quote:

What do Mass Murderers and Suicide Terrorist Have in Common?

Over the last three years, I have examined interviews, case studies, suicide notes, martyrdom videos and witness statements and found that suicide terrorists are indeed suicidal in the clinical sense — which contradicts what many psychologists and political scientists have long asserted. Although suicide terrorists may share the same beliefs as the organizations whose propaganda they spout, they are primarily motivated by the desire to kill and be killed — just like most rampage shooters.

In fact, we should think of many rampage shooters as nonideological suicide terrorists. In some cases, they claim to be fighting for a cause — neo-Nazism, eugenics, masculine supremacy or an antigovernment revolution — but, as with suicide terrorists, their actions usually stem from something much deeper and more personal.

There appears to be a triad of factors that sets these killers apart. The first is that they are generally struggling with mental health problems that have produced their desire to die. The specific psychiatric diagnoses vary widely, and include everything from clinical depression and post-traumatic stress disorder to schizophrenia and others forms of psychosis. The suicide rate was 12.4 per 100,000 people in the United States in 2010 (the highest in 15 years). Suicide is relatively rare, but it is rarer still in most Muslim countries. This is a very limited pool from which most suicide terrorists and rampage shooters come.

The second factor is a deep sense of victimization and belief that the killer’s life has been ruined by someone else, who has bullied, oppressed or persecuted him. Not surprisingly, the presence of mental illness can inflame these beliefs, leading perpetrators to have irrational and exaggerated perceptions of their own victimization. It makes little difference whether the perceived victimizer is an enemy government (in the case of suicide terrorists) or their boss, co-workers, fellow students or family members (in the case of rampage shooters).

The key is that the aggrieved individual feels that he has been terribly mistreated and that violent vengeance is justified. In many cases, the target for revenge becomes broader and more symbolic than a single person, so that an entire type or category of people is deemed responsible for the attacker’s pain and suffering. Then, the urge to commit suicide becomes a desire for murder-suicide, which is even rarer; a recent meta-analysis of 16 studies suggests that only two to three of every one million Americans commit murder-suicide each year.

The third factor is the desire to acquire fame and glory through killing. More than 70 percent of murder-suicides are between spouses or romantic or sexual partners, and these crimes usually take place at home. Attackers who commit murder-suicide in public are far more brazen and unusual. Most suicide terrorists believe they will be honored and celebrated as “martyrs” after their deaths and, sure enough, terrorist organizations produce martyrdom videos and memorabilia so that other desperate souls will volunteer to blow themselves up.

Similarly, rampage shooters have often been captivated by the idea that they will become posthumously famous. “Isn’t it fun to get the respect that we’re going to deserve?” the Columbine shooter Eric Harris remarked. He had fantasized with his fellow attacker, Dylan Klebold, that the filmmakers Steven Spielberg and Quentin Tarantino would fight over the rights to their life story. http://www.bulletsandballots.com/2012/12/what-do-mass-murderers-and-su
icide.html


I've seen variations of this; I've also seen those who contradict these theories; and certainly, the two in the most recent example didn't appear to have any intention of suiciding (tho' their actions might indicate some subconscious intent of being killed or captured, not mere lack of forethought about "afterwards"). But there's quite a bit out there now about teh similiarites between those who pick up a gun to go kill a bunch of people and those who, ostensibly for religious or political reasons, "pick up a bomb" to go kill a bunch of people.

Given both types intend to kill--not something your "average" human does--I find the theories interesting. There appear to be a few things in the life of at least the "leader" (if you will) in this case to indicate he had become increasingly disenfranchised and his life wasn't going well. So....?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:43 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Sig,

This kind of police action in Boston is going to get more and more regular. Its an old tactic, do it a bit, then do it some more, till it becomes "normal" and people expect/won't mind it.

Slippery slope. Unless we, ALL of us, stop it cold.

Example: http://www.reagancoalition.com/articles/2013/20130426004-sweep-oakland
.html


"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you... YOU are locked in here with ME."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:45 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


NIKI- Thanks for the article. I think whatever it was, was personal. Tamerlan said "I don't have a single American friend. I don't understand them,". That expresses a deep alienation from all of the people around him.

WULF- Great, just great.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:49 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


I gotta say something, but I won't respond further about it, other than to say this: I know a vet. I met him at an Occupy rally. He was a mess; PTSD and other physical injuries, homeless and living on the street. He'd been through hell. I went home and gave him most of my stash--marijuana was the only thing he said that helped the pain, lessened the anxiety of PTSD, but didn't fuck him up like the meds they gave him. I also gave him money, food, and cigarettes, and spent a long time sitting with him, listening to him and holding him while he wept. He was young, and he was suicidal.

I have immense respect for our soldiers and our vets; I also know some soldiers, and families of soldiers, whom I support in every way I can. I give monthly to Wounded Warrior Project. What our soldiers are sent overseas to do is not always of their choosing; they do the best job they can and those I've known are honorable people who hate the slaughter they see and care about other human beings. That is not our "military", our "military-industrial complex" OR our government, who are the ones deciding which countries to bomb, invade, occupy and/or destroy.

Those same vets, when they come home, face substandard medical care, a military not even wanting to TREAT them for things like PTSD or rape, little help gaining employment, a right wing which wants to do just as little as humanly possible for them and ignores them as much as possible.

So screw you, Wulf; like your buddies, you're happy to wag our vets in our faces like the bloody flag, but you don't know SHIT about The Left and your cronies in our government would be tickled shitless to leave those vets on the field to die; after all, there are always more where they came from. I'm part of The Left you so cheerfully despise, and I support our troops; I support the HUMAN BEINGS who make up our troops!


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:53 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Jezus Criste--Wulf put up an ANTI-GANG SWEEP in Oakland as somehow related to "what we should be doing" about terrorism??? Is he INSANE???

Oh...sorry...rhetorical question...moving on...

(I will not be responding further to ANYTHING Wulf puts up here, whatever the provocation.)


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:56 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Yeah, Sig, I've seen articles like that, in various forms, on numerous media websites since Boston. These two, being unafiliated with any larger group and no larger group having crowed about the bombings, seems to have made people think a bit beyond the "terrorism" thing to "what makes people do this?" I'm thinking it might be partly because they weren't blatantly "Muslim-looking", so SOME people, at least, went beyond just seeing "terrorists" and began thinking about them in human form...

That's actually a good thing, to my way of thinking...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:58 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


NIKI, one of my nieces and her husband are in the military. They joined to get an education they couldn't otherwise afford (opthamologist and dentist, repectively). My other niece, younger sister to the first, got her medical education by taking out huge loans. She is now working as an ER doctor in Ohio.

The young couple made choice with both financial and moral dimensions. They were both fortunate that neither one of them was stationed overseas. And, yes, I realize that in today's economy sometimes the military seems like the best option. But, what do these young people think they are joining the military for?? To square-dance?

Okay, I get it: young people are thoughtless. I feel sorry for the vets with PTSD. They went through a meat-grinder. But I also feel sorry for Iraqis, 80% of whom are ALSO suffering from PTSD. PTSD veterans should be out on speaking tour; because young enlistees have no idea what's in store for them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 8:02 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


Give us a break Niki,

Noone believes you. You claim to have "met a vet" at an OCCUPY rally.

Wow.

My friends are vets. I've worked with vets. My wife gets vets jobs as a recruiter. My grandfather was a veteran, her father was a veteran. One of my best friends is a veteran. I learned to drink and shoot from Marine vets.

You? You MIGHT have met some veteran at a modern day hippie fest.

YOUR opinion is INVALID.




"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you... YOU are locked in here with ME."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 8:08 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by Niki2:
Jezus Criste--Wulf put up an ANTI-GANG SWEEP in Oakland as somehow related to "what we should be doing" about terrorism??? Is he INSANE???




Of course he is.

He's so deranged, he thinks his hatred is shared by most of the world. He's crazy and moronic.

I know it was rhetorical and all... It just needed sayin'.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 8:10 AM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:
Give us a break Niki,

Noone believes you. You claim to have "met a vet" at an OCCUPY rally.




Poor little idiot. Your thinking it doesn't mean it applies to others.

Have you even seen the number of homeless vets out ther, you fucktard? Your stupidity is astounding.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 8:23 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


WULF- When you speak from deep ignorance, it's best that you not speak at all. YES, there were vets at Occupy events. Some because they were homeless, and the Occupy camps offered them a safe place to sleep, and food. Some as deliberate participants:

Marine veteran on ‘Occupy’ protests: This is our time to change greed in America

Quote:

The Marine Corps veteran seen in videos shouting at New York City police officers during the ongoing “Occupy Wall Street” demonstration appeared Monday night on Countdown with Keith Olbermann to discuss the situation.

Sgt. Shamar Thomas, of the 3rd Light Armored Reconnaissance Battalion, confronted a group of police officers and gave them a stern lecture at the top of his voice about how they should not be hurting peaceful American protesters.


http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/10/17/marine-veteran-on-occupy-protest
s-this-is-our-time-to-change-greed-in-america
/

Veterans March For Occupy Wall Street — And It's Like Nothing You've Ever Seen Before
www.businessinsider.com/veterans-march-for-occupy-wall-street-2010-11?
op=1#ixzz2RavxLEr4




Please, dear, go look it up.


NIKI- "Sweeps" are a military tactic which can be used against gangs, protesters, "Muslims", and the undocumented. Although they're done with a warrant with specific people in mind (I ASSUME! MAYBE NOT!) they target everyone in an area. Each car is stopped and checked on the way in or out. Each door is knocked on by armed police. It doesn't matter if your name is on a warrant, or not: you will have to explain who you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 8:36 AM

STORYMARK


Wasn't the occupy guy who got shot in the head with rubber bullets very famouly a vet?

Wulfie, how is that alternate reality of yours?




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 9:14 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Sig and Mark, thank you. Yes, the guy who was shot at the Occupy rally was a vet; one of our own, as it happens (from Berserkeley). He wasn't at the rally initially as part of Occupy, but with his brother; the result of his experience was that he joined Occupy, and he spoke at one of our Saturday demonstrations afterwards. I mentioned it here at the time.

I also posted about the vet I met the day it happened; I came home from the Saturday noon rally and posted it here, and my post was pretty upset about the situation. Probably nobody remembers, dunno how many of those who are here now were here then, but Mike, if you're out there and have a few minutes to work your magic, and there's any way you can Google it, that would be really neat. Not that it matters; apparently Wulf is so accustomed to lying and being lied to that he thinks everyone does it, but I DO NOT LIE. I may omit things or word things carefully, but I've never deliberately lied on any website, and some here who went through my break with Frem know how important that is to me.

One of my vet-family friends is a woman I've known for over 12 years on a mental-health forum; her daughter was on her third tour overseas last time we spoke. I make a monthly gift of $10 to Wounded Warrior Project. I also sponsor two children through Save the Children monthly and am a member and sponsor a wolf at Wolf Haven International ( http://www.wolfhaven.org/).

Nobody needs to believe me, any more than I believe Hero or anyone else who, over time, shows themselves to be false. But that's the truth.

And, far more importantly, there are many, many veterans out there who are suffering and need our help. It's not for me to judge why a young person chooses to join the military--my husband's son did, tho' he was injured in Boot Camp and never got the chance to serve. The military, by the way, did the absolute minimum possible where his injury was concerned, and he now carries a permanent disability (no, not an "official" one he gets paid for or anything, just one that causes him pain and keeps him from pursuing careers he would like) because they screwed up the medical care he got.

I had friends who were drafted in the '60s; I had some who came back changed forever, and some who didn't come back. My opinion about the SOLDIERS in our military is my own, that being that there are ones who behave honorably and ones who don't--you know, kinda like all human beings. My opinion of our MILITARY is well known, but I make a distinction between the young men who serve and those who make the decisions and often consider them as cannon fodder, useful politically and in war but little else.

Sig, I know what a sweep is; I live in the Bay Area...y'know, urban living? If your remark was about the Oakland sweep, my remark was that Wulf was apparently saying we should be doing sweeps of--what, all Muslims? All immigrants? Yeah, they can be used for many things, but his utilizing a sweep of GANGS was laughable to me.
Quote:

"It's a very active and violent criminal street gang that's involved in a lot of shootings, robberies in West Oakland, and even some in East Oakland as well," said Lt. Tony Jones with the OPD Gang Intelligence Task Force.

One mother in the Acorn Housing complex added, "The youngest I've seen was a 12, a 12-year-old with a gun. It was hanging out of his pocket."

Police say the Acorn gang has been living here and intimidating residents for years. Most residents were afraid to talk on camera.

"Just walking through the neighborhood, you're just on your tippy toes, basically," the mother added.


This is the illustration Wulf gave of what we should be doing to...I don't know, Chechyn university students? Muslim immigrants? Anyone wanna guess?

By the way, when it comes to those sweeps, there's a lot Wulf doesn't know, nor do most here, about how they're done. Lots more I don't know, unquestionably, and I'm not going to get into it here, but the sweeps are among the final actions after a LOT more goes into it, working with the residents, MEETING with the gangs themselves, and more.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 11:21 AM

WULFENSTAR

http://youtu.be/VUnGTXRxGHg


So, an army of cops are A-ok... so long as its happening where you are not.

You make me sick.

You want everyone to rely on somebody else, like you do.



"None of you seem to understand. I'm not locked in here with you... YOU are locked in here with ME."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 11:36 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:


Well, you don't have to be Muslim to be angry about slaughtering up to a million people. Add in the close identification with the victims and he went over the edge.



Well, that 'million slaughtered' is horrific fiction, with the bulk of those coming from Muslims themselves, blowing each other up.

But what better way to protest the killing of others than with more killings ! Alluha Akbar, indeed!

Quote:



As far as the mother is concerned, she is obviously not a jihadist, just very very angry at the United States for the death of her son.



Really? You're THAT gullible ?


She's a jihadist sympathizer.

Boston suspects' mother was on watch list, officials say


Two government officials said the CIA had Zubeidat Tsarnaeva's name added along with that of her son Tamerlan Tsarnaev after Russia contacted the agency in 2011 with concerns that the two were religious militants about to travel to Russia. The officials spoke on condition of anonymity because they were not authorized to speak publicly about the case.

Read more: http://www.wjla.com/articles/2013/04/boston-suspects-mother-was-on-wat
ch-list-officials-say-88020.html#ixzz2RbhZIkOp


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 12:20 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

You want everyone to rely on somebody else, like you do.
WULF: YOU rely on somebody else. In fact, you rely on a whole bunch of somebody elses. Do you test your own water? Do you pave your own road? Repair your own car? As you get older, you'll rely on more and more somebody elses. That's life.

Quote:

One of my best friends is a veteran. I learned to drink and shoot from Marine vets.
Drink, and shoot? Not at the same time, I hope!

Anyway, whatever happened to the poor white kid in a hostile black neighborhood? Or was that story complete fiction?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 1:23 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:
Give us a break Niki,

Noone believes you. You claim to have "met a vet" at an OCCUPY rally.

Wow.

My friends are vets. I've worked with vets. My wife gets vets jobs as a recruiter. My grandfather was a veteran, her father was a veteran. One of my best friends is a veteran. I learned to drink and shoot from Marine vets.

You? You MIGHT have met some veteran at a modern day hippie fest.

YOUR opinion is INVALID.




Nah, you've never met a vet. You get all your info from John Wayne movies, and he, my friend, never suffered from PTSD

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 2:29 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:
So, an army of cops are A-ok... so long as its happening where you are not.



Who said that?

Quote:

You make me sick.




That might have something to do with your imagining complete horseshit.




Excuse me while I soak in all these sweet, sweet conservative tears.

"We will never have the elite, smart people on our side." -- Rick "Frothy" Santorum

"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 5:00 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:



But what better way to protest the killing of others than with more killings ! Alluha Akbar, indeed!




Dang - my irony meter just broke again.



Why did we invade Iraq, exactly?

And what was our purpose in invading Afghanistan?

Protesting killing with more killing pretty much sums it up.

Was American a Muslim nation under Dubya Bush, or was it all just a crusade?



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 5:03 PM

KWICKO

"We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false." -- William Casey, Reagan's presidential campaign manager & CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)


Quote:

Originally posted by WULFENSTAR:
So, an army of cops are A-ok... so long as its happening where you are not.

You make me sick.

You want everyone to rely on somebody else, like you do.





You know who DIDN'T come rushing to the rescue in Boston? A bunch of heavily-armed militia wannabe idiots like Wulfie, that's who. It wasn't the private citizen as armed hero who took down the bombers with his AR-15 and 100-round drum, was it?

Nope. It was the usual "union thugs" who did it.



"I supported Bush in 2000 and 2004 and intellegence [sic] had very little to do with that decision." - Hero

"I was wrong" - Hero, 2012

Mitt Romney, introducing his running mate: "Join me in welcoming the next President of the United States, Paul Ryan!"

Rappy's response? "You're lying, gullible ( believing in some BS you heard on msnbc ) or hard of hearing."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 6:28 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:



Why did we invade Iraq, exactly?



Non compliance of UN Resolutions.

Quote:



And what was our purpose in invading Afghanistan?


To take down the Taliban, which was giving aid and comfort to al Qaeda, who attacked us on 9/11/ 01.

Quote:



Protesting killing with more killing pretty much sums it up.



It wasn't " protesting " anything.
Quote:



Was American a Muslim nation under Dubya Bush, or was it all just a crusade?



Far less a Muslim nation than it is today, w/ Barack Hussien Obama in the White House.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 6:32 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Why did we invade Iraq, exactly?
And what was our purpose in invading Afghanistan?
Protesting killing with more killing pretty much sums it up.

BWAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!

I think you're owing me about seven keyboards now! (White wine, sticky.) I'm sure that rappy will never, ever get the point.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 6:38 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


No, I never will. Because to " get the point ", I'd have to buy into the false premise that the terrorists from Chechnya are on equal footing as we were, as were were attacked,and they weren't.

We didn't kill 3,000 Chechen civilians. .

It's beyond absurd. But I guess your wine soaked brain can't comprehend all that right now.

Drink up!

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 6:58 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Kwicko, should I reply to this idiot?

Naaahhh....

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:06 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:


Quote:

Why did we invade Iraq, exactly?


Non compliance of UN Resolutions.




So you invaded Iraq in definance of the UN Security Council because Iraq had defied the UN Resolutions. Does that mean somebody should invade you?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:10 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Kwicko, should I reply to this idiot?

Naaahhh....




Asking permission from your master, are ya?

Don't bother. We both know you're too drunk to make a go of it anyway.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:11 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Magonsdaughter:

So you invaded Iraq in definance of the UN Security Council because Iraq had defied the UN Resolutions. Does that mean somebody should invade you?



Which Resolution states that a member nation of the UN can invade us ?

Bring it.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:15 PM

MAGONSDAUGHTER


Missed the point, sweetie. Have a lovely day.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:26 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


It wasn't in defiance of the UN though.

Are we really going to go all over this crap again ? Because of what 2 Muslim jihadists did in Boston ?

These nuts still get worked up over shit that took place like 700 years ago. If they can't remember a reason to blow up innocents, they'll make one up.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:37 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

These nuts still get worked up over shit that took place like 700 years ago. If they can't remember a reason to blow up innocents, they'll make one up.
As will you, sweetie. (nonexistant) WMD comes to mind.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, April 26, 2013 7:39 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

These nuts still get worked up over shit that took place like 700 years ago. If they can't remember a reason to blow up innocents, they'll make one up.
As will you, sweetie. (nonexistant) WMD comes to mind.



Tell that to the Kurds.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:03 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Tell that to the Kurds.
Aaaaannd... back to your favorite delusion.

Kurds were attacked in 1988. And that justifies an invasion... what, 15 years later??? Kinda late, dontcha think??

----------------------------
So, let's go through your list of delusions, one more time:

Saddam Hussein had nothing to do with 9-11. There were no "terrorist training grounds" supporting any terrorist groups, and Hussein himself hated al Qaida.

Saddam did not have enough WMD to form a credible threat to anyone. By 2003, there were only a few remnants of misplaced, forgotten and spoiled chemical and biological shells from 1988.

Iraq did not move WMD into Syria. Although it was kind of amusing to hear you insist that he had.

Saddam did not have a delivery system, since all of his rocketry was restricted to a range that allowed only for defense against Iran.

Saddam did not have a WMD production program, or even a nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons research program. There were no efforts along those lines.

Despite what Rumsfeld said, he did not have WMD deployed anywhere near Baghdad, or anywhere else, for that matter.

The UN did not ask for our "help" in enforcing the weapons ban. They had their own inspection team - which included USA military and CIA inspectors. In fact, the prospect of USA bombing led to an evacuation when the inspectors were within a few months of completing their task.

Nor did the last UN resolution on the matter- R1441- allow any nation to invade Iraq at a whim. UN resolutions supersede each other, that is, altho later resolutions reference previous ones, they also CANCEL THEM OUT. So reference to previous resolutions was not carte blanche for invasion.

-----------

All of this was known by the Bush administration and by anyone who cared to look into the matter. Since you cling so tightly to plainly false ideas (and this is just one) everyone here has pretty much - and quite rightly- branded you as delusional. That's why nobody takes you seriously, on anything.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:14 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


You're wrong on about 80%, but that's an improvement for you.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 27, 2013 11:25 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

You're wrong on about 80%, but that's an improvement for you.
Prove it.

I know you won't because you haven't got a leg to stand on, and not a shred of credible information to back up your moronic fantasies. I've asked you about these time and time again, and all you did was run away. Which you will do again. And I know your right-wing friends here on the board realize what a cretin you are, because not one of them will come to your defense.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 27, 2013 4:05 PM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


Sig, sweetie, think of all those moments of your life now lost, totally wasted, never to be regained. You usually do a really great job of ignoring Mr. Incapable of Reason; I'm sorry it failed you today and hope you'll be back stronger tomorrow. Nobody is EVER going to convince Rap tha Iraq wasn't A Good Thing, A Righteous War--remember, he can't AFFORD to recognize the truth. Keep thinking that, and don't let him get to you again. I hate to see you lose more of those precious moments of your life...


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, April 27, 2013 5:35 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Hey, it got him out of the thread, didn't it?

And look! Not a single friend showed up to defend rappy, because they know he's a frelling idiot on this topic.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 3:36 AM

NIKI2

Gettin' old, but still a hippie at heart...


(NOW you've done it...)




NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 4:38 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
NIKI- Thanks for the article. I think whatever it was, was personal. Tamerlan said "I don't have a single American friend. I don't understand them,". That expresses a deep alienation from all of the people around him.



"America, the golden door, had already welcomed two of his brothers when Anzor Tsarnaev crossed the ocean with his family in 2002. Anzor’s brother Ruslan, who had immigrated just a few years earlier, already had a law degree and was on his way to an executive job and a six-figure salary. And at first, Anzor, his wife, Zubeidat, and their two sons, Tamerlan and Dzhokhar, seemed as energetic and brimming with initiative as their relatives had been. Anzor, a mechanic, fixed up cars. His wife turned a cut-rate apartment in affluent Cambridge into an improvised salon, offering facials at attractive prices. The boys — who authorities believe are the Boston Marathon bombers, responsible for killing four people and injuring more than 250 — took to their new home with gusto. The older one, Tamerlan, was sociable, even showy, dressing sharply, honing his body to become an Olympic boxer. He married an American WASP, daughter of a well-to-do Rhode Island family.

The younger boy, Dzhokhar, was almost instantly as American as they come: He fell for a blond beauty and won her over. He made the high school wrestling team and was popular and empathic enough to be named captain. He partied hard and studied when he had to.

But over the past four years, even as members of their extended family found their piece of the American dream, the Cambridge Tsarnaevs’ experience in their new land curdled. Money grew scarce, and the family went on welfare. Zubeidat was accused of stealing from a department store. Anzor’s business, never prosperous, faded.

When the mother found solace in a deepening religiosity, the father, icy to such devotion and ill with cancer, went home to Dagestan, a place that was never really home to start with.

And the boys underwent transformations so dramatic that some friends could barely recognize them: Tamerlan in his early 20s embraced a harsh, separatist brand of Islam and in a couple of years went from wishing his neighbor a merry Christmas to angrily attacking a Muslim grocer for advertising a Thanksgiving charity food collection. The change in Dzhokhar, now a college sophomore, became apparent only in the past few weeks, and even then seemed to be tacked on to his existing lifestyle rather than displacing it. Less than two weeks before the marathon, Dzhokhar, previously known to friends as a stoner always up for a beer and a blunt, told a college friend that he no longer cared about his classes, that religion and God were the only true things in life."


http://www.washingtonpost.com/sf/feature/wp/2013/04/27/the-tsarnaev-fa
mily-a-faded-portrait-of-an-immigrants-american-dream/?hpid=z1


Sounds more like the brothers gave up their friends as they somehow became radicalized, perhaps under the mother's influence.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 6:09 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


What's to prove? You're wrong.

You toss out red herrings like Iraq didn't have anything to do w/ 9/11. Yeah, so what ? That never was the reason we went to war in Iraq. We went to war in Afghanistan a full year before Iraq, specifically BECAUSE of 9/11.

And hell yeah Saddam supported terrorism. It's laughable to hear you even try to claim he didn't.

Quote:



Iraq under Saddam supported international terrorist organizations to bolster Iraq's revolutionary credentials, ensure his own role as Great Arab leader, and intimidate rival governments.

In examining the history, methods, and patterns of behavior of Saddam Husayn in supporting international terrorism, some "truths" stand out. Beginning in the early 1970s, Saddam provided safe haven, training, arms, and other forms of assistance to Palestinian and Arab extremists. Baghdad hosted the Abu Nidal Organization (ANO), the Popular Front for the Liberation of Palestine (PFLP), the Democratic Front for the Liberation of Palestine (DFLP), and the Hawari faction of the PLO. In addition, Baghdad created the Arab Liberation Front (ALF) as its personal surrogate in the wars against Israel. Although the ALF conducted no terrorist operations, Saddam used it in the 1970s and resurrected it again in the current Palestinian intifada as a means to recruit Palestinians and, in 2001, to win praise for offering $25,000 to the family of each Palestinian "martyred" in an Israeli attack. Some examples of Iraqi support include:

Abu Nidal. While enjoying safe haven in Iraq, the ANO conducted a number of terrorist attacks on Jewish and Israel targets in the 1970s and 1980s, including murders at synagogues and attacks on El Al airline passengers in Turkey, Austria, Belgium, and Italy, and the hijacking of a Pan Am airliner (Pan Am 73) in Karachi, in which 22 people (2 Americans) were murdered. ANO also attacked PLO representatives in Europe, murdered Jordanian diplomats, and attempted to assassinate Israel's ambassador in London. (This attack became the cause celebre for Israel's invasion of Lebanon in 1982.) When ANO leader Sabri al-Banna refused to conduct operations against the Syrian regime ordered by Iraq, he was cast out of the country, only to later be allowed back. He died in August 2002 in Baghdad from 4 gunshot wounds to the head, a suicide according to Iraqi security officials. I assume Saddam had decided to remove evidence of his links to one of the most notorious of international terrorists at a time when the United States was increasing pressure on him to reveal his WMD programs and was accusing him of sponsoring al-Qaida.

Abu Abbas. Palestinian terrorist Mahmud Abbas, known as Abu Abbas, and his organization, the Palestine Liberation Front (PLF), enjoyed safe haven and support in Saddam's Iraq. Abu Abbas was responsible for the October 1985 hijacking of the Italian cruise ship Achille Lauro and the murder of Leon Klinghoffer, an elderly American confined to a wheelchair. In October 2000, following the outbreak of Israeli-Palestinian fighting, Abu Abbas announced from Baghdad that the PLF would resume attacks on Israel.

Others: In the 1970s Saddam aided Palestinian radical factions that conducted terrorist operations on Israeli, Jewish, Western, and moderate Arab targets. In the 1980s, he sheltered the Kurdish anti-Turkish terrorist group, the Kurdish Workers Party (PKK) at the same time he allowed Ankara hot pursuit of PKK terrorists across its border. In the 1990s, he provided safe haven and supported attacks by the leftist anti-Iranian Mujahideen-e Khalq on targets inside Iran, including rocket attacks on government office buildings in Tehran.

http://www.9-11commission.gov/hearings/hearing3/witness_yaphe.htm




You present a clever trick, by suggesting Saddam didn't help directly w/ the 9/11 attackers, as if that some how absolves him from other dealings he had.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 6:34 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


But I did find other comical items in your post...

Quote:


Saddam did not have enough WMD to form a credible threat to anyone. By 2003, there were only a few remnants of misplaced, forgotten and spoiled chemical and biological shells from 1988.



Wait...He didn't have " enough " ?? I thought he didn't have ANY!! Now you've changed your tune on that note ? Funny.

Quote:



Iraq did not move WMD into Syria. Although it was kind of amusing to hear you insist that he had.



And yet, Syria has WMD. Huh.

Quote:


Saddam did not have a delivery system, since all of his rocketry was restricted to a range that allowed only for defense against Iran.



Remind the folks in Israel that important fact. They were on the receiving end of quite a few scud missiles from where? Oh yeah..IRAQ.

Quote:


Saddam did not have a WMD production program, or even a nuclear, biological, or chemical weapons research program. There were no efforts along those lines.



So, now he DIDN'T have WMD, huh? And if he didn't have nuclear program, then I guess that means he didn't have all the others, huh ? Is that how it works ? You can't have one unless you have the whole set ?

Quote:


Despite what Rumsfeld said, he did not have WMD deployed anywhere near Baghdad, or anywhere else, for that matter.



OK, if you say so. Your word's good enough for me. ( sarcasm )

Quote:


The UN did not ask for our "help" in enforcing the weapons ban. They had their own inspection team - which included USA military and CIA inspectors. In fact, the prospect of USA bombing led to an evacuation when the inspectors were within a few months of completing their task.



Sure, right.

Quote:


Nor did the last UN resolution on the matter- R1441- allow any nation to invade Iraq at a whim. UN resolutions supersede each other, that is, altho later resolutions reference previous ones, they also CANCEL THEM OUT. So reference to previous resolutions was not carte blanche for invasion.



It wasn't " at a whim ". But that's been gone over and over ad nauseum, so what's the point ?


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 6:38 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


Stop being a stupid two year old, thinking you can get your way with the grown-ups of you just throw a loud enough tantrum long enuf.

Or not.

And keep being looked on like a cretin.



ENJOY YOUR NEXT FOUR YEARS!

HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA - HERE'S LAUGHING AT YOU KID!

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 8:32 AM

HKCAVALIER


RWA thought processing is all. It's not about protecting this country from an imminent threat. It's about punishing the evil-doer.

When non-RWA folk say there were no WMD, they mean all the rest--there was no ongoing program, there was no WMD that posed a threat to us--because protecting our nation is the issue for them. AURaptor's feeling vindicated because there literally were FRAGMENTARY AND UTTERLY USELESS WMD is disgusting and deeply intellectually dishonest as any justification for war.

But the RWA focuses on the sins of the evil-doer. A link to the non-RWA protection motive is then found in the twisted metaphysics of the RWA because the true RWA sees all evil-doers as threats. For the RWA, America's not the world's police force, but the world's firing squad.

HKCavalier

Hey, hey, hey, don't be mean. We don't have to be mean, because, remember, no matter where you go, there you are.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 9:34 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
Stop being a stupid two year old, thinking you can get your way with the grown-ups of you just throw a loud enough tantrum long enuf.

Or not.

And keep being looked on like a cretin.




Thank you for showing us all that you're exactly what you accuse others of being.



And OMG, back to the 'imminent threat' whining ? Hell, that's been distorted every bit as much as Cheney's " deficits don't matter " line. Give it a rest already.

Quote:

When non-RWA folk say there were no WMD, they mean all the rest--there was no ongoing program, there was no WMD that posed a threat to us--because protecting our nation is the issue for them. AURaptor's feeling vindicated because there literally were FRAGMENTARY AND UTTERLY USELESS WMD is disgusting and deeply intellectually dishonest as any justification for war.


RWA - ? Regional Water Authority ? I'm guessing it has something to do w/ Right-Wing something or other. Meh.

The intellectual dishonesty is that those who think Saddam was a freakin' Boy Scout, and wasn't doing anything he wasn't suppose to be doing. How many YEARS did Saddam have to hide, destroy or move out of country the specific items we TOLD him we were coming to inspect ? Doesn't take a ruttin' genius to do a massive clean up job, to cover their tracks. I'm betting they called this guy...



On second thought, he'd have done a better job.


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 9:52 AM

1KIKI

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.


"Money grew scarce, and the family went on welfare. Zubeidat was accused of stealing from a department store. Anzor’s business, never prosperous, faded."

Ah, yes the American dream. Money, success, material goods. But the dream never happens for 24.75% of Americans who live in or near poverty. What then? Well, if you're born American and fully propagandized, you blame yourself. If you're not, you more rationally blame the system.


Record U.S. Poverty Rate Holds As Inequality Grows
Today the Census Bureau released its analysis of U.S. poverty in 2011, and the official poverty rate essentially held at 15 percent, meaning that 46.2 million people live below the poverty line.
...
They aren't in poverty, but they are just a step away from falling into its clutches.
More than 30 million (9.75%) Americans are living just above the poverty line. These near poor, often defined as having incomes of up to 1.5 times the poverty threshold, were supporting a family of four on no more than $34,500 last year.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 10:02 AM

NEWOLDBROWNCOAT


Best thing about Saddam Hussein was that while he was there, he kept the Iranians-- well, in check is not the right word, but they were so busy fighting him and keeping an eye on him, they didn't have enough left over to get into too much mischief. Then we removed him , and HEY! PRESTO! Iraq is now or will soon be, an Iranian client state.

Good job our side.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 10:07 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by 1kiki:
"Money grew scarce, and the family went on welfare. Zubeidat was accused of stealing from a department store. Anzor’s business, never prosperous, faded."

Ah, yes the American dream. Money, success, material goods. But the dream never happens for 24.75% of Americans who live in or near poverty. What then? Well, if you're born American and fully propagandized, you blame yourself. If you're not, you more rationally blame the system.


Record U.S. Poverty Rate Holds As Inequality Grows
Today the Census Bureau released its analysis of U.S. poverty in 2011, and the official poverty rate essentially held at 15 percent, meaning that 46.2 million people live below the poverty line.
...
They aren't in poverty, but they are just a step away from falling into its clutches.
More than 30 million (9.75%) Americans are living just above the poverty line. These near poor, often defined as having incomes of up to 1.5 times the poverty threshold, were supporting a family of four on no more than $34,500 last year.



Are you seriously fucking blaming the United States for this family's shoplifting, drug dealing and oh yeah, let's not forget MURDERING ways ?

Unfuckingbelievable.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, April 28, 2013 10:19 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by NewOldBrownCoat:
Best thing about Saddam Hussein was that while he was there, he kept the Iranians-- well, in check is not the right word, but they were so busy fighting him and keeping an eye on him, they didn't have enough left over to get into too much mischief. Then we removed him , and HEY! PRESTO! Iraq is now or will soon be, an Iranian client state.

Good job our side.



Yep. Good job indeed. It was well known, back during the Iran/ Iraq war, that Saddam was anything but a 'good guy'. It may not have been reported that way, but the folks at the State Dept. knew well enough.

That's the catch-22 world we live in, where sometimes to fight one evil, you must use another. Had we not sided w/ the militant Muslisms in Afghanistan in the 80's, the Soviet Union would have likely won their 'occupation' war, and had their nose all that much close to the oil in that region, as well as a warm water port.

Maybe the USSR doesn't collapse. Maybe the wall in Berlin is still standing today.

Choices are made, with the info we have at the time, and we live w/ the consequences.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Multiculturalism
Tue, November 5, 2024 08:22 - 52 posts
Is Elon Musk Nuts?
Tue, November 5, 2024 08:04 - 418 posts
More men contract and die from Covid-19
Tue, November 5, 2024 07:57 - 17 posts
Elon Musk
Tue, November 5, 2024 07:52 - 30 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Tue, November 5, 2024 07:33 - 637 posts
All things Space
Tue, November 5, 2024 07:23 - 258 posts
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 06:48 - 4514 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Tue, November 5, 2024 06:17 - 7422 posts
South Korea
Tue, November 5, 2024 05:00 - 4 posts
Worst poll yet!
Tue, November 5, 2024 04:43 - 19 posts
Poll Shows Americans' Massive Disapproval Of Both Parties: "Now It's Just An Oligarchy"
Tue, November 5, 2024 04:36 - 24 posts
New CNN Poll Raises Eyebrows
Tue, November 5, 2024 04:32 - 10 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL