REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Syrian Rebels with Sarin? Also Israeli Air Strikes and WW3

POSTED BY: BYTEMITE
UPDATED: Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:22
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3280
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 2:37 PM

BYTEMITE


http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-middle-east-22424188

Nothing like veering towards utter catastrophe, heedless of all facts or consequences.

Even a number of US military officials are balking at this, and war is what they DO.

If we want to help the civilians, that's what HUMANITARIAN AID is for.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:11 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


You do realize that this article is four months old, right?


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 3:17 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
You do realize that this article is four months old, right?



It's been under reported, and for good reason. Barry's 'Red-line' declaration was a colossal boner by a Commander OF Chief who has no exit strategy, no military objective, no stated goals, other than to say " Guys! Stop that! ".

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 5:06 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


RAPPY-
This was under-reported for the reason that if Obama were to follow HIS OWN logic, he would have had to bomb the so-called rebels. Since "punishing the use of chemical weapons [by whatever party]" is not part of his agenda, this was not in USA the news.

An investigation showed that the Sarin used did not have stabilizers, which would have been part of a normal military-grade manufcture. I saw videos of the delivery systems, which showed a variety of bomblets of different manufacture, as well as barrels and bags of chemicals.

GEEZER
Quote:

You do realize that this article is four months old, right?
You DO realize that by the time Obama gets around to firing on Syria, that use of chemical weapons will have been more than a month old?

I guess my point is... So what? Chemical weapons have already been used. Finger points tentatively in the direction of the "rebels". One would think that this evidence should be taken into consideration when trying to figure out who used chemical weapons most recently.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 5:25 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
You do realize that this article is four months old, right?





...!

Damn. I heard something somewhere else linking rebels to Sarin gas so I went looking for source articles, but thought that this article was commenting on the recent attacks.

So that's two ways this information has tripped me up today.

Still... I do wonder why we're so certain that only the Assad regime had the means and the motive to use chemical weapons.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 6:01 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
GEEZER
Quote:

You do realize that this article is four months old, right?
You DO realize that by the time Obama gets around to firing on Syria, that use of chemical weapons will have been more than a month old?

I guess my point is... So what? Chemical weapons have already been used. Finger points tentatively in the direction of the "rebels". One would think that this evidence should be taken into consideration when trying to figure out who used chemical weapons most recently.



I don't care who has used chemical weapons. It shouldn't be our duty to prevent it. Pres. Obama should never have made statements about a "Red Line" relating to their use. Now he either has to go over the slippery slope of military action, or be shown up as someone who doesn't back up his threats. I'd bet he's really hoping that the Congress doesn't back him up, so he can get out with some respect intact.

The UN should be the organization dealing with this, but no meaningful action will get past Russia and China.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:04 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I care. But my response tends to be somewhat different. My FIRST response is: Stop aiding tyrants and terrorists. Just stop. It doesn't matter what the "realpolitik" is, eventually you will create such instability and earn so much blowback you will have negated any short-term benefit you might have gained.

If you find yourself wanting to help people, then HELP. Roads, schools, wells, loan forgiveness ... all of them are so much more effective helping people than bombs and missiles.

If there is tyrant who is really brutalizing a nation, then find his (or her) source of power and unplug it. There is (almost) no tyrant who can exist without foreign banks, foreign trade, and foreign guns propping up his (or her) tyranny.


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 9:19 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


So, is credence being given to the version of the story where some group among the "rebels " were to blame for this attack ?

I believe I said from the very first news of this attack, that it may have been either self inflicted, to get the US involved, OR a colossal screw up, by those who aren't trained to handle such weapons.

Quote:


Testimony from victims now strongly suggests it was the rebels, not the Syrian government, that used Sarin Nerve Gas during a recent incident in the revolution-wracked nation, a senior UN diplomat said Monday.

Carla del Ponte, a member of the UN Independent International Commission of Inquiry on Syria, told Swiss TV there were “strong, concrete suspicions but not yet incontrovertible proof,” that rebels seeking to oust Syrian President Bashar al-Assad had used the nerve agent.

But she said her panel had not yet seen any evidence of Syrian government forces using chemical weapons (CW), according to the BBC, she added that more investigation was needed.

Damascus is facing growing Western accusations that its forces used such weapons, which US President Obama has described as crossing a Red Line. But Ms. del Ponte’s remarks may serve to shift the focus of international concern.

Ms. del Ponte, who in Y 1999 was appointed to head the UN was crimes tribunals for Yugoslavia and Rwanda, has sometimes been a controversial figure. She was removed from her Rwanda post by the UN Security Council in Y 2003, but she continued as the Chief prosecutor for the Yugoslav tribunal until Y 2008.

Rebel Free Syrian Army spokesman Louay Almokdad denied that rebels had use chemical weapons (CW).



http://www.livetradingnews.com/un-official-syrian-rebels-used-sarin-ne
rve-gas-assads-army-6636.htm


Also, the reports of advance warning and scouts, targeting places to strike days before the attack , sound a lot like the satellite photos of mobile WMD vans that Colin Powell showed the UN Security council. Only w/ out any real evidence.

I'm not suggesting anyone doctored or fabricated the evidence, I just think there's too much fog to really tell what exactly happened, who did it, how, etc...



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 10:45 PM

BYTEMITE


I have suspicions all around, and no idea who might be the perpetrator here, only that there are a number of factions that have the motive.

I also know that supporting the Al Qaeda and Muslim Brotherhood Rebels is just as bad as supporting Assad. :/

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 3, 2013 10:59 PM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
If you find yourself wanting to help people, then HELP. Roads, schools, wells, loan forgiveness ... all of them are so much more effective helping people than bombs and missiles.



Okay. So how do we help folks in Syria? You think Assad will let us provide humanitarian supplies that the rebels might use? Same in places like DR Congo. If we send aid, it just ends up lining the pockets of the kleptocratic government.

Quote:

If there is tyrant who is really brutalizing a nation, then find his (or her) source of power and unplug it. There is (almost) no tyrant who can exist without foreign banks, foreign trade, and foreign guns propping up his (or her) tyranny.




So you want us to take on Russia? Who do you think is supplying Assad's arms? China will provide money to the government of any country they think they can extract resources from, and will turn a blind eye to tyranny, corruption, genocide, etc. Want to take on China as well?

Unfortunately, there is sometimes nothing you can do.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 4, 2013 12:34 AM

JONGSSTRAW


Obama's hope and change.....


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 4, 2013 1:12 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Not so much a bother that he won't be able to get in a quick 18 holes. Or 36.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 4, 2013 9:42 AM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Okay. So how do we help folks in Syria? You think Assad will let us provide humanitarian supplies that the rebels might use?


Quote:

Unfortunately, there is sometimes nothing you can do.


Questionable points:

1) Assad has enough control of the country in the middle of a civil war that he can stop supply runs.
2) Assad can stop supply runs to refugee camps outside his country.
3) Therefore humanitarian aid is useless.

Counter arguments:

1) It's a civil war.
2) Other powers in the region who are concerned about Syrian refugees would probably support this move, and probably even Russia and China wouldn't have much to protest.
3) Better than military action we can't even afford.
Conclusion: If we want to do something, humanitarian aid is probably the way to go.

Of course other questions arise as to whether we could even afford humanitarian aid. Perhaps you have specific insight on this, Geezer.

There is also the question as to whether civilians will even accept humanitarian aid, because the US has sometimes used humanitarian aid as a cover for military action and we have zero credibility and an untrustworthy reputation over there.

None of those are exactly reasons why we SHOULDN'T try as far as I can see, but they are complications. And, like anything that involves the middle east, attempting to help at all has the potential to go wrong in new and surprising ways. It's like trying to pour milk on your breakfast cereal and accidentally burning down the house instead.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Wednesday, September 4, 2013 11:51 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Okay. So how do we help folks in Syria?
Well, first of all, we can stop arming the "rebels" in Syria who - at this point- are nothing more than AQ.

We can have a friendly talk with the Saudis and Qataris and Croatia, who (between the three of them) flew in some 150 planeloads of weapons thru Turkey, specifically to AQ. And how about that NATO ally of ours, Turkey?

Quote:

You think Assad will let us provide humanitarian supplies that the rebels might use? Same in places like DR Congo. If we send aid, it just ends up lining the pockets of the kleptocratic government.
No, but we could work with Russia to find a negotiated settlement, which was what they suggested something like a year ago, and something we refused to countenance.

Quote:

So you want us to take on Russia?
No, I want us to do what we should have done a year ago: keep our eye on the ball. Assad was not such a horrible leader, just as Qaddafi was preferable to the clusterfuck that is now Libya. As a minority himself, he did a good job protecting other minorities - including Xtians- in Syria. If Assad falls, we'll have another nation completely riven by Saudi terrorists and factional terrorism. Since we've managed to destablize every single secular leadership in the ME so far ... what are we, 0 for 4? ... I'm beginning to think that clusterfucking the mideast is our goal.

For such a smart man you're pretty dumb sometimes.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 2:29 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!



























In Firefly the Alliance merged the US flag with the flag of Communist China

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 7:34 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!




And yet, those with Obama-phones, ObamaCare, welfare and WIC cards stay oblivious.


Just keep votin', and massah will provide.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 8:54 AM

FREMDFIRMA


Worth a note here Rappy, that when the OTHER scumsucking sociopath did the exact same thing, charged into a full on into a war with no real evidence and laughable reasons, you couldn't get ENOUGH of that Kool-aid, chugga-chugga-chugga, and shrieked like a demented banshee at anyone who pointed out how laughable the so-called-evidence and rationale was, and despite your pathetic lies and evasions and prayers for short memories some of us DO remember it, and your enteral guilt for enabling it whether you feel it or not.

Project all you want, and hell, flame Obama all you want for kowtowing to the same masters YOU serve, but don't pretend you aren't slimed with the same scummy brush, that you are not every bit as guilty, and pretending that folks who never supported this weakass punk save as a blockage to the outright genocidal nihilistic (cause when can you really call TRYING to start WWIII and blow the planet to flinders to they can jumpstart the rapture) lunatics whom you slobberingly and unquestioningly support despite your ridiculous and less-than-credible protestations of no religious bias.

Seriously, is there ANYTHING you are not a total quisling to, even your own so called "god" ?
*shaking head*
I guess in the end the only satisfaction imma ever have on this is that those pearly gates open on a firey pit and the howling laughter of a blind, mad "god" whom is far more evil than any human consciousness could fathom.

And whether you admit the support of that monster or not, the folks whom you support politically are absolutely and utterly subservient to that vile monstrosity and it's need to feed on human suffering, and that, that ALONE, is reason enough to find you so pitiable and despicable as to be beneath notice much of the time... except for the simple fact that the folks you support are actively working to the destruction of the entire fucking PLANET that I happen to live on and don't have any means of escaping.

I'll leave you to figure out the obvious from that, though you won't, cause you have sold so much of your own humanity to someone elses agenda which doesn't even benefit you that you're prettymuch incapable of critical thought.

Which also means I feel no more sympathy for you than a board in a woodcarvers shop, and maybe even less, cause I dun even consider you human.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 10:13 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


G - pardon my semi annual reply to a PN post.

My bad.

Frem - your revisionist view of history is predictable to the point of inanity. No further reply warranted .


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 10:21 AM

BYTEMITE


*Siiiiiiigh*



The one time we all agree on something. THE ONE TIME. And we can barely put aside our differences and mistakes like voting for Obama or supporting Bush long enough to BEG to the powers that be.

Oh please don't attack Syria and start WW3! We'll give you concessions that you would've taken from us by force anyway! Oh whoop, never mind I forgot I'm just a cog in our two party manufactured political distraction machine and those other jerks just SAID SOMETHING and I have to yell at them instead.

Yeah. Asking them to listen to us is going to work SO WELL. I don't know about you guys but based on this conversation I'm sure that democrats and republicans can unite against this really bad idea and take it down together.

In other words:

We are FUCKED.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 1:22 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:

Oh please don't attack Syria and start WW3!

I don't know about you guys but based on this conversation I'm sure that democrats and republicans can unite against this really bad idea and take it down together.


Except they're not gonna do that. They're gonna give Obama the green light to attack. That's what happens when a weak "leader" draws a red line. His Dem friends, even life-long anti-war types, have to support him no matter what, and there are enough Repub hawk idiots like McCain and Boehner to carry the flag into battle for him. But even in the unlikely event that they don't, he's still gonna do it.

Quote:

In other words:

We are FUCKED.


Not really. You'll be just fine, unless higher gas and consumer goods prices means you're "fucked". Actually, for me, I almost would like to see it all to come to final terms this time. The whole Middle East thing is an interminable bore. Syria, Russia, Iran, Turkey, Israel, Hezbollah, Al Qaeda, etc. etc.....Yeah, whoever and whatever's left when the last smoke cloud clears. Meanwhile, I'll be in my pool sipping a fresh rum runner. Ta ta.


NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 1:31 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Worth a note here Rappy, that when the OTHER scumsucking sociopath did the exact same thing, charged into a full on into a war with no real evidence and laughable reasons, you couldn't get ENOUGH of that Kool-aid, chugga-chugga-chugga, and shrieked like a demented banshee at anyone who pointed out how laughable the so-called-evidence and rationale was, and despite your pathetic lies and evasions and prayers for short memories some of us DO remember it, and your enteral guilt for enabling it whether you feel it or not.



Worth repeating.




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 1:34 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Except they're not gonna do that. They're gonna give Obama the green light to attack.


My entire post except for the last line and the first paragraph was, how you say, "sarcasm."

Of course they are. Because the world is fucking awful, and those people who are in charge of it are the WORST of the worst of all the awful. They are concentrated AWFUL.

And the rest of us are about as effective as piss in the ocean at stopping them.

I think I hate everything.

Quote:

Not really. You'll be just fine, unless higher gas and consumer goods prices means you're "fucked".


I think there's a lot more on the line here than gas and food prices. China may be an overbloated iguana instead of the imperial dragon it tries to make itself out to be, and Russia is just a failed superpower clinging to it's last glory days of yesteryear, but that doesn't mean they couldn't be a serious threat in terms of military and economics if they got involved. And if Iran gets involved, China and Russia will get involved.

Quote:

The whole Middle East thing is an interminable bore.


Yes it is. :( My concern is that it may become very, very terminal in the near future.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 2:00 PM

JONGSSTRAW


Quote:

Originally posted by AURAPTOR:

It's been under reported, and for good reason. Barry's 'Red-line' declaration was a colossal boner by a Commander OF Chief who has no exit strategy, no military objective, no stated goals, other than to say " Guys! Stop that! ".



Actually, the whole thing by Obama is pure genius. He's gonna do his bombing in Syria, and if there's any retaliation he's got the pieces in place to take on the real red line... Iran's nuclear facilities. All he and Israel need is one bullet fired back at them to send in the jets and bunker busters. It'll be glorious.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:07 PM

FREMDFIRMA


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
The one time we all agree on something. THE ONE TIME.


But we don't.

See, that's why I am so annoyed about it, Rappy and his ilk, their problem with it ISN'T WHAT WE ARE DOING - not in the slightest, it's WHO is holding the reins when it happens, and that's *IT*.

Were their "side" making this exact same boneheaded move, that very slobbering partisanship would steamroller their common sense and ability (if any) to reason and they'd be right there with the pom-poms cheering it on - in fact, while rarely admitted openly, there is no level of depravity they wouldn't support if their "side" held it up as a political goal.

This despite both "sides" dancing to the tune of the same friggin puppetmasters when it comes right down to it, and why left/right yes/no black/white all-or-nothing binary politics is nothing by a facade held up only by the obedience of the gullible, of which there seem to be plenty, hell even this PRETENSE of skittishness is a goddamn farce, they'll do what they will do, and if folks wanna put a stop to that shit, when they order you to commit, support or finance such deeds.

Say "NO." - and stand behind it, just that simple.
Even simpler if you're not fool enough to let some shitheel stand behind you who will *instantly* scream "YES!" and slam a knife in your back the instant that their "side" gets to do those things.

And that much a fool I ain't ever been.

-Frem

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:36 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
The one time we all agree on something. THE ONE TIME.


But we don't.

See, that's why I am so annoyed about it, Rappy and his ilk, their problem with it ISN'T WHAT WE ARE DOING - not in the slightest, it's WHO is holding the reins when it happens, and that's *IT*.



Unfortunately correct. And then there's "glorious" Jong....




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:41 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

See, that's why I am so annoyed about it, Rappy and his ilk, their problem with it ISN'T WHAT WE ARE DOING - not in the slightest, it's WHO is holding the reins when it happens, and that's *IT*.


The motives do matter. Know the motives and you can stop the plots and schemes. Both sides could be out looking for an advantage, and not all of their objectives may be trustworthy or end well.

But there's other things that matter in this situation too. Whatever the reason, a bunch of us want to prevent a push for war based on dubious information and cheap offensively obvious emotional manipulation and blackmail tactics.

You're more experienced than I am. I get that you think that this is a win the battle to lose the war scenario because whoever comes out on top is the bigger threat than yet another war in the Middle East could ever be. And you're right. But it's also potentially missing the forest for the trees.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 4:54 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
The one time we all agree on something. THE ONE TIME.


But we don't.

See, that's why I am so annoyed about it, Rappy and his ilk, their problem with it ISN'T WHAT WE ARE DOING - not in the slightest, it's WHO is holding the reins when it happens, and that's *IT*.



Unfortunately correct. And then there's "glorious" Jong....




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"



I'm really hoping that was sarcasm in response to my own gloomy bleak sarcasm.

Don't take that away from me. I have so little faith left in humanity.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:04 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
The one time we all agree on something. THE ONE TIME.


But we don't.

See, that's why I am so annoyed about it, Rappy and his ilk, their problem with it ISN'T WHAT WE ARE DOING - not in the slightest, it's WHO is holding the reins when it happens, and that's *IT*.



Unfortunately correct. And then there's "glorious" Jong....




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"



I'm really hoping that was sarcasm in response to my own gloomy bleak sarcasm.

Don't take that away from me. I have so little faith left in humanity.



Sarcasm, yes. But not in response to anything you said. Read jong's last comment...




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:10 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Worth a note here Rappy, that when the OTHER scumsucking sociopath did the exact same thing, charged into a full on into a war with no real evidence and laughable reasons, you couldn't get ENOUGH of that Kool-aid, chugga-chugga-chugga, and shrieked like a demented banshee at anyone who pointed out how laughable the so-called-evidence and rationale was, and despite your pathetic lies and evasions and prayers for short memories some of us DO remember it, and your enteral guilt for enabling it whether you feel it or not.



Worth repeating.



Completely wrong, on all counts. Again.

But leave it to Storybook to side with lunacy, again.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:13 PM

BYTEMITE


Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by BYTEMITE:
I'm really hoping that was sarcasm in response to my own gloomy bleak sarcasm.

Don't take that away from me. I have so little faith left in humanity.



Sarcasm, yes. But not in response to anything you said. Read jong's last comment...




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"



I know, that's what I was hoping was sarcasm.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:28 PM

STORYMARK


Quote:

Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:

Originally posted by Storymark:
Quote:

Originally posted by FREMDFIRMA:
Worth a note here Rappy, that when the OTHER scumsucking sociopath did the exact same thing, charged into a full on into a war with no real evidence and laughable reasons, you couldn't get ENOUGH of that Kool-aid, chugga-chugga-chugga, and shrieked like a demented banshee at anyone who pointed out how laughable the so-called-evidence and rationale was, and despite your pathetic lies and evasions and prayers for short memories some of us DO remember it, and your enteral guilt for enabling it whether you feel it or not.



Worth repeating.



Completely wrong, on all counts. Again.

But leave it to Storybook to side with lunacy, again.






I don't always agree with Frem - but he sure as shit has you pegged. Deny all you like, we've all read the shit you've posted over the years. You were the biggest war cheerleader around.

Keep it up, we'll keep laughing at ya. Its literally all you're good for.




"Goram it kid, let's frak this thing and go home! Engage!"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:36 PM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!



Quote:

I don't always agree with Frem - but he sure as shit has you pegged. Deny all you like, we've all read the shit you've posted over the years. You were the biggest war cheerleader around.

Keep it up, we'll keep laughing at ya. Its literally all you're good for.



Laugh all you want, but the only fools are y'all.

If you think I was 'pegged', then it's clear y'all can't read.

Iraq isn't Syria. Apples and Oranges, good buddy.

And how pissed are you, to STILL bitch and moan about Iraq, on the eve of Barry's colossal blunder and potentially starting WW3 , because I'm NOT for the U.S. using military force now ??

CRASSIC !!!


Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:47 PM

BYTEMITE


This thread started with so much hope, what with me tripping and falling on my face right off the bat with an old news article and not checking the dates.

What lofty reaches might we yet encounter?

Oh even my sarcasm isn't helping anymore. Hello depression and despair, I see you guys haven't been waiting too long. Make yourselves at home.

These are the times I wish I had developed a taste for alcohol when I was five.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, September 5, 2013 5:52 PM

FREMDFIRMA



Gosh, I Wonder What Suddenly Turned Republicans Into Such Peaceniks?
http://www.motherjones.com/kevin-drum/2013/09/republicans-house-syria-
against

Quote:

There's obviously a bit of hypocrisy on both sides in this affair, but I have to say that watching Republican pols and conservative pundits get on their high horses about Syria has been pretty nauseating. These are guys who mostly have never met a war they didn't like, and until a few months ago were practically baying at the moon to demand that that President Obama stop diddling around and get serious about aiding the rebels and taking out the monstrous Bashar al-Assad. But now?


And Byte, you worry too much, there's another route to sandbagging them here, which doesn't involve sticking our throats out for giggling sociopaths who can't be trusted.
Hint: Who was the real "hero" at tiananmen square, the student or the tank driver ?

-F

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 6, 2013 1:08 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Iraq isn't Syria. Apples and Oranges, good buddy.
Yep, you're right. There was far less evidence to invade Iraq, far greater planned "action", many hundreds of thousands more dead, and far more money spent. Syria is but a pale reflection.

And, yeah rappy... we know what you said then, and you can't possibly expunge that memory no matter how hard you try.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 6, 2013 3:09 AM

PIRATENEWS

John Lee, conspiracy therapist at Hollywood award-winner History Channel-mocked SNL-spoofed PirateNew.org wooHOO!!!!!!






























Poll: Majority Of Americans Approve Of Sending Congress To Syria
http://www.theonion.com/articles/poll-majority-of-americans-approve-of
-sending-cong,33752
/




In Firefly the Alliance merged the US flag with the flag of Communist China

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, September 6, 2013 8:22 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Iraq isn't Syria. Apples and Oranges, good buddy.
Yep, you're right. There was far less evidence to invade Iraq, far greater planned "action", many hundreds of thousands more dea, and far more money spent. Syria is but a pale reflection.

And, yeah rappy... we know what you said then, and you can't possibly expunge that memory no matter how hard you try.



It's funny that you can't distinguish one issue from the other. I have no reason in the least to expunge anything I said. You're just too much of a pea brain Left wing myrmidon to comprehend the difference of then and now.

Iraq had 10 years of violating UN sanctions,broken cease fire agreements, targeting our aircraft, no fly zones, embargoes... every conceivable effort to resolve the matter w/ Saddam was used first, and it failed. Here? We have zero legitimate / legal reason for bombing a foreign country.

Continue to spin and tilt at windmills, Storybook. It's quite amusing.

And as for this jack wagon...

Quote:

There's obviously a bit of hypocrisy on both sides in this affair, but I have to say that watching Republican pols and conservative pundits get on their high horses about Syria has been pretty nauseating. These are guys who mostly have never met a war they didn't like, and until a few months ago were practically baying at the moon to demand that that President Obama stop diddling around and get serious about aiding the rebels and taking out the monstrous Bashar al-Assad. But now?


Who ever authored this tripe is clearly talking out their arse. Boehner, McCain,and others, they're seemingly on board w/ use of force. Aren't they Republicans ? And were they all 'gung ho' on helping bomb Libya ? I think this person can't get past the fact this his Peace Prize Prez is not only keeping our military active in the middle east, he's expanding our footprint in the region, spreading our good will to more Muslim nations. What a swell guy.

If this clown was intellectually honest and sincere, he'd applaud those on the Right for taking a stand against war. But instead, it's " nauseating " for him to watch. This only shows it's not about peace for this clown, but about supporting his dear and fluffy lord, no matter what.

True hypocrite.



Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, September 9, 2013 10:25 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Okay. So how do we help folks in Syria?
Well, first of all, we can stop arming the "rebels" in Syria who - at this point- are nothing more than AQ.

We can have a friendly talk with the Saudis and Qataris and Croatia, who (between the three of them) flew in some 150 planeloads of weapons thru Turkey, specifically to AQ. And how about that NATO ally of ours, Turkey?

Quote:

You think Assad will let us provide humanitarian supplies that the rebels might use? Same in places like DR Congo. If we send aid, it just ends up lining the pockets of the kleptocratic government.
No, but we could work with Russia to find a negotiated settlement, which was what they suggested something like a year ago, and something we refused to countenance.

Quote:

So you want us to take on Russia?
No, I want us to do what we should have done a year ago: keep our eye on the ball. Assad was not such a horrible leader, just as Qaddafi was preferable to the clusterfuck that is now Libya. As a minority himself, he did a good job protecting other minorities - including Xtians- in Syria. If Assad falls, we'll have another nation completely riven by Saudi terrorists and factional terrorism. Since we've managed to destablize every single secular leadership in the ME so far ... what are we, 0 for 4? ... I'm beginning to think that clusterfucking the mideast is our goal.

For such a smart man you're pretty dumb sometimes.



So you let Assad win the civil war? And then believe his promises, negotiated through the Russians (who are making a fortune selling arms to Assad, and have no interest in stopping the war), that he won't take revenge on everyone he thinks was against him? And then you believe that he'll let us provide aid to those folks he's promised not to kill?

Or are you suggesting that when the Arab Spring started, we should have gone in with support for the dictators and strongmen, since they'd keep the lid on Muslim extremists? Hmm. Change "Muslim extremists" to "Communist insurgents" and that sounds kinda familiar.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 10, 2013 12:15 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Quote:

Or are you suggesting that when the Arab Spring started, we should have gone in with support for the dictators and strongmen, since they'd keep the lid on Muslim extremists? Hmm. Change "Muslim extremists" to "Communist insurgents" and that sounds kinda familiar.
I'm suggesting what I already suggested many times before. There are non-military actions that can be taken. I won't go thru them again, I'll leave you to look them up. Or you can put your thinking cap on and come up with constructive ideas of your own.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 10, 2013 8:20 AM

AURAPTOR

America loves a winner!


Syria 'Welcomed' Russian Proposal to Destroy Its Chemical Weapons


http://abcnews.go.com/International/syria-welcomed-russian-proposal-de
stroy-chemical-weapons/story?id=20198655



Now, let's see what Barry has to say about this, in his 'big prime time speech' tonight.

THIS should be interesting.

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

Resident USA Freedom Fundie

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, September 10, 2013 10:22 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Quote:

Or are you suggesting that when the Arab Spring started, we should have gone in with support for the dictators and strongmen, since they'd keep the lid on Muslim extremists? Hmm. Change "Muslim extremists" to "Communist insurgents" and that sounds kinda familiar.
I'm suggesting what I already suggested many times before. There are non-military actions that can be taken. I won't go thru them again, I'll leave you to look them up. Or you can put your thinking cap on and come up with constructive ideas of your own.



Yeah, I know. Dig wells, build schools, improve roads, provide food aid, etc. Economic sanctions against bad governments.

The problem with "Dig wells, etc..." is you have to have the consent of the government there to do these things, and that's not often gonna be forthcoming, especially if the aid might go to folks who are of another tribe, or religion, or other branch of the same religion. And in cases where aid is accepted, most of the money you want to invest in improvements is likely gonna end up in the Swiss bank accounts of the folks running the government. So if you want the aid to actually reach folks who need it, you need to bypass or remove the government - and that ends up being a "Send in the Marines" scenario.

As for financial sanctions, it's been demonstrated over and over again that when the government doesn't care how much its people suffer, sanctions don't work, as the kleptocracy will find a way to make its buck. And there's usually someone, say China, who will dodge the sanctions and trade with anyone if they think they can make a buck.

This is not to say that aid or sanctions won't work where the governments in question aren't pure rotters, but unfortunately, there's a lot of pure rotters out there.

I wish I could put on my thinking cap and come up with constructive ideas I believe might actually work, but most seem to involve a time machine and a trip to the past.


"When your heart breaks, you choose what to fill the cracks with. Love or hate. But hate won't ever heal. Only love can do that."

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
Elections; 2024
Tue, November 5, 2024 00:26 - 4511 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Mon, November 4, 2024 23:40 - 4674 posts
Kamala Harris for President
Mon, November 4, 2024 20:13 - 636 posts
Game Companies are Morons.
Mon, November 4, 2024 18:24 - 175 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:54 - 7421 posts
Electoral College, ReSteal 2024 Edition
Mon, November 4, 2024 16:52 - 37 posts
The DEI Hires Thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:23 - 4 posts
U.S. Senate Races 2024
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:15 - 11 posts
Election fraud.
Mon, November 4, 2024 15:09 - 37 posts
Unemployment Rate Facts
Mon, November 4, 2024 14:06 - 828 posts
Any Conservative Media Around?
Mon, November 4, 2024 13:58 - 164 posts
The predictions thread
Mon, November 4, 2024 10:48 - 1181 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL