Trump Hush Money by JEWELSTAITEFAN

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Trump Hush Money

POSTED BY: JEWELSTAITEFAN
UPDATED: Saturday, March 31, 2018 17:35
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 1440
PAGE 1 of 1

Tuesday, March 20, 2018 6:10 PM

And non-disclosure agreements.

I thought there was a thread about Stormy Danials (Stephanie Clifford), but I don't see it.

Now here is one about Karen McDougal.

https://ca.news.yahoo.com/entertainment/former-playboy-model-karen-mcd
ougal-sues-break-silence-180236071.html

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, March 21, 2018 11:04 AM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

I am really not fond of the back-door practice of newspapers pretending to buy a story, as a way to secure copyright, non-release of the story.

This is a bit ironic, because for decades the Playboy fortune profited from copyright laws. Once a story or excerpt was printed, clearance had to be obtained from Hefner to proceed with sequel or film. One example was Casino Royale, IIRC.

And their own lawyers working against them (the women) - that is the part that should be reversible.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 23, 2018 3:18 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

I wonder if their broadcast interviews will get them more money.

I hope Karen McDougal benefits from this. Not feeling it for Stefanie.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, March 31, 2018 5:35 PM

JEWELSTAITEFAN

When BJ and Hilliary were covering up and hiding Slick's record of serial Rapes as nd Sexual Assault, it was as defense of his habitual raping.

These Trump interactions and consensual relationships are apparently pertinent in regard to Campaign Finance Regulations. These relate to a lawyer funneling funds to Clifford, and Democraps want to portray this as a contribution to Trump, although unreported.

Has as anybody heard this in the MSM? I may have heard it once, but among all the Anderson Pooper Springer shows, it certainly has not had the larger context explained very well.
The salacious appeal has overridden the purpose of the interest.

Has anybody else noticed a lack of context, or do you regularly heard the explanation?

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE