Quote:

---

The implication of this equivocation and external desire? Democrats don’t think Harris is someone who can calm nerves and project confidence as their candidate and maybe is not someone who could do the job of president.

Which begs the question: Why, then, was she Biden’s choice for vice president?

So Democratic honchos now find themselves in a Catch-22.

By whispering an interest in other candidates, as many are doing, they’re undermining their own past actions and, simultaneously, their stated commitment to diversity, equity and inclusion. You could say the same of those ambitious governors, all of whom are bending themselves into pretzels to look like Team Biden/Harris players while simultaneously tending to their personal ambitions. We’ve not heard any of them say they would not run if Harris was also running; their support, such as it is, appears to hinge only on Biden’s decision, not any actions of Harris.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Unless I am mistaken, Trump was the specific preferred choice for GoP candidate that Libtards wanted, right?

And Lord Darth Obiden was their pre-arranged selection for their party.

They got exactly what they wanted, right?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You haven't seen anything till you've seen Dan Quayle and Spiro Agnew.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:



I think I'll withhold my reply until if or when I know the answer to that here.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:


Translation: "We hired a DEI idiot to be one heartbeat away from the Presidency, and she's the dumbest of all the DEI idiots that ever got hired.

WTF do we do now? We've got to run Joe and keep him alive another 4 years or everyone will know us as the liars and and con artists we really are."

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
You haven't seen anything till you've seen Dan Quayle and Spiro Agnew.

---