The next dipshit, dumbfuck waste of time that the dead Democrats in Congress are going to pull by 6ixStringJack

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

The next dipshit, dumbfuck waste of time that the dead Democrats in Congress are going to pull

POSTED BY: 6IXSTRINGJACK
UPDATED: Friday, March 6, 2026 11:56
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 171
PAGE 1 of 1

Sunday, March 1, 2026 1:28 AM

Democrats demand immediate vote to restrain Trump on Iran

Congress is expected to vote on two resolutions that seek to block further military action, the latest test of a long-shot strategy to reassert lawmakers’ war powers.

https://archive.is/2g4SH#selection-259.0-263.166

OH! SCARY! THEY DEMAND IT!!!!!!

WaPo is starting to read like Ted's bullshit daily clickbait here. You can tell that they just laid off 1/3rd of their staff and they're getting really desperate for clicks from you stupid little douchebags.

If all you did was read the WP headline like our two idiot headline readers from the Left here always do, you'd probably think that this sounds scary to Trump and his plans.

Nope... You'd have to go down 12 paragraphs to get to the good stuff...

Quote:
War powers resolutions are one of the few ways for Democrats — as well as Republicans concerned Trump has not come to Congress — to push back.

OH, RLY???

Please. Do go on...

Quote:
The War Powers Resolution, which Congress passed in 1973 over President Richard M. Nixon’s veto in response to the Vietnam War, lets a single member of Congress force a vote on withdrawing U.S. forces from a conflict or blocking strikes when hostilities are imminent. But the hurdles to enacting such resolutions are high because the Supreme Court ruled in 1983 that presidents could veto them, which Congress can override only with a two-thirds majority in each chamber. No war powers resolution has ever overcome a veto.

In other words, go fuck yourselves, Democrats. You're just playing with your eternally-impotent puds again, as per usual.

Trump will immediately veto your ass, and then you're never going to get a 2/3rds majority in either chamber, let alone both of them.

You no-good waste of everybody's tax dollars and time fuckwits.

P.S. John Fetterman's on our side too. Not that it matters here.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 6, 2026 11:56 AM

6IXSTRINGJACK

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
I don't remember where the little faggot posted his clickbait on this issue. It may have been in the tags and already aged off...

Ahhh... There it is. It wasn't the faggot's fault. It was Jaynez fault for necroposting the hell out of the RWED again and pushing this thread from only 5 days ago down to Page 4.

Thanks Jaynez.

March 4th, CBS News: Senate rejects attempt to rein in Trump's power to wage war on Iran

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/senate-vote-iran-war-powers-resolution-tr
ump/

Quote:
In a 47 to 53 vote, the resolution fell short of the simple majority it needed to advance. With Democratic Sen. John Fetterman of Pennsylvania voting against the measure, it needed the support of at least five Republicans. Only GOP Sen. Rand Paul of Kentucky supported it.

March 5th, CBS News: House votes down resolution to curb Trump's Iran war powers

https://www.cbsnews.com/news/house-vote-iran-war-powers-resolution-tru
mp/

Quote:
The measure failed in a 212 to 219 vote, with four Democrats joining all but two Republicans to kill it.

Didn't matter anyways, as I've said, because Trump could have vetoed it and then it would have required a 2/3rds majority in both chambers to override the veto. You couldn't even get a simple majority in either chamber.

Womp, womp.

--------------------------------------------------

Be Nice. Don't be a dick.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER	POST DATE

USER

POST DATE