ANGELUS ARCANUM

SO will UPN ride to the rescue?

POSTED BY: RKWALSH
UPDATED: Monday, March 1, 2004 06:50
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 5591
PAGE 1 of 1

Wednesday, February 18, 2004 8:22 AM

RKWALSH


Forget fox i am starting to hate the WB it didn't show any loyalty to Buffy there would have bee nothing after Buffy's sacrificed herself for Dawn if UPN hadn't to paraphrase Joss Whedon "when WB dumped us UPN married us" and now it let's go of angel too darn them all to heck. So are the ratings that bad? Would it be worth it for UPN to adopt Angel? Is there a petition to sign?


NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, February 19, 2004 10:20 AM

RITA


Well i do like Girlfriends and Half and Half but yeah there other programs are weak. If they have Enterprise on that must mean they have a sci-fi fan base so wouldn't they be interested in BUffy's sucessor?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Friday, February 20, 2004 4:36 AM

CONEJITA


Too true other than a few select show's UPN's lineup is weak. But does anyone know if a show with Angel's ratings (never as big as buffy's despites it's being a much higher caliber show) would be a boon to the network?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 21, 2004 8:31 AM

RITA


Hey i have already posted here but i wanted to post it up on the main board again to see if anyone had any details? Sorry for taking up valuable space.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 21, 2004 9:10 AM

INVISIBLEGREEN


Quote:

Originally posted by rkwalsh:
Forget fox i am starting to hate the WB it didn't show any loyalty to Buffy there would have bee nothing after Buffy's sacrificed herself for Dawn if UPN hadn't to paraphrase Joss Whedon "when WB dumped us UPN married us" and now it let's go of angel too darn them all to heck. So are the ratings that bad? Would it be worth it for UPN to adopt Angel? Is there a petition to sign?



First of all, if UPN hadn't picked up BtVS, FOX would have. But UPN offered more money. The WB never cancelled BtVS, they just held off (too late) on paying what Twentieth Century Fox wanted, until the point when the show became fair game for all networks to pick up. The WB has been bitter about losing BtVS ever since.

"Angel's" ratings aren't bad, they are OK. They ratings are actually significantly up this season. But it's a very expensive program. If UPN were to pick up "Angel," they wouldn't make much of a profit. UPN actually lost money on BtVS, but they took the risk because they hoped to attract new viewers to their network. There is a small chance that UPN will pick up "Angel," but it isn't looking too good.

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 21, 2004 9:30 AM

RITA


OH DAMN!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 28, 2004 2:49 PM

GHOULMAN


Well, here's to seeing Joss in a movie career. I'm thinking he'll make the leap with alacrity and enjoy the freedom of doing it without some WB, UPN, wonk coming along every few years (or months in this case) and saying 'oh, and you're fired'.

Dear wonks, if your reading this I'd like to pass along a mere opinion regarding your treatment of Joss and his crew ...

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:03 PM

LITWOLF689


Quote:

Originally posted by rkwalsh:
Is there a petition to sign?




If you go to PetitionOline.com and search for Angel, there is a petition somewhere for UPN to pick up Angel. Good luck finding it though, there are a lot of petitions in there!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, February 28, 2004 3:46 PM

INFRA172


I'm so damned tired of people saying "but it's an expensive show". It's not. It's been said many times that they do a lot with little. It's not an expensive show. There's only one reason why Angel was cancelled. The WB is putting together a new vampire show and they didn't want to have two of them on their network. It'll probably be a [flying goat testicles] and get cancelled after five episodes, but we'll still be deprived of our Whedon fix. That's the truth. All these other reasons simply aren't true.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 29, 2004 10:47 AM

INSANESPIKE


In all honesty, I don't think we'll ever know the TRUE reason "Angel" was cancelled. After reading all the statements made by the WB executives, and then finding out that about everything said in those statements were all false, I've pretty much given up on there being an actual real reason given. Something is going on behind closed doors that we don't, and probably never will, know about. It seems to me to be nothing more than stupid executive politics.

"How drunk was I last night?"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 29, 2004 11:10 AM

INVISIBLEGREEN


Quote:

Originally posted by infra172:
I'm so damned tired of people saying "but it's an expensive show". It's not. It's been said many times that they do a lot with little. It's not an expensive show. There's only one reason why Angel was cancelled. The WB is putting together a new vampire show and they didn't want to have two of them on their network. It'll probably be a [flying goat testicles] and get cancelled after five episodes, but we'll still be deprived of our Whedon fix. That's the truth. All these other reasons simply aren't true.



The main reason "Angel" was cancelled was too make room for new shows. To them "Angel" is stale. Something else they could bring in would have much higher ratings. They also want to be able to rerun new shows during the same week, which would require a free time slot. Since "Angel's" rating's-to-cost ratio is pretty low, The WB put it on the chopping block.

Angel is an expensive show. It's true that they do a lot with a little, but it's still expensive. Reality shows and sitcoms are MUCH cheaper (except for "Friends," etc.).

NOTIFY: N   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, February 29, 2004 11:47 AM

MISGUIDED BY VOICES


Quote:

Originally posted by infra172:
I'm so damned tired of people saying "but it's an expensive show". It's not. It's been said many times that they do a lot with little. It's not an expensive show. There's only one reason why Angel was cancelled. The WB is putting together a new vampire show and they didn't want to have two of them on their network. It'll probably be a [flying goat testicles] and get cancelled after five episodes, but we'll still be deprived of our Whedon fix. That's the truth. All these other reasons simply aren't true.



Yes, because having two successful shows would be a bad thing. I've heard this rumour that they didn't want two vampire shows, and that may have something to do with it, but they cancelled Angel because it wasn't doing enough for them in the short term for the amount of money that they were throwing at it. They also have enough episodes to syndicate as of the end of this year, so everything else is just lagniappe.

"I threw up on your bed"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 1, 2004 6:47 AM

ANGEL10101


yah there are many petitiions to sign. most of them are right one main page of www.petitiononline.com and and there are 3 there at the moment. ALso there are 4 new one here they are http://www.petitiononline.com/lpgs/petition.html
http://www.petitiononline.com/atss6rwb/petition.htmlhttp://www.petitio
nonline.com/1197k/petition.html

http://www.petitiononline.com/1197k/petition.html
http://www.petitiononline.com/ats5/petition.html

also a lot of good idea for petitioning are at www.savingangel.com
www.saveangel.org
www.supportangel.com

anymore questions you can email me. also tell you friends to sign the perition and write postcards to wb,upm,tnt,and fox. thaz

angels the best keep it up

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, March 1, 2004 6:50 AM

ANGEL10101


you can see angel rating for last week on www.saveangel.org. also look down the page or go to www.savingangel.com they have the best idea to save angel. www.supportangel.com has all the address where you can send postcards to to save angel. also tell you friends to send postcards. the more people you tell to save angel the more chances the are for upn to pick up the show.

angel the best keep up the good work

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
ANGEL : After Show Reactions - YouTube
Fri, July 26, 2019 21:29 - 9 posts
Happy Birthday Elizabeth Rohm
Sun, April 28, 2019 10:44 - 3 posts
David Boreanaz Lands in New Series Seal Team
Thu, July 6, 2017 00:04 - 2 posts
Angel's Coat?
Fri, February 3, 2017 04:40 - 22 posts
You are my sunshine....
Mon, June 24, 2013 10:52 - 10 posts
Andy Hallet has left the building...
Fri, June 14, 2013 11:34 - 7 posts
Connor's hair...I should have appreciated it more
Fri, June 14, 2013 01:34 - 9 posts
So, that's finally it for Angel on TNT ?
Tue, August 21, 2012 01:09 - 1 posts
David Boreanaz' ho Rachel Uchitel had starring role in 9/11 Coverup
Tue, May 29, 2012 21:41 - 4 posts
Angel: "Give me a stake!" Cordy: "What? It's 8 in the morning."
Fri, March 9, 2012 12:33 - 2 posts
Vincent Kartheiser on the big screen - In Time
Mon, September 12, 2011 12:10 - 1 posts
Summer Glau on Angel
Sun, August 21, 2011 03:40 - 15 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL