Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Yanno, I think you behave worse than Trump. You lie in thread after thread, troll endlessly, and in addition I think you're betraying our nation. Hmmm ... I guess that makes YOU the Russian troll!

---

Quote:

---

Don't talk to me about civility. - RF

---

Quote:

---

Why not?

You claim (or Reddit does, anyway) that "418 hate crimes" were committed by people who mentioned Trump specifically by name". And then YOU go on to characterize everyone who voted for Trump as violent, and a "blumpist".

Dood, how many people voted for Trump?
62,979,636
Out of which 418 appear to be batshit crazy.

That's, like, 0.00066 percent. Don't you think you're going a little overboard with prejudice (prejudice = to prejudge)? And, on that basis, you think it's OK to not be civil to an entire group of people?

If I were to use YOUR approach, and castigate an ENTIRE GROUP for the behavior of some of its individuals, I would look at perhaps the violent crime rate among males. I think the statistics are a lot more robust than the ones that YOU quote! After all, males account for almost 74% (not 0.00066%) of violent crime. Using YOUR approach, I think we would be justified in locking up ALL males; don't you? Or how about blacks? Blacks certainly count for a disproportionate (three times higher) percentage of crime. Using YOUR approach, maybe we should claim that all blacks are dangerous, and should be on automatic parole. Or maybe I should say that everyone who is against Trump is a total asshole, based on the behavior of about six people here, and decide that YOU don't deserve civility and a fair hearing.



*****

That's why I say we should focus on the behavior of individuals and their actions; not some sort of imaginary enemy. This idea that we should stop listening to each other because of few people on either side of an issue is a recipe for civil war. I know it might seem to you, at the moment, that civil war is the only route to get what "you want" but unless you've lived through extremely violent times - or you know someone who has and they can describe it for you - I don't think you realize how dangerous that is. (Also, you - collectively - have been extremely muddled about your goals, which have shifted with media coverage from RUSSIA!!! to transgender rights to climate shift to migrant children. What, really do you want? Is it worth being an asshole to half of the voting public?)

You've distorted your view of approximately half of the voting public. You've inserted YOUR OPINION of them in place of what they have ACTUALLY SAID AND DONE. Most likely, your view of Trump supporters comes to you thru the news, it's doubtful that you have meaningful, open-ended contact with many IRL; so everything you think you know about "blumpists" is based on the media. Which, we know, is unbiased.


Now, IMHO, there is a large number of Americans who are hurting economically. They lived through Bush and Obama as the wealth gap got larger and larger, and they may not know what "the answer" is, but they sure felt that "more of the same" was not a helpful direction. Is the DNC willing to address THEIR needs? Or is the DNC going to promote the right of illegal migrants over theirs, promote the rights of "trading partners" over theirs, promote the rights of banks over theirs, drag the smelly RUSSIA!!! red herring around ad infinitum, and continue to divide us over what are quite reasonable demands for meaningful jobs at living wages?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Crying about personal attacks while simultaneously doing the same...

---

Quote:

---

For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.- THUGR

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.- GSTRING

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Oh, baloney. Let's see who started it in this thread ...

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.- GSTRING

---

Quote:

---

For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.- THUGR

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.- RF

---

Quote:

---

Crying about personal attacks while simultaneously doing the same...

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.

T

---

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.

T

---

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
For those of you who haven't figured it out yet there are two types of opinions being posted in these threads. One is pro russian, the other is not.

T

---

You know, if Siggy could just try to rephrase the standard Russian troll talking points, he might be able to pass as something other than an obvious Russian troll.

---

Poll:

Does reaverfan still think that Signy is a man, or is he trying to get under her skin?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JO753:
My opinion: Sig, 1Kiki, 6string, JSF are all the same team at the FSB. Could be any number uv individualz, maybe they specialize in 1 or more karaktrz each, kinda like the viose talent in the Simpsonz, only here they dont need a viose so can play anybody.

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

---

Quote:

---

My opinion: Sig, 1Kiki, 6string, JSF are all the same team at the FSB. Could be any number uv individualz, maybe they specialize in 1 or more karaktrz each, kinda like the viose talent in the Simpsonz, only here they dont need a viose so can play anybody. - JO

Can you say that again in English please? I don't even know what I'm being accused of here. Do Right, Be Right. :)- SIX

---