Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Why Do Libtards Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison?

---

Quote:

---

The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.

In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.

“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”

As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.

The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor. HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.

The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015. Exactly how many of those fell prey to traffickers is unknown, because the agency does not keep track.

---

Quote:

---

New York Magazine media bias rating is Left.

New York Magazine's bias is considered to be liberal. Despite the fact that New York Magazine’s readers reside in a location that many consider to be liberal, in the 1990s, the magazine chose Tucker Carlson, a conservative talk-show-host, as the company’s primary national correspondent. The AllSides Bias Rating™ of the New York Magazine is "far left." The majority of AllSides users who voted agree that the New York Magazine has a left-sided bias in its stories.

More On New York Magazine

The New York Magazine was founded in April of 1968 by Milton Glaser and Clay Felker and has an emphasis on New York City news. When the magazine was founded, its prime competitor was the New Yorker; at the time, New York Magazine was thought to be less polite, establishing itself as a “cradle of New Journalism." Over time, the magazine broadened its scope to become more national. Now, the New York Magazine covers the news, culture, entertainment, and lifestyle defined in New York City life. Each week, 1.8 million people read the magazine. The company has created other news websites as well, such as vulture.com, thecut.com, and scienceofus.com, each focusing on different areas of the news.

---

Quote:

---

These media sources are moderately to strongly biased toward liberal causes through story selection and/or political affiliation. They may utilize strong loaded words (wording that attempts to influence an audience by using appeal to emotion or stereotypes), publish misleading reports and omit reporting of information that may damage liberal causes. Some sources in this category may be untrustworthy. See all Left Bias sources.

Factual Reporting: HIGH

Notes: Established in 1968. New York is a bi-weekly magazine concerned with life, culture, politics, and style generally, and with a particular emphasis on New York City. NY Mag has a left wing bias in story selection and reporting, but is always sourced and factual. (5/13/2016)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
ADDENDUM: Both considered to be Left to Far Left, as well as factual.

Nope... can't claim it's bogus because it came from zerohedge or RT.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
http://nymag.com/daily/intelligencer/2016/01/hhs-handed-child-migrants
-to-human-traffickers.html

New York Magazine
Article Date: January 29, 2016 10:25 am

Quote:

---

The United States government placed an unknown number of Central American migrant children into the custody of human traffickers after neglecting to run the most basic checks on these so-called “caregivers,” according to a Senate report released on Thursday.

In the fall of 2013, tens of thousands of unaccompanied minors traveled to the U.S. southern border, in flight from poverty and gang violence in Central America. At least six of those children were eventually resettled on an egg farm in Marion, Ohio, where their sponsors forced them to work 12 hours a day under threats of death. Local law enforcement uncovered the operation last year, prompting the Senate’s Permanent Subcommittee on Investigations to open an inquiry into the federal government’s handling of migrants.

“It is intolerable that human trafficking — modern-day slavery — could occur in our own backyard,” Senator Rob Portman, Republican of Ohio and the chairman of the subcommittee, told the New York Times. “But what makes the Marion cases even more alarming is that a U.S. government agency was responsible for delivering some of the victims into the hands of their abusers.”

As detention centers became incapable of housing the massive influx of migrants, the Department of Health and Human Services started placing children into the care of sponsors who would oversee the minors until their bids for refugee status could be reviewed. But in many cases, officials failed to confirm whether the adults volunteering for this task were actually relatives or good Samaritans — and not unscrupulous egg farmers or child molesters. The department performed check-in visits at caretakers’ homes in only 5 percent of cases between 2013 and 2015, according to the report.

The Senate’s investigation built on an Associated Press report that found more than two dozen unaccompanied children were placed in homes where they were sexually abused, starved, or forced into slave labor. HHS claimed that it lacked the funds and authorities that a more rigorous screening process would have required. However, the investigation also found that HHS did not spend all of the money allocated to it for handling the crisis.

The agency placed 90,000 migrant children into sponsor care between 2013 and 2015. Exactly how many of those fell prey to traffickers is unknown, because the agency does not keep track.

---

Oops.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

In Japanese, 6ix, your symbols for "Shiro hidari" mean "white left".
https://goo.gl/d4vQ95

In plain english, 6ix, you are "dumb" + "ass".

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Trump keeps blaming Democrats for his own policy of family separation

As a backlash grows to the Trump administration’s policy of family separation at the border, President Donald Trump went on Twitter to blame Democrats — again.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17474816/trump-blame
s-congressional-democrats-family-separation-us-mexico-border

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:

Trump keeps blaming Democrats for his own policy of family separation

As a backlash grows to the Trump administration’s policy of family separation at the border, President Donald Trump went on Twitter to blame Democrats — again.

https://www.vox.com/policy-and-politics/2018/6/18/17474816/trump-blame
s-congressional-democrats-family-separation-us-mexico-border

---

And the little fascists unthinkingly just buy it. Typical reichwing idiocy.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


It's Chinese, dipshit.

It's not my name for you either. Google it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.

---

And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.

Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


It's Chinese, dipshit.

It's not my name for you either. Google it.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

In today’s news, which can’t be blamed on Congressional Democrats, but does fit with the story of Why Do Republicans Demand Children Be Thrown Into Adult Prison? a Republican Texas sheriff's deputy is accused of sexually abusing a 4-year-old, then threatening her mom with deportation. You never know what a sheriff’s deputy is capable of, but it was never Obama’s problem; it was always the local Sheriff’s problem to control his deputy.
www.cnn.com/2018/06/18/us/texas-deputy-child-sex-assault-charge-trnd/i
ndex.html

While Trump delivers concrete material benefits to wealthy business executives in the form of tax cuts and industry-friendly regulation, what he’s offering his working-class backers is that cracking down on foreigners will solve their problems and that his willingness to suffer the condemnation of cosmopolitans is a token of his dedication to their interests.

Trump’s white working-class base sees a world in which cultural elites have marginalized their concerns in favor of caring a lot about the problems of immigrants and minorities. White working-class voters see a zero-sum battle for attention and sympathy in which caring about immigrants’ problems means neglecting their own. Not everyone of such voters may approve of cruel treatment of Central American asylum seekers, but at the end of the day, the message that Trump is perhaps excessively cruel to foreigners emphasizes the notion that he is on their side.

The symbols in Chinese are spoken as Bái zuo https://goo.gl/1gdS2U
The exact same symbols, with the exact same meaning in Japanese, are Shiro hidari https://goo.gl/d4vQ95
But either way, 6ix is still "dumb"+"ass"


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.

---

And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.

Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.

---

In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
And it looks like SGG just mentioned that he is outraged that children of Illegal Aliens are not thrown in Adult Detention.
In the news thread.

---

And it looks like SGG even started his own thread demanding that infants and children be thrown into Adult Prison.

Beginning to realize SGG is a cruel, heartless SCUMBAG. I did, in fact, long suspect he was a Liberal - now he merely confirms it.

---

In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.

---

Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.

Sorry to blow up your false narrative.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.

Sorry to blow up your false narrative.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Trump is creating his American caliphate, and democracy has no defence

The terror of the Trump doctrine is not in its innovation but in its imitation. The last few months are a testament to the fact that history is not past, that the passage of time does not necessarily imply progress. The words Sessions quoted were used in the 1840s and 50s to justify slavery. When abolitionists argued that slavery was cruel, and that separating families was a violation of religious ethics, they were met with the argument of religious compliance with the law. John Fea, a history professor at Messiah College in Pennsylvania, told the Washington Post: “Whenever Romans 13 was used in the 18th and 19th century – and Sessions seems to be doing the same thing, so in this sense there is some continuity – it’s a way of manipulating the scriptures to justify your own political agenda.”

The invocation of piety is also familiarly threadbare when the behaviour of this holy sovereign, allegedly with God’s will vested in him, is taken into account. Trump is a man mired in allegations of infidelity committed across the course of his three marriages. His church attendance was summed up in his statement that he had “never asked God for forgiveness”, and he referred to communion as “my little wine” and “my little cracker”. Yet he received 80% of the white evangelical vote. Of his unlikely Christian support base, Amy Sullivan, in the New York Times, says: “Decades of fearmongering about Democrats and religious liberals have worked. 80% of white evangelicals would vote against Jesus Christ himself if he ran as a Democrat.”

This is the most sinister and most powerful element of the dictator’s playbook: the pact with the base. Every policy, every utterance, becomes about what it signifies to its target audience rather than what it objectively means. During the presidential campaign, when Trump said that “you just don’t see the expression Merry Christmas any more”, he wasn’t expressing, or even reflecting, an earnest concern about the erosion of Christian values. He was feeding a paranoia and nativist angst about race and identity. There is no Trump doctrine, but there is a Trump code, transmitted from the pulpits of the White House to his voters.

Where others see panicked children and parents mad with distress when ripped away from their offspring, Trump supporters decipher the scene in terms of what Trump is projecting: your fears are real, your will is done, and I am its executor. Once this line of communication has been established, there is little that can disrupt it, no appeal to emotion or logic that is fruitful. It is a feedback loop that is not about values or religion or even conservatism. It is about prejudice against the other and anger at liberals, the perceived enablers of the other.

To those Americans shocked that ancient biblical texts preaching obedience to the law are being uttered by senior White House officials, those of us who have gone through the anguish of holy texts being used to justify crimes against humanity can extend much empathy but no comfort – and the certainty that there is more to come. https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2018/jun/18/trump-american-c
aliphate-democracy-arab-world

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by REAVERFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:


I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

I'd argue that there's no comparison.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1kiki:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
In California the applicable law is WIC 300(g) which specifies when parents are incarcerated or institutionalized. Most recent revisions to WIC 300 seem to be in 2000 and 2005.
Anybody want to guess which cruel, inhumane, intolerant, anti-family Party was in control of California Legislature at These times? Certainly no Trump running CA then.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
Actually, the Dems WEREN'T in charge. Republicans did it all.

Sorry to blow up your false narrative.

---

Actually, the Dems WERE completely in charge of ordinary legislation in 2000. (Increasing taxes requires a supermajority vote.)

2000
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D50/ R29
CA governor D

And though there was a R governor in 2005, the D's were still solidly in control of the legislature.

2005
CA legislature Senate D25/ R15
CA legislature Assembly D48/ R32
CA governor R


SO IT'S NOT TRUE REPUBLICANS 'DID IT ALL'.

I'd like to think you're mistaken, but the information you chose to highlight, and chose to leave out, in order to present a one-sided picture, makes you look more like a deliberate liar, REAVERFAN.

SECOND is a troll because it constantly misrepresents what people post, fails to address their actual positions, and resorts to personal attacks when its brain isn't working (which is most of the time).

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:
And the Republicans came up with the legislation and got it passed.


You are a Russian troll, nothing more. Your credibility is no better than your God Trump's.

I realize that I just taught you more than you've ever known about California politics just now. Don't pretend to know things you clearly don't. You're not that smart.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Disingenuous Liberals are fomenting discord with the pretext of Asylum seekers being unusually detained. This is a lie. Valid Asylees can report to a Port of Entry and present their claim of Asylum. But these Criminals are illegally crossing the border, and then when captured spout the pretext of Asylum.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I have been wondering about something. Of the number of Illegal Aliens trying to claim Asylum, what percentage are found to be valid claims? And what percent are denied entry due to the claim being frivolously false? What percent deported, what percent jailed?
And how does this compare to normal numbers of Asylum Claims?
Does anybody know? Since MSM is dutifully hiding this info, I suspect the answers are not favorable to them.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

---

Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.

And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

---

Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.

And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.

When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.

When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.

Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.

Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Liberals have been whining that there are 10,000 of these kids separated from their families. But they are feverishly hiding the fact that 8,000 were already separated before arriving at the border, because the family had self-depricates already, sending their kids alone to infiltrate America.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

---

Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.

And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.

When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.

When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.

Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.

Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

How many Illegal "help" did second say he keeps on his plantation?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Back to the topic:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Liberals have been whining that there are 10,000 of these kids separated from their families. But they are feverishly hiding the fact that 8,000 were already separated before arriving at the border, because the family had self-depricates already, sending their kids alone to infiltrate America.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
There seems to be a divide between 2 groups of folk.
Liberals assumed Obama would never adhere to The Constitution nor any Law, and they encouraged his lawlessness, corruption, and reckless abandon.
Same for Hilliary. And Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Lerner, Holder, etc.
So why would anybody consider that this lawless group would also not support Illegal entry into America, and assume that is the best way?

Other folk think Laws still exist, and maybe Obama didn't completely break America. Maybe they just haven't been paying attention the past decade, but think the Constitution has not been discarded. For these folk, it is difficult to understand why some criminally inclined people just don't follow the Law, and enter the country legally.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I'd argue that continuing to allow illegals to come to America and to illegally work for illegal money under the table at pennies to the dollar of what the actual work SHOULD pay is more akin to slavery than anything you bring up here.

---

Then you would not understand capitalism or democracy, 6ix. There is no "what the actual work SHOULD pay". There has never been a should. There is only what the boss is forced to pay. Emphasis on force. If the local government won't force their miserly bosses, the Ebenezer Scrooges of America, to pay the minimum, the minimum won't be paid. I have seen how cowardly the American workforce is, and that workforce does not have the courage or intelligence to pressure government to force bosses to pay the minimum. And an American workforce that directly, without the government, forces up pay for everyone? Not happening. Too bad for the workforce, a bunch of chickens, but great for the bosses of America who will make chicken soup and Chicken McNuggets out of you.

And it always needs repeating: those in bottom 50% of Americans have no correct idea how capitalism works. They imagine getting rid of aliens will raise their pay. It will not.
www.brookings.edu/blog/brookings-now/2017/08/24/do-immigrants-steal-jo
bs-from-american-workers/

The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

STFU. It's called supply and demand, dipshit.

When you have people coming over the border illegally, that are willing to work for below even minimum wage under the table to avoid being caught, it disrupts what wages actually SHOULD be paid by law.

When done en masse, as it has been since no laws are ever really enforced regarding illegal immigration, it cheapens the value of the work that is done. Since somebody is willing to do it for next to nothing, the work itself must only be worth next to nothing.

Wow. You're wrong on two different levels in one post. Congrats.

Rich Democrats absolutely LOVE the status quo regarding illegal immigration and cheap labor.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
There seems to be a divide between 2 groups of folk.
Liberals assumed Obama would never adhere to The Constitution nor any Law, and they encouraged his lawlessness, corruption, and reckless abandon.
Same for Hilliary. And Comey, Mueller, Lynch, Lerner, Holder, etc.
So why would anybody consider that this lawless group would also not support Illegal entry into America, and assume that is the best way?

Other folk think Laws still exist, and maybe Obama didn't completely break America. Maybe they just haven't been paying attention the past decade, but think the Constitution has not been discarded. For these folk, it is difficult to understand why some criminally inclined people just don't follow the Law, and enter the country legally.

---