Quote:

---

Lets not forget Trump refuses to stop using unsecured phones. Our local hypocrites say nothing about that. Clinton's emails were more secure than that.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Lets not forget Trump refuses to stop using unsecured phones. Our local hypocrites say nothing about that. Clinton's emails were more secure than that.

---

Let's not forget that MY particular beef with Clinton's emails ... as I have mentioned more than once ... have less to do with security than with transparency. There is a well-known principle in public service that says that any government business, even if conducted on a private device (such as personal email, phone, or server) is subject to retention and FIOA. I, as a public servant, have been subpoenaed more than once because our agency was being sued. You don't quietly erase a huge amount of emails after being subpoenaed. If I tried that, our lawyers would have a shit-fit. THEY would want to know what was being erased, to ensure themselves that there was nothing relevant to the case. And if they saw that there was hanky-panky going on with another issue ... say, for example, I was arranging for another company to "pass" its testing ... they'd not only fire my ass, they'd probably turn me over to the DA.

Hillary had a "private" server on which she commingled official and non-official business. After being subpoenaed, she retroactively erased... and not in any casual way but REALLY erased ... 33,000 "private" emails. All about Chelsea's wedding and yoga pants??

Gee, whose word do we take on that? Hillary's? And not even under oath? Is there anyone else? Well, Cheryl Mills helped her select which emails to keep and which to delete. And was Mills' put out of reach on the matter? Yes. And were Mills' cellphone and laptop ... which might have contained remnants of emails or questions and instructions on the issue, destroyed with a hammer? Yes, they were.

What the hell was the FBI doing? It boggles the mind.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
If Trumps innocent what's the worry. Two years and nothing found as some say may actually be, two years and so much found with more being found every day. It would be a reason no charges have been files against Trump and his family yet. It's the reason I'm betting on.

tick tock

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Hey comrade troll, your thread title is a lie. Fix it....

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Hey comrade troll, your thread title is a lie. Fix it....

---

Hey TROLL< the criminal investigation is still ongoing. Your brain is broken: Fix it.

---

Quote:

---

Inspector General Finds FBI, DOJ Broke Law In Clinton Email Probe, Refers To Criminal Prosecutor."

---

Quote:

---

TICK TOCK: FBI braces as IG’s second report looms
June 15, 2018


Horowitz, a former federal prosecutor, announced in March that he is probing allegations of government surveillance abuse, in light of memos released on Capitol Hill about FBI and DOJ efforts to obtain FISA warrants to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of its Russia investigation.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also said U.S. Attorney John Huber is investigating claims of FBI and DOJ misconduct related to these actions, noting that Huber would be “conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and “in cooperation” with Horowitz.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Inspector General Finds FBI, DOJ Broke Law In Clinton Email Probe, Refers To Criminal Prosecutor."

---

The name of the criminal prosecutor is Huber.

Here is one link, atho there are many out there. It's not widely covered by the M$M, but that doesn't mean it isn't happening.

Quote:

---

TICK TOCK: FBI braces as IG’s second report looms
June 15, 2018


Horowitz, a former federal prosecutor, announced in March that he is probing allegations of government surveillance abuse, in light of memos released on Capitol Hill about FBI and DOJ efforts to obtain FISA warrants to surveil Trump campaign adviser Carter Page as part of its Russia investigation.

Attorney General Jeff Sessions has also said U.S. Attorney John Huber is investigating claims of FBI and DOJ misconduct related to these actions, noting that Huber would be “conducting his work from outside the Washington D.C. area and “in cooperation” with Horowitz.

---

https://rebekahworsham.org/2018/06/15/tick-tock-fbi-braces-as-igs-seco
nd-report-looms/

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

As long as you insist that everything is the Republicans'/ Democrats' fault, then you fail to grasp the REAL problem with American politics.

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876]

That's not a link to a news outlet. It's fake and wacko. Right up you're ally. Like I've said comrade, your thread is based on a lie.

T

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Sig's first and second links go to the same story. Ones foxs' spin and the other a real news outlet Bloomberg news. Both NEITHER are discussing the DOJ report.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
I can't believe that THUGR is trying to deny that a prosecutor was assigned to look into the doings at the FBI and DOJ. It was pretty widely reported at the time, I provided a copy of the actual memo from Sessions .... Sheesh! The guy sure is a persistent little troll, isn't he?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Dang. I forgot yesterday to post a copy, or transcript of the report. Can anybody else please do so?
I'm talking about IG Report 1.0, released Thursday.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Dang. I forgot yesterday to post a copy, or transcript of the report. Can anybody else please do so?
I'm talking about IG Report 1.0, released Thursday.

---

Do you have access to the Internet? You could just google "IG Report 1.0, released Thursday" and then click on one the linkys and copy and paste that into a post here - wouldn't that work?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Dang. I forgot yesterday to post a copy, or transcript of the report. Can anybody else please do so?
I'm talking about IG Report 1.0, released Thursday.

---

Do you have access to the Internet? You could just google "IG Report 1.0, released Thursday" and then click on one the linkys and copy and paste that into a post here - wouldn't that work?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Wow, I'm SUREsig, jack, jsf and kiki are going to be outraged by this.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I have not had an opportunity to look at the report. But I keep hearing about how the actual Report in detail lays out and illustrates the Crimes committed by FBI and DoJ, but the Executive Summary says the exact opposite of the actual Report, not in any way a summary at all.
I wonder if this Executive Summary was what the past couple weeks have been spent on, to produce cover.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Wow, I'm SUREsig, jack, jsf and kiki are going to be outraged by this.

T

---

Nope. Don't give a shit.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Wow, I'm SUREsig, jack, jsf and kiki are going to be outraged by this.

T

---

Nope. Don't give a shit.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Good little Germans never do.

You don't do right, and you're not right.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:
Do you have access to the Internet? You could just google "IG Report 1.0, released Thursday" and then click on one the linkys and copy and paste that into a post here - wouldn't that work?

---

Are you slow?
No, I don't.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I have not had an opportunity to look at the report. But I keep hearing about how the actual Report in detail lays out and illustrates the Crimes committed by FBI and DoJ, but the Executive Summary says the exact opposite of the actual Report, not in any way a summary at all.
I wonder if this Executive Summary was what the past couple weeks have been spent on, to produce cover.

---

There is no need to wonder, JewelStaiteFan. The 500-Page Inspector General’s Report In 900 Words is here: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-500-page-inspector-generals-r
eport-in-900-words/

1. Comey looks bad procedurally but not legally

2. The FBI looks bad politically but not legally

3. The report is vindication for Clinton
The report confirms that she should not have been charged with any crime for email use.

4. The report doesn’t mean much for the Russia probe — and that’s what really matters now

Read the Inspector General's report here: www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download


The Joss Whedon script for Serenity, where Wash lives, is Serenity-190pages.pdf at www.mediafire.com/folder/1uwh75oa407q8/Firefly

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
Wow, I'm SUREsig, jack, jsf and kiki are going to be outraged by this.

T

---

Nope. Don't give a shit.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

---

Good little Germans never do.

You don't do right, and you're not right.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I have not had an opportunity to look at the report. But I keep hearing about how the actual Report in detail lays out and illustrates the Crimes committed by FBI and DoJ, but the Executive Summary says the exact opposite of the actual Report, not in any way a summary at all.
I wonder if this Executive Summary was what the past couple weeks have been spent on, to produce cover.

---

There is no need to wonder, JewelStaiteFan. The 500-Page Inspector General’s Report In 900 Words is here: https://fivethirtyeight.com/features/the-500-page-inspector-generals-r
eport-in-900-words/

1. Comey looks bad procedurally but not legally

2. The FBI looks bad politically but not legally

3. The report is vindication for Clinton
The report confirms that she should not have been charged with any crime for email use.

4. The report doesn’t mean much for the Russia probe — and that’s what really matters now

Read the Inspector General's report here: www.justice.gov/file/1071991/download

---

Quote:

---

FBI agent Peter Strzok escorted from agency amid disciplinary proceedings

---

Quote:

---

Investigations, probes.?
Nothing short of

Arrest.
Indictments.
Enprisonment
Trial.

And,
Execution for Crimes Against Humanity & Crimes Against the American People will suffice.

You would think the Criminal Law Enforcement Agencies would want to get back to good standing with the American People. However, whatever trust, loyalty & respect the American People had for them has been squandered.

And, they only have themselves to blame for not arresting, indicting, enprisoning & Executing Pure Evil War Criminal Treasonous Seditious Psychopath Hillary Clinton and others.

Fuck Them!
And, their
Tyrannical Lawlessness.

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Section 2381: Treason
Section 2382: Misprision of treason
Section 2383: Rebellion or insurrection
Section 2384: Seditious conspiracy
Section 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government

It’s absolute, complete, open in your Face Tyrannical Lawlessness.
We’re at and in that Historic moment in time.

---

Quote:

---

If he wasn't escorted out of the building and up against a dirt berm in front of a firing squad, I don't care.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

FBI agent Peter Strzok escorted from agency amid disciplinary proceedings

---

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fbi-agent-peter-strzok-escorted-from-
agency-amid-disciplinary-proceedings/

Here are a few comments about Strzok

Quote:

---

Investigations, probes.?
Nothing short of

Arrest.
Indictments.
Enprisonment
Trial.

And,
Execution for Crimes Against Humanity & Crimes Against the American People will suffice.

You would think the Criminal Law Enforcement Agencies would want to get back to good standing with the American People. However, whatever trust, loyalty & respect the American People had for them has been squandered.

And, they only have themselves to blame for not arresting, indicting, enprisoning & Executing Pure Evil War Criminal Treasonous Seditious Psychopath Hillary Clinton and others.

Fuck Them!
And, their
Tyrannical Lawlessness.

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Section 2381: Treason
Section 2382: Misprision of treason
Section 2383: Rebellion or insurrection
Section 2384: Seditious conspiracy
Section 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government

It’s absolute, complete, open in your Face Tyrannical Lawlessness.
We’re at and in that Historic moment in time.

---

And

Quote:

---

If he wasn't escorted out of the building and up against a dirt berm in front of a firing squad, I don't care.

---

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

As long as you insist that everything is the Republicans'/ Democrats' fault, then you fail to grasp the REAL problem with American politics.

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

I don't think the comparison to Alberto Gonzalez is really a valid guideline.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

FBI agent Peter Strzok escorted from agency amid disciplinary proceedings

---

https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/news/fbi-agent-peter-strzok-escorted-from-
agency-amid-disciplinary-proceedings/

Here are a few comments about Strzok

Quote:

---

Investigations, probes.?
Nothing short of

Arrest.
Indictments.
Enprisonment
Trial.

And,
Execution for Crimes Against Humanity & Crimes Against the American People will suffice.

You would think the Criminal Law Enforcement Agencies would want to get back to good standing with the American People. However, whatever trust, loyalty & respect the American People had for them has been squandered.

And, they only have themselves to blame for not arresting, indicting, enprisoning & Executing Pure Evil War Criminal Treasonous Seditious Psychopath Hillary Clinton and others.

Fuck Them!
And, their
Tyrannical Lawlessness.

18 U.S. Code Chapter 115 - TREASON, SEDITION, AND SUBVERSIVE ACTIVITIES
Section 2381: Treason
Section 2382: Misprision of treason
Section 2383: Rebellion or insurrection
Section 2384: Seditious conspiracy
Section 2385: Advocating overthrow of Government

It’s absolute, complete, open in your Face Tyrannical Lawlessness.
We’re at and in that Historic moment in time.

---

And

Quote:

---

If he wasn't escorted out of the building and up against a dirt berm in front of a firing squad, I don't care.

---

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

As long as you insist that everything is the Republicans'/ Democrats' fault, then you fail to grasp the REAL problem with American politics.

America is an oligarchy http://www.fireflyfans.net/mthread.aspx?tid=57876

---

Were those comments from you, or a different link?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Dang. I forgot yesterday to post a copy, or transcript of the report. Can anybody else please do so?
I'm talking about IG Report 1.0, released Thursday.

---

Do you have access to the Internet? You could just google "IG Report 1.0, released Thursday" and then click on one the linkys and copy and paste that into a post here - wouldn't that work?

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:

Shocked, I'm shocked three people in the FBI are against Trump being president. That is until I remember what many many republicans said during the campaign. So much of what they said about Trump was much worse. Including those who feigned outrage during the testimony of the head of the DOJ and FBI concerning this report.

T

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
We need to be listening to Christian Adams about this subject.

He also has a book called Injustice.

---

Quote:

---

Memos detail FBI’s ‘Hurry the F up pressure’ to probe Trump campaign

Multiple reviews of whether FBI agents’ political bias affected the Russia-Trump collusion case remain in their infancy, but investigators already have unearthed troubling internal communications long withheld from public view.

We already know from FBI counterintelligence agent Peter Strzok’s now-infamous text messages with his fellow agent and reported lover, Lisa Page, that Strzok — the man driving that Russia collusion investigation — disdained Donald Trump and expressed willingness to use his law enforcement powers to “stop” the Republican from becoming president.

The question that lingers, unanswered: Did those sentiments affect official actions?

Memos the FBI is now producing to the Department of Justice (DOJ) inspector general and multiple Senate and House committees offer what sources involved in the production, review or investigation describe to me as “damning” or “troubling” evidence.

They show Strzok and his counterintelligence team rushing in the fall of 2016 to find “derogatory” information from informants or a “pretext” to accelerate the probe and get a surveillance warrant on figures tied to the future president.

One of those figures was Carter Page, an academic and an energy consultant from New York; he was briefly a volunteer foreign policy adviser for the GOP nominee’s campaign and visited Moscow the summer before the election.

The memos show Strzok, Lisa Page and others in counterintelligence monitored news articles in September 2016 that quoted a law enforcement source as saying the FBI was investigating Carter Page’s travel to Moscow.

The FBI team pounced on what it saw as an opportunity as soon as Page wrote a letter to then-FBI Director James Comey complaining about the “completely false” leak.

“At a minimum, the letter provides us a pretext to interview,” Strzok wrote to Lisa Page on Sept. 26, 2016.

Within weeks, that “pretext” — often a synonym for an excuse — had been upsized to a Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA) court warrant, giving the FBI the ability to use some of its most awesome powers to monitor Carter Page and his activities.

To date, the former Trump adviser has been accused of no wrongdoing despite being subjected to nearly a year of surveillance.

Some internal memos detail the pressure being applied by the FBI to DOJ prosecutors to get the warrant on Carter Page buttoned up before Election Day.

In one email exchange with the subject line “Crossfire FISA,” Strzok and Lisa Page discussed talking points to get then-FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe to persuade a high-ranking DOJ official to sign off on the warrant.

“Crossfire Hurricane” was one of the code names for four separate investigations the FBI conducted related to Russia matters in the 2016 election.

“At a minimum, that keeps the hurry the F up pressure on him,” Strzok emailed Page on Oct. 14, 2016, less than four weeks before Election Day.

Four days later the same team was emailing about rushing to get approval for another FISA warrant for another Russia-related investigation code-named “Dragon.”

“Still an expedite?” one of the emails beckoned, as the FBI tried to meet the requirements of a process known as a Woods review before a FISA warrant can be approved by the courts.

“Any idea what time he can have it woods-ed by?” Strzok asked Page. “I know it’s not going to matter because DOJ is going to take the time DOJ wants to take. I just don’t want this waiting on us at all.”

Until all the interviews are completed by Congress and DOJ’s inspector general later this year, we won’t know why counterintelligence agents who normally take a methodical approach to investigation felt so much pressure days before the election on this case.

Were they concerned about losing a chance to gather evidence at a critical moment? Or maybe, as some Republicans long have suspected, they wanted to impact the election?

The agents got the Carter Page warrant in October and, within two weeks, Democrats in Congress such as then-Sen. Harry Reid (Nev.) and some media members were raising questions about the FBI withholding word of a probe that could hurt Trump. FBI agents monitored those reports, too.

The day after Trump’s surprising win on Nov. 9, 2016, the FBI counterintelligence team engaged in a new mission, bluntly described in another string of emails prompted by another news leak.

“We need ALL of their names to scrub, and we should give them ours for the same purpose,” Strzok emailed Page on Nov. 10, 2016, citing a Daily Beast article about some of former Trump campaign chairman Paul Manafort’s allegedly unsavory ties overseas.

“Andy didn’t get any others,” Page wrote back, apparently indicating McCabe didn’t have names to add to the “scrub.”

“That’s what Bill said,” Strzok wrote back, apparently referring to then-FBI chief of counterintelligence William Priestap. “I suggested we need to exchange our entire lists as we each have potential derogatory CI info the other doesn’t.” CI is short for confidential informants.

It’s an extraordinary exchange, if for no other reason than this: The very day after Trump wins the presidency, some top FBI officials are involved in the sort of gum-shoeing normally reserved for field agents, and their goal is to find derogatory information about someone who had worked for the president-elect.

As the president-elect geared up to take over, the FBI made another move that has captured investigators’ attention: It named an executive with expertise in the FBI’s most sensitive surveillance equipment to be a liaison to the Trump transition.

On its face, that seems odd; technical surveillance nerds aren’t normally the first picks for plum political assignments. Even odder, the FBI counterintelligence team running the Russia-Trump collusion probe seemed to have an interest in the appointment.

These and other documents are still being disseminated to various oversight bodies in Congress, and more revelations are certain to occur.

Yet, now, irrefutable proof exists that agents sought to create pressure to get “derogatory” information and a “pretext” to interview people close to a future president they didn’t like.

Clear evidence also exists that an investigation into still-unproven collusion between a foreign power and a U.S. presidential candidate was driven less by secret information from Moscow and more by politically tainted media leaks.

And that means the dots between expressions of political bias and official actions just got a little more connected.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JJ:
T

---

Quote:

---

Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent To ‘Foreign Entity’

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

“Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call,” Gohmert said.

The ICIG previously caught problems regarding Clinton’s server that the FBI missed. The bureau didn’t notice that some emails were openly marked classified with a “(C)” when they were sent. (RELATED: FBI Missed Clinton Emails Openly MARKED Classified, Wanted To Conclude Probe Before IG Caught Mistake)

The ICIG spotted the oversight after the FBI missed it, texts between Strzok and his mistress, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, show.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Gohmert: Watchdog Found Clinton Emails Were Sent To ‘Foreign Entity’

A member of the House Committee on the Judiciary said during a hearing Thursday that a government watchdog found that nearly all of former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s emails were sent to a foreign entity and that the FBI didn’t follow-up on that finding.

The Intelligence Community Inspector General (ICIG) found an “anomaly on Hillary Clinton’s emails going through their private server, and when they had done the forensic analysis, they found that her emails, every single one except four, over 30,000, were going to an address that was not on the distribution list,” Republican Rep. Louie Gohmert of Texas said during a hearing with FBI official Peter Strzok.

“It was going to an unauthorized source that was a foreign entity unrelated to Russia,” he added.

Gohmert said the ICIG investigator, Frank Rucker, presented the findings to Strzok, but that the FBI official did not do anything with the information.

Strzok acknowledged meeting with Rucker, but said he did not recall the “specific content.”

“The forensic examination was done by the ICIG and they can document that,” Gohmert said, “but you were given that information and you did nothing with it.”

He also said that someone alerted the Department of Justice Inspector General Michael Horowitz to the issue.

“Mr. Horowitz got a call four times from someone wanting to brief him about this, and he never returned the call,” Gohmert said.

The ICIG previously caught problems regarding Clinton’s server that the FBI missed. The bureau didn’t notice that some emails were openly marked classified with a “(C)” when they were sent. (RELATED: FBI Missed Clinton Emails Openly MARKED Classified, Wanted To Conclude Probe Before IG Caught Mistake)

The ICIG spotted the oversight after the FBI missed it, texts between Strzok and his mistress, former FBI lawyer Lisa Page, show.

---

http://dailycaller.com/2018/07/12/ig-clinton-foreign-emails/

---