Democrats eyeing 2018 say it's time to start talking Russia by THGRRI

REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Democrats eyeing 2018 say it's time to start talking Russia

POSTED BY: THGRRI
UPDATED: Monday, June 22, 2020 14:59
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 11142
PAGE 2 of 3

Monday, November 13, 2017 2:09 PM

My life has been a net positive this year since I stopped drinking. I've slowly dug my way out of the hole I've created for myself.

While people like you bitch and whine about the sky falling everyday and how 2017 is the worst year ever, there are people who are still making their own lives better without succumbing to the inane babbleing of their own respective echo chambers.

I made a point which went completely over your head when I didn't post here for a month. That point was that although I was gone and had done a great deal in that time to improve my own situation and help other people that I care about, the world still turned regardless.

While you were here "fighting the good fight" and getting absolutely nothing done against things that were way out of your reach and influence, I was actually getting shit done.

Maybe our country is under attack. I give everything 50/50. Everything.

If the MSM on one side wasn't constantly coming up with a million reasons why Trump is a piece of shit, and the other side of the MSM wasn't constantly coming up with a million reasons why the exact opposite was true, there might be something worth paying attention to.

As it is, there is no reason to do it other than entertainment.

So if our country is under attack as you say it is, what are you doing about it?

Name one tangible thing you've done to fend them off.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, November 13, 2017 3:19 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

So if our country is under attack as you say it is, what are you doing about it?

Name one tangible thing you've done to fend them off.

I voted against Trump dummy.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, November 13, 2017 7:04 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

So if our country is under attack as you say it is, what are you doing about it?

Name one tangible thing you've done to fend them off.

I voted against Trump dummy.

Thanks for your service.... however ineffectual and meaningless it was. More than 1 year ago.

I rest my case.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, November 13, 2017 8:38 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6ixStringJack:

So if our country is under attack as you say it is, what are you doing about it?

Name one tangible thing you've done to fend them off.

I voted against Trump dummy.

Thanks for your service.... however ineffectual and meaningless it was. More than 1 year ago.

I rest my case.

Lets see if I can paint a picture of Jack

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, November 13, 2017 8:53 PM

It must be frustrating to lose arguments all of the time, huh T?

I don't admire your shoes.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, November 14, 2017 11:05 AM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
So if our country is under attack as you say it is, what are you doing about it?
Name one tangible thing you've done to fend them off.- SIX

I voted against Trump dummy. - THUGR

Thanks for your service.... however ineffectual and meaningless it was. More than 1 year ago. I rest my case.- SIX

Lets see if I can paint a picture of Jack
- THUGR

It must be frustrating to lose arguments all of the time, huh T? - SIX

Yep, you know you've won when THUGR shits a gif and bails.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 16, 2017 1:05 PM

Here it is in a nutshell. This is why I do what I do here. It's also why if you're American you should hate sig, kiki and jack to name three, for trying to assist Trump in his attempts to undermine our democracy, our hard fought republic.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:46 PM

Yes T, the espousal of hate.

The cornerstone of totalitarianism.

Everybody should line up right behind you and follow your example and carry the banner of benevolent hatred for anybody who disagrees with your outlook in the world..

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, November 16, 2017 4:54 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
Yes T, the espousal of hate.-

Which THUGR does quite well. Hate, that is.

Quote:
The cornerstone of totalitarianism.

You betcha!

You know, I would be a helluva a lot more inclined to vote Dem if the title of this thread said

Quote:
Democrats eyeing 2018 say it's time to STOP talking Russia

Our biggest problem is not Russia, and if the Dems ever stop spouting that nonsense they might be worth supporting.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, November 21, 2017 10:53 AM

I'm pretty sure I never said it was time for the democrats to start speaking about Russians comrade sig. I think the media coverage is doing a good job of it. I only posted what some democrats said.

Nope, the message has to be inclusive. They need to speak to what concerns the white male voter of the middle class. They need to reengage with the democrats they've lost in the past few years.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, December 22, 2017 10:12 PM

Most Americans doubt Trump on Russia probe, while Mueller approval tilts positive

56% of Americans think Trump's public statements on the Russia probe have been mostly or completely false. 47% of Americans approve of Mueller's handling of the Russia probe vs. 34% who disapprove

http://www.cnn.com/2017/12/21/politics/trump-mueller-russia-poll/index
.html

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, December 22, 2017 10:54 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
First and foremost, my country is under attack by Russian trolls at the behest of Putin.

Good grief.

Even if that were the case .... SO WHAT??? Is your grip on reality so light that you worry about some comments throwing your mental orbits out of kilter?

Seriously, THUGR, you keep clinging to "mainstream" like it was some sort of mental life-raft.

But what IS "mainstream"?

It's merely the "official" version; the way TPTB want you to see things. Once upon a time, that was the Church. The earth was the center of the solar system: so sayeth the "mainstream". Now its the corporate press, publishing what's best for them.

And you believe them.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, December 23, 2017 5:42 AM

America loves a winner!

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
"It will be on the evening news all the time," said Jentleson,

Jentleson and others argue that ongoing developments in the investigation force the party's hand. The news, not the candidates themselves, often determines what campaigns are about.

They won't be able to talk issues, because Trump's tax cut will keep $ in the wallets of working people and allow companies to re-invest and kick start the economy. Things will start looking up, for everyone, so the Dems will be forced to beat a dead horse.

Do they REALLY want to talk Uranium ONE collision ? Or Hezbollah drug deals with Obama ?

No, I don't think they do.

And btw ....

You haven't liked or followed any pages or accounts from the IRA (Internet Research Agency).

No shit , Sherlock. This entire thing is one massive scam and smear campaign to explain away why Hillary lost.

MOVE THE FUCK ON ALREADY !

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, December 23, 2017 10:35 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by AURaptor:
Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
"It will be on the evening news all the time," said Jentleson,

Jentleson and others argue that ongoing developments in the investigation force the party's hand. The news, not the candidates themselves, often determines what campaigns are about.

They won't be able to talk issues, because Trump's tax cut will keep $ in the wallets of working people and allow companies to re-invest and kick start the economy. Things will start looking up, for everyone, so the Dems will be forced to beat a dead horse.

Do they REALLY want to talk Uranium ONE collision ? Or Hezbollah drug deals with Obama ?

No, I don't think they do.

And btw ....

You haven't liked or followed any pages or accounts from the IRA (Internet Research Agency).

No shit , Sherlock. This entire thing is one massive scam and smear campaign to explain away why Hillary lost.

MOVE THE FUCK ON ALREADY !

Fathom the hypocrisy of a government that requires every citizen to prove they are insured... but not everyone must prove they are a citizen

I'm just a red pill guy in a room full of blue pill addicts.

" AU, that was great, LOL!! " - Chrisisall

Wow, have you taken the right pill. Arguing with yourself is a troubling sign.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, December 23, 2017 5:56 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
Even if that were the case .... SO WHAT??? Is your grip on reality so light that you worry about some comments... throwing your mental orbits out of kilter?- SIGNY

That's funny.- G

No, but YOU'RE funny, because ...

Quote:
"It's just a little nuclear bomb. Go ahead, you can pet it. See? Not such a big deal, right?"- G

Are you seriously equating "comments" with nuclear bombs???

Quote:
ON FRIDAY, FACEBOOK made available a tool to allow users to see whether they had liked or followed a page linked to Russia’s attempt to influence the 2016 US election.

Facebook had promised to make such a tool available in November, after the company revealed in a congressional hearing that more than 140 million people may have been exposed to Russia-linked propaganda during the 2016 election cycle.

OMG!!! CALL THE CDC!!! Somebody MIGHT HAVE SEEN a comment MAYBE posted by someone linked to Russia!

Quote:
During the hearings earlier this year, Facebook released roughly 3,000 ads that it said it had linked to Russian accounts. But it has never released a list of the accounts and pages that it linked to Russia’s efforts.

Wow, all of 3000 ads?

Quote:
How Many Ads Do You See in One Day?

Digital Marketing experts estimate that most Americans are exposed to around 4,000 to 10,000 advertisements each day.
https://www.redcrowmarketing.com/2015/09/10/many-ads-see-one-day/

Quote:
140 million... is that a lot?

It's a lot of "maybes", which is what I got out of the article. And it's only a problem if those 140 million are too stupid to parse content for themselves.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 9:05 AM

Former CIA director defends top FBI officials amid Trump attacks

Former CIA Director John Brennan came to the defense of two senior FBI officials on Saturday after President Trump targeted the pair on Twitter.

Brennan tweeted that FBI Deputy Director Andrew McCabe and top FBI lawyer James Baker "epitomize integrity, competence, and respect for rule of law."

"Not surprised @realDonaldTrump fears them, along with the rest of FBI," continued Brennan

http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/366342-former-cia-dir
ector-defends-top-fbi-officials-amid-trump

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 10:44 AM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

John Brennan is a notorious liar. He lied to Congress and therefore to the American people many times about his CIA's illegal surveillance programs, about the CIA's illegal torture programs, about the CIA's secret drone program, and about how transparent he was prepared to be.

Quote:
CIA director John Brennan lied to you and to the Senate. Fire him

As reports emerged Thursday that an internal investigation by the Central Intelligence Agency’s inspector general found that the CIA “improperly” spied on US Senate staffers when researching the CIA’s dark history of torture, it was hard to conclude anything but the obvious: John Brennan blatantly lied to the American public. Again...

“Let me assure you the CIA was in no way spying on [the committee] or the Senate,” he said.

...Brennan was forced to privately apologize to intelligence committee chairs in a “tense” meeting earlier this week.

[AND]In a little noticed story last week, McClatchy reported that the CIA has also been spying on emails from whistleblower officials and Congress

As Obama’s top counterterrorism advisor for his entire first term in the White House, Brennan built, oversaw, executed and excused America’s robotic assassination [DRONE] program. During a speech in 2011, the keeper of the kill list said there had not been “a single collateral death” from US drone strikes because of their “exceptional proficiency [and] precision”

... Brennan promised to be “as open as possible with these programs”; [BUT] we know almost nothing. What we do know, has been pried from the CIA by lawsuits and court orders.

... Brennan also fed the public wildly inaccurate details about the Osama bin Laden raid in 2011, and despite condemning leaks of classified information from others, he has often leaks classified information himself to suit his own needs. This is not the type of guy who is going to resign because of some report he doesn’t like; this is the type of spy who apologizes even though he’s not sorry, who lies because he doesn’t like to tell the truth.

I clipped the salient points, but you can read more detail here: https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2014/jul/31/cia-director-joh
n-brennan-lied-senate

Glenn Greenwald details the lies of our intelligence heads here: https://www.realclearpolitics.com/video/2017/01/06/greenwald_intellige
nce_chiefs_alleging_russia_hacked_election_have_a_history_of_lying_to_the_public.html

These guys are paid liars: It's their job. If you're as sensitive to the trustworthiness of your "sources" as you claim to be, you shouldn't credit a word that they say without looking more deeply into whatever they're talking about.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 11:30 AM

T's Playbook, rule #233:

Posting from any source is alright, so long as the source is saying what I want to hear. It doesn't matter if it's an anonymous source, somebody I've never heard of until I read the headline of the article they wrote or were quoted in that I liked or they have a long history of being untrustworthy.

I'm surprised some people can hear anything at all in those echo chambers these days. Some people are really just so enamored with the sound of their own voice...

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 1:26 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

G, stop wetting your pants.

I read the article that you linked; there was nothing in there about the ads having been shown millions of times. What it said was, and I quote

Quote:
more than 140 million people may have been exposed to Russia-linked propaganda during the 2016 election cycle.

Now, first of all, we're "exposed to" thousands to tens of thousands of ads per day. Almost NONE of them break our "attention barrier": According to the research (that I posted, which you apparently didn't read) we (maybe) notice a hundred ads, and probably pay attention to far fewer.

Quote:
Of course, most people won’t actually recall seeing 10,000 messages. This is because, in order to keep our sanity, we’ve developed a screening process to ignore most advertising messages. Less than 100 of them make it past our “attention wall” each day https://www.redcrowmarketing.com/2015/09/10/many-ads-see-one-day/

So you're jumping from "140 million may have been exposed" to 140 million actually noticed, read, and were influenced by these ads. But just because some random ad was flashed up on the sidebar of a website doesn't mean it was noticed or responded to. FB could pop this hysteria right away by airing the ads that they THOUGHT were Russian-based. Then we could judge for ourselves whether we even saw or noticed them or thought they were effective.

But according to TPTB, god forbid that the "common man" (or woman) have to think about new ideas. Clearly, TPTB feel that you (i.e. they) must be "protected" from a different POV. Democracy and the "marketplace of ideas" .... not something they advocate; apparently that is bad news (for them).

That's why I made the CDC analogy: of the many people who "may have been exposed" to a virus, fewer actually were and even fewer were infected. To carry the analogy farther, whether those "exposed" were infected depends in part on the robustness of a person's immune system. If people's mental durability is weak, they'll be more influenced by "fake news" (i.e. "lies") than people who know how to parse truth from fiction.

BTW, no, I don't participate in social media. Just like OONJERAH. It's a soul-destroying, life-sucking experience, programmed to keep you tied to those little dopamine-producing "hits" which keep you addicted. SM is for suckers.
http://www.slate.com/articles/technology/technology/2017/11/facebook_w
as_designed_to_be_addictive_does_that_make_it_evil.html

The LAST thing that TPTB want out of their populace is people who will think for themselves.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 1:44 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
millions of voting age suckers

Then maybe those voting-age suckers should get a little more educated and a little less sheeple-ish.

FB would do a great service to the population at large if it would post the ads that it THOUGHT (no evidence that we know of) were linked to Russia.

Then the purchasers of the ads could come forward and possibly clear their name, and the viewers of the ads could re-view them in a new context. And people could actually start thinking about the issues instead of reacting to the dog whistle RUSSIA!.

As I posted before, propaganda and lies can be countered with facts and truth ... not with MORE propaganda! Transparency is key.

It would be a decades-long conversation, but it is a conversation long looooong overdue, and that conversation is not in the interests of TBTB. So any real discussion of real issues is shut down as soon as possible.

The person who doesn't understand this "new world" is you, because it's the same old world (those in power control the means of communication) with a new technology.

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 2:40 PM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.

Quote:
What? Maybe they should grow wings and fly.

Are you saying that people are uneducable? That they should continue to be subject to advertising and propaganda (which are really the same) for the rest of their lives?

You don't believe in education? I thought you were all for it!

Quote:
What? "... the purchasers of the ads could come forward and possibly clear their name..." Right, they could come forward and explain why they were trying to influence our election. Wait, we already know.

HOW MANY entities do you think "purchased ads" to "influence the election"?

Hundreds? Thousands? TENS of thousands???

Quote:
What are you lying about now? FB has evidence

Once again, you seem not to understand what "evidence" is. FB has accusations, maybe they even have legitimate suspicions, but in terms of "evidence" - none was mentioned in the article that you posted. No IP addresses were ID'd, no trace of translation from Cyrillic. No time stamps. No nothing.

So we only have Facebook's WORD that ads were "linked to" Russia. Now, as I read the vetting process, it was very much like THUGR's: I don't like the content so it must be Russia-linked! I looked it up. I think you should too. MOST of those ads were placed in ... what year? I bet you don't know!

IF THE ADS WERE POSTED, THOSE LEGITIMATE PURCHASERS WHO WERE UNFAIRLY CHARACTERIZED could come forward and identify themselves. THOSE ADS LEFT TWISTING IN THE WIND could then be more reliably identified as suspect.

Quote:
No they can't! Just look who won the election - the biggest liar on the planet.

Hillary lost, and SHE'S one of the biggest liars on the planet.

The election of Trump was one giant protest vote. A few ads here and there ... and you think it swung the election. Really????

The people investigating Hillary and Trump have a deep political anti-Trump bias. They're being demoted, fired, kicked out of investigations, or are "retiring" when in reality they should probably be fired or charged.

The alphabet-agency purveyors of the "RUSSIA!" hysteria are professional liars. The DNC was demonstrated to be irremediably corrupt in way both personal and political, and in ways both large and small. The election is over and done with, the "evidence" is evaporating even as we watch, and you're STILL barking about Russia??

Don't you have anything more important to think about?

-----------
Pity would be no more,
If we did not MAKE men poor - William Blake

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, December 24, 2017 4:26 PM

It's a knockout folks. G KO'ed sig with little effort. Same old sad story.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, January 2, 2018 3:05 PM

Utah Republican Sen. Orrin Hatch to retire; Romney could run. If Romney runs and wins, it's another sign the middle will hold.

Tick Tock

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, January 2, 2018 4:13 PM

If that's true and you really give a shit about the middle holding, where were you when he ran against extremist Obama?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, January 3, 2018 10:02 PM

Steve Bannon in new book: Russia probe's focus is money-laundering

Former White House chief strategist Steve Bannon said he believes the special counsel investigation on Russia is focusing on money laundering and called a Trump Tower meeting between the Trump campaign and a Russian lawyer "treasonous."

https://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2018/01/03/Steve-Bannon-in-new-book-Ru
ssia-probes-focus-is-money-laundering/6461515002655/

Inside the tumultuous relationship of Donald Trump and Steve Bannon

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/inside-the-tumultuous-relation
ship-of-donald-trump-and-steve-bannon/2018/01/03/b152950c-f0c1-11e7-b3bf-ab90a706e175_story.html?utm_term=.3aa5e7d85d67

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, January 16, 2018 5:41 PM

Jeb Bush backs Romney for Utah Senate run

Some Senate Republicans are eager for Romney to run because they believe he would serve as an independent voice who is not afraid to stand up against his own party's president.

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/politics/jeb-bush-backs-romney-for-utah
-senate-run/ar-AAuKjZk?li=AA5a8k&ocid=spartanntp

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, January 20, 2018 5:00 PM

Twitter says 50,000 Russia-linked accounts tweeted during 2016 US presidential election

The company is emailing 677,775 users who either followed, retweeted or liked a tweet from the more than 50,000 Russia-linked election bots.

http://www.zdnet.com/article/twitter-says-50000-russia-linked-accounts
-tweeted-during-2016-us-presidential-election/

Sig, when you get your email why don't you post it here?

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, January 20, 2018 5:56 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

It's illegal to post emails without permission of all parties.

HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, January 20, 2018 8:53 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 1kiki:
It's illegal to post emails without permission of all parties.

I don't think that's true. At least I don't think it's true unless the email comes with a note that says that this email is only intended to be viewed by its intended recipients, as is common for more secure emails in the corporate sector.

Here's something pretty funny that happened recently to somebody who was looking for a free hotel stay and got her email posted on the hotel's facebook page:

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Saturday, January 20, 2018 9:42 PM

Goodbye, kind world (George Monbiot) - In common with all those generations which have contemplated catastrophe, we appear to be incapable of understanding what confronts us.

... just repeating what a webmaster told me ...

HAS IT NOT OCCURRED TO YOU BY NOW THAT IF YOU HAVE TO RESORT TO LOGICAL FALLACIES AND TROLLING YOUR SO-CALLED ARGUMENTS ARE LIES?

NOTIFY: N | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, January 21, 2018 11:32 AM

Yeah... I'm not a lawyer, but I'd just recommend not going on that assumption unless you actually read a law stating that. Even if you do find one, I'd make sure that it really means anything because for instance if the state of California had a law protecting all emails from being posted without consent of all parties, who's to say that would mean anything if you were communicating with anybody outside of the state of California?

I just operate on the assumption that anything I send to anybody on an email is potentially just as public as posting something to Twitter or Facebook or just here in the RWED.

Not arguing with you. Just something you might want to consider.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, January 21, 2018 3:01 PM

rezident owtsidr

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:
Here's something pretty funny that happened recently to somebody who was looking for a free hotel stay

She just wants to start the next Kardashian ass jiggle empire. Wuts rong with that?

----------------------------
DUZ XaT SEM RiT TQ YQ? - Jubal Early

http://www.7532020.com

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, February 18, 2018 12:28 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:
That you regurgitated without thought DNC propagnada that they are going to "start" talking about Russia (that alone should be enough to get anybody to spew coffee over their keyboard) and that this somehow "forces" them not to talk about economic issues.

But, yanno, if you want to go over a cliff and persuade as many Americans as possible to go over the cliff with you ... well, I guess you get what you all deserve. Too bad I'm living with you.

13 Russians indicted.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, February 18, 2018 12:31 PM

How many Russians were indicted?

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, February 19, 2018 6:47 PM

13 and 3 Russian companies

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, February 19, 2018 6:49 PM

“act of war” against the U.S.

In the wake of last week’s indictments alleging that 13 Russian nationals and entities created fake social media accounts and sponsored political events to sow political discord in the U.S., something of a consensus has arisen in the political and media class (with some notable exceptions) that these actions not only constitute an “act of war” against the U.S., but one so grave that it is tantamount to Pearl Harbor and 9/11. Indeed, that Russia’s alleged “meddling” is comparable to the two most devastating attacks in U.S. history has, overnight, become a virtual cliché.

The claim that Russian meddling in the election is “an act of war” comparable to these events isn’t brand new. Senators from both parties, such as Republican John McCain and Democrat Jeanne Shaheen, have long described Russian meddling in 2016 as an “act of war.” Hillary Clinton, while promoting her book last October, described Russia’s alleged hacking of the DNC and John Podesta’s email inbox as a “cyber 9/11.” And last February, the always-war-hungry Tom Friedman of the New York Times said on Morning Joe that Russian hacking “was a 9/11 scale event. They attacked the core of our democracy. That was a Pearl Harbor scale event.”

But the last few days have ushered in an explosion of this rhetoric from politicians and journalists alike. On Friday night’s Chris Hayes show on MSNBC, two separate guests – Democratic Congressman Jerry Nadler and long-time Clinton aide Philippe Reines – posited Pearl Harbor as the “equivalent” of Russian meddling, provoking a shocked reaction from Hayes:

https://theintercept.com/2018/02/19/a-consensus-emerges-russia-committ
ed-an-act-of-war-on-par-with-pearl-harbor-and-911-should-the-u-s-response-be-similar/

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, February 19, 2018 6:56 PM

Facebook's latest plan to thwart Russia: send postcards

Facebook will send postcards to verify the location and identity of people buying election-related advertising in a bid to curb foreign nationals' ability to influence American politics.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/technology/2018/02/19/facebooks-latest-plan
-thwart-russia-send-postcards/

Boy, rappy ran for the hills again didn't he. The evidence showing him to be brainless is overwhelming.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 9, 2018 10:43 AM

Anybody remember this thread?

T

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:

Here it is in a nutshell. This is why I do what I do here. It's also why if you're American you should hate sig, kiki and jack to name three, for trying to assist Trump in his attempts to undermine our democracy, our hard fought republic.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Friday, March 9, 2018 1:57 PM

Former Trump aide Sam Nunberg shows up to face grand jury

http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/trump-aide-expected-face-grand-jury/sto
ry?id=53624442

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, March 12, 2018 3:31 PM

Britain just got tough on Putin — and put Trump in a very tough spot

British Prime Minister Theresa May on Monday accused the Russian government of at least being complicit in an “unlawful use of force” on British soil in the poisoning of former Russia spy Sergei Skripal and his daughter last week. May gave the Russian government a day to offer a response, without which she said the attack would be regarded as an action “by the Russian state against the United Kingdom” and would lead to consequences.

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/the-fix/wp/2018/03/12/britain-just
-got-tough-on-putin-and-put-trump-in-a-very-tough-spot/?utm_term=.7f5da3364e69

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Wednesday, March 14, 2018 6:25 PM

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 15, 2018 12:16 PM

The Trump administration has issued long-delayed sanctions against five Russian entities and 19 individuals for 2016 election interference and other cyber-attacks. NBC’s Kelly O’Donnell and Tom Winter report.

http://www.msnbc.com/msnbc/watch/treasury-dept-sanctions-russian-cyber
-actors-for-election-interference-1186663491516

This is what I've been waiting for. Trump has no choice at this point and can't block this anymore. The vote for these sanctions was what, 6 months ago, and passed with a veto proof majority. I hope this is only the beginning.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 15, 2018 2:30 PM

Special Counsel Mueller has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia. New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt shares his latest report on the Russia investigation.

https://www.msnbc.com/craig-melvin/watch/nyt-robert-mueller-subpoenas-
trump-organization-demanding-russia-documents-1186815043746

Trump Towers Moscow and so much more. This sure is exciting isn't it???

I can't wait to see the tweets...will he fire McCabe 3 days before he retires so he can't receive his pension? Trump is that fucked up.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 29, 2018 10:57 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Special Counsel Mueller has subpoenaed the Trump Organization to turn over documents, including some related to Russia. New York Times reporter Michael Schmidt shares his latest report on the Russia investigation.

https://www.msnbc.com/craig-melvin/watch/nyt-robert-mueller-subpoenas-
trump-organization-demanding-russia-documents-1186815043746

Trump Towers Moscow and so much more. This sure is exciting isn't it???

I can't wait to see the tweets...will he fire McCabe 3 days before he retires so he can't receive his pension? Trump is that fucked up.

Yep, he did it. Something like 26 hours before he was too retire. The good news is that several democrats have offered him temporary jobs so he can get his pension. Fuck you Trump. Hope we can return the favor.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Thursday, March 29, 2018 11:34 AM

I'm sure that pension was well deserved.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, April 1, 2018 12:21 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I'm sure that pension was well deserved.

Yep, it is.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Sunday, April 1, 2018 1:18 PM

Quote:
Originally posted by THGRRI:
Quote:
Originally posted by 6IXSTRINGJACK:

I'm sure that pension was well deserved.

Yep, it is.

T

Citations needed.

Do Right, Be Right. :)

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Monday, August 6, 2018 11:34 AM

Quote:
Originally posted by SIGNYM:

It's time to START??

HAHAHAHA!

They've been talking about nothing but Russia!!! since Nov 2016!

And despite all your denials and lies since the last post on this thread, the facts are still winning out.

T

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, August 7, 2018 5:40 PM

T

CNN brought a group of Trump voters together to discuss their views on family separations and the president's perceived views on race.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

Tuesday, August 7, 2018 8:22 PM

#walkaway, indeed.

NOTIFY: Y | REPLY | REPLY WITH QUOTE | TOP | HOME

YOUR OPTIONS

SHARE THREAD

NEW POSTS TODAY

USER

POST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS

Elections; 2024
Wed, November 27, 2024 13:36 - 4841 posts

NATO
Wed, November 27, 2024 13:27 - 15 posts

In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Wed, November 27, 2024 13:23 - 4773 posts

Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Wed, November 27, 2024 12:47 - 7508 posts

Why does THUGR shit up the board by bumping his pointless threads?
Wed, November 27, 2024 12:10 - 31 posts

The Death of the Russian Ruble?
Wed, November 27, 2024 10:27 - 16 posts

Subway Death
Wed, November 27, 2024 10:25 - 14 posts

HAH! Romania finds new way to passify Dracula...
Wed, November 27, 2024 10:21 - 6 posts

Venezuela imposes more media controls. Chavez plays maracas.
Wed, November 27, 2024 10:09 - 68 posts

India
Wed, November 27, 2024 10:00 - 142 posts

What kind of superpower could China be?
Wed, November 27, 2024 09:40 - 61 posts

The disaster called Iran
Wed, November 27, 2024 09:10 - 22 posts

VIEW MORE TOPICS

FFF.NET SOCIAL