REAL WORLD EVENT DISCUSSIONS

Iraqi Elections

POSTED BY: GEEZER
UPDATED: Monday, January 31, 2005 08:34
SHORT URL:
VIEWED: 3058
PAGE 1 of 1

Saturday, November 20, 2004 11:06 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Iraq is supposed to hold elections for a 275 member Transitional National Assembly in late January. Registration and voting procedures, and the method of selecting a president and prime minister, are outlined in the BBC Q&A article at this link.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3971635.stm

This assembly is to develop a national constitution in time for the election of a permanent government by December 2005.

The Coalition and Allawi government of course support this election. The U.N. supports it. They actually wanted it sooner. The European Union supports it. The Iraqi Shiites support it. The Iraqi Kurds support it. Bush is on record as accepting the result even if it is a religious government.

The only people who seem to oppose it are the Sunnis, who threaten a boycott, and the insurgents, who have recently been destroying voter registration rolls and ballots, and threatening election workers.

So, is the election a good thing, which may be the first step in allowing the Iraqi people self-determination, or is it all right to allow the minority to prevent it?


"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 22, 2004 4:33 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


I'm interested in the procedure by which nation-wide slates of candidates are proposed by the various partys, and the people vote for the slate, rather than individuals. In a country that has so much tribal, religious, and clan loyalty, and that relies on consensus decisions by religious and tribal elders to resolve disputes, this seems to me to be an attempt to recognize this fact by presenting the party slates as sort of a 'super-clan', representing the interests of similar tribes, clans and religious factions.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 22, 2004 4:37 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Opps. I created a new thread on this topic for you. I even promsied not to post in that thread! Sorry about that!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, November 22, 2004 6:21 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Iraq is supposed to hold elections for a 275 member Transitional National Assembly in late January. Registration and voting procedures, and the method of selecting a president and prime minister, are outlined in the BBC Q&A article at this link.

http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/middle_east/3971635.stm

This assembly is to develop a national constitution in time for the election of a permanent government by December 2005.

The Coalition and Allawi government of course support this election. The U.N. supports it. They actually wanted it sooner. The European Union supports it. The Iraqi Shiites support it. The Iraqi Kurds support it. Bush is on record as accepting the result even if it is a religious government.

The only people who seem to oppose it are the Sunnis, who threaten a boycott, and the insurgents, who have recently been destroying voter registration rolls and ballots, and threatening election workers.

So, is the election a good thing, which may be the first step in allowing the Iraqi people self-determination, or is it all right to allow the minority to prevent it?


"Keep the Shiny side up"



Well, I hope it happens. I hope the Sunnis try and take a realistic stance on the process. I think it's walking a very fine line and Iraq is on the brink of a potential civil war. The Sunnis are definitely outnumbered in Iraq, unless Iran starts sending in more insurgents. So ultimately, it is up to the Sunnis to decide whether or not they want to participate in a constructive way or create a civil war.

It's strange to see the term religious government as being potentially counter to democratic beliefs. It seems to me that every democratic government has in one way or another been built upon the premise of religion and morality (however skewed). Personally, I can see the viable possibility of an Islamic democracy, that would eventually find itself mutating to allow for modern freedoms (womens right to vote etc..etc..).

The first Iraqi elections are bound to be fraught with issues, but that doesn't mean they shouldn't be held. You have to start somewhere.

Its similar to the concept of folks waiting to have children until they can afford to have them hehe. If you wait till you can afford them..you'll never have them. I feel the same about the Iraqi elections.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 23, 2004 5:12 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Quote:

156 Parties to Run in Iraq Elections
Updated: Tuesday, Nov. 23, 2004 - 8:54 AM

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's Independent Electoral Commission said Tuesday that 156 political parties have been approved to run candidates in the Jan. 30 general election.

They included the Iraqi National Accord party led by Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and the new party of President Ghazi al-Yawer, called the Iraqis' Party, commission spokesman Farid Ayar said in a statement.

Ayar said 212 parties applied for certification but 56 were rejected for failing to meet criteria.

Also among those approved was the Iraqi Islamic Party, a Sunni group that had threatened to boycott the election to protest the U.S.-led offensive against Fallujah. The party later decided to participate.


(Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)



Looks like at least some of the Sunnis are willing to play. Maybe the Arab governments participating in the conference in Egypt can do some jawboning and get some of the other Sunni factions to give it a try. If not, they'll really be out in the cold.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Tuesday, November 23, 2004 7:23 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Quote:

156 Parties to Run in Iraq Elections
Updated: Tuesday, Nov. 23, 2004 - 8:54 AM

BAGHDAD, Iraq (AP) - Iraq's Independent Electoral Commission said Tuesday that 156 political parties have been approved to run candidates in the Jan. 30 general election.

They included the Iraqi National Accord party led by Prime Minister Ayad Allawi and the new party of President Ghazi al-Yawer, called the Iraqis' Party, commission spokesman Farid Ayar said in a statement.

Ayar said 212 parties applied for certification but 56 were rejected for failing to meet criteria.

Also among those approved was the Iraqi Islamic Party, a Sunni group that had threatened to boycott the election to protest the U.S.-led offensive against Fallujah. The party later decided to participate.


(Copyright 2004 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.)



Looks like at least some of the Sunnis are willing to play. Maybe the Arab governments participating in the conference in Egypt can do some jawboning and get some of the other Sunni factions to give it a try. If not, they'll really be out in the cold.

"Keep the Shiny side up"



It would be a real testament to the Iraqi peoples to see all those involved participate in a constructive way. Here's to hope!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:08 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Looks like the election is getting closer to reality. Shi'a, Kurd, Sunni, and coalition parties from both religious and secular sides are registered and starting to campaign. Even Moqtada Sadr is playing nice. The Sunni boycott doesn't seem to have as much support as it did, and they're joining in.

The big problem now is the insurgency, who seem to want to derail the process. It's a testament to the mainstream Iraqis that they are willing to risk so much to hold their election. The probably realize that they'll get rid of the U.S. sooner if they have a government that can legally kick us out.

Anyone have thoughts on the election at this point?

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:17 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I thought that Allawi would win, but likely it will be the slate that Sistani is associated with. Allawi & CO. are rather uneasy about Iran's potential influence over post-election Iraq, as many high-level Shiite's in Sistani's group harbored in Iran during the Saddam days.

ConorFlynn- The insurgents are not coming from Iran. Iran is mainly Shiite, and has close ties to Sistani. Judging by the apparent popularity of Sistani's group, Iran would have everything to gain and nothing to lose from a successful election. The insurgents are prolly mostly Sunnis, who see their political dominance coming to a screeching halt, with some help from foreigners.

If Sistani wins, I suspect that his group will prolly forge close (but unofficial/ under the radar) ties with Iran.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 7:54 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Quote:

Originally posted by SignyM:

ConorFlynn- The insurgents are not coming from Iran. Iran is mainly Shiite, and has close ties to Sistani. Judging by the apparent popularity of Sistani's group, Iran would have everything to gain and nothing to lose from a successful election. The insurgents are prolly mostly Sunnis, who see their political dominance coming to a screeching halt, with some help from foreigners.

If Sistani wins, I suspect that his group will work very, very hard to remove USA troops, and will prolly forge close (but unofficial/ under the radar) ties with Iran.



Well I disagree with you on whether or not there are insurgents from Iran. Here's an interesting compilation with several mentions of Iranian Insurgencies. There are only several hundred other links that discuss similar notions.
http://www.hudson.org/files/publications/BNIranvIraq05-11-2004.pdf

Heres a snippet from US News. You ave to purchase a copy of the article. So I'll just throw a little out there:)

Quote:

Title: Special Report: The Iran Connection
Author(s): Edward T. Pound with Jennifer Jack
Citation: November 22, 2004 p 34-38, 40-44, 46, 48
Section: Special Report , The Iran Connection
Subjects: IRAN; IRAQ; INTELLIGENCE SERVICES; MILITARY INTELLIGENCE; FOREIGN POLICY, US; MIDDLE EAST; VIOLENCE; TERRORISM; INTERNATIONAL SECURITY; CLASSIFIED DOCUMENTS; WEAPONS
Word Count: 6119

Abstract: U.S. intelligence services are reporting acts by factions of the government of Iran that are meant to drive coalition forces out of Iraq and destabilize the Middle East. Those acts include setting up intelligence networks in Shiite cities in Iraq, planning attacks against American targets, supplying funding, weapons, training, and safe havens to Iraqi insurgents, supporting Ansar al-Islam and Sadr's Mahdi militia, and placing bounties on American soldiers.


http://www.usnews.com/usnews/issue/archive/041122/20041122046941_brief
.php

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:30 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


The paper details close ties between al-Sadr and Iran. Nothing new there. Sistani and Chalabi (who is in the Sistani-backed list) also have close ties to Iran. In fact, as I said before, MANY influential Shiites have ties to Iran. The question is not "whether" Iran seeks to influence/ create an Iraqi government (of course it does) but the best means that it perceives towards that goal. Right now, an election process may be the best means because it gets Iran a toehold in an Iraqi government that would be preceived as "legitimate" by the international community, at no cost in lives and materiel. Seeking to take over Iraq through insurgent action would create a government that would be shunned internationally and difficult to maintain. It's much easier to be the power behind the power behind the throne.

As far as Zarqawi is concerned, he has his own rabid anti-American agenda which overlaps with Iran's in some ways, and in some ways it deosn't.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:47 AM

CONNORFLYNN


I agree with you completely. That still doesn't mean insurgents aren't coming from Iran. Iran has it's own problems in that respect and the borders are porous.

Personally I want to see Iraq hold elections (regardless of the outcome..as long as the Iraqis get to choose) to at least begin to bring some semblance of stability back to that region.

My only hope as things progress is that Diplomacy is used MUCH MORE often. The more I research this matter and review histories..the more I think that the sword can only get so far before even sane minded folks get pissed and rise up against the coalition.

PS.. Do you think Sistani will work with the US and vice versa in terms of rebuilding relations through diplomatic means, a peace? Also, do you think there is hope for a non-miltary resolution with Iran?

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:54 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Since the main brief of the folks elected in January will be to come up with a new constitution, the first clue as to which way things go may be how much of an Islamic or secular slant they include in it. Everyone talks about Sunni vs. Shi'a vs. Kurd, but I wonder if religious vs. secular is going to be more of an issue? Iran, or course, would like another Islamic Republic. The U.S. will be pushing for a more open, inclusive society.

Kind of funny, when you think about it. The Republican Administration, elected on the back of the Christian Fundamentalists, trying to establish a secular democracy in Iraq. Maybe we should arrange to invade ourselves, and then kick out our own homegrown Ayatollahs.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 8:59 AM

CONNORFLYNN


Quote:

Originally posted by Geezer:
Since the main brief of the folks elected in January will be to come up with a new constitution, the first clue as to which way things go may be how much of an Islamic or secular slant they include in it. Everyone talks about Sunni vs. Shi'a vs. Kurd, but I wonder if religious vs. secular is going to be more of an issue? Iran, or course, would like another Islamic Republic. The U.S. will be pushing for a more open, inclusive society.

Kind of funny, when you think about it. The Republican Administration, elected on the back of the Christian Fundamentalists, trying to establish a secular democracy in Iraq. Maybe we should arrange to invade ourselves, and then kick out our own homegrown Ayatollahs.

"Keep the Shiny side up"



Amen to that brother! (Pun intended)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 10:54 AM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


I said I wouldn't post until after holiday but here I am... too bad there isn't a rolleyes emoticon, I could really use one on myself! Oh wait, this will do...

The problem with Iran is not the form of the elections or even the makeup of Parliament but those Islamic judges who can decide whether everything (laws, elections, press) is done acccording to Islamic law. They have interfered with every part of the political Iranian process including disqualifying candidates and shutting down newspapers. IMHO If this sort of religious court gets built into the Iraqi constitution, you'll know which way the government is heading.



NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 1:11 PM

CONNORFLYNN


I am trying to become more familiar with Islam in general as well as Islamic law. I have 2 friends who are from Iran (brothers) Bobak and Shaheen. Their father was part of the Islamic Revolution in Iran and he is not allowed to return to Iran. In his words.."If I return, the Ayatollah will have me shot". Apparently the majority of his family is in exile or dead. According to him (and he seems to follow the persian news and revolutionary sites..since I can't read persian, I have to take his word for it) the majority of Iran's youth are for reform and mostly Pro-western..but the Iraq situation and "Iran/axis of evil" statement has made them leery. That's why we need to work strictly on a diplomatic approach rather then military if at all possible when dealing with Iran. The hearts are with us or so I am led to believe..now we need to prove we are with them.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Thursday, December 16, 2004 3:28 PM

SIGNYM

I believe in solving problems, not sharing them.


Damn straight!

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Saturday, January 29, 2005 10:08 AM

GEEZER

Keep the Shiny side up


Well, here comes the election. I think that the fact it is happening at all is pretty significant. No doubt that there will be nay-sayers regardless of the result, but I consider it a good long step in the right direction.

Just the fact that the insurgents are trying so hard to disrupt it tells me that it's the right thing to do. Comments they have made about democracy being anti-Islam give a real good hint about where they're coming from.

So here's to the average Iraqi who's willing to risk his or her life just to show the world that they do want a better future for their country. May whoever's cranking up there keep them safe.

"Keep the Shiny side up"

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Sunday, January 30, 2005 4:49 PM

NEUTRINOLAD


I'd like to point out that there have already been successful free democratic elections in Afghanistan that allowed the people to choose their own leaders.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 31, 2005 5:33 AM

XENOCIDE


As much as I opposed this war... as much as I hate this administration and the neo-cons writing its policy and philosophy, today I have to take my hat off, to the president and the troop.

Democracy isn't perfect by any means, but everyhing else is so much worse.

This election is a beautiful thing.

I hope it serves to unite Iraq against the forces seeking to restore tyranny.

I hope this election unites them though ours has divided us.

I hope that their constitutional congress is wise and just, tolerant and brilliant.

I hope they can tie together their disparate Republic.

Let them be a light on the hill in a dark world.
Maybe they can remind us all what democracy is about.

Thus ends the spurt of optimism.

-Eli

(Bitter signature edited out for the occasion, cause sometimes it can matter)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 31, 2005 5:33 AM

XENOCIDE


As much as I opposed this war... as much as I hate this administration and the neo-cons writing its policy and philosophy, today I have to take my hat off, to the president and the troop.

Democracy isn't perfect by any means, but everyhing else is so much worse.

This election is a beautiful thing.

I hope it serves to unite Iraq against the forces seeking to restore tyranny.

I hope this election unites them though ours has divided us.

I hope that their constitutional congress is wise and just, tolerant and brilliant.

I hope they can tie together their disparate Republic.

Let them be a light on the hill in a dark world.
Maybe they can remind us all what democracy is about.

Thus ends the spurt of optimism.

-Eli

(Bitter signature edited out for the occasion, cause sometimes it can matter)

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 31, 2005 7:34 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by xenocide:
As much as I opposed this war... as much as I hate this administration and the neo-cons writing its policy and philosophy, today I have to take my hat off, to the president and the troop.

Democracy isn't perfect by any means, but everyhing else is so much worse.

This election is a beautiful thing.

I hope it serves to unite Iraq against the forces seeking to restore tyranny.

I hope this election unites them though ours has divided us.

I hope that their constitutional congress is wise and just, tolerant and brilliant.

I hope they can tie together their disparate Republic.

Let them be a light on the hill in a dark world.
Maybe they can remind us all what democracy is about.

Thus ends the spurt of optimism.

-Eli

(Bitter signature edited out for the occasion, cause sometimes it can matter)



Well said.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 31, 2005 7:35 AM

HERO


Quote:

Originally posted by xenocide:
As much as I opposed this war... as much as I hate this administration and the neo-cons writing its policy and philosophy, today I have to take my hat off, to the president and the troop.

Democracy isn't perfect by any means, but everyhing else is so much worse.

This election is a beautiful thing.

I hope it serves to unite Iraq against the forces seeking to restore tyranny.

I hope this election unites them though ours has divided us.

I hope that their constitutional congress is wise and just, tolerant and brilliant.

I hope they can tie together their disparate Republic.

Let them be a light on the hill in a dark world.
Maybe they can remind us all what democracy is about.

Thus ends the spurt of optimism.

-Eli

(Bitter signature edited out for the occasion, cause sometimes it can matter)



I completely disagree.

H

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

Monday, January 31, 2005 8:34 AM

XENOCIDE


I completely disagree.

H



Well, That's allowed.








-Eli

If voting mattered, they'd make it illegal.

NOTIFY: Y   |  REPLY  |  REPLY WITH QUOTE  |  TOP  |  HOME  

YOUR OPTIONS

NEW POSTS TODAY

USERPOST DATE

OTHER TOPICS

DISCUSSIONS
The Olive Branch (Or... a proposed Reboot)
Sun, November 24, 2024 19:17 - 3 posts
Musk Announces Plan To Buy MSNBC And Turn It Into A News Network
Sun, November 24, 2024 19:05 - 1 posts
Punishing Russia With Sanctions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:05 - 565 posts
human actions, global climate change, global human solutions
Sun, November 24, 2024 18:01 - 953 posts
Russia Invades Ukraine. Again
Sun, November 24, 2024 17:13 - 7497 posts
Elections; 2024
Sun, November 24, 2024 16:24 - 4799 posts
US debt breaks National Debt Clock
Sun, November 24, 2024 14:13 - 33 posts
The predictions thread
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:15 - 1189 posts
The mysteries of the human mind: cell phone videos and religiously-driven 'honor killings' in the same sentence. OR How the rationality of the science that surrounds people fails to penetrate irrational beliefs.
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:11 - 18 posts
In the garden, and RAIN!!! (2)
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:05 - 4762 posts
Sweden Europe and jihadi islamist Terror...StreetShitters, no longer just sending it all down the Squat Toilet
Sun, November 24, 2024 13:01 - 25 posts
MSNBC "Journalist" Gets put in his place
Sun, November 24, 2024 12:40 - 2 posts

FFF.NET SOCIAL