Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.


Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

---

Quote:

---

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

---

Quote:

---

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

---

Quote:

---

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.

---

Quote:

---

Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout

December 20, 2019 6:32 PM

Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)

Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.

Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.

The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,” as Brennan testified in May 2017.

---

Quote:

---

Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.

According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.

---

Quote:

---

The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.

---

Quote:

---

After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,

---

Quote:

---

the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.

---

Quote:

---

After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by second:
Your traitor has already been caught and blah blah blah

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.


Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

---

I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?

I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.

In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Supposedly the former head ofthe No Such Agency, Adm Michael Rogers, is cooperating with Durham.

Quote:

---

Former NSA Director Michael Rogers Cooperating with Durham Investigation into Trump-Russia Probe
By Tobias Hoonhout

December 20, 2019 6:32 PM

Then-NSA director Admiral Michael Rogers participates in a session at the third annual Intelligence and National Security Summit in Washington, D.C., in 2016. (Gary Cameron/Reuters)

Former National Security Agency director and retired Adm. Michael Rogers has met multiple times with U.S. attorney John Durham as part of an ongoing probe into the origins of the counterintelligence investigation into the 2016 Trump campaign, The Intercept reported Friday.

Rogers, who served as NSA director under Obama and Trump, “has cooperated voluntarily,” according to sources. Durham, who did not agree with DOJ inspector general Mike Horowitz’s report on the predication of the FBI’s Crossfire Hurricane investigation, is also looking into what role former CIA director John Brennan played in the 2017 intelligence community assessment that detailed Russian interference in the election.

The assessment, compiled by the FBI, the CIA, and the NSA, stated that Vladimir Putin “ordered an influence campaign” that “aspired to help” Trump and discredit Clinton. While the FBI and the CIA had high confidence in the conclusion, Rogers’s NSA reported a moderate confidence and was the “lone exception,” as Brennan testified in May 2017.

---

The reason why the NSA only had "moderate confidence" in the report (which according to whistleblower analysis means "no confidence at all" in spook-speak) was because they [the NSA] had intercepted NO packets of DNC files heading across the internet to Julian Assange. I have made this point many times, and this point has been made many times by former high-level employees and whistleblowers, but not on the M$M. If you people would bother to listen to something other than Rachel Madcow bloviating about the latest propaganda, you might have known this too.

Quote:

---

Rogers, who retired in May 2018, played a central role in addressing FISA abuses of Section 702 — which allows the government to acquire counterintelligence by surveilling foreign persons.

According to a FISA court ruling declassified in April 2017, a Rogers-ordered audit found violations in “approximately eighty-five percent” of Section 702 searches from November 1, 2015, to May 1, 2016.

---

... under Obama ...

Quote:

---

The violations were mainly linked to a practice known as “upstream” surveillance in which NSA agents use a search tool to collect any communications that mention the target.

---

And they can do this because they have a big giant database of illegally-obtained communication.

Quote:

---

After learning of the issue Rogers subsequently shut down the “about query” tool on October 21, 2016,

---

According to Adm Rogers, he cut off CIA and FBI access to this database, which was fostering more surveillance and prosecution abuses.

Quote:

---

the same day the FBI received a FISA warrant to surveil Trump-campaign adviser Carter Page, and then told the FISC of his findings three days later.

---

Under Obama

Quote:

---

After former DNI James Clapper recommended to Obama that he be removed, Rogers travelled to Trump tower to meet with the president-elect Trump without informing his supervisors on November 17, 2016. Later that day, the Trump transition team announced it was shifting its operations to Trump National Golf Club in New Jersey.

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:
Now, what does this all mean?

I was very disappointed in the way Barr handled Epstein's death. Between the missing security videotapes and the unconscionable lapses in jailhouse procedure, and especially the nonsensical medical examiner's report this smacks of one giant coverup. Either Barr is being ultra-cooperative with Mossad and the Royal Family, or Epstein had something on Barr (or his dad), or this is just a giant hoax and Epstein isn't dead, he'sin witness protection (which seems pretty far-fetched). It took the FIB and entire month after Epstein's murder to finally make their way over to Pedo Island, and I don't think they've yet been to Epstein's ranch. I suspect that this gave other intelligence agencies a chance to sanitize the evidence.

In sum, my guess is that Barr will pursue the "pedophilia" angle but not the "blackmail" angle because too many names would come to light, or he would be very selective about pursuing who availed themselves of Epstein's "services" to limit the damage.

JSF: This prediction might be that since Durham was not involved in Epstein, then that means Durham will not charge anybody in his Investigation. Or maybe I got that wrong.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by captaincrunch:

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
Well, this is the Countdown clock that is long overdue being started.

When will Criminal Charges be brought against Comey, Brennan, Clapper, McCabe, Rosenstein, Sztrok, Page, Ohr, etc, etc?

Who will be first? Will one turn State's Evidence, for consideration of lighter sentence?

It seems fairly evident that, now with Durham on the cases, these Bozos will be facing charges.


Ad also, did I forget anybody special?

---

I'm guessing right after the 23rd Benghazi investigation and the 12th Nunes memo and the 16th IG Report - THAT'S when the sh*t will really hit the fan!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Trump said he has the most transparent presidency ever. I think it's true.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by reaverfan:


Facebook and Twitter are choking the spread of a controversial New York Post story about Hunter Biden after questions arise about its veracity and a possible disinformation campaign
https://www.businessinsider.com/facebook-hunter-biden-new-york-post-st
ory-fact-checkers-2020-10

Whenever a fake story comes out, you can always count on the Russian troll to spew their bullshit, then get their ass handed to them by me, with facts and logic.

I have done so, yet again.

You always have, and always will lose to me.

Russian troll destroyed.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by 1KIKI:
Honestly, I was hoping Durham would wrap up with something substantial before the election, because afterward - if Biden wins - he might get shut down.

I want it ALL to be brought to light. Both sides, any person involved, all the facts.

---

Quote:

---

Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.

The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:

Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.

pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020

Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.

---

Quote:

---

Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.

Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:

Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020

Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.

The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.

The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.

---

Quote:

---

News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.

"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."

The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We recognize that Twitter is just one of many places where people can find information online, and the Twitter Rules are intended to protect the conversation on our service, and to add context to people’s experience where we can.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Did President Trump give NBC News permission to publish that recording of him talking to Billy Bush?

Oh and one more thing...

"obtained without authorization"

Trump's tax records were given to The New York Times "without authorization" and Twitter made sure that it was the top trending story for days https://t.co/9pJIfzvwSh
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) October 15, 2020

Of course, conservatives immediately pointed out that it's not Twitter's communication skills that are the issue.

Your “communication” is not the problem. The problem is your totalitarian censorship, your election interference, and the fact that you allow genocidal terrorists to threaten Jews while banning elected U.S. officials from sharing American journalism. https://t.co/F0CrgP6GP7
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 15, 2020

And another user pointed out the irony of journalists backing Twitter's explanation.

Journalists carrying water for a digital platform suppressing certain types of journalism is a creepy phenomenon that will not end well for anyone, least of all journalists. https://t.co/J4JlnQQGqg
— Omri Ceren (@omriceren) October 14, 2020

We have one warning for Mr.Dorsey, stay out of the way of (soon to be Congresswoman Laura Loomer):

Mark Zuckerberg wants us to be in Facebook jail forever.

When I get to Congress, I’m going to make sure he goes to real jail.

And when I say I’m going to do something, nothing can or will stop me.

He needs to serve time for his crimes.

If innocent American citizens can serve time in Prison for fake “Russian collision election interference”, then the tech executives can serve time in prison for committing actual election interference!

LOCK ZUCK UP!

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I understand that many Libtards do not care about the Biden Crime Family, and their structure to give half of their corrupt and treasonous income back to Joe, thus laundering his income for him. Plus, auctioning off his bribes and access is not a problem in Libtard books.


https://realnse.com/2020/10/15/giuliani-reveals-new-email-showing-hunt
er-biden-giving-half-of-foreign-salary-to-joe-biden/

His sale of access is near to rival The Clinton Crime Family Foundation.

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by SIGNYM:

Quote:

---

Update (2000ET): Unless you've been hiding under a rock all day, you'll know that Twitter and Facebook have been escalating their censorship of a shocking New York Post story showing emails (to and from Hunter Biden) that clearly contradict Joe Biden's claims that he never discussed business with his son.

The authenticity of the contents of the emails was not denied by the Biden campaign and furthermore, the possibility of an off-the-books meeting between the VP and the Ukrainian executive was not denied:

Several GOP lawmakers got officially 'involved', including Rep Jim Jordan, who issued his own letter to Facebook demanding an explanation for why it decided to censor the Hunter Biden story.

pic.twitter.com/Kkz2Pztccw
— Rep. Jim Jordan (@Jim_Jordan) October 14, 2020

Facebook reiterated its warning that that the U.S.’s foreign adversaries, including Russia, might seek to trick journalists into amplifying hacked or inaccurate content they want to spread ahead of an election.

---

Wow, hiding behind fake Russian interference in order to interfere with the election.

Quote:

---

Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook’s head of security policy, issued this warning again Wednesday on Twitter, “given this morning’s news cycle.” He did not directly say whether this was why Facebook took action on the New York Post content.

Then Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey offered his comment, rapidly backpedaling on the actions his firm had taken:

Our communication around our actions on the @nypost article was not great. And blocking URL sharing via tweet or DM with zero context as to why we’re blocking: unacceptable. https://t.co/v55vDVVlgt
— jack (@jack) October 14, 2020

Which sounded somewhat genuine, until the company attempted to provide "much needed clarity" about its decision.

The company then tried to cover its action by laying out a step-by-step explanation of how the story violated its terms of service. Notably, many of the examples it offered are routinely exhibited in news stories of all kinds.

The main offense that it's leaning on: publishing personal photos without the explicit permission of the subject.

---

Oh, puhleez! Can't they come up with a better excuse than that?

Quote:

---

News media have long respected the privacy of private individuals, but when it comes to public figures, all bets are off. At least that's what many reporters are taught in journalism school.

"We want to provide much needed clarity around the actions we’ve taken with respect to two NY Post articles that were first Tweeted this morning."

The images contained in the articles include personal and private information — like email addresses and phone numbers — which violate our rules. https://t.co/plPa5SZ3we
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

As noted this morning, we also currently view materials included in the articles as violations of our Hacked Materials Policy. https://t.co/gCY4BnBHHa
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Commentary on or discussion about hacked materials, such as articles that cover them but do not include or link to the materials themselves, aren’t a violation of this policy. Our policy only covers links to or images of hacked material themselves.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

The policy, established in 2018, prohibits the use of our service to distribute content obtained without authorization. We don’t want to incentivize hacking by allowing Twitter to be used as distribution for possibly illegally obtained materials. https://t.co/qx9rlzWH4O
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We know we have more work to do to provide clarity in our product when we enforce our rules in this manner. We should provide additional clarity and context when preventing the Tweeting or DMing of URLs that violate our policies.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

We recognize that Twitter is just one of many places where people can find information online, and the Twitter Rules are intended to protect the conversation on our service, and to add context to people’s experience where we can.
— Twitter Safety (@TwitterSafety) October 14, 2020

Did President Trump give NBC News permission to publish that recording of him talking to Billy Bush?

Oh and one more thing...

"obtained without authorization"

Trump's tax records were given to The New York Times "without authorization" and Twitter made sure that it was the top trending story for days https://t.co/9pJIfzvwSh
— Ryan Saavedra (@RealSaavedra) October 15, 2020

Of course, conservatives immediately pointed out that it's not Twitter's communication skills that are the issue.

Your “communication” is not the problem. The problem is your totalitarian censorship, your election interference, and the fact that you allow genocidal terrorists to threaten Jews while banning elected U.S. officials from sharing American journalism. https://t.co/F0CrgP6GP7
— Sean Davis (@seanmdav) October 15, 2020

And another user pointed out the irony of journalists backing Twitter's explanation.

Journalists carrying water for a digital platform suppressing certain types of journalism is a creepy phenomenon that will not end well for anyone, least of all journalists. https://t.co/J4JlnQQGqg
— Omri Ceren (@omriceren) October 14, 2020

We have one warning for Mr.Dorsey, stay out of the way of (soon to be Congresswoman Laura Loomer):

Mark Zuckerberg wants us to be in Facebook jail forever.

When I get to Congress, I’m going to make sure he goes to real jail.

And when I say I’m going to do something, nothing can or will stop me.

He needs to serve time for his crimes.

If innocent American citizens can serve time in Prison for fake “Russian collision election interference”, then the tech executives can serve time in prison for committing actual election interference!

LOCK ZUCK UP!

---

---

Quote:

---

Originally posted by JEWELSTAITEFAN:
I don't know where from, but it sounds like everybody now knows that Sloppy Joe has admtted to being the central architect of all of the Biden corruption, Biden bribery, Biden money siphoning that he has been denying lately.

How timely.

---